Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Review Article
  • Published:

Modelling kidney disease using ontology: insights from the Kidney Precision Medicine Project

Nature Reviews Nephrology volume 16, pages 686–696 (2020)Cite this article

Subjects

Abstract

An important need exists to better understand and stratify kidney disease according to its underlying pathophysiology in order to develop more precise and effective therapeutic agents. National collaborative efforts such as the Kidney Precision Medicine Project are working towards this goal through the collection and integration of large, disparate clinical, biological and imaging data from patients with kidney disease. Ontologies are powerful tools that facilitate these efforts by enabling researchers to organize and make sense of different data elements and the relationships between them. Ontologies are critical to support the types of big data analysis necessary for kidney precision medicine, where heterogeneous clinical, imaging and biopsy data from diverse sources must be combined to define a patient’s phenotype. The development of two new ontologies — the Kidney Tissue Atlas Ontology and the Ontology of Precision Medicine and Investigation — will support the creation of the Kidney Tissue Atlas, which aims to provide a comprehensive molecular, cellular and anatomical map of the kidney. These ontologies will improve the annotation of kidney-relevant data, and eventually lead to new definitions of kidney disease in support of precision medicine.

Key points

  • Ontologies are powerful tools for organizing, integrating and linking heterogeneous data types, especially in the biomedical sciences.

  • Significant additions to biomedical ontologies are necessary to better define kidney molecular and histopathological phenotypes, which is critical for kidney precision medicine.

  • The Kidney Precision Medicine Project is creating a community-based Kidney Tissue Atlas to integrate molecular, cellular and anatomical knowledge of the kidney.

  • The development of the Kidney Tissue Atlas Ontology and the Ontology of Precision Medicine and Investigation will facilitate data collection, harmonization and analysis in support of kidney precision medicine.

  • The Kidney Precision Medicine Project has extensively adopted, reused and extended community-based reference ontologies to support the annotation of kidney data.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Overview of KPMP centres and the flow of KPMP data from different provenances.
Fig. 2: The KPMP ontology framework for supporting data representation, integration and analysis.
Fig. 3: Using the Kidney Tissue Atlas Ontology to support molecular and histopathological extensions to kidney disease diagnosis.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Abrahams, E. Right drug-right patient-right time: personalized medicine coalition. Clin. Transl Sci. 1, 11–12 (2008).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Khwaja, A. KDIGO clinical practice guidelines for acute kidney injury. Nephron Clin. Pract. 120, c179–c184 (2012).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Stevens, P. E. & Levin, A. Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes Chronic Kidney Disease Guideline Development Work Group Members. Evaluation and management of chronic kidney disease: synopsis of the kidney disease: improving global outcomes 2012 clinical practice guideline. Ann. Intern. Med. 158, 825–830 (2013).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Hawrylycz, M. et al. in Springer Handbook of Bio-/Neuroinformatics. (ed. Kasabov, N.) 1111–1126 (Springer, 2014).

  5. Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network. et al. The Cancer Genome Atlas Pan-Cancer analysis project. Nat. Genet. 45, 1113–1120 (2013).

    PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. HuBMAP Consortium. The human body at cellular resolution: the NIH Human Biomolecular Atlas Program. Nature 574, 187–192 (2019).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Regev, A. et al. The Human Cell Atlas. Elife 6, e27041 (2017).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Cimiano, P. in Ontology Learning and Population from Text: Algorithms, Evaluation and Applications (ed. Cimiano, P.) 9–17 (Springer, 2006).

  9. Gruber, T. R. Toward principles for the design of ontologies used for knowledge sharing? Int. J. Human-Computer Stud. 43, 907–928 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ashburner, M. et al. Gene ontology: tool for the unification of biology. The Gene Ontology Consortium. Nat. Genet. 25, 25–29 (2000).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Huang, D. W., Sherman, B. T. & Lempicki, R. A. Bioinformatics enrichment tools: paths toward the comprehensive functional analysis of large gene lists. Nucleic Acids Res. 37, 1–13 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Subramanian, A. et al. Gene set enrichment analysis: a knowledge-based approach for interpreting genome-wide expression profiles. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 102, 15545–15550 (2005).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Doms, A. & Schroeder, M. GoPubMed: exploring PubMed with the Gene Ontology. Nucleic Acids Res. 33, W783–W786 (2005).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Thomas, P. D. et al. Gene Ontology Causal Activity Modeling (GO-CAM) moves beyond GO annotations to structured descriptions of biological functions and systems. Nat. Genet. 51, 1429–1433 (2019).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Whetzel, P. L. et al. BioPortal: enhanced functionality via new Web services from the National Center for Biomedical Ontology to access and use ontologies in software applications. Nucleic Acids Res. 39, W541–W545 (2011).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Mungall, C. J., Torniai, C., Gkoutos, G. V., Lewis, S. E. & Haendel, M. A. Uberon, an integrative multi-species anatomy ontology. Genome Biol. 13, R5 (2012).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Rosse, C. & Mejino, J. L. V. Jr. A reference ontology for biomedical informatics: the Foundational Model of Anatomy. J. Biomed. Inform. 36, 478–500 (2003).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Natale, D. A. et al. Protein Ontology (PRO): enhancing and scaling up the representation of protein entities. Nucleic Acids Res. 45, D339–D346 (2017).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Kibbe, W. A. et al. Disease Ontology 2015 update: an expanded and updated database of human diseases for linking biomedical knowledge through disease data. Nucleic Acids Res. 43, D1071–D1078 (2015).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Shefchek, K. A. et al. The Monarch Initiative in 2019: an integrative data and analytic platform connecting phenotypes to genotypes across species. Nucleic Acids Res. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkz997 (2019).

  21. Kamdar, M. R., Tudorache, T. & Musen, M. A. A systematic analysis of term reuse and term overlap across biomedical pntologies. Semant. Web 8, 853–871 (2017).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Euzenat, J. & Shvaiko, P. Ontology Matching. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-38721-0 (Springer, 2013).

  23. Smith, B. et al. The OBO Foundry: coordinated evolution of ontologies to support biomedical data integration. Nat. Biotechnol. 25, 1251–1255 (2007).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Robinson, P. N. & Mundlos, S. The Human Phenotype Ontology. Clin. Genet. 77, 525–534 (2010).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Haendel, M. A., Chute, C. G. & Robinson, P. N. Classification, ontology, and precision medicine. N. Engl. J. Med. 379, 1452–1462 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Keenan, A. B. et al. The Library of Integrated Network-Based Cellular Signatures NIH program: system-level cataloging of human cells response to perturbations. Cell Syst. 6, 13–24 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Vempati, U. D. et al. Metadata standard and data exchange specifications to describe, model, and integrate complex and diverse high-throughput screening data from the Library of Integrated Network-based Cellular Signatures (LINCS). J. Biomol. Screen. 19, 803–816 (2014).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Ong, E. et al. Ontological representation, integration, and analysis of LINCS cell line cells and their cellular responses. BMC Bioinformatics 18, 556 (2017).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. ENCODE Project Consortium. An integrated encyclopedia of DNA elements in the human genome. Nature 489, 57–74 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Malladi, V. S. et al. Ontology application and use at the ENCODE DCC. Database 2015 (2015).

  31. McMahon, A. P. et al. GUDMAP: the genitourinary developmental molecular anatomy project. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 19, 667–671 (2008).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Cole, N. I. et al. An ontological approach to identifying cases of chronic kidney disease from routine primary care data: a cross-sectional study. BMC Nephrol. 19, 85 (2018).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Bajema, I. M. et al. Revision of the International Society of Nephrology/Renal Pathology Society classification for lupus nephritis: clarification of definitions, and modified National Institutes of Health activity and chronicity indices. Kidney Int. 93, 789–796 (2018).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Leung, N. et al. The evaluation of monoclonal gammopathy of renal significance: a consensus report of the International Kidney and Monoclonal Gammopathy Research Group. Nat. Rev. Nephrol. 15, 45–59 (2019).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Sethi, S. et al. Mayo Clinic/Renal Pathology Society consensus report on pathologic classification, diagnosis, and reporting of GN. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 27, 1278–1287 (2016).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Harding, S. D. et al. The GUDMAP database–an online resource for genitourinary research. Development 138, 2845–2853 (2011).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Little, M. H. et al. A high-resolution anatomical ontology of the developing murine genitourinary tract. Gene Expr. Patterns 7, 680–699 (2007).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Hayamizu, T. F. et al. EMAP/EMAPA ontology of mouse developmental anatomy: 2013 update. J. Biomed. Semant. 4, 15 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Haas, M. et al. Consensus definitions for glomerular lesions by light and electron microscopy: recommendations from a working group of the Renal Pathology Society. Kidney Int. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.kint.2020.08.006 (2020).

  40. Diehl, A. D. et al. The Cell Ontology 2016: enhanced content, modularization, and ontology interoperability. J. Biomed. Semant. 7, 44 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Hansen, J., Meretzky, D., Woldesenbet, S., Stolovitzky, G. & Iyengar, R. A flexible ontology for inference of emergent whole cell function from relationships between subcellular processes. Sci. Rep. 7, 17689 (2017).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. No authors listed. Focal segmental glomerulosclerosis. Human Phenotype Biology http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/HP_0000097 (2020).

  43. No authors listed. Cell Ontology. glomerular visceral epithelial cell. Ontobee. http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/CL_0000653 (2020).

  44. He, Y. et al. KTAO: a Kidney Tissue Atlas Ontology to support community-based kidney knowledge base development and data integration. in Proc. 9th International Conference on Biological Ontology (RWTH, 2018).

  45. Peters, B., & The OBI Consortium. Ontology for biomedical investigations. Nat. Preced. https://doi.org/10.1038/npre.2009.3623 (2009).

  46. Kang, Y., Fink, J. C., Doerfler, R. & Zhou, L. Disease specific ontology of adverse events: ontology extension and adaptation for chronic kidney disease. Comput. Biol. Med. 101, 210–217 (2018).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Y. Lin, et al. Development of a BFO-based Informed Consent Ontology (ICO). in Proc. 5th International Conference on Biomedical Ontologies (ICBO) (2014).

  48. He, Y. et al. OPMI: the Ontology of Precision Medicine and Investigation and its support for clinical data and metadata representation and analysis. in Proc. 11th International Conference on Biomedical Ontology (2019).

  49. Hripcsak, G. et al. Observational Health Data Sciences and Informatics (OHDSI): opportunities for observational researchers. Stud. Health Technol. Inform. 216, 574–578 (2015).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. Eddy, S., Mariani, L. H. & Kretzler, M. Integrated multi-omics approaches to improve classification of chronic kidney disease. Nat. Rev. Nephrol. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41581-020-0286-5 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Stokman, M. F. et al. The expanding phenotypic spectra of kidney diseases: insights from genetic studies. Nat. Rev. Nephrol. 12, 472–483 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Salem, R. M. et al. Genome-wide association study of diabetic kidney disease highlights biology involved in glomerular basement membrane collagen. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 30, 2000–2016 (2019).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. Bandrowski, A. et al. The Ontology for Biomedical Investigations. PLoS ONE 11, e0154556 (2016).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. Smith, J. R. et al. The clinical measurement, measurement method and experimental condition ontologies: expansion, improvements and new applications. J. Biomed. Semant. 4, 26 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  55. He, Y. et al. OAE: the Ontology of Adverse Events. J. Biomed. Semant. 5, 29 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  56. Hastings, J. et al. ChEBI in 2016: improved services and an expanding collection of metabolites. Nucleic Acids Res. 44, D1214–D1219 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Hanna, J., Joseph, E., Brochhausen, M. & Hogan, W. R. Building a drug ontology based on RxNorm and other sources. J. Biomed. Semant. 4, 44 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The KPMP project is supported by the NIH National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK) U2C project 1U2CDK114886. The authors appreciate the discussion with, editing by and support from Deborah Hoshizaki from the NIDDK and the KPMP consortium.

Author information

Author notes

  1. These authors contributed equally: Edison Ong, Lucy L. Wang.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Computational Medicine and Bioinformatics, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA

    Edison Ong, Matthias Kretzler & Yongqun He

  2. Allen Institute for Artificial Intelligence, Seattle, WA, USA

    Lucy L. Wang

  3. Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA

    Jennifer Schaub, Becky Steck & Matthias Kretzler

  4. Department of Nephrology and Hypertension, Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA

    John F. O’Toole

  5. Department of Inflammation and Immunity, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA

    John F. O’Toole

  6. Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA

    Avi Z. Rosenberg

  7. UW Medicine Research IT, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA

    Frederick Dowd

  8. Department of Pharmacological Sciences, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA

    Jens Hansen & Ravi Iyengar

  9. Institute for Systems Biomedicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA

    Jens Hansen & Ravi Iyengar

  10. Division of AI/Computational Pathology, Department of Pathology, and Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA

    Laura Barisoni

  11. Division of Nephrology, School of Medicine, Washington University in St. Louis, St Louis, MO, USA

    Sanjay Jain

  12. Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA

    Ian H. de Boer & Jonathan Himmelfarb

  13. Division of Renal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA, USA

    M. Todd Valerius

  14. Section of Nephrology, Boston University Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA

    Sushrut S. Waikar

  15. Kidney Research Institute, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA

    Christopher Park & Jonathan Himmelfarb

  16. Department of Population and Quantitative Health Sciences, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA

    Dana C. Crawford

  17. Department of Genetics and Genome Sciences, School of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA

    Dana C. Crawford

  18. Cleveland Institute for Computational Biology, Cleveland, OH, USA

    Dana C. Crawford

  19. Structural and Computational Biology, European Molecular Biology Laboratory, Heidelberg, Germany

    Theodore Alexandrov

  20. Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA

    Theodore Alexandrov

  21. Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA, USA

    Christopher R. Anderton

  22. Department of Genetics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA

    Christian Stoeckert

  23. Department of Biomedical Informatics, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA

    Chunhua Weng

  24. Department of Biomedical Informatics, Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, USA

    Alexander D. Diehl

  25. Environmental Genomics and Systems Biology, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, USA

    Christopher J. Mungall

  26. Department of Environmental and Molecular Toxicology, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, USA

    Melissa Haendel

  27. The Jackson Laboratory for Genomic Medicine, Farmington, CT, USA

    Peter N. Robinson

  28. Department of Biomedical Informatics and Medical Education, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA

    Sean Mooney

  29. Unit for Laboratory Animal Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA

    Yongqun He

  30. Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA

    Yongqun He

Authors
  1. Edison Ong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Lucy L. Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jennifer Schaub
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. John F. O’Toole
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Becky Steck
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Avi Z. Rosenberg
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Frederick Dowd
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Jens Hansen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Laura Barisoni
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Sanjay Jain
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Ian H. de Boer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. M. Todd Valerius
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Sushrut S. Waikar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  14. Christopher Park
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  15. Dana C. Crawford
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  16. Theodore Alexandrov
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  17. Christopher R. Anderton
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  18. Christian Stoeckert
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  19. Chunhua Weng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  20. Alexander D. Diehl
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  21. Christopher J. Mungall
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  22. Melissa Haendel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  23. Peter N. Robinson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  24. Jonathan Himmelfarb
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  25. Ravi Iyengar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  26. Matthias Kretzler
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  27. Sean Mooney
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  28. Yongqun He
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Consortia

Kidney Precision Medicine Project

Contributions

This review was coordinated by the KPMP, with S.M. and Y.H. providing conceptual guidance. E.O., J.S., J.F.O., B.S., F.D., L.B., S.J., C.P., S.M. and Y.H. contributed to the design, development, coordination and application of the KPMP ontologies. E.O., L.L.W., J.S., J.F.O., S.M. and Y.H. wrote the manuscript with support from B.S., S.J., I.H.D., S.S.W., D.C.C., C.S., C.W., A.D.D., C.J.M. and M.K. J.S., J.F.O., S.J., I.H.D., M.T.V., S.S.W., J. Himmelfarb and M.K. provided guidance on clinical nephrology, A.Z.R. and L.B. provided guidance on pathology, B.S. and F.D. provided guidance on data systems, D.C.C., T.A., C.R.A., C.S. and R.I. provided guidance on omics analyses and J. Hansen, C.W., A.D.D., C.M., M.H. and P.N.R. provided guidance on reference ontologies. All authors reviewed and approved the manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Sean Mooney or Yongqun He.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Peer review information

Nature Reviews Nephrology thanks B. Smith and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Related links

Allen Brain Atlas: https://portal.brain-map.org/

Encyclopedia of DNA Elements (ENCODE) project: https://www.encodeproject.org/

Human BioMolecular Atlas Program: https://commonfund.nih.gov/hubmap

Human Cell Atlas: https://www.humancellatlas.org/

International Classification of Diseases (ICD): https://www.who.int/classifications/icd/en/

Kidney Precision Medicine Project: https://kpmp.org/

Kidney Tissue Atlas data portal: https://atlas.kpmp.org/

Library of Integrated Network-Based Cellular Signatures: http://www.lincsproject.org/

Ontology of General Medical Science: https://github.com/OGMS/ogms

Ontology of Genes and Genomes: http://www.obofoundry.org/ontology/ogg.html

Open Biological and Biomedical Ontology (OBO) Foundry: http://www.obofoundry.org/

Systematized Nomenclature of Medicine (SNOMED): https://www.snomed.org/snomed-ct/

The Cancer Genome Atlas: https://www.cancer.gov/tcga

Supplementary information

Glossary

Natural language

A language that has evolved naturally in humans and is used in speech or writing, as opposed to a constructed or formal language.

Logical expressions

A programmatic construct that expresses logical operations over mathematical terms or entities, which allows a computer to reason over the entities in the expression.

Controlled vocabularies

A way to organize knowledge for retrieval; comprises a set of selected terms used for document indexing and information retrieval.

Taxonomies

Controlled vocabularies that have a hierarchical structure indicating subclass relationships between entities.

Fuzzy matching

A technique that identifies the correspondence among phenotypic profiles that may be less than 100% perfect.

Causal reasoning

The process used to identify the causality (cause and effect) between two entities.

Case report forms

A document (paper or electronic) containing a questionnaire used for clinical research or other purposes.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ong, E., Wang, L.L., Schaub, J. et al. Modelling kidney disease using ontology: insights from the Kidney Precision Medicine Project. Nat Rev Nephrol 16, 686–696 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41581-020-00335-w

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41581-020-00335-w

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing