The Wilms’ tumour suppressor Wt1 is a major regulator of tumour angiogenesis and progression

Wagner, Kay-Dietrich; Cherfils-Vicini, Julien; Hosen, Naoki; Hohenstein, Peter; Gilson, Eric; Hastie, Nicholas D.; Michiels, Jean-François; Wagner, Nicole

doi:10.1038/ncomms6852

Article
Published: 16 December 2014

The Wilms’ tumour suppressor Wt1 is a major regulator of tumour angiogenesis and progression

Kay-Dietrich Wagner¹,
Julien Cherfils-Vicini¹,
Naoki Hosen²,
Peter Hohenstein³,
Eric Gilson^1,4,
Nicholas D. Hastie⁵,
Jean-François Michiels^1,6^na1 &
…
Nicole Wagner¹^na1

Nature Communications volume 5, Article number: 5852 (2014) Cite this article

8047 Accesses
64 Citations
3 Altmetric
Metrics details

Subjects

Abstract

Angiogenesis, activation of metastasis and avoidance of immune destruction are important for cancer progression. These biological capabilities are, apart from cancer cells, mediated by different cell types, including endothelial, haematopoietic progenitor and myeloid-derived suppressor cells. We show here that all these cell types frequently express the Wilms’ tumour suppressor Wt1, which transcriptionally controls expression of Pecam-1 (CD31) and c-kit (CD117). Inducible conditional knockout of Wt1 in endothelial, haematopoietic and myeloid-derived suppressor cells is sufficient to cause regression of tumour vascularization and an enhanced immune response, leading to decreased metastasis, regression of established tumours and enhanced survival. Thus, Wt1 is an important regulator of cancer growth via modulation of tumour vascularization, immune response and metastasis formation.

You have full access to this article via your institution.

Download PDF

Understanding tumour endothelial cell heterogeneity and function from single-cell omics

Article 22 June 2023

Qun Zeng, Mira Mousa, … Peter Carmeliet

Tumoural activation of TLR3–SLIT2 axis in endothelium drives metastasis

Article 30 September 2020

Bernardo Tavora, Tobias Mederer, … Sohail F. Tavazoie

Pericyte FAK negatively regulates Gas6/Axl signalling to suppress tumour angiogenesis and tumour growth

Article Open access 04 June 2020

Tanguy Lechertier, Louise E. Reynolds, … Kairbaan M. Hodivala-Dilke

Introduction

Angiogenesis is considered as one important hallmark of cancer¹. Inhibition of tumour angiogenesis has long been suggested as a therapeutic option for cancer treatment², and a large number of patients benefited from treatment with inhibitors of vascular-endothelial growth factor (VEGF)³. However, resistance to therapies targeting VEGF⁴ and selection for metastasis⁵ have been described. Recent studies showed that different cell types besides endothelial cells, orchestrate tumour angiogenesis and cancer progression. Bone marrow-derived cells (for example, monocytes—macrophages and haematopoietic progenitor cells (HPCs)) promote tumour angiogenesis^6,7 and stimulate tumour cell dissemination and metastasis⁸. HPCs also contribute to endothelial cells and some pericytes in the tumour¹. A fraction of myeloid cells (myeloid-derived suppressor cells, MDSCs) promotes angiogenesis and tumour progression while at the same time provides the means to evade immune destruction by suppressing T-cell activity¹. Therefore, identification of common markers of the mentioned cell types might allow their simultaneous targeting for efficient anticancer therapy.

We found earlier that the Wilms’ tumour suppressor WT1 is highly expressed in vessels of most human tumours, but not in healthy adjacent tissues⁹. WT1 encodes a zinc-finger transcription factor with crucial functions in development and has originally been identified as a tumour suppressor¹⁰. Owing to its overexpression in leukaemia and a variety of solid cancers, it is nowadays considered as a potential oncogene¹¹ and promising target for cancer immunotherapy. Clinical trials of WT1 peptide vaccination in patients with myeloid malignancies and several solid cancers resulted in positive outcomes¹². As WT1 is expressed only in some cancer cell types, the explication for these successful interventions might also be due to extra-tumoural WT1 targeting of vascular and stromal cells implicated in tumour progression. Due to the embryonic lethality of Wt1-mutant mice¹³, until recently it had not been possible to determine the role of Wt1 for tumour vessel formation, its impact on tumorigenesis and the resulting consequences on cancer growth, independent from its expression in cancer cells.

Here, by using multiple combinations of genetic approaches and different tumour types, we determined the phenotype of Wt1-expressing cells invading tumours, and their relevance for tumour angiogenesis, progression, metastasis and survival.

Results

WT1 expression in human tumours

We investigated vascular and stromal WT1 expression in a series of 80 human cancers from seven tumour types (lung, breast, ovary, colon, pancreas, prostate carcinoma and melanoma). As described, WT1 was strongly expressed in a mostly nuclear, sometimes cytoplasmic pattern in tumour vessels⁹, but also in stromal cells (Fig. 1). The intensity and frequency of WT1 expression in tumour vessels and stroma were homogenous in different samples and tumour types. Vascular and stromal WT1 were independent from WT1 expression in tumour cells^14,15. WT1 was not expressed in healthy adjacent tissues, indicating that WT1 marks explicitly tumour vasculature and some stromal cells. To determine the function of vascular and stromal WT1 expression for tumourigenesis in vivo, we made use of several mouse models.

**Figure 1: *WT1* is expressed in the tumour vasculature and stromal cells of different human cancers in a homogeneous manner.**

Wt1 expression in the mouse

To determine whether Wt1-expressing cells similarly contribute to tumour vessels and stroma in mice, we induced syngenic B16F10 tumours (mouse melanoma cell line) in Wt1-GFP knock-in animals¹⁶ (Supplementary Table 1). Immunostaining revealed association of green fluorescent protein (GFP) with vessels and cells in the tumour stroma proving that Wt1-positive cells from the host invade the tumour. Confocal microscopy confirmed partial co-localization of GFP and Pecam-1. GFP overlapped to some extent with smooth muscle actin, desmin and CD45, indicating that Wt1 also marks other cell types than endothelial cells in the tumour stroma (Supplementary Fig. 1). To investigate whether vessel-associated Wt1 is specific for tumours, we analysed GFP expression in organs of Wt1-GFP knock-in mice. GFP was detectable in kidney podocytes, the epicardium of the heart, in neurons of the brain, mesothelium of the lung, a small population of cells in the adrenal cortex, stromal cells, megacaryocytes and monocytes in the spleen and granulosa cells of the ovary. In these organs, no vascular GFP could be found. Rarely, few vessels in the heart and in brown adipose tissue were GFP positive. In contrast, in the uterus, an organ with high angiogenic capacity, a large number of vascular and stromal cells expressed GFP. We confirmed these findings by Wt1 staining of the mentioned organs (Supplementary Fig. 2).

Wt1 knockout reduces angiogenesis and tumour growth

To determine a functional relevance of Wt1 for tumour vessel formation and tumorigenesis, we used Wt1 conditional knockout mice (Wt1^lox/lox)¹⁷ crossed either with a tamoxifen-inducible Tie2-Cre¹⁸ or VE-cadherin-Cre¹⁹ (Supplementary Table 1). Both of them have been described to be active in endothelial cells. However, Tie2 expression has also been shown in monocytic cells of haematopoietic origin, mesenchymal progenitors and MDSCs^6,7,8,20. In adult Tie2-CreERT2;Wt1^lox/lox or VE-CreERT2;Wt1^lox/lox mice, Cre was activated by tamoxifen injection. Tie2-CreERT2;Wt1^lox/lox and VE-CreERT2;Wt1^lox/lox injected with vehicle and Tie2-CreERT2 mice injected with tamoxifen served as controls.

We compared the effects of Wt1 loss on tumour growth in the two mouse lines by knocking out Wt1 in Tie2⁺ or VE-cadherin⁺ cells, followed by subcutaneous implantation of B16 or LLC1 tumour cells. Four weeks after tumour cell injection, we determined tumour weights and vessel density in tumours. Body weights were comparable in all groups of mice (B16 tumours: Tie2-CreERT2;Wt1^lox/lox+oil 29.18±0.3 g; Tie2-CreERT2+tamoxifen 31.91±1.17 g; Tie2-CreERT2;Wt1^lox/lox+tamoxifen 30.72±0.7 g; VE-CreERT2;Wt1^lox/lox+oil 29.5±0.45 g; VE-CreERT2;Wt1^lox/lox+tamoxifen 29.43±1.1 g; LLC1 tumours: Tie2-CreERT2;Wt1^lox/lox+oil 29.22±1.9 g; Tie2-CreERT2+tamoxifen 28.72±1.2 g; Tie2-CreERT2;Wt1^lox/lox+tamoxifen 29.56±0.4 g; VE-CreERT2;Wt1^lox/lox+oil 26.13±0.3 g; VE-CreERT2;Wt1^lox/lox+tamoxifen 27.32±1.2 g). Tumour weights were reduced by ~90% in Tie2-CreERT2;Wt1^lox/lox+tamoxifen (Fig. 2a,b), and by ~50% in VE-CreERT2;Wt1^lox/lox+tamoxifen mice (Fig. 3a,b). Tumour growth curves revealed a comparable growth in all groups of mice at the beginning. Surprisingly, tumour volumes decreased in Tie2-CreERT2;Wt1^lox/lox+tamoxifen animals (Fig. 2c). After 4 weeks, we observed a combination of reduced tumour volume, lower tumour cell number, strong lymphocytic cell infiltration (arrowheads in Fig. 2e), concentric fibrosis and central necrosis as signs of tumour regression^21,22 in Tie2-CreERT2;Wt1^lox/lox+tamoxifen animals. No signs of regression could be noticed in the control groups (Fig. 2d). When complete regression was observed, all what remained was a small scar at the injection site without presence of tumour cells. Although tumour growth became delayed in VE-CreERT2;Wt1^lox/lox+tamoxifen mice, tumours did not regress; only a slightly enhanced necrosis could be observed (Fig. 3c,d).

**Figure 2: Reduced vessel density and tumour regression upon *Tie2*-Cre-mediated conditional *Wt1* knockout.**

**Figure 3: Delayed tumour growth upon *VE-cadherin-Cre*-mediated *Wt1* knockout.**

Vessel density in tumours was determined by immunostaining for Pecam-1. In both tumour models, vessel density was significantly reduced in Tie2-CreERT2;Wt1^lox/lox+tamoxifen animals (Fig. 2f,g). Also in VE-CreERT2;Wt1^lox/lox+tamoxifen mice, tumour vessel density was diminished, albeit to a lesser extent (Fig. 3e,f).

To exclude that the observed differences between the two Cre lines were due to variations in Wt1 deletion, recombination efficiency was analysed, which did not evidence major differences (Supplementary Fig. 3a). We further investigated Wt1 levels in endothelial cells by quantitative reverse transcription (qRT)–PCR after VE-cadherin (CD144) labelling and subsequent fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) from tumours of Tie2- and VE-CreERT2;Wt1^lox/loxanimals. Wt1 was equally reduced in endothelial cells from both Cre lines upon knockout by tamoxifen (Supplementary Fig. 3b). To further confirm that the observed phenotype differences between the two Cre lines were not due to different deletion efficiencies, Tie2-CreERT2;mTmG and VE-CreERT2;mTmG reporter mice²³ were generated (Supplementary Table 1). They allow lineage analysis as they express GFP following tamoxifen-induced recombination. GFP/Pecam-1 double-labelling of induced LLC1 tumours revealed that tumour vessels were to the same extent Tie2- or VE-cadherin-Cre dependent (Supplementary Fig. 3c). This was also reflected by a high Pecam-1/GFP overlap correlation coefficient, which showed no difference between the two Cre lines used (Supplementary Fig. 3d). However, in the tumours of Tie2-CreERT2;mTmG+tamoxifen animals, frequently GFP⁺ cells could be observed, which were Pecam-1 negative, indicating that not all Tie2-Cre-dependent cells were endothelial, as further confirmed by a lower GFP/Pecam-1 overlap correlation coefficient for the Tie2-CreERT2;mTmG+tamoxifen than the VE-CreERT2;mTmG+tamoxifen-derived tumours (Supplementary Fig. 3c,d).

Wt1 knockout increases anti-tumour immune responses

Next, we confirmed an increased immune infiltration in Tie2-CreERT2;Wt1^lox/lox+tamoxifen tumours by CD3 T-cell labelling. B16 and LLC1 tumours of Tie2-CreERT2;Wt1^lox/lox+tamoxifen animals displayed a significantly higher CD3 T-cell infiltration while no difference in VE-CreERT2;Wt1^lox/lox+tamoxifen tumours compared with controls could be found (Supplementary Fig. 4a). To further discriminate between the different cell types involved in the increased immune response, we performed multiple labelling FACS analysis for CD45, CD3 (T cells), CD4, CD8, Cd19 (B cells), Nkp46 (natural killer (NK) cells) and CD69 and CD107 (activated lymphocytes)^24,25,26. Tumours were collected 9 days after tumour induction to avoid secondary effects due to extensive tumour necrosis. FACS analysis revealed higher numbers of CD3⁺, CD4⁺ and CD8⁺ T cells, and NK cells, but no for B cells. Furthermore, the fraction of activated CD8⁺ T cells and activated NK cells were higher in tumours of Tie2-CreERT2;Wt1^lox/lox+tamoxifen mice compared with controls (Supplementary Fig. 4a,b,e). In VE-CreERT2;Wt1^lox/lox+tamoxifen tumours, no significant differences with respect to immune cell infiltration and activation could be observed compared with controls (Supplementary Figs 4b and 5c,d).

Wt1 has an angiogenic function

Given the strong effects of Wt1 knockout under the Tie2-ERT2Cre (referred to as Wt1 KO afterwards) on tumour growth, we decided to analyse in more detail the underlying mechanisms and to identify Wt1-dependent cell types involved in tumour progression. FACS analysis of tumours from Wt1-GFP knock-in mice revealed that the majority of tumour-derived Wt1-GFP⁺ cells also expressed Tie2 (n=3, 83.7±4.0%) (Supplementary Fig. 6a), confirming the relevance of Tie2-CreERT2 strain for our study.

To determine the significance of Wt1 for vessel formation, we additionally performed ex vivo and in vivo angiogenesis assays. Aortic rings from Wt1 KO mice and the respective control groups (n=3 each) were isolated and the time-dependent outgrowth of sprouts measured. Conditional knockout of Wt1 significantly inhibited aortic-ring sprouting (Supplementary Fig. 6b,c). As for the in vivo angiogenesis assay, we implanted Matrigel plugs, removed the plugs after 5 days and visualized vascularization by haematoxylin–eosin, trichrome Masson, Gordon reticulin staining and immunostaining for Pecam-1. Quantification of the number of Pecam-1-positive cells and of haemoglobin content²⁷ revealed significantly fewer vessels and haemoglobin in Matrigel plugs from Wt1 KO animals (Supplementary Fig. 6d–f). Cell types, which normally express Wt1, that is, podocytes of the kidney and epicardial cells of the heart^17,28,29 showed no histological differences upon Tie2-Cre-mediated knockout of Wt1 (Supplementary Fig. 6g,k), suggesting specificity of Tie2-Cre. Heart- and kidney-specific Wt1 expression was not affected (Supplementary Fig. 6g,h,k) and no increase in proteinurea was detectable up to 1 year after tamoxifen induction (Supplementary Fig. 6j). In contrast, in the uterus, vessel formation was severely reduced and Wt1 expression lost in Wt1 KO mice (Supplementary Fig. 6g,i). In other organs, vessel density did not seem to be affected, as we did not detect differences for Pecam-1 area density in adrenal and thyroid glands, pancreas, heart, intestine, kidney and spleen between the different groups of mice (Supplementary Fig. 7).

Increased hypoxia in Wt1 KO tumours

As lack of vessels would diminish oxygenation and cause hypoxia, we analysed hypoxic areas in relation to vascular structures by co-immunostaining for Pecam-1 and pimonidazole. In control animals, we observed numerous tumour vessels and small hypoxic areas, whereas in tumours of Wt1 KO mice, large hypoxic areas and few Pecam-1-positive vessels were detected (Supplementary Fig. 8a,b). In agreement with the observed hypoxia, immunohistochemistry for Hif-1α evidenced a large number of cells with nuclear Hif-1α accumulation in Wt1 KO mice. In control tumours, only a small number of cells in the periphery of necrotic areas showed nuclear Hif-1α staining (Supplementary Fig. 8c,d). Confocal microscopy of Wt1/Pecam-1-immunostained tumour samples confirmed not only the diminution of vascular structures, but also the lack of Wt1 expression in the few vessels in tumours of Wt1 KO mice (Supplementary Fig. 8e,f).

Reduced metastases and increased survival in Wt1 KO mice

Next, we analysed whether conditional knockout of Wt1 might modify metastasis occurrence. In this respect, the B16 and LLC1 models are very useful as they form spontaneous metastases^30,31. We investigated serial lung and liver sections of Wt1 KO mice and the respective control groups for metastases. Of note, no metastases could be detected in the B16 model in Wt1 KO mice, and also in the LLC1 model, the number of animals bearing metastases was significantly lower in this group of mice (Fig. 4a). In contrast, we observed no differences in metastasis formation compared with controls in the VE-CreERT2 strain. Fifty percent of control animals and 50% of VE-CreERT2;Wt1^lox/lox+tamoxifen mice had either B16 or LLC1 metastasis. In agreement with tumour regression and reduced metastases occurrence, we observed higher survival rates in Wt1 KO mice in both tumour models (Fig. 4b).

**Figure 4: Reduced metastasis and increased survival in *Wt1* KO animals.**

To exclude that the lower metastases formation in Wt1 KO mice was simply due to the reduced size or regression of the primary tumours, LLC1 tumour cells were intravenously injected and tamoxifen or vehicle treatment started simultaneously. After 3 weeks, lung metastases formation was studied. Lung weights in control animals were more than doubled compared with Wt1 KO mice (Fig. 4c). Control animals (100%) displayed large metastatic tumoural nodules invading the lung, with on average 28 tumour nodules per section. In contrast, 20% of the Wt1 KO animals had no detectable pulmonary metastasis, and the remaining 80% had on average fewer than one metastasis per section (0.23), being micrometastases, consisting of some spare tumour cells (Fig. 4d–f).

Regression of pre-established tumours in Wt1 KO mice

To investigate a potential therapeutic relevance of Wt1 inhibition for tumour treatment, we produced tumours by B16 or LLC1 cell injection in Tie2-CreERT2;Wt1^lox/lox or Tie2-CreERT2 animals prior to tamoxifen administration, which was started when the tumours reached a diameter of ~5mm and continued for 1 week (Fig. 5). In Wt1 KO animals, we observed a decline of tumour volumes also when tumours were pre-established (Fig. 5a–c). Histological analyses showed partial or complete regression of the majority of tumours in Wt1 KO animals (Fig. 5d,e) and reduced metastasis occurrence (Fig. 5f,g). Pecam-1 immunostaining revealed a lower vessel density in Wt1 KO animals (Fig. 5h,i). In addition, Wt1 KO animals were resistant to a challenge of re-injection of tumour cells. To ensure that the suppression of tumourigenesis might not partially be due to ectopic tumour inoculation, we produced orthotopic lung tumours by injecting LLC1 cells into the right-lung lobe of mice. After 3 days, when a solid tumour could be detected (Supplementary Fig. 9a), tamoxifen or vehicle treatment was started in additional mice. After 3 weeks, lung and body weights were measured, tumour volumes determined and livers and brains analysed for potential metastases (Supplementary Fig. 9b–h). Tumour volumes were significantly lower in Wt1 KO mice compared with vehicle-treated controls and also lower than in untreated animals after 3 days indicating tumour regression. Histological analysis confirmed regression with increased fibrosis and lymphocyte infiltration (Supplementary Fig. 9f vs e). In contrast to controls, where liver metastases were detectable in 33% of the mice, no lung to liver metastases were detected in Wt1 KO animals (Supplementary Fig. 9g,h).

**Figure 5: Already established tumours regress after inducible conditional knockout of *Wt1*.**

Most likely secondary to the reduced vascularization, proliferation and apoptosis were significantly affected in Wt1 KO animals. Proliferation was determined by immunostaining for proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) and apoptosis by TdT-mediated dUTP nick end labeling (TUNEL) assays. The number of PCNA-positive tumour cells was reduced in Wt1 KO animals compared with controls, whereas the number of apoptotic cells was increased (Supplementary Fig. 10a–h). Apoptosis was not restricted to tumour cells, but also detectable in the stroma surrounding the tumour (Supplementary Fig. 10i–l).

Vessel regression in tumours of Wt1 KO animals

To assess vessel patency and potential regression, we performed immunofluorescence double-stainings. Lectin/Pecam-1 double-labelling showed reduced Pecam-1 area density and severely compromised vessel patency in pre-established tumours followed by Wt1 knockout after 9 days, which became more pronounced after 18 days (Fig. 6a). At this time point, double-labelling for Pecam-1 and collagen IV to mark basement membranes confirmed blood vessel regression and persistence of some basement membrane ‘ghosts’ (Fig. 6b). Double-staining for Pecam-1 and desmin as markers for pericytes evidenced the remaining of some scattered pericytes in the tumours with advanced regression (Fig. 6c). As a potential mechanism for vessel regression, we detected a large fraction of TUNEL-positive endothelial cells in B16 and LLC1 tumours of Wt1 KO mice indicating apoptosis of endothelial cells (Supplementary Fig. 11).

**Figure 6: Vessel regression in *Wt1* KO animals.**

Gene expression differences in Wt1 KO tumours

To identify molecular events involved in the observed phenotype, we collected tumours when the size started to diminish in the Wt1 KO groups and performed qRT–PCRs on whole-tumour lysates for several genes involved in angiogenesis, apoptosis, epithelial–mesenchymal transition and immune function. The Wt1-dependent anti-angiogenic molecule thrombospondin 1 (ref. 32) was upregulated in both, B16 and LLC1 tumours. Other known Wt1-dependent pro-angiogenic factors such as Ets-1 and Vegf-a^9,33 were either unchanged or upregulated, respectively. Consistent in both tumour types, we found upregulation of caspase 9, CD3, CD69, CD83, Il2 and Il7 receptors, Ccr7 and Icos. Pecam-1, smooth muscle α-actin, desmin, c-kit, CD11b and Ly-6G (Gr-1) were downregulated in tumours of Wt1 KO animals versus controls (Fig. 7a,b). As the qRT-PCR results did not only confirm the observed vessel regression, but also corroborated the enhanced immune response in Wt1 KO tumours, we next addressed the question which other Wt1-expressing cell types apart from differentiated endothelial cells are implicated in the observed inhibition of angiogenesis, enhanced tumoural lymphocyte infiltration and reduced metastasis. We generated an additional mouse line, the triple-transgenic Tie2-CreERT2;Wt1^lox/GFP line (Supplementary Table 1), which allows to determine through multi-labelling FACS analyses which cell types are affected by the tamoxifen-induced Wt1 knockout.

**Figure 7: Quantitative RT–PCR and FACS analyses corroborate additional Wt1 functions in other cell types than endothelial cells in tumours.**

Wt1-expressing cell types in tumours

In Tie2-CreERT2;Wt1^lox/GFP+tamoxifen animals, we detected a lower number of Wt1-GFP⁺ cells in tumours, spleen, blood and bone marrow. No difference was observed in the kidneys compared with controls (Fig. 7c; Supplementary Fig. 12a–d). Multi-labelling FACS was used to identify endothelial cells (CD31⁺CD45⁻), HPCs (CD45⁺CD31⁺CD117⁺Sca⁺), MDSCs (CD45⁺CD11b⁺Gr1⁺), most of which were granulocytic MDSCs (CD45⁺CD11b⁺Gr1⁺Ly6G⁺), pericytes (CD45⁻CD140b⁺) and macrophages (CD45⁺CD11b⁺F4/80⁺Gr1⁻) among the Wt1-GFP⁺ cells from the tumours and bone marrows. In Tie2-CreERT2;Wt1^lox/GFP+tamoxifen animals, the fractions of endothelial cells, HPCs and MDSCs were lower in tumours and bone marrows compared with controls (Fig. 7d; Supplementary Fig. 12e,f). No significant changes for the fractions of pericytes (≈4%) and macrophages (≈2%) among the GFP⁺ cells could be observed possibly reflecting the lack of Tie2-Cre activity in these cell types.

Wt1 is required for MDSC function

To confirm the reduction of MDSC infiltration in Wt1 KO tumours, we performed immunolabelling for Ly-6G (Gr-1), one of the principal MDSC markers. In both tumour types, Ly-6G-positive cells were significantly reduced in WT1 KO animals (Fig. 8a). Next, to determine the function of Wt1 expression in MDSCs, we induced LLC1 tumours in Tie2-CreERT2;Wt1^lox/lox and Tie2-CreERT2 animals, and isolated MDSCs from these tumours to knockout Wt1 in vitro by tamoxifen treatment. MDSCs isolated from the tumours of Tie2-CreERT2 animals and treated with tamoxifen served as controls to exclude unspecific tamoxifen effects. Isolated MDSCs displayed a mostly granulocytic phenotype and expressed to >90% CD11b and Ly-6G/Gr-1 (Fig. 8b,c). In vitro knockout of Wt1 led to a significant reduction in expression of Ly-6G/Gr1, CD11b and matrix metalloproteinase 9 (MMP9) (Fig. 8d). Co-culture experiments with T lymphocytes isolated from spleens of non-tumour-bearing animals revealed that KO of Wt1 in MDSCs abolished one of their major capabilities, the suppression of T-lymphocyte proliferation (Fig. 8e,f). This might explain the high lymphocytic infiltration observed in the Wt1 KO tumours.

**Figure 8: Wt1 is important for MDSC function.**

Wt1 transcriptionally activates Pecam-1 and c-kit

To determine which of the differentially expressed genes might be directly regulated by Wt1 and be involved in the observed phenotype, we performed in silico analyses of respective promoter regions. The Pecam-1 promoter contained multiple repetitions of known Wt1-binding elements (ggagg), while the mouse c-kit promoter comprised one Wt1-binding element (gggagg) close to the transcription start site (Fig. 9). To test whether Wt1 directly stimulates their activity, we cloned the promoters in a luciferase reporter vector and performed transient co-transfection experiments with Wt1(−KTS) or Wt1(+KTS) expression constructs. These two WT1 variants differ by the presence/absence of three amino acids (KTS) in the zinc-finger domain of the molecule. Pecam-1 and c-kit promoter activity was stimulated by WT1(−KTS). In contrast, WT1(+KTS), which has a role in post-transcriptional RNA processing and pre-messenger RNA splicing^34,35 rather than transcriptional regulation, did not significantly change promoter activities. Deletion of the predicted Wt1-binding sites abolished activation of these promoter constructs by Wt1(−KTS) (Fig. 9b,f). Chromatin immunoprecipitation assays (CHIP) using two different antibodies against Wt1 confirmed direct binding of Wt1 to the promoters, but not to 3′ untranslated region (UTR) sequences of Pecam-1 and c-kit. An antibody against acetyl-histone 3 and input DNA served as positive controls and normal rabbit serum as a negative control (Fig. 9c,g). Double-labelling for Wt1 and c-kit on tumours produced in C57/BL6 mice confirmed partial co-localization of Wt1 and c-kit (Fig. 9e).

To determine the relevance of Wt1-dependent activation of c-kit and Pecam-1, we used as in vitro system mouse endothelial cells (C166) transduced with amphotropic virus encoding shWt1, full-length c-kit or Pecam-1 and the corresponding control vectors. Endothelial cell c-kit expression has been described, both, in in vitro³⁶ and in vivo studies of human³⁷ and mouse³⁸ tissues. Western blots confirmed downregulation of Ets-1, which we already identified as a WT1 target in human endothelial cells⁹, and of c-kit and Pecam-1 upon knockdown of Wt1 (Supplementary Figs 13a and 14). Wt1 knockdown decreased migration and proliferation of mouse endothelial cells, in agreement with our study on their human counterpart⁹. Overexpression of c-kit did not significantly change proliferation, but increased migration of C166 cells compared with controls. c-kit overexpression partially rescued decreased proliferation and migration upon knockdown of Wt1. Pecam-1 overexpression did neither alter proliferation nor migration compared with controls and did not rescue the Wt1 knockdown effects on these cell biological properties (Supplementary Fig. 13b–e). In contrast, Pecam-1 overexpression stimulated tube formation and rescued impaired tube formation of endothelial cells with Wt1 knockdown, which was also the case for overexpression of c-kit (Supplementary Fig. 13f,g), demonstrating that WT1 depends in part on c-kit and Pecam-1 for its pro-angiogenic functions.

Lineage tracing confirms Wt1 dependency of the tumour stroma

Finally, to investigate the contribution of Wt1-dependent cells to the totality of endothelial, HPCs and MDS cells present in the tumour, we performed lineage analyses using Wt1CreERT2 (ref. 39) crossed with mTmG mice²³ (Supplementary Table 1). These animals express red fluorescence (Tomato⁺) prior to, and GFP (GFP⁺) following tamoxifen-inducible Wt1-Cre-mediated recombination. Double-labelled cells signify persistence of Tomato protein after Cre-mediated recombination²³. Therefore, double-fluorescent and single GFP⁺ cells were combined in the analysis as Wt1-Cre-mediated recombined and are referred to as GFP⁺. FACS analyses of tumour-bearing animals injected with tamoxifen revealed average fractions of 4.1%, 6.6%, 6.5% and 3.6% of GFP⁺ cells in kidney, bone marrow, spleen and blood, respectively; the remaining cells being Tomato⁺. Average fractions of GFP⁺ cells were higher in bone marrow, spleen and blood of Wt1CreERT2;mTmG+tamoxifen animals with tumours compared with healthy controls, suggesting accumulation of Wt1-dependent cell types in these organs in the presence of tumours (Fig. 10a). On average, 26.8% (B16 tumours) and 35.0% (LLC1 tumours) of cells represent host-derived stromal cells (Tomato⁺ and/or GFP⁺). Out of these, 58.4% and 52.0% of cells were Wt1-Cre-mediated recombined in B16 and LLC1 tumours, respectively (Fig. 10b,c; Supplementary Fig. 15a–e), pointing to the importance of Wt1 for the tumour stroma. Multi-labelling FACS analyses were performed as described on LLC1 tumours from Wt1CreERT2;mTmG+tamoxifen animals to identify individual cell types. Endothelial cells represented ~8%, HPCs ~3% and MDSCs ~5.4% of total cells in the tumour (Fig. 10d). On average, 59.8% of endothelial cells, 69.7% of HPCs and 72.2% of MDSCs were GFP⁺, indicating a major contribution of Wt1 to these cell types (Fig. 10e; Supplementary Fig. 15f,g). Pericytes represented ~3% of the total number of cells, half of them being GFP⁺. The contribution of macrophages was highly variable between tumour samples, most of them being GFP⁻.

**Figure 10: Wt1 lineage tracing in mice and expression in human tumours.**

We confirmed co-expression of WT1 with markers of the above identified cell types also in human tumours. WT1 co-localized with Pecam-1 and CD34 as vascular markers, CD45 as a haematopoietic marker, CD33, which labels human MDSCs, and desmin in pericytes (Fig. 10f).

Discussion

We demonstrate here the importance of vascular and stromal Wt1 expression for tumourigenesis. In human tumour samples, we observed in a previous⁹ and the present study high, homogeneous WT1 expression in the tumour vasculature and some stromal cells, independent from WT1 levels in cancer cells. This observation led us to study the functional relevance of Wt1 for tumourigenesis in vivo, using different genetically modified inducible mouse models. We confirmed the high contribution of Wt1-expressing cells to the tumour stroma in mice. To determine the relevance of Wt1 for tumour vessel formation and cancer progression, and to distinguish between the effects of a purely endothelial-specific and a broader Wt1 knockout, affecting other stromal cell types, we used Wt1 conditional knockout mice (Wt1^lox/lox)¹⁷ crossed either with a tamoxifen-inducible VE-cadherin-Cre¹⁹ or a Tie2-Cre¹⁸. Both Cre lines are active in endothelial cells. In addition, Tie2 expression has been shown in monocytic cells, haematopoietic progenitors and MDSCs^6,7,8,20.

Targeting of Wt1 in both Cre lines led to significant reduction of tumour vascularization and growth, indicating that Wt1 plays an important role for tumour progression through regulation of angiogenesis. This is in line with previous studies, where we and others demonstrated the requirement of Wt1 in coronary vessel formation during embryonic development^17,28 and a pro-angiogenic function of WT1 in vitro⁹. We excluded that the observed differences in the results of the Wt1 knockout with the two Cre lines were due to differing recombination efficiencies, and confirmed that Wt1 levels were equally reduced in tumour endothelial cells of both Cre lines after tamoxifen induction.

We further analysed the phenotype of the Wt1 knockout under Tie2-Cre, showing that loss of Wt1 reduced angiogenesis in aortic-ring assays ex vivo and Matrigel plug assays and tumours in vivo, suggesting that both local and recruited Wt1-expressing cells are involved in the angiogenic response. Of note, we did neither observe differences in the vascularization of most organs, nor signs of an impaired kidney function or other pathophysiological abnormalities in Wt1 KO animals. Survival analysis after tumour induction demonstrated a markedly improved survival compared with controls in the Wt1 KO animals, further excluding major pathological side effects.

The sequence of reduction of tumour vessel patency, as indicated by lectin staining, followed by decreased Pecam-1 expression, appearance of basement membrane ghosts and persistence of only few Pecam-1-positive structures and scattered pericytes is in agreement with vessel regression⁴⁰ upon targeting of Wt1. In line with the reduced vessel density, larger hypoxic areas and increased Hif-1α expression in tumours from Wt1 KO animals were observed. As Hif-1α has been shown to positively regulate Vegf⁴¹, it is not surprising that we detected significant increases in Vegf-a messenger RNA expression in both tumour types. We showed earlier that Wt1 is regulated by Hif-1α⁴². Wt1 in turn regulates Vegf³³. Our data support the view that activation of the Hif-1α–Vegf axis is not sufficient to induce angiogenesis in the absence of Wt1.

We did not observe changes in the expression of Wt1-regulated angiogenic Ets-1 (ref. 9) or its downstream target Vegfr2 (ref. 43) in whole-tumour lysates, which might be, as for Vegf-a, due to a high expression by the hypoxic tumour cells. In contrast, we could confirm upregulation of thrombospondin 1. Thrombospondin 1 is regarded as a key counterbalance in the angiogenic switch of tumours¹. As Wt1 has been shown to transcriptionally suppress thrombospondin 1 (ref. 32), high expression of thrombospondin 1 might at least in part represent a molecular mechanism of the anti-angiogenic action upon the loss of Wt1. The direct transcriptional activation of Pecam-1 by Wt1, which we report here, is in agreement with decreased Pecam-1 expression and reduced angiogenesis and increased endothelial cell apoptosis in tumours of Wt1 KO mice⁴⁴. Overexpression of Pecam-1 in mouse endothelial cells knocked down for Wt1 expression partially rescued the impaired tube formation of these cells. This finding is in agreement with the literature where decreased tube formation of endothelial cells treated with antibodies against Pecam-1 has been reported⁴⁵. Activation of c-kit by Wt1 explains the lower c-kit expression in tumours of Wt1 KO animals. c-kit is expressed by human and rodent endothelial cells^36,37,38, and it has been shown that stem cell factor, a c-kit ligand, stimulated migration and tube formation of human endothelial cells⁴⁶. We demonstrate here that overexpression of c-kit increases migration and tube formation of mouse endothelial cells and partially rescues the disturbed proliferation, migration and tube formation in Wt1 knockdown cells. As it is known that c-kit⁺ HPCs contribute to tumour angiogenesis⁴⁷, loss of Wt1 in these cells will additionally result in reduced angiogenesis.

The reduced proliferation and enhanced apoptosis of tumour cells are likely due to the lower vessel density, as it is known that angiogenesis increases the rate of cancer cell proliferation³. Resistance of tumour cells to apoptosis has also been linked to angiogenesis and infiltrating myeloid and haematopoietic cells⁴⁸.

Interestingly, inducible Wt1 knockout under Tie2-Cre led not only to reduction of tumour growth as in the VE-Cre-mediated Wt1 knockout animals, but further to tumour regression. We could observe a higher lymphocytic tumoural infiltration in Tie2- than in VE-CreERT2;Wt1^lox/lox+tamoxifen animals. Tumours of Tie2-CreERT2;Wt1^lox/lox+tamoxifen animals displayed more CD3, CD4, CD8 and NK cell infiltration, with a higher number of activated NK and CD8 T cells compared with controls. In contrast, no differences in immune infiltration were observed in tumours of VE-CreERT2;Wt1^lox/lox+tamoxifen versus controls, suggesting that Wt1 might be expressed in Tie2-Cre-dependent cell types regulating immune cell infiltration. In addition to the strongly diminished vascularization, enhanced immune response and tumour regression in Tie2-CreERT2;Wt1^lox/lox+tamoxifen animals, we demonstrated a significantly diminished occurrence of metastasis, which was not the case for VE-CreERT2;Wt1^lox/lox+tamoxifen animals.

The generation of a triple-transgenic inducible Tie2-CreERT2;Wt1^lox/GFP line allowed us to detect which cells are affected by the Wt1 knockout. In tumours, GFP⁺ cells accounted for ~4% of total cells and the majority (~60%) were endothelial cells. Interestingly, around 10% of GFP⁺ cells could be identified as HPCs, and 5% as MDSCs. A small number of GFP⁺ cells were pericytes and macrophages. In the bone marrow of tumour-bearing animals, we found ~6% of GFP⁺ cells, and, in contrast to tumours, the majority (~60%) were HPCs. Inducible knockout of Wt1 led to a significant decrease of all three cell types in tumours and bone marrow, indicating that a fraction of endothelial, HPCs and MDSCs depends on Wt1. The observed increased immune response underlines the impact of Wt1-dependent MDSCs in suppression of anti-tumour immune responses. MDSC depletion of tumours was shown to enhance therapeutic vaccination responses, leading to increased frequencies of NK, CD3, CD4 and CD8 cells invading the tumours, which became apoptotic and less metastatic⁴⁹, a similar phenotype observed in Tie2-CreERT2;Wt1^lox/lox+tamoxifen animals. Knockout of Wt1 in MDSCs impaired their capability to suppress T-cell proliferation and might therefore explain the observed phenotype of increased immune infiltration in Wt1 KO tumours. Interestingly, MDSCs expressed less MMP9 upon Wt1 knockout. WT1 transcriptionally activates MMP9 (ref. 50). MMP9 secretion by MDSCs increases tumour angiogenesis and metastases occurence⁵¹, which could further explain the strong anti-angiogenic and anti-metastatic effect observed upon knockout of Wt1. The recent finding that WT1 transcriptionally activates TRF2 (ref. 52), a telomeric protein favouring angiogenesis⁵² and counteracting innate immuno-surveillance of tumours⁵³, provides another mechanism by which WT1 might control tumour angiogenesis and immune infiltration.

Lineage analyses using Wt1CreERT2 animals³⁸ crossed with mTmG mice²³ corroborated the high Wt1 contribution to the tumour stroma. Around 50% of the tumour stromal cells expressed or had expressed Wt1, and further analysis showed that the majority of endothelial, HPCs and MDSCs were Wt1 dependent. We confirmed co-expression of WT1 with endothelial, HPC, MDSC and pericyte markers also in human tumour samples, suggesting a similar relevance of WT1 expression for human cancer growth.

In clinical trials using WT1 peptide vaccination, apart from haematological malignancies, promising results in solid cancers were already obtained¹². However, until now it was not recognized that inhibition of WT1 in endothelial cells, HPCs and MDSCs could contribute to these positive outcomes, which further implicates Wt1 as a critical regulator of tumourigenesis and potential therapeutic target. Antibody-mediated RNA interference⁵⁴ or antibody–drug conjugates⁵⁵ directed against WT1 might become interesting approaches for cancer therapy. Hopefully, this study may provide a cornerstone for such further developments.

Methods

Animals

All animals were used in accord with the French Coordination Committee on Cancer Research guidelines and local Home Office regulations (Ciepal). Wt1^lox/lox and Tie2-CreERT2 animals were crossed to generate Tie2-CreERT2;Wt1^lox/lox mice^17,18. VE-cadherin-CreERT2 (ref. 19) mice obtained from L. Iruela-Arispe were crossed with Wt1^lox/lox animals to generate the VE-CreERT2;Wt1^lox/lox strain. Both Cre lines were backcrossed four times with C57BL6. Alternatively, Tie2-CreERT2;Wt1^lox mice were crossed with Wt1^GFP mice¹⁶ to generate Tie2-CreERT2;Wt1^lox/GFP animals. Wt1CreERT2;mTmG animals were generated by crossing Wt1CreERT2 (ref. 38) (Jax stock number: 010912) with mTmG²³ (Jax stock number: 007576) mice. Age- and sex-matched Tie2-CreERT2;Wt1^lox/lox, VE-CreERT2;Wt1^lox/lox, Tie2-CreERT2;mTmG, VE-CreERT2;mTmG and Wt1CreERT2;mTmG animals were injected for 1 week intraperitoneally (i.p.) either with sunflower oil (vehicle) or tamoxifen dissolved in sunflower oil in a dose of 33 mg kg⁻¹ per day⁵⁶. Tie2-CreERT2 animals injected with tamoxifen served as an additional control. Z/Pax2,CreZ/Pax2,CreZ/Pax2,Cre served as a positive control for proteinurea⁵⁶. Male and female mice aged between 3 and 12 months were used for experiments.

Deletion of Wt1 was investigated by recombination PCR as described⁵⁷. One week after the last tamoxifen or vehicle treatment, 1 × 10⁶ B16F10 or LLC1 tumour cells were injected subcutaneously. Alternatively, Matrigel plugs were produced by subcutaneous injection, or thoracic aortae were removed for aortic-ring assays. Uterus histology was investigated in synchronized mice⁵⁸. For survival analysis, animals were kept up to 100 days after tumour production. For a ‘therapeutic approach’, tumours were produced by subcutaneous injection of B16F10 or LLC1 tumour cells and the tumours were allowed to grow until they reached a diameter of ~5 mm. Tamoxifen was injected afterwards as described above. Tumour size was measured using the caliper method⁵⁹. Alternatively, orthotopic tumours were produced by injection of 3 × 10⁴ LLC1 cells into the right-lung lobe of mice. In this case, tamoxifen injection started after 3 days. In another approach, metastases formation was investigated by intravenous inoculation of 3 × 10⁵ LLC1 cells and subsequent starting of tamoxifen injections. Tumours and organs were collected after 3–4 weeks. In addition to the tumours, vessel density in adrenal glands, thyroids, pancreas, hearts, intestines, kidneys and spleens was determined by Pecam-1 immunostaining, followed by quantification of the Pecam-1 area density using ImageJ for Tie2-CreERT2 and Tie2-CreERT2;Wt1^lox/lox mice injected with tamoxifen or vehicle (n=5 each).

Wt1^GFP+/− mice were injected subcutaneously with B16F10 or LLC1 cells; tumours were collected and processed for further analyses. Age-matched female Wt1GFP^+/− mice without tumours (n=3) were used for immunohistological analysis of GFP and Wt1 expression in kidney, heart, brain, lung, intestine, liver, uterus, adrenal gland, brown adipose tissue, spleen, pancreas, muscle and ovary.

Wt1CreERT2;mTmG, tamoxifen induced, Tie2-CreERT2;Wt1^lox/GFP, tamoxifen or vehicle treated, Tie2-CreERT2;Wt1^lox/lox mice, injected with tamoxifen or vehicle, and VE-CreERT2;Wt1^lox/lox mice, injected with tamoxifen or vehicle, were used for FACS analyses. LLC1 or B16 tumours, bone marrows, kidneys, spleens and blood were subjected to FACS analyses (n=3-6). Wt1CreERT2;mTmG littermates injected with tamoxifen, but without tumours, were used as additional controls for the FACS analyses (n=3).

Urine analysis was performed using Multistix 8SG strips (Bayer, Berkely, USA) and SDS–polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, followed by Coomassie staining of the gels.

Genotyping

The genotype of animals was identified by PCR. PCR conditions and primer sequences are available on request.

Cell culture

B16F10 mouse melanoma cells (accession number CRL-6475) and LLC1 mouse lung cancer cells (accession number CRL-1642) were grown in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM)-F12 medium (Lonza, Levallois-Perret, France), and C166 mouse endothelial cells (accession number CRL-2581) in DMEM medium (Lonza). M15 mouse mesonephros cells (Sigma, Lyon, France), and HEK293 cells (accession number CRL-1573) were grown in DMEM medium (Lonza). Media were supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum (FCS), 100 IU ml⁻¹ penicillin and 100 μg ml⁻¹ streptomycin (Invitrogen, Cergy Pontoise, France).

Lentivirus production

Lentivirus for transfection was prepared essentially as described⁶⁰. pWPIR-GFP vector (8.6 μg; obtained from Didier Trono, Swiss Institute of Technology, Lausanne, Switzerland) expressing empty vector, c-kit or Pecam-1; pLKO.1 vector (8.6 μg; Sigma, St Louis, MO, USA) expressing Wt1 short hairpin RNA (Sigma) or non-coding short hairpin RNA (Sigma); or 8.6 μg of Lenti-Delta 8.91 and 2.8 μg of VSV-g were introduced into 5 × 10⁶ HEK293 cells in DMEM, supplemented with 10% FCS at 37° in 5% CO₂ in 10-cm dishes, by calcium phosphate-mediated transfection. Virus containing supernatants were collected after 48 h, passed through a 0.45-μm Millipore filter and used to infect C166 cells.

Detection of cell proliferation

Fourty-eight hours after transduction of C166 cells, bromodeoxyuridine was added and the cells were incubated for 3 h. Afterwards, 5-bromodeoxyuridine incorporation was measured spectrophotometrically according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Millipore, Molsheim, France).

Migration assays

Fourty-eight hours after transduction of C166 cells, scratch migration assays⁶¹ were performed. Images were captured after 0, 9, 20 and 27 h and scratch diameters were measured.

In vitro angiogenesis assay

Fourty-eight hours after transduction, C166 cells were transferred to 96-well dishes coated with 100 μl Matrigel basement membrane matrix (Chemicon, Millipore, Guyancourt, France). Branching points and tubule length were determined after additional 9 h.

In vivo matrigel plug assay

Matrigel (500 μl) (Becton Dickinson, Le Pont de Claix, France) containing 60 U ml⁻¹ heparin (Sigma, Saint-Quentin Fallavier, France) were injected subcutaneously (n=5 per group). Matrigel plugs were removed after 5 days and divided for haemoglobin quantification using Drabkin Reagent (Sigma), paraffin embedding and subsequent histological analysis.

Aortic-ring assay

Mice were euthanized by cervical dislocation, and thoracic aortae were removed, washed in DMEM containing antibiotics, cleaned of periadvential tissue and cut in 1-mm rings⁶². The rings were placed between two layers of 50 μl growth factor-reduced Matrigel (Becton Dickinson) supplemented with 20 U ml⁻¹ heparin (Sigma) and overlaid with 100 μl of DMEM with VEGF (30 ng ml⁻¹). Media were changed every 48 h and the number of vessels growing from each aortic ring was determined using phase-contrast microscopy. Experiments were performed in triplicates, n=3 per group.

Histology and immunohistology

Histology and immunohistochemistry analyses were performed according to published protocols²⁸. Some animals were anaesthetized with ketamine (100 mg kg⁻¹ i.p.) mixed with xylazine (10 mg kg⁻¹ i.p.). Thirty minutes prior to anaesthesia, 60 mg kg⁻¹ pimonidazole (HPI Inc., Burlington, USA) was injected i.p. to mark hypoxic areas in the tumours. Fifty μg of fluorescin isothiocyante-labelled Lycopersicon esculentum lectin (Vector Laboratories) was injected in the tail vein under anaesthesia to investigate vessel patency. After 2 min, the chest was opened and the vasculature perfused with 10 ml phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) solution containing 10 U ml⁻¹ heparin (Sigma) via a 21-gauge cannula inserted in the left ventricle (perfusion pressure 120 mm Hg). PBS and blood exited via an incision in the right atrium. Washing with PBS was followed by fixation in 3% paraformaldehyde in PBS. Afterwards, tumours and organs were removed, embedded in OCT compound (Sakura Finetek, Villeneuve d’Ascq, France) and stored at −80 °C until cutting on a cryostat or processed for paraffin embedding.

Briefly, samples from at least five different animals per group (Tie2 -CreERT2;Wt1^lox/lox+vehicle, Tie2-CreERT2+tamoxifen and Tie2-CreERT2;Wt1^lox/lox+tamoxifen, VE-CreERT2;Wt1^lox/lox+vehicle, VE-CreERT2;Wt1^lox/lox+tamoxifen, Wt1^GFP+/− mice) were analysed by three independent investigators, one of them an experienced pathologist. Three-μm paraffin sections and 5-, 10-, 30- or 60-μm cryosections were used for histological and immunohistological procedures.

For calculation of volumes of orthotopic lung tumours, lungs were sectioned at 3 μm and sections were stained with haematoxylin–eosin at an interval of 60 μm. The tumour area was quantified for each stained section using the ImageJ software. The tumour volume was then calculated according to: , where V_i is the tumour volume, A_ij the tumour area in each section and T the thickness between the sections⁶³.

To quantify metastasis occurrence in the subcutaneous tumour models and after intravenous injection of tumour cells, three-μm sections of the entire lung and the left lobe of the liver (only for subcutaneous tumour models) were taken at 100-μm intervals. For orthotopic tumours, metastasis was analysed in liver and brain. Haematoxylin–eosin staining was routinely performed on all tissue samples; Matrigel sections were additionally stained with Gordon reticulin and trichrome Masson. Eighty paraffin-embedded human tumour samples (lung, breast, colon, ovary, pancreas and melanoma) were used for immunohistochemical detection of WT1. The study adheres to the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki and to title 45, US Code of Federal Regulations, part 46, Protection of Human Subjects. For immunohistology, after heat-mediated antigen retrieval and quenching of endogenous peroxidase activity, antigens were detected after antibody application using the EnVision Peroxidase/DAB Detection System from Dako (Trappes, France). Sections were counterstained with haematoxylin (Sigma). For immunofluorescence double-labelling, sections were incubated with the respective antibodies after preincubation with 10% normal donkey serum in PBS with 1% bovine serum albumin and 0.1% Triton X-100. In case of primary antibodies from mouse, sections were incubated before with mouse blocking reagent (Vector Laboratories). Antigens were visualized using DyLight 488- and DyLight 594-coupled secondary antibodies derived from donkey in a 1:150 dilution (Jackson ImmunoResearch, Newmarket, Suffolk, UK). Omission of the first antibody served as a negative control. In addition, some slides were incubated with immunoglobulin G isotype controls (1:100, rabbit monoclonal, clone SP137 or 1:100, mouse monoclonal, clone MOPC-21, Abcam). The following antibodies were used: WT1 (1:100, mouse monoclonal, clone 6FH2, DAKO); PCNA (1:100, mouse monoclonal, PC10, sc-56, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Heidelberg, Germany); PECAM-1 (CD31) (1:100, goat polyclonal, M-20, sc-1506, Santa Cruz Biotechnology), PECAM-1 (1:50, mouse monoclonal, clone JC70A, Dako), CD33 (1:100, mouse monoclonal, clone PWS44, Leica Biosystems), Pimonidazole (1:200, rabbit polyclonal, HPI Inc.), Hif1α (1:100, rabbit polyclonal, kind gift of J. Pouysségur), desmin (1:50, mouse monoclonal, clone D33, DAKO), a-smooth muscle actin (1:500, mouse monoclonal, clone 1A4, Sigma), CD34 (1:200, mouse monoclonal, clone QBEnd 10, Dako), CD45 (1:50, rat monoclonal, BD Biosciences, Le Pont de Claix, France), CD45 (1:300, mouse monoclonal, clone Ros 220, Immuntech, Marseille, France), c-kit (1:200, goat polyclonal, AF1356, R&D Systems, Lille, France), CD3 (1:100, rabbit monoclonal, clone SP7, ab16669, Abcam) and GFP (1:500, rabbit polyclonal, ab290, Abcam). Slides were viewed under an epifluorescence microscope (DMLB, Leica, Germany) connected to a digital camera (Spot RT Slider, Diagnostic Instruments, Scotland).

For confocal microscopic examination (ZEISS LSM Exciter microscope, Zeiss, Jena, Germany), 3-μm paraffin sections and 30- or 60-μm cryosections were used. High-resolution Z-stacks (1, 0.7 and 0.5 μm) and three-dimensional surface rendering of Z-stacks were generated using the Zen program (Zeiss).

Area densities for all immunohistological stainings were determined using the ImageJ software. Vessel area density was analysed on at least five different sections of tumours or organs per mouse, in case of paraffin sections, obtained at an interval of 200 μm, for thick cryosections, obtained with cutting intervals of 60 μm. Rarely, intervals had to be shortened due to extreme tumour regression. The extent of GFP/Pecam-1 co-localization in tumours of Tie2-CreERT2;mTmG+tamoxifen and VE-CreERT2;mTmG+tamoxifen mice was calculated for confocal images using ImageJ, with the JACoP plugin measuring Pearson k1 and k2 coefficients on threshold-corrected images⁶⁴.

TUNEL labelling of apoptotic cells

Apoptotic cells were detected by TUNEL staining of paraffin sections using the In Situ Cell Death Detection Kit (Roche Molecular Biochemicals, Meylan, France) as described previously²⁸.

FACS analysis

Tissues (tumours, spleens, kidneys, bone marrows or blood) were minced and single-cell suspensions were obtained after enzymatic digestion (1 mg ml⁻¹ collagenase A and 100 IU ml⁻¹ type I DNase (Roche Diagnostics) for 1 h at 37 °C under agitation in serum-free DMEM medium. The single-cell suspension was filtered through a 70-μm cell strainer (BD Biosciences) and cells were washed twice in 2% FCS and 0.5 mM EDTA in PBS.

After 15 min of saturation in Fc Block (2.4G2) from BD Biosciences, single-cell suspensions were surface stained for 40 min on ice in the dark with the following conjugated antibodies or corresponding isotype controls: anti-CD117 (2B8), anti-CD45 (30-F11), anti-CD107a (1D4B), anti-CD4 (GK1.5), anti-CD3 (145-2C11), anti-CD69 (H1.2F3) and anti-NKp46 (29A1.4) from BD Biosciences; anti-CD140b (APB5), anti-CD202b (Tek4) and anti-CD31 (390) from eBioscience (Paris, France); and anti-CD11b (M1/70), anti-F4/80 (BM8), anti-Ly-6A/E (Sca-1, D7), anti-Gr-1 (RB6-8C5), anti-Ly6G (1A8), anti-CD8 (53-6.7), anti-CD19 (6D5) and anti-CD144 (VECD1) from BioLegend (London, UK). Cells were washed with PBS containing 2% FCS and 0.5 mM EDTA. Staining was assessed with a FACSAria cytometer, and flow cytometry data were analysed using FacsDiva 6 software and FlowJo (BD Biosciences).

MDSC function assays

MDSCs were isolated from LLC1 tumours of Tie2-CreERT2 and Tie2-CreERT2; Wt1^lox/lox animals by labelling cell suspensions with anti-Ly-6G-biotinylated monoclonal antibody, followed by anti-biotin-coupled magnetic beads and sorting using LS MACS columns and the MidiMACS system (Miltenyi Biotec). The isolated cells were >90% pure for CD11b+Gr1+-expressing MDSCs as determined by flow cytometry. MDSCs were cultured in complete RPMI media containing 10 ng ml⁻¹ granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor and treated with 4-hydroxy tamoxifen (1 μM) (Sigma) for 24 h.

CD3+ cells from spleens of healthy C57/Bl6 mice were sorted from cell suspensions by flow cytometry. Cells were resuspended at 10⁶ per ml and incubated with carboxyfluorescein succinimidyl ester (CFSE) (5 μM) (Molecular Probes) at 37 °C for 15 min and washed three times with complete RPMI medium. T cells were placed in triplicates into 96-well plates (2 × 10⁵ per well) and activated with CD3/CD28 Dynabeads (3 μl per well) and rIL2 (10 U ml⁻¹) (Life Technologies). Finally, Tie2-CreERT2+tamoxifen tumour-derived MDSCs or Tie2-CreERT2;Wt1^lox/lox+tamoxifen tumour-derived MDSCs were co-cultured with T lymphocytes in a 2:1, 1:1 and 0:1 ratio of MDSCs to T cells. Proliferation as a surrogate marker for T-cell activation was determined by CFSE dilution after 72 h after co-culture initiation using flow cytometry.

Real-time RT–PCR

Total RNA was isolated from uteri, kidneys and tumours using the Trizol reagent (Invitrogen). Only tumours from conditional Wt1 knockout mice, which showed no complete regression, were included. The RNA pellet was dissolved in diethyl pyrocarbonate-treated H₂O. First-strand complementary DNA synthesis was performed with 1 μg of total RNA using oligo(dT) primers and superscript II reverse transcriptase (Invitrogen). One μl of the reaction product was taken for real-time RT–PCR amplification (ABI Prism 7000, Applied Biosystems) using a commercial SYBR Green kit (Eurogentec, Angers, France). Primer sequences are available on request. Expression of each gene was normalized to the respective Gapdh and Rplp0 expression.

SDS–polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and western blot

Total cell lysates were prepared, electrophoresed and blotted, as described in detail elsewhere⁹. The following antibodies were used: WT1, rabbit monoclonal, (1:1,000, Abcam), Ets-1, rabbit polyclonal (1:500, Santa Cruz Biotechnology), PECAM-1, goat polyclonal (1:300, Santa Cruz), c-Kit, goat polyclonal (1:2,000, R&D systems), actin, goat polyclonal, (1:500, Santa Cruz), Gapdh, goat polyclonal, (1:300, Santa Cruz).

Cloning and transient transfection experiments

Promoter sequences of differentially expressed genes identified by real-time RT–PCR were inspected for potential Wt1-binding sites using the Promo3 software⁶⁵. A 2.7-kb fragment from the Pecam-1 promoter was synthesized by GenScript; the c-kit promoter was a gift by C. Nishiyama⁶⁶. All promoter constructs were subcloned in the pGl3basic luciferase expression vector (Promega). Each promoter construct was co-transfected with Wt1(−KTS) or Wt1(+KTS) expression constructs in HEK293 cells using Fugene 6 reagent (Roche Molecular Biochemicals) (n=12 each). HEK293 cells were chosen as they express low levels of WT1, are easy to transfect and in several instances showed the ability to recapitulate in vivo regulation^9,27. Putative Wt1-binding sites were deleted from the promoter constructs using the Quik Change II site-directed mutagenesis kit (Stratagene, Agilent Technologies, Massy, France) with the following oligonucleotides: c-kit, 5′-CCCCGGGCACTAGGCAAGTGCGACC-3′, Pecam-1, 5′-GAAAAGGGAATGTTAGCTGAGCTGGGGACTGGAG-3′. Deletion constructs were again co-transfected with Wt1(−KTS) or Wt1(+KTS) expression constructs (n=12 each).

ChIP assay

ChIP assay was performed on M15 cells using the manufacturer’s instructions (Millipore) as described⁶⁷. One microgram of the following antibodies each were used: WT1, rabbit monoclonal, (ab52933, Abcam), WT1 rabbit polyclonal (sc-192, Santa Cruz Biotechnology) and acetyl-histone H3 (06-599, Upstate). Normal rabbit serum served as a negative control and dilutions of the input sample as positive control. The following primers were used: Pecam-1 promoter, 5′-TTAGCCATCCCCTGGGTCAG-3′ (forward), 5′-TCCAGAGGTGATGGGACCTG-3′ (reverse); Pecam-1 3′UTR, 5′-CCGATTCCTGGATTGCGAGA-3′ (forward), 5′-AGCGCCTCTGAGTCTCTGTA-3′ (reverse), c-kit promoter, 5′-ttattgcagcccgagagccc-3′ (forward), 5′-TGCACTTGGGCGAGAGCTGT-3′ (reverse); c-kit 3′UTR, 5′-AGTTACCGCGCTCTGTTTGA-3′ (forward), 5′-GGTACTTAAGGGGCCACACC-3′ (reverse). PCR products were electrophoresed on 4% agarose gels. Alternatively, samples were used in quantitative PCRs (n=3 each). Fold enrichment was calculated from cycle threshold (CT) values relative to the input signal of each experiment set to 100%.

Statistical analysis

Data are expressed as means±s.e.m. Analysis of variance with Bonferroni test as post hoc test or Mann–Whitney tests were performed as indicated. Significance of metastasis occurrence was calculated for Tie2-CreERT2;Wt1^lox/lox+tamoxifen animals and individual control groups using Fisher’s exact test. A P value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Additional information

How to cite this article: Wagner, K.-D. et al. The Wilms’ tumour suppressor Wt1 is a major regulator of tumour angiogenesis and progression. Nat. Commun. 5:5852 doi: 10.1038/ncomms6852 (2014).

References

Hanahan, D. & Weinberg, R. A. Hallmarks of cancer: the next generation. Cell 144, 646–674 (2011).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Folkman, J. Tumor angiogenesis: therapeutic implications. New Engl. J. Med. 285, 1182–1186 (1971).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Carmeliet, P. & Jain, R. K. Molecular mechanisms and clinical applications of angiogenesis. Nature 473, 298–307 (2011).
Article CAS ADS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Casanovas, O., Hicklin, D. J., Bergers, G. & Hanahan, D. Drug resistance by evasion of antiangiogenic targeting of VEGF signaling in late-stage pancreatic islet tumors. Cancer Cell 8, 299–309 (2005).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Ebos, J. M. et al. Accelerated metastasis after short-term treatment with a potent inhibitor of tumor angiogenesis. Cancer Cell 15, 232–239 (2009).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
De Palma, M. et al. Tie2 identifies a hematopoietic lineage of proangiogenic monocytes required for tumor vessel formation and a mesenchymal population of pericyte progenitors. Cancer Cell 8, 211–226 (2005).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Mazzieri, R. et al. Targeting the ANG2/TIE2 axis inhibits tumor growth and metastasis by impairing angiogenesis and disabling rebounds of proangiogenic myeloid cells. Cancer Cell 19, 512–526 (2011).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
DeNardo, D. G. et al. CD4(+) T cells regulate pulmonary metastasis of mammary carcinomas by enhancing protumor properties of macrophages. Cancer Cell 16, 91–102 (2009).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Wagner, N., Michiels, J. F., Schedl, A. & Wagner, K. D. The Wilms’ tumour suppressor WT1 is involved in endothelial cell proliferation and migration: expression in tumour vessels in vivo. Oncogene 27, 3662–3672 (2008).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Haber, D. A. et al. An internal deletion within an 11p13 zinc finger gene contributes to the development of Wilms’ tumor. Cell 61, 1257–1269 (1990).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Hohenstein, P. & Hastie, N. D. The many facets of the Wilms’ tumour gene, WT1. Hum. Mol. Genet. 15, R196–R201 (2006).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Oka, Y., Tsuboi, A., Oji, Y., Kawase, I. & Sugiyama, H. WT1 peptide vaccine for the treatment of cancer. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 20, 211–220 (2008).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Kreidberg, J. A. et al. WT-1 is required for early kidney development. Cell 74, 679–691 (1993).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Goldstein, N. S. & Uzieblo, A. WT1 immunoreactivity in uterine papillary serous carcinomas is different from ovarian serous carcinomas. Am. J. Clin. Pathol. 117, 541–545 (2002).
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Wagner, N., Panelos, J., Massi, D. & Wagner, K. D. The Wilms’ tumor suppressor WT1 is associated with melanoma proliferation. Pflugers Arch. 455, 839–847 (2008).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Hosen, N. et al. The Wilms’ tumor gene WT1-GFP knock-in mouse reveals the dynamic regulation of WT1 expression in normal and leukemic hematopoiesis. Leukemia 21, 1783–1791 (2007).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Martínez-Estrada, O. M. et al. Wt1 is required for cardiovascular progenitor cell formation through transcriptional control of Snail and E-cadherin. Nat. Genet. 42, 89–93 (2010).
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Forde, A., Constien, R., Gröne, H. J., Hämmerling, G. & Arnold, B. Temporal Cre-mediated recombination exclusively in endothelial cells using Tie2 regulatory elements. Genesis 33, 191–197 (2002).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Monvoisin, A. et al. VE-cadherin-CreERT2 transgenic mouse: a model for inducible recombination in the endothelium. Dev. Dyn. 235, 3413–3422 (2006).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Coffelt, S. B. et al. Angiopoietin 2 stimulates TIE2-expressing monocytes to suppress T cell activation and to promote regulatory T cell expansion. J. Immunol. 186, 4183–4190 (2011).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Liu-Jarin, X. et al. Histologic assessment of non-small cell lung carcinoma after neoadjuvant therapy. Mod. Pathol. 16, 1102–1108 (2003).
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Ogston, K. N. et al. A new histological grading system to assess response of breast cancers to primary chemotherapy: prognostic significance and survival. Breast 12, 320–327 (2003).
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Muzumdar, M. D., Tasic, B., Miyamichi, K., Li, L. & Luo, L. A global double-fluorescent Cre reporter mouse. Genesis 45, 593–605 (2007).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Ziegler, S. F., Ramsdell, F. & Alderson, M. R. The activation antigen CD69. Stem Cells 12, 456–465 (1994).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Alter, G., Malenfant, J. M. & Altfeld, M. CD107a as a functional marker for the identification of natural killer cell activity. J. Immunol. Methods 294, 15–22 (2004).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Aktas, E., Kucuksezer, U. C., Bilgic, S., Erten, G. & Deniz, G. Relationship between CD107a expression and cytotoxic activity. Cell. Immunol. 254, 149–154 (2009).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Drabkin, D. L. & Austin, J. H. Spectrophotometric studies: II. preparations from washed blood cells; nitric oxide hemoglobin and sulfhemoglobin. J. Biol. Chem. 112, 51–65 (1935).
CAS Google Scholar
Wagner, N. et al. Coronary vessel development requires activation of the TrkB neurotrophin receptor by the Wilms’ tumor transcription factor Wt1. Genes Dev. 19, 2631–2642 (2005).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Wagner, K. D. et al. The Wilms’ tumor suppressor Wt1 is expressed in the coronary vasculature after myocardial infarction. FASEB J. 16, 1117–1119 (2002).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Fidler, I. J. Biological behavior of malignant melanoma cells correlated to their survival in vivo. Cancer Res. 35, 218–224 (1975).
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Yoo, M. H., Xu, X. M., Carlson, B. A., Gladyshev, V. N. & Hatfield, D. L. Thioredoxin reductase 1 deficiency reverses tumor phenotype and tumorigenicity of lung carcinoma cells. J. Biol. Chem. 281, 13005–13008 (2006).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Dejong, V. et al. The Wilms’ tumor gene product represses the transcription of thrombospondin 1 in response to overexpression of c-Jun. Oncogene 18, 3143–3151 (1999).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
McCarty, G., Awad, O. & Loeb, D. M. WT1 protein directly regulates expression of vascular endothelial growth factor and is a mediator of tumor response to hypoxia. J. Biol. Chem. 286, 43634–43643 (2011).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Larsson, S. H. et al. Subnuclear localization of WT1 in splicing or transcription factor domains is regulated by alternative splicing. Cell 81, 391–401 (1995).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Davies, R. C. et al. WT1 interacts with the splicing factor U2AF65 in an isoform-dependent manner and can be incorporated into spliceosomes. Genes Dev. 12, 3217–3225 (1998).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Broudy, V. C. et al. Human umbilical vein endothelial cells display high-affinity c-kit receptors and produce a soluble form of the c-kit receptor. Blood 83, 2145–2152 (1994).
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Sihto, H., Tynninen, O., Bützow, R., Saarialho-Kere, U. & Joensuu, H. Endothelial cell KIT expression in human tumours. J. Pathol. 211, 481–488 (2007).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Fang, S., Wei, J., Pentinmikko, N., Leinonen, H. & Salven, P. Generation of functional blood vessels from a single c-kit+ adult vascular endothelial stem cell. PLoS Biol. 10, e1001407 (2012).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Zhou, B. et al. Epicardial progenitors contribute to the cardiomyocyte lineage in the developing heart. Nature 454, 109–113 (2008).
Article CAS ADS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Inai, T. et al. Inhibition of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) signaling in cancer causes loss of endothelial fenestrations, regression of tumor vessels, and appearance of basement membrane ghosts. Am. J. Pathol. 165, 35–52 (2004).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Levy, A. P., Levy, N. S., Wegner, S. & Goldberg, M. A. Transcriptional regulation of the rat vascular endothelial growth factor gene by hypoxia. J. Biol. Chem. 270, 13333–13340 (1995).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Wagner, K. D. et al. Oxygen-regulated expression of the Wilms’ tumor suppressor Wt1 involves hypoxia-inducible factor-1 (HIF-1). FASEB J. 17, 1364–1366 (2003).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Elvert, G. et al. Cooperative interaction of hypoxia-inducible factor-2alpha (HIF-2alpha ) and Ets-1 in the transcriptional activation of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2 (Flk-1). J. Biol. Chem. 278, 7520–7530 (2003).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Dimaio, T. A. et al. Attenuation of retinal vascular development and neovascularization in PECAM-1-deficient mice. Dev. Biol. 315, 72–88 (2008).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
DeLisser, H. M. et al. Involvement of endothelial PECAM-1/CD31 in angiogenesis. Am. J. Pathol. 151, 671–677 (1997).
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Matsui, J., Wakabayashi, T., Asada, M., Yoshimatsu, K. & Okada, M. Stem cell factor/c-kit signaling promotes the survival, migration, and capillary tube formation of human umbilical vein endothelial cells. J. Biol. Chem. 279, 18600–18607 (2004).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Nolan, D. J. et al. Bone marrow-derived endothelial progenitor cells are a major determinant of nascent tumor neovascularization. Genes Dev. 21, 1546–1558 (2007).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Hanahan, D. & Coussens, L. M. Accessories to the crime: functions of cells recruited to the tumor microenvironment. Cancer Cell 21, 309–322 (2012).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Srivastava, M. K. et al. Myeloid suppressor cell depletion augments antitumor activity in lung cancer. PLoS ONE 7, e40677 (2012).
Article CAS ADS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Katuri, V. et al. WT1 regulates angiogenesis in Ewing Sarcoma. Oncotarget 5, 2436–2449 (2014).
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Talmadge, J. E. & Gabrilovich, D. I. History of myeloid-derived suppressor cells. Nat. Rev. Cancer 13, 739–752 (2013).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
El Mai, M. et al. The telomeric protein TRF2 regulates angiogenesis by binding and activating the PDGFRβ promoter. Cell Rep. 9, 1047–1060 (2014).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Biroccio, A. et al. TRF2 inhibits a cell-extrinsic pathway through which natural killer cells eliminate cancer cells. Nat. Cell Biol. 15, 818–828 (2013).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Song, E. et al. Antibody mediated in vivo delivery of small interfering RNAs via cell-surface receptors. Nat. Biotechnol. 23, 709–717 (2005).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Lewis Phillips, G. D. et al. Targeting HER2-positive breast cancer with trastuzumab-DM1, an antibody-cytotoxic drug conjugate. Cancer Res. 68, 9280–9290 (2008).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Wagner, K. D. et al. An inducible mouse model for PAX2-dependent glomerular disease: insights into a complex pathogenesis. Curr. Biol. 16, 793–800 (2006).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Chau, Y. Y. et al. Acute multiple organ failure in adult mice deleted for the developmental regulator Wt1. PLoS Genet. 7, e1002404 (2011).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Chipman, R. K. & Fox, K. A. Oestrous synchronization and pregnancy blocking in wild house mice (Mus musculus). J. Reprod. Fertil. 12, 233–236 (1966).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Euhus, D. M., Hudd, C., LaRegina, M. C. & Johnson, F. E. Tumor measurement in the nude mouse. J. Surg. Oncol. 31, 229–234 (1986).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Tiscornia, G., Singer, O. & Verma, I. M. Production and purification of lentiviral vectors. Nat. Protoc. 1, 241–245 (2006).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Liang, C. C., Park, A. Y. & Guan, J. L. In vitro scratch assay: a convenient and inexpensive method for analysis of cell migration in vitro. Nat. Protoc. 2, 329–333 (2007).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Staton, C. A., Reed, M. W. & Brown, N. J. A critical analysis of current in vitro and in vivo angiogenesis assays. Int. J. Exp. Pathol. 90, 195–221 (2009).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Collan, Y. & Romppannen, T. Morphometry in Morphological Diagnosis 40 (Kuopio Univ. Press (1982).
Bolte, S. & Cordelières, F. P. A guided tour into subcellular colocalization analysis in light microscopy. J. Microsc. 224, 213–232 (2006).
Article CAS MathSciNet PubMed Google Scholar
Messeguer, X. et al. PROMO: detection of known transcription regulatory elements using species-tailored searches. Bioinformatics 18, 333–334 (2002).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Maeda, K., Nishiyama, C., Ogawa, H. & Okumura, K. GATA2 and Sp1 positively regulate the c-kit promoter in mast cells. J. Immunol. 185, 4252–4260 (2010).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Wagner, K. D., Benchetrit, M., Bianchini, L., Michiels, J. F. & Wagner, N. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor β/δ (PPARβ/δ) is highly expressed in liposarcoma and promotes migration and proliferation. J. Pathol. 224, 575–588 (2011).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank L. Cervera, A. Loubat, I. Lébé, S. Samara, J. Paputh, M. Radjkumar, S.M. Wagner, A. Borderie, S. Destrée, H. Morrison, P. Devenney, M. Muir, A. Kinnaird and G. Manfroni for technical assistance. We thank D. Gabrilovic and H. Echchannaoui for helpful discussions on MDSC isolation and culture. The Hif-1α antibody was a gift by J. Pouysségur. The c-kit promoter construct was kindly provided by C. Nishiyama. We thank N. Hübner, H. Schulz, K. Saar and V.G. Brunton for critical discussions. N.W. was a recipient of fellowships from the Fondation de France and EMBO. The study was supported by the Fondation Cœur et Artères (FCA R09038AA), the Association pour la Recherche sur le Cancer (R13026AA-ARC-WAGNER), Fondation de France (FDF-U1081-WAGNER) (K.-D.W.) and Ligue Nationale contre le Cancer (Equipe labélisée, E.G.). This work was supported by the French Government (National Research Agency, ANR) through the ‘Investments for the Future’ LABEX SIGNALIFE program (reference ANR-11-LABX-0028-01). This work was performed using the microscopy (PICMI) and cytometry (CYTOMED) facilities of IRCAN and the cytometry facility of IBV. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish or preparation of the manuscript.

Author information

Jean-François Michiels and Nicole Wagner: These authors contributed equally to this work

Authors and Affiliations

Institute for Research on Cancer and Aging, Nice (IRCAN), Faculty of Medicine, University of Nice Sophia-Antipolis, CNRS UMR7284/INSERM U1081, Nice, 06107, France
Kay-Dietrich Wagner, Julien Cherfils-Vicini, Eric Gilson, Jean-François Michiels & Nicole Wagner
Division of Health Sciences, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan
Naoki Hosen
The Roslin Institute, University of Edinburgh, Easter Bush Campus, Midlothian EH25 9RG, UK,
Peter Hohenstein
Department of Medical Genetics, CHU Nice, Nice, 06202, France
Eric Gilson
MRC Human Genetics Unit, MRC Institute of Genetics and Molecular Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH4 2XU, UK
Nicholas D. Hastie
Department of Pathology, CHU Nice, Nice, 06002, France
Jean-François Michiels

Authors

Kay-Dietrich Wagner
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Julien Cherfils-Vicini
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Naoki Hosen
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Peter Hohenstein
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Eric Gilson
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Nicholas D. Hastie
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Jean-François Michiels
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Nicole Wagner
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

K.-D.W., J.-F.M. and N.W. conceived the study, developed the experimental strategies and supervised the project. K.-D.W., J.C.-V. and N.W. performed experiments. E.G., N.H., P.H. and N.D.H. generated and provided materials and animal lines. K.-D.W., J.C.-V., J.-F.M. and N.W. analysed the data. K.-D.W. and N.W. wrote and edited the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nicole Wagner.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Figures 1-15 and Supplementary Table 1. (PDF 5432 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wagner, KD., Cherfils-Vicini, J., Hosen, N. et al. The Wilms’ tumour suppressor Wt1 is a major regulator of tumour angiogenesis and progression. Nat Commun 5, 5852 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms6852

Download citation

Received: 19 September 2014
Accepted: 13 November 2014
Published: 16 December 2014
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms6852

This article is cited by

G-quadruplex forming region within WT1 promoter is selectively targeted by daunorubicin and mitoxantrone: A possible mechanism for anti-leukemic effect of drugs
- Saeedeh Ghazaey Zidanloo
- Abasalt Hosseinzadeh Colagar
- Zahra Bagheryan
Journal of Biosciences (2019)
WT1 expression in vessels varies with histopathological grade in tumour-bearing and control tissue from patients with breast cancer
- Richard J. McGregor
- You-Ying Chau
- Patrick W. F. Hadoke
British Journal of Cancer (2018)
Involvement of DHH and GLI1 in adrenocortical autograft regeneration in rats
- Nae Takizawa
- Susumu Tanaka
- Hisao Yamada
Scientific Reports (2018)
WT1 expression in breast cancer disrupts the epithelial/mesenchymal balance of tumour cells and correlates with the metabolic response to docetaxel
- Mara Artibani
- Andrew H. Sims
- Peter Hohenstein
Scientific Reports (2017)
WT1-AS promotes cell apoptosis in hepatocellular carcinoma through down-regulating of WT1
- Long Lv
- Gong Chen
- Jianping Gong
Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research (2015)

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.