Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Analysis
  • Published:

Chromatin marks identify critical cell types for fine mapping complex trait variants

Nature Genetics volume 45, pages 124–130 (2013)Cite this article

Subjects

Abstract

If trait-associated variants alter regulatory regions, then they should fall within chromatin marks in relevant cell types. However, it is unclear which of the many marks are most useful in defining cell types associated with disease and fine mapping variants. We hypothesized that informative marks are phenotypically cell type specific; that is, SNPs associated with the same trait likely overlap marks in the same cell type. We examined 15 chromatin marks and found that those highlighting active gene regulation were phenotypically cell type specific. Trimethylation of histone H3 at lysine 4 (H3K4me3) was the most phenotypically cell type specific (P < 1 × 10−6), driven by colocalization of variants and marks rather than gene proximity (P < 0.001). H3K4me3 peaks overlapped with 37 SNPs for plasma low-density lipoprotein concentration in the liver (P < 7 × 10−5), 31 SNPs for rheumatoid arthritis within CD4+ regulatory T cells (P = 1 × 10−4), 67 SNPs for type 2 diabetes in pancreatic islet cells (P = 0.003) and the liver (P = 0.003), and 14 SNPs for neuropsychiatric disease in neuronal tissues (P = 0.007). We show how cell type–specific H3K4me3 peaks can inform the fine mapping of associated SNPs to identify causal variation.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Overview of the statistical approach.
Figure 2: Evaluating the significance of phenotypic cell type specificity for different marks.
Figure 3: SNPs for four complex traits overlap H3K4me3 marks in specific cell types.
Figure 4: Cell type specificity for four sets of SNPs.
Figure 5: Selected phenotypically associated loci with high cell type specificity.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Nicolae, D.L. et al. Trait-associated SNPs are more likely to be eQTLs: annotation to enhance discovery from GWAS. PLoS Genet. 6, e1000888 (2010).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Fraser, H.B. & Xie, X. Common polymorphic transcript variation in human disease. Genome Res. 19, 567–575 (2009).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Lango Allen, H. et al. Hundreds of variants clustered in genomic loci and biological pathways affect human height. Nature 467, 832–838 (2010).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Nica, A.C. et al. Candidate causal regulatory effects by integration of expression QTLs with complex trait genetic associations. PLoS Genet. 6, e1000895 (2010).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Fehrmann, R.S. et al. eQTLs reveal that independent genetic variants associated with a complex phenotype converge on intermediate genes, with a major role for the HLA. PLoS Genet. 7, e1002197 (2011).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Fairfax, B.P. et al. Genetics of gene expression in primary immune cells identifies cell type–specific master regulators and roles of HLA alleles. Nat. Genet. 44, 502–510 (2012).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Musunuru, K. et al. From noncoding variant to phenotype via SORT1 at the 1p13 cholesterol locus. Nature 466, 714–719 (2010).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Adrianto, I. et al. Association of a functional variant downstream of TNFAIP3 with systemic lupus erythematosus. Nat. Genet. 43, 253–258 (2011).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Ernst, J. et al. Mapping and analysis of chromatin state dynamics in nine human cell types. Nature 473, 43–49 (2011).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Creyghton, M.P. et al. Histone H3K27ac separates active from poised enhancers and predicts developmental state. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 107, 21931–21936 (2010).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Waki, H. et al. Global mapping of cell type–specific open chromatin by FAIRE-seq reveals the regulatory role of the NFI family in adipocyte differentiation. PLoS Genet. 7, e1002311 (2011).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Atchison, M.L. Enhancers: mechanisms of action and cell specificity. Annu. Rev. Cell Biol. 4, 127–153 (1988).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Song, L. et al. Open chromatin defined by DNaseI and FAIRE identifies regulatory elements that shape cell-type identity. Genome Res. 21, 1757–1767 (2011).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Boyle, A.P. et al. High-resolution mapping and characterization of open chromatin across the genome. Cell 132, 311–322 (2008).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Encode Project Consortium. A user's guide to the encyclopedia of DNA elements (ENCODE). PLoS Biol. 9, e1001046 (2011).

  16. Barski, A. et al. High-resolution profiling of histone methylations in the human genome. Cell 129, 823–837 (2007).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Kouzarides, T. Chromatin modifications and their function. Cell 128, 693–705 (2007).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Wang, Z. et al. Combinatorial patterns of histone acetylations and methylations in the human genome. Nat. Genet. 40, 897–903 (2008).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Thousand Genomes Project. A map of human genome variation from population-scale sequencing. Nature 467, 1061–1073 (2010).

  20. Hindorff, L.A. et al. Potential etiologic and functional implications of genome-wide association loci for human diseases and traits. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 106, 9362–9367 (2009).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Bernstein, B.E. et al. Genomic maps and comparative analysis of histone modifications in human and mouse. Cell 120, 169–181 (2005).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Bernstein, B.E. et al. The NIH Roadmap Epigenomics Mapping Consortium. Nat. Biotechnol. 28, 1045–1048 (2010).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Pekowska, A. et al. H3K4 tri-methylation provides an epigenetic signature of active enhancers. EMBO J. 30, 4198–4210 (2011).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Jia, L. et al. Functional enhancers at the gene-poor 8q24 cancer-linked locus. PLoS Genet. 5, e1000597 (2009).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Teslovich, T.M. et al. Biological, clinical and population relevance of 95 loci for blood lipids. Nature 466, 707–713 (2010).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Smith, L.C., Pownall, H.J. & Gotto, A.M. Jr. The plasma lipoproteins: structure and metabolism. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 47, 751–757 (1978).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Hobbs, H.H., Brown, M.S. & Goldstein, J.L. Molecular genetics of the LDL receptor gene in familial hypercholesterolemia. Hum. Mutat. 1, 445–466 (1992).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Firestein, G.S. Evolving concepts of rheumatoid arthritis. Nature 423, 356–361 (2003).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Lee, D.M. et al. Mast cells: a cellular link between autoantibodies and inflammatory arthritis. Science 297, 1689–1692 (2002).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Boilard, E. et al. Platelets amplify inflammation in arthritis via collagen-dependent microparticle production. Science 327, 580–583 (2010).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Stahl, E.A. et al. Genome-wide association study meta-analysis identifies seven new rheumatoid arthritis risk loci. Nat. Genet. 42, 508–514 (2010).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Akbar, A.N., Vukmanovic-Stejic, M., Taams, L.S. & Macallan, D.C. The dynamic co-evolution of memory and regulatory CD4+ T cells in the periphery. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 7, 231–237 (2007).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Eyre, S. et al. High-density genetic mapping identifies new susceptibility loci for rheumatoid arthritis. Nat. Genet. 44, 1336–1340 (2012).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Psychiatric GWAS Consortium Bipolar Disorder Working Group. Large-scale genome-wide association analysis of bipolar disorder identifies a new susceptibility locus near ODZ4. Nat. Genet. 43, 977–983 (2011).

  35. Schizophrenia Genome-Wide Association Study (GWAS) Consortium. Genome-wide association study identifies five new schizophrenia loci. Nat. Genet. 43, 969–976 (2011).

  36. Goldman-Rakic, P.S. & Selemon, L.D. Functional and anatomical aspects of prefrontal pathology in schizophrenia. Schizophr. Bull. 23, 437–458 (1997).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Goldstein, J.M. et al. Cortical abnormalities in schizophrenia identified by structural magnetic resonance imaging. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry 56, 537–547 (1999).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Strakowski, S.M., Delbello, M.P. & Adler, C.M. The functional neuroanatomy of bipolar disorder: a review of neuroimaging findings. Mol. Psychiatry 10, 105–116 (2005).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Morris, A.P. et al. Large-scale association analysis provides insights into the genetic architecture and pathophysiology of type 2 diabetes. Nat. Genet. 44, 981–990 (2012).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Cho, Y.S. et al. Meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies identifies eight new loci for type 2 diabetes in east Asians. Nat. Genet. 44, 67–72 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Dupuis, J. et al. New genetic loci implicated in fasting glucose homeostasis and their impact on type 2 diabetes risk. Nat. Genet. 42, 105–116 (2010).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Kong, A. et al. Parental origin of sequence variants associated with complex diseases. Nature 462, 868–874 (2009).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Kooner, J.S. et al. Genome-wide association study in individuals of South Asian ancestry identifies six new type 2 diabetes susceptibility loci. Nat. Genet. 43, 984–989 (2011).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Perry, J.R. et al. Stratifying type 2 diabetes cases by BMI identifies genetic risk variants in LAMA1 and enrichment for risk variants in lean compared to obese cases. PLoS Genet. 8, e1002741 (2012).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Qi, L. et al. Genetic variants at 2q24 are associated with susceptibility to type 2 diabetes. Hum. Mol. Genet. 19, 2706–2715 (2010).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Saxena, R. et al. Large-scale gene-centric meta-analysis across 39 studies identifies type 2 diabetes loci. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 90, 410–425 (2012).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Shu, X.O. et al. Identification of new genetic risk variants for type 2 diabetes. PLoS Genet. 6, pii: e1001127 (2010).

  48. Tsai, F.J. et al. A genome-wide association study identifies susceptibility variants for type 2 diabetes in Han Chinese. PLoS Genet. 6, e1000847 (2010).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Voight, B.F. et al. Twelve type 2 diabetes susceptibility loci identified through large-scale association analysis. Nat. Genet. 42, 579–589 (2010).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. Yamauchi, T. et al. A genome-wide association study in the Japanese population identifies susceptibility loci for type 2 diabetes at UBE2E2 and C2CD4A-C2CD4B. Nat. Genet. 42, 864–868 (2010).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Seino, S., Shibasaki, T. & Minami, K. Dynamics of insulin secretion and the clinical implications for obesity and diabetes. J. Clin. Invest. 121, 2118–2125 (2011).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. Ward, L.D. & Kellis, M. HaploReg: a resource for exploring chromatin states, conservation, and regulatory motif alterations within sets of genetically linked variants. Nucleic Acids Res. 40, D930–D934 (2012).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Setoguchi, R., Hori, S., Takahashi, T. & Sakaguchi, S. Homeostatic maintenance of natural Foxp3+ CD25+ CD4+ regulatory T cells by interleukin (IL)-2 and induction of autoimmune disease by IL-2 neutralization. J. Exp. Med. 201, 723–735 (2005).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. McCarroll, S.A. et al. Deletion polymorphism upstream of IRGM associated with altered IRGM expression and Crohn′s disease. Nat. Genet. 40, 1107–1112 (2008).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. Degner, J.F. et al. DNase I sensitivity QTLs are a major determinant of human expression variation. Nature 482, 390–394 (2012).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  56. Zhang, Y. et al. Model-based analysis of ChIP-Seq (MACS). Genome Biol. 9, R137 (2008).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank M. Daly, M. Kellis, D. Diogo, X. Hu, Y. Okada, R. Plenge, S. Ripke, G. Srivastava, E. Stahl and S. Sunyaev for critical feedback and discussion. G.T. is supported by the Rubicon grant from The Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO). B.E.S. and S.R. are supported by the Harvard University Milton Fund, and Brigham and Women's Hospital. S.R. is also supported by funds from the US NIH (K08AR055688 and U01HG0070033) and the Arthritis Foundation. X.S.L. is also supported by funds from the US NIH (R01 HG004069). We thank the ENCODE Project, supported by the NHGRI, and the NIH Roadmap Epigenomics Mapping Consortium for making data available.

Author information

Author notes

  1. Barbara E Stranger

    Present address: Present addresses: Section of Genetic Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA and Institute for Genomics and Systems Biology, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.,

  2. Gosia Trynka and Cynthia Sandor: These authors contributed equally to this work.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Division of Genetics, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA

    Gosia Trynka, Cynthia Sandor, Buhm Han, Barbara E Stranger & Soumya Raychaudhuri

  2. Division of Rheumatology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA

    Gosia Trynka, Cynthia Sandor, Buhm Han & Soumya Raychaudhuri

  3. Partners Center for Personalized Genetic Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, USA

    Gosia Trynka, Cynthia Sandor, Buhm Han & Soumya Raychaudhuri

  4. Program in Medical and Population Genetics, Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA

    Gosia Trynka, Cynthia Sandor, Buhm Han, Barbara E Stranger & Soumya Raychaudhuri

  5. Department of Biostatistics and Computational Biology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA

    Han Xu & X Shirley Liu

  6. Faculty of Medical and Human Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK

    Soumya Raychaudhuri

Authors
  1. Gosia Trynka
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Cynthia Sandor
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Buhm Han
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Han Xu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Barbara E Stranger
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. X Shirley Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Soumya Raychaudhuri
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

S.R. led the study. G.T., C.S., S.R., B.H. and H.X. performed the analysis. G.T., C.S., S.R., B.E.S. and X.S.L. wrote the manuscript. All authors reviewed the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Soumya Raychaudhuri.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Text and Figures

Supplementary Figures 1–10 and Supplementary Tables 1–4 (PDF 4097 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Trynka, G., Sandor, C., Han, B. et al. Chromatin marks identify critical cell types for fine mapping complex trait variants. Nat Genet 45, 124–130 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.2504

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.2504

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing