Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Similarities between the growth dynamics of university research and of competitive economic activities

Nature volume 400, pages 433–437 (1999)Cite this article

Abstract

Quantifying the dynamics of research activities is of considerable current interest, not least because of recent changes in research and development (R&D) funding1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9. Here we quantify and analyse university research activities, and compare their growth dynamics with those of business firms10,11,12,13,14. Our study involves the analysis of five distinct databases, the largest of which is a National Science Foundation database of the R&D expenditures in science and engineering for a 17-year period (1979–95) in 719 United States universities. We find that the distribution of growth rates displays a ‘universal’ form that does not depend on the size of the university or on the measure of size used; and the width of this distribution decays with size as a power law. These findings are quantitatively similar to those of business firms10,11,12,13,14, and so are consistent with the hypothesis that the growth dynamics of complex organizations are governed by universal mechanisms. One possible explanation for these similarities is that the combination of peer review and government direction leads to an outcome similar to that induced by market forces (where the analogues of peer review and government direction are, respectively, consumer evaluation and product regulation).

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Growth dynamics of research activities at universities.
Figure 2: Robustness of empirical findings for the distribution of growth rates.
Figure 3: Statistical analysis of the units forming the internal structure of a university, the schools.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Moed, H. F., Luwel, M., Houben, J. A., Van Den Berghe, H. & Spruyt, E. Funding and research performance. Nature 392, 119 (1997).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. Miflin, B. Institutes top UK science league table. Nature 390, 12 (1997).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Buffetaut, E. No independence for French researchers. Nature 392, 542 (1998).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Anderson, C. Job security—Tenure, under fire once again, still holds strong. Science 265, 1923 (1994).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Holden, C. Tenure turmoil sparks reforms. Science 276, 24–26 (1997).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Halpern, J. J. & Velleman, P. F. Tenure tracking. Science 276, 1321 (1997).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Geissman, J. W.et al. Tenure tracking. Science 276, 1320–1321 (1997).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Gazzaniga, M. S. How to change the university. Science 282, 237 (1998).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Cooper, W. E. Restructuring the university. Science 282, 1047 (1998).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Gibrat, R. Les Inégalités Economiques (Sirey, Paris, (1931).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Ijiri, Y. & Simon, H. A. Skew Distributions and the Sizes of Business Firms (North Holland, Amsterdam, (1977).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Sutton, J. Gibrat's legacy. J. Econ. Lit. 35, 40–59 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Stanley, M. H. R.et al. Scaling behaviour in the growth of companies. Nature 379, 804–806 (1996).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Takayasu, H. & Okuyama, K. Country dependence on company size distributions and a numerical model based on competition and cooperation. Fractals 6, 67–79 (1998).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Vicsek, T. Fractal Growth Phenomena 2nd edn (World Scientific, Singapore, (1992).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  16. Bunde, A. & Havlin, S. Fractals and Disordered Systems (Springer, Berlin, (1991).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  17. National Science Foundation, DivisionofScienceResourcesStudie Academic Research and Development Expenditures (NSF, Arlington, Virginia, (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Braun, T. & Schubert, A. Indicators of research output in the sciences for 5 central European countries. Scientometrics 36, 145–165 (1996).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Lewison, G. New bibliometric techniques for the evaluation of medical schools. Scientometrics 41, 5–16 (1998).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Schwarz, A. W., Schwarz, S. & Tijssen, R. J. W. Research and research impact of a technical univeristy—A bibliometric study. Scientometrics 41, 371–388 (1998).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. United States University Science Indicators on Diskette, 1981–1997 (Inst. for Scientific Information, Philadelphia, (1998).

  22. Narin, F. Patents as indicators for the evaluation of industrial research output. Scientometrics 34, 489–496 (1995).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. United States Patent and Trademarks Office Databases 1976–1997 〈http://www.uspto.gov〉.

  24. Higher Education Funding Council for England The 1996 Research Assessment Exercise (HEFCE, Bristo, (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada NSERC Grant Database for 1991–1998 (NSERC, Ottaw, (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Summers, R. & Heston, A. The Penn World Tables (Mark 5): An expanded set of international comparisons, 1950–1988. Q. J. Econ. 106, 327–368 (1991).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Durlauf, S. N. On the convergence and divergence of growth rates. Econ. J. 106, 1016–1018 (1996).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  28. Lee, Y., Amaral, L. A. N., Canning, D., Meyer, M. & Stanley, H. E. Universal features in the growth dynamics of complex organizations. Phys. Lev. Lett. 81, 3275–3278 (1998).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Amaral, L. A. N., Buldyrev, S. V., Havlin, S., Salinger, M. A. & Stanley, H. E. Power law scaling for a system of interacting units with complex internal structure. Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 1385–1388 (1998).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Jovanovic, B. The diversification of production. Brookings Pap. Econ. Activity: Microeconomics (1) 197–247 (1993).

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank M. Barthélemy, S. V. Buldyrev, D. Canning, X. Gabaix, S. Havlin, P. Ch. Ivanov, H. Kallabis, Y. Lee and B. Roehner for discussions. We also thank N. Bayers, E. Garfield, and especially R. E. Hudson for help with obtaining the ISI database, and H. F. Moed for comments on the manuscript, and in particular for suggesting the arguments about effectiveness used in the last paragraph. This work was supported by the NSF. L.A.N.A. thanks FCT/Portugal for support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Center for Polymer Studies and Department of Physics, Boston University, Boston, 02215, Massachusetts, USA

    Vasiliki Plerou, Luís A. Nunes Amaral, Parameswaran Gopikrishnan, Martin Meyer & H. Eugene Stanley

  2. Department of Physics, Boston College, Chestnut Hill, 02167, Massachusetts, USA

    Vasiliki Plerou

Authors
  1. Vasiliki Plerou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Luís A. Nunes Amaral
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Parameswaran Gopikrishnan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Martin Meyer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. H. Eugene Stanley
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to H. Eugene Stanley.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Plerou, V., Amaral, L., Gopikrishnan, P. et al. Similarities between the growth dynamics of university research and of competitive economic activities. Nature 400, 433–437 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1038/22719

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/22719

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing