Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Immediate Communication
  • Published:

Genomic prediction of cognitive traits in childhood and adolescence

Molecular Psychiatry volume 24, pages 819–827 (2019)Cite this article

Subjects

Abstract

Recent advances in genomics are producing powerful DNA predictors of complex traits, especially cognitive abilities. Here, we leveraged summary statistics from the most recent genome-wide association studies of intelligence and educational attainment, with highly genetically correlated traits, to build prediction models of general cognitive ability and educational achievement. To this end, we compared the performances of multi-trait genomic and polygenic scoring methods. In a representative UK sample of 7,026 children at ages 12 and 16, we show that we can now predict up to 11% of the variance in intelligence and 16% in educational achievement. We also show that predictive power increases from age 12 to age 16 and that genomic predictions do not differ for girls and boys. We found that multi-trait genomic methods were effective in boosting predictive power. Prediction accuracy varied across polygenic score approaches, however results were similar for different multi-trait and polygenic score methods. We discuss general caveats of multi-trait methods and polygenic score prediction, and conclude that polygenic scores for educational attainment and intelligence are currently the most powerful predictors in the behavioural sciences.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Plomin R, von Stumm S. The new genetics of intelligence. Nat Rev Genet. 2018;19:148–59.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Visscher PM, Wray NR, Zhang Q, Sklar P, McCarthy MI, Brown MA, et al. 10 Years of GWAS discovery: biology, function, and translation. Am J Hum Genet. 2017;101:5–22.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Pasaniuc B, Price AL. Dissecting the genetics of complex traits using summary association statistics. Nat Rev Genet. 2017;18:117–27.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Turley P, Walters RK, Maghzian O, Okbay A, Lee JJ, Fontana MA, et al. Multi-trait analysis of genome-wide association summary statistics using MTAG. Nat Genet. 2018;50:229–37.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Maier RM, Zhu Z, Lee SH, Trzaskowski M, Ruderfer DM, Stahl EA, et al. Improving genetic prediction by leveraging genetic correlations among human diseases and traits. Nat Commun. 2018;9:989.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Benyamin B, Pourcain B, Davis OS, Davies G, Hansell NK, Brion MJ, et al. Childhood intelligence is heritable, highly polygenic and associated with FNBP1L. Mol Psychiatry. 2014;19:253–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Butcher LM, Davis OS, Craig IW, Plomin R. Genome-wide quantitative trait locus association scan of general cognitive ability using pooled DNA and 500K single nucleotide polymorphism microarrays. Genes Brain Behav. 2008;7:435–46.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Davies G, Armstrong N, Bis JC, Bressler J, Chouraki V, Giddaluru S, et al. Genetic contributions to variation in general cognitive function: a meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies in the CHARGE consortium (N = 53,949). Mol Psychiatry. 2015;20:183–92.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Davies G, Marioni RE, Liewald DC, Hill WD, Hagenaars SP, Harris SE, et al. Genome-wide association study of cognitive functions and educational attainment in UK Biobank (N= 112,151). Mol Psychiatry. 2016;21:758–67.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Davies G, Tenesa A, Payton A, Yang J, Harris SE, Liewald D, et al. Genome-wide association studies establish that human intelligence is highly heritable and polygenic. Mol Psychiatry. 2011;16:996–1005.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Plomin R, Hill L, Craig IW, McGuffin P, Purcell S, Sham P, et al. A genome-wide scan of 1842 DNA markers for allelic associations with general cognitive ability: a five-stage design using DNA pooling and extreme selected groups. Behav Genet. 2001;31:497–509.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Trampush JW, Yang ML, Yu J, Knowles E, Davies G, Liewald DC, et al. GWAS meta-analysis reveals novel loci and genetic correlates for general cognitive function: a report from the COGENT consortium. Mol Psychiatry. 2017;22:336–45.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Sniekers S, Stringer S, Watanabe K, Jansen PR, Coleman JRI, Krapohl E, et al. Genome-wide association meta-analysis of 78,308 individuals identifies new loci and genes influencing human intelligence. Nat Genet. 2017;49:1107–12.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Savage JE, Jansen PR, Stringer S, Watanabe K, Bryois J, de Leeuw CA, et al. Genome-wide association meta-analysis in 269,867 individuals identifies new genetic and functional links to intelligence. Nat Genet. 2018;50:912–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Rietveld CA, Medland SE, Derringer J, Yang J, Esko T, Martin NW, et al. GWAS of 126,559 individuals identifies genetic variants associated with educational attainment. Science. 2013;340:1467–71.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Okbay A, Beauchamp JP, Fontana MA, Lee JJ, Pers TH, Rietveld CA, et al. Genome-wide association study identifies 74 loci associated with educational attainment. Nature. 2016;533:539–42.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Lee JJ, Wedow R, Okbay A, Kong E, Maghzian O, Zacher M et al. Gene discovery and polygenic prediction from a genome-wide association study of educational attainment in 1.1 million individuals. Nat. Genet. 2018;50:1112–21

  18. Krapohl E, Plomin R. Genetic link between family socioeconomic status and children’s educational achievement estimated from genome-wide SNPs. Mol Psychiatry. 2016;21:437–43.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Selzam S, Krapohl E, von Stumm S, O’Reilly PF, Rimfeld K, Kovas Y, et al. Predicting educational achievement from DNA. Mol Psychiatry. 2018;23:161.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Rietveld CA, Esko T, Davies G, Pers TH, Turley P, Benyamin B, et al. Common genetic variants associated with cognitive performance identified using the proxy-phenotype method. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2014;111:13790–4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Krapohl E, Patel H, Newhouse S, Curtis CJ, von Stumm S, Dale PS, et al. Multi-polygenic score approach to trait prediction. Mol Psychiatry. 2018;23:1368–74.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Euesden J, Lewis CM, O’Reilly PF. PRSice: Polygenic Risk Score software. Bioinformatics. 2015;31:1466–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Vilhjalmsson BJ, Yang J, Finucane HK, Gusev A, Lindstrom S, Ripke S, et al. Modeling linkage disequilibrium increases accuracy of polygenic risk scores. Am J Hum Genet. 2015;97:576–92.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Mak TSH, Porsch RM, Choi SW, Zhou X, Sham PC. Polygenic scores via penalized regression on summary statistics. Genet Epidemiol. 2017;41:469–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Hill WD, Hagenaars SP, Marioni RE, Harris SE, Liewald DCM, Davies G, et al. Molecular genetic contributions to social deprivation and household income in UK biobank. Curr Biol. 2016;26:3083–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Seed C Hail: An Open-Source Framework for Scalable Genetic Data. 2017.

  27. Grotzinger AD, Rhemtulla M, de Vlaming R, Ritchie SJ, Mallard TT, Hill WD et al. Genomic SEM provides insights into the multivariate genetic architecture of complex traits. bioRxiv 2018.

  28. Haworth CM, Davis OS, Plomin R. Twins Early Development Study (TEDS): a genetically sensitive investigation of cognitive and behavioral development from childhood to young adulthood. Twin Res Hum Genet. 2013;16:117–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Oliver BR, Plomin R. Twins’ Early Development Study (TEDS): a multivariate, longitudinal genetic investigation of language, cognition and behavior problems from childhood through adolescence. Twin Res Hum Genet. 2007;10:96–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Yang J, Ferreira T, Morris AP, Medland SE, Madden PA, Heath AC, et al. Conditional and joint multiple-SNP analysis of GWAS summary statistics identifies additional variants influencing complex traits. Nat Genet. 2012;44:369–75. s361-363

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Purcell S, Neale B, Todd-Brown K, Thomas L, Ferreira MA, Bender D, et al. PLINK: a tool set for whole-genome association and population-based linkage analyses. Am J Hum Genet. 2007;81:559–75.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Krapohl E, Euesden J, Zabaneh D, Pingault JB, Rimfeld K, von Stumm S, et al. Phenome-wide analysis of genome-wide polygenic scores. Mol Psychiatry. 2015;21:1188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Haworth CMA, Wright MJ, Luciano M, Martin NG, de Geus EJC, van Beijsterveldt CEM, et al. The heritability of general cognitive ability increases linearly from childhood to young adulthood. Mol Psychiatry. 2010;15:1112–20.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Plomin R. Blueprint: how DNA makes us who we are. London: Allen Lane/Penguing Press; 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Fletcher JM, Lehrer SF. Genetic lotteries within families. J Health Econ. 2011;30:647–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Pingault J-B, O’Reilly PF, Schoeler T, Ploubidis GB, Rijsdijk F, Dudbridge F. Using genetic data to strengthen causal inference in observational research. Nat Rev Genet. 2018;19:566–80.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Belsky DW, Domingue BW, Wedow R, Arseneault L, Boardman JD, Caspi A, et al. Genetic analysis of social-class mobility in five longitudinal studies. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2018;115:E7275–E7284.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Kong A, Thorleifsson G, Frigge ML, Vilhjalmsson BJ, Young AI, Thorgeirsson TE, et al. The nature of nurture: effects of parental genotypes. Science. 2018;359:424–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Plomin R, Bergeman CS. The nature of nurture: genetic influence on “environmental” measures. Behav Brain Sci. 2011;14:373–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Plomin R. Genetics and experience: the interplay between nature and nurture. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 1994.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  41. Krapohl E, Plomin R. Genetic link between family socioeconomic status and children’s educational achievement estimated from genome-wide SNPs. Mol Psychiatry. 2015;21:437.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We gratefully acknowledge the ongoing contribution of the participants in the Twins Early Development Study (TEDS) and their families. TEDS is supported by a programme grant to RP from the UK Medical Research Council (MR/M021475/1 and previously G0901245), with additional support from the US National Institutes of Health (AG046938). The research leading to these results has also received funding from the European Research Council under the European Union’s Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007-2013)/grant agreement n° 602768 and ERC grant agreement n° 295366. RP is supported by a Medical Research Council Professorship award (G19/2). This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under the Marie Sklodowska-Curie grant agreement no. 721567.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Social, Genetic and Developmental Psychiatry Centre, King’s College London, London, UK

    A. G. Allegrini, S. Selzam, K. Rimfeld & R. Plomin

  2. Department of Education, University of York, Heslington, York, UK

    S. von Stumm

  3. Clinical Educational and Health Psychology, Division of Psychology and Language Sciences, University College London, London, UK

    J. B. Pingault

Authors
  1. A. G. Allegrini
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. S. Selzam
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. K. Rimfeld
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. S. von Stumm
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. J. B. Pingault
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. R. Plomin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

AGA and RP conceived and designed the study. AGA analysed and interpreted the data. SS performed quality control of genotype data. AGA and RP wrote the manuscript. SS, KR, SvS and JBP contributed to and critically reviewed the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. G. Allegrini.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Allegrini, A.G., Selzam, S., Rimfeld, K. et al. Genomic prediction of cognitive traits in childhood and adolescence. Mol Psychiatry 24, 819–827 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41380-019-0394-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41380-019-0394-4

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links