The Importance of Clinical Phenotype in Understanding and Preventing Spontaneous Preterm Birth

 

 Buy Article Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Spontaneous preterm birth (SPTB) is a well-known cause of maternal and neonatal morbidity. The search for the underlying pathways, documentation of the genetic causes, and identification of markers of spontaneous PTB have been marginally successful due to the fact that it is highly complex, with numerous processes that lead to a final common pathway. There is a great need for a comprehensive, consistent, and uniform classification system, which will be useful in identifying mechanisms, assigning prognosis, aiding in clinical management, and can identify areas of interest for intervention and future study. Effective classification systems must overcome obstacles including the lack of widely accepted definitions and uncertainty about inclusion of classifying features (e.g., presentation at delivery and multiple gestations) and levels of detail of these features. The optimal classification system should be based on the clinical phenotype, including characteristics of the mother, fetus, placenta, and the presentation for delivery. We present a proposed phenotyping system for spontaneous PTB. Future classification systems must establish a universally accepted set of definitions and a standardized clinical workup for all PTBs including the minimum clinical data to be collected and the laboratory and pathologic evaluation that should be completed.

• References

• 1 Muglia LJ, Katz M. The enigma of spontaneous preterm birth. N Engl J Med 2010; 362 (6) 529-535
  Google Scholar
• 2 Blencowe H, Cousens S, Oestergaard MZ , et al. National, regional, and worldwide estimates of preterm birth rates in the year 2010 with time trends since 1990 for selected countries: a systematic analysis and implications. Lancet 2012; 379 (9832) 2162-2172
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 3 Behrman RE, Butler AS eds. Preterm Birth: Causes, Consequences, and Prevention. Washington, DC: 2007
  Google Scholar
• 4 Clements KM, Barfield WD, Ayadi MF, Wilber N. Preterm birth-associated cost of early intervention services: an analysis by gestational age. Pediatrics 2007; 119 (4) e866-e874
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 5 Romero R, Dey SK, Fisher SJ. Preterm labor: one syndrome, many causes. Science 2014; 345 (6198) 760-765
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 6 Goldenberg RL, Gravett MG, Iams J , et al. The preterm birth syndrome: issues to consider in creating a classification system. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2012; 206 (2) 113-118
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 7 Zhang H, Baldwin DA, Bukowski RK , et al; Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD) Genomic and Proteomic Network for Preterm Birth Research (GPN-PBR). A genome-wide association study of early spontaneous preterm delivery. Genet Epidemiol 2015; 39 (3) 217-226
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 8 Crider KS, Whitehead N, Buus RM. Genetic variation associated with preterm birth: a HuGE review. Genet Med 2005; 7 (9) 593-604
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 9 Macones GA, Parry S, Elkousy M, Clothier B, Ural SH, Strauss III JF. A polymorphism in the promoter region of TNF and bacterial vaginosis: preliminary evidence of gene-environment interaction in the etiology of spontaneous preterm birth. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004; 190 (6) 1504-1508, discussion 3A
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 10 Dolan SM, Hollegaard MV, Merialdi M , et al. Synopsis of preterm birth genetic association studies: the preterm birth genetics knowledge base (PTBGene). Public Health Genomics 2010; 13 (7–8) 514-523
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 11 Esplin MS. Overview of spontaneous preterm birth: a complex and multifactorial phenotype. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2014; 57 (3) 518-530
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 12 Creinin MD, Simhan HN. Can we communicate gravidity and parity better?. Obstet Gynecol 2009; 113 (3) 709-711
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 13 Manuck TA, Esplin MS, Biggio J , et al; Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Genomics and Proteomics Network for Preterm Birth Research. The phenotype of spontaneous preterm birth: application of a clinical phenotyping tool. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2015; 212 (4) 487.e1-487.e11
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 14 Esplin MS, Manuck TA, Varner MW , et al. Cluster analysis of spontaneous preterm birth phenotypes identifies potential associations among preterm birth mechanisms. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2015; 213 (3) 429.e1-429.e9
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 15 Lockwood CJ, Kuczynski E. Risk stratification and pathological mechanisms in preterm delivery. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 2001; 15 (Suppl. 02) 78-89
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 16 Berkowitz GS, Blackmore-Prince C, Lapinski RH, Savitz DA. Risk factors for preterm birth subtypes. Epidemiology 1998; 9 (3) 279-285
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 17 Moutquin JM. Classification and heterogeneity of preterm birth. BJOG 2003; 110 (Suppl. 20) 30-33
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 18 Henderson JJ, McWilliam OA, Newnham JP, Pennell CE. Preterm birth aetiology 2004-2008. Maternal factors associated with three phenotypes: spontaneous preterm labour, preterm pre-labour rupture of membranes and medically indicated preterm birth. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2012; 25 (6) 642-647
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 19 Kramer MS, Papageorghiou A, Culhane J , et al. Challenges in defining and classifying the preterm birth syndrome. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2012; 206 (2) 108-112
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 20 Villar J, Papageorghiou AT, Knight HE , et al. The preterm birth syndrome: a prototype phenotypic classification. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2012; 206 (2) 119-123
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 21 Savitz DA, Blackmore CA, Thorp JM. Epidemiologic characteristics of preterm delivery: etiologic heterogeneity. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1991; 164 (2) 467-471
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 22 Joseph KS, Huang L, Liu S , et al; Fetal and Infant Health Study Group of the Canadian Perinatal Surveillance System. Reconciling the high rates of preterm and postterm birth in the United States. Obstet Gynecol 2007; 109 (4) 813-822
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 23 Menon R, Dunlop AL, Kramer MR, Fortunato SJ, Hogue CJ. An overview of racial disparities in preterm birth rates: caused by infection or inflammatory response?. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2011; 90 (12) 1325-1331
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 24 Catov JM, Flint M, Lee M, Roberts JM, Abatemarco DJ. The relationship between race, inflammation and psychosocial factors among pregnant women. Matern Child Health J 2015; 19 (2) 401-409
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 25 Myatt L, Eschenbach DA, Lye SJ , et al; International Preterm Birth Collaborative Pathways and Systems Biology Working Groups. A standardized template for clinical studies in preterm birth. Reprod Sci 2012; 19 (5) 474-482
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 26 Haas DM, Parker CB, Wing DA , et al; NuMoM2b study. A description of the methods of the Nulliparous Pregnancy Outcomes Study: monitoring mothers-to-be (nuMoM2b). Am J Obstet Gynecol 2015; 212 (4) 539.e1-539.e24
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 27 Goldenberg RL, Andrews WW, Faye-Petersen O, Cliver S, Goepfert AR, Hauth JC. The Alabama Preterm Birth Project: placental histology in recurrent spontaneous and indicated preterm birth. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2006; 195 (3) 792-796
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar