Skip to main content
Log in

Instructional Design Consequences of an Analogy between Evolution by Natural Selection and Human Cognitive Architecture

  • Published:
Instructional Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Evolution by natural selection may becharacterized as a system in which a largestore of genetic information will persistindefinitely while it remains coordinated withits environment but will continuously producesmall random variations that are tested forenvironmental effectiveness. In anyenvironment, effective variations will persistwhile ineffective variations will disappear.Similarly, human cognitive architectureincludes a large store of information held inlong-term memory that coordinates our cognitiveactivities. A very limited working memory teststhe effectiveness of small variations tolong-term memory with effective variationsaltering long-term memory while ineffectivevariations are lost. Both an existing geneticcode and information in long-term memoryprovide a central executive that guidesbehaviour. Such a central executive isunavailable when an environment alters or whenworking memory must be used to deal with novelinformation. A major function of instructionaldesign is to provide the otherwise missingstructure of a central executive when dealingwith novel information and to reduce thatstructural support as knowledge accumulates inlong-term memory. Cognitive load theory bothprovides instructional design principles thatwould be difficult to devise without itsparticular view of human cognitive architectureand throws further light on that architecture.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Ayres, P. (1993) Why goal-free problems can facilitate learning, Contemporary Educational Psychology 18:376–381.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baddeley, A. (1992) Working memory, Science 255: 556–559.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bobis, J., Sweller, J. & Cooper, M. (1993) Cognitive load effects in a primary school geometry task, Learning and Instruction 3: 1–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bobis, J., Sweller, J. & Cooper, M. (1994) Demands imposed on primary-school students by geometric models, Contemporary Educational Psychology 19: 108–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruner, J. (1961) The act of discovery, Harvard Educational Review 31: 21–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brünken, R., Plass, J. & Leutner, D. (2004) Assessment of cognitive load in multimedia learning with dual-task methodology: Auditory load and modality effects, Instructional Science 32(1–2): 115–133 (this issue).

    Google Scholar 

  • Burns, B. & Vollmeyer, R. (2002) Goal Specificity effects on hypothesis testing in problem solving, Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 55A: 241–261.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, W. (1994) Using worked examples as an instructional support in the algebra classroom, Journal of Educational Psychology 86: 360–367.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cerpa, N., Chandler, P. & Sweller, J. (1996) Some conditions under which integrated computer-based training software can facilitate learning, Journal of Educational Computing Research 15: 345–367.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chandler, P. & Sweller, J. (1991) Cognitive load theory and the format of instruction, Cognition and Instruction 8: 293–332.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chandler, P. & Sweller, J. (1992) The split-attention effect as a factor in the design of instruction, British Journal of Educational Psychology 62: 233–246.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chandler, P. & Sweller, J. (1996) Cognitive load while learning to use a computer program, Applied Cognitive Psychology 10: 151–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chase, W.G. & Simon, H.A. (1973) Perception in chess, Cognitive Psychology 4: 55–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, G. & Sweller, J. (1987) The effects of schema acquisition and rule automation on mathematical problem-solving transfer. Journal of Educational Psychology 79: 347–362.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, G., Tindall-Ford, S., Chandler, P. & Sweller, J. (2001) Learning by imagining, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied 7: 68–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Craig, S., Gholson, B. & Driscoll, D. (2002) Animated pedagogical agents in multimedia educational environments: Effects of agent properties, picture features, and redundancy, Journal of Educational Psychology 94: 428–434.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Groot, A. (1965) Thought and Choice in Chess. The Hague, Netherlands: Mouton (original work published 1946).

    Google Scholar 

  • Egan, D.E. & Schwartz B.J. (1979) Chunking in recall of symbolic drawings, Memory and Cognition 7: 149–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ericsson, K.A. & Kintsch, W. (1995) Long-term working memory, Psychological Review 102: 211–245.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geddes, B. & Stevenson, R. (1997) Explicit learning of a dynamic system with a non-salient pattern, Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 50A: 742–765.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ginns, P., Chandler, P. & Sweller, J. (2003) When imagining information is effective, Contemporary Educational Psychology 28: 229–251.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeffries, R., Turner, A., Polson, P. & Atwood, M. (1981) Processes involved in designing software. In: J.R. Anderson (ed), Cognitive Skills and Their Acquisition, pp. 255–283. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeung, H., Chandler, P. & Sweller, J. (1997) The role of visual indicators in dual sensory mode instruction, Educational Psychology 17: 329–343.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalyuga, S., Ayres, P., Chandler, P. & Sweller, J. (2003) Expertise reversal effect, Educational Psychologist 38: 23–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalyuga, S., Chandler, P. & Sweller, J. (1998) Levels of expertise and instructional design, Human Factors 40: 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalyuga, S., Chandler, P. & Sweller, J. (1999) Managing split-attention and redundancy in multimedia instruction, Applied Cognitive Psychology 13: 351–371.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalyuga, S., Chandler, P. & Sweller, J. (2000) Incorporating learner experience into the design of multimedia instruction, Journal of Educational Psychology 92: 126–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalyuga, S., Chandler, P. & Sweller, J. (2001) Learner experience and efficiency of instructional guidance, Educational Psychology 21: 5–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalyuga, S., Chandler, P., Tuovinen, J. & Sweller, J. (2001) When problem solving is superior to studying worked examples, Journal of Educational Psychology 93: 579–588.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marcus, N., Cooper, M. & Sweller, J. (1996) Understanding instructions, Journal of Educational Psychology 88: 49–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, R. & Anderson, R. (1991) Animations need narrations: An experimental test of a dual-coding hypothesis, Journal of Educational Psychology 83: 484–490.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, R. & Anderson, R. (1992) The instructive animation: Helping students build connections between words and pictures in multimedia learning, Journal of Educational Psychology 84: 444–452.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, R., Bove, W., Bryman, A., Mars, R. & Tapangco, L. (1996) When less is more: Meaningful learning from visual and verbal summaries of science textbook lessons, Journal of Educational Psychology 88: 64–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, R., Heiser, J. & Lonn, S. (2001) Cognitive contraints on multimedia learning: When presenting more material results in less understanding, Journal of Educational Psychology 93: 187–198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, R. & Moreno, R. (1998) A split-attention effect in multimedia learning: Evidence for dual-processing systems in working memory, Journal of Educational Psychology 90: 312–320.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNamara, D., Kintsch, E., Songer, N.B. & Kintsch, W. (1996) Are good texts always better? Interactions of text coherence, Background knowledge, and levels of understanding in learning from text, Cognition and Instruction 14: 1–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, G.A. (1956) The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information, Psychological Review 63: 81–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, C., Lehman, J. & Koedinger, K. (1999) Goals and learning in microworlds, Cognitive Science 23: 305–336.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moreno, R. & Mayer, R. (1999) Cognitive principles of multimedia learning: The role of modality and contiguity, Journal of Educational Psychology 91: 358–368.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mousavi, S.Y., Low, R. & Sweller, J. (1995) Reducing cognitive load by mixing auditory and visual presentation modes, Journal of Educational Psychology 87: 319–334.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mwangi, W. & Sweller, J. (1998) Learning to solve compare word problems: The effect of example format and generating self-explanations, Cognition and Instruction 16: 173–199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Owen, E. & Sweller, J. (1985) What do students learn while solving mathematics problems? Journal of Educational Psychology 77: 272–284.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paas, F. (1992) Training strategies for attaining transfer of problem-solving skill in statistics: A Cognitive-Load approach, Journal of Educational Psychology 84: 429–434.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paas, F., Camp, G. & Rikers, (2001) Instructional compensation for age-related cognitive declines: Effects of goal specificity in maze learning, Journal of Educational Psychology 93: 181–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paas, F. & Van Merriënboer, J. (1994) Variability of worked examples and transfer of geometrical problem solving skills: A cognitive-load approach, Journal of Educational Psychology 86: 122–133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paas, F., Renkl, A. & Sweller, J. (2003) Cognitive load theory and instructional design, Educational Psychologist 38: 1–4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Penney, C.G. (1989) Modality effects and the structure of short term verbal memory, Memory and Cognition 17: 398–422.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, L. & Peterson, M. (1959) Short-term retention of individual verbal items, Journal of Experimental Psychology 58: 193–198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pillay, H. (1994) Cognitive load and mental rotation: structuring orthographic projection for learning and problem solving, Instructional Science 22: 91–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollock, E., Chandler, P. & Sweller, J. (2002) Assimilating complex information, Learning and Instruction 12: 61–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quilici, J.L. & Mayer, R.E. (1996) Role of examples in how students learn to categorize statistics word problems, Journal of Educational Psychology 88: 144–161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reder, L. & Anderson, J.R. (1980) A comparison of texts and their summaries: Memorial consequences, Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 19: 121–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reder, L. & Anderson, J.R. (1982) Effects of spacing and embellishment on memory for main points of a text, Memory and Cognition 10: 97–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Renkl, A. (1997) Learning from worked-out examples: A study on individual differences, Cognitive Science 21: 1–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Renkl, A. & Atkinson, R.K. (2003) Structuring the transition from example study to problem solving in cognitive skill acquisition: A cognitive load perspective, Educational Psychologist 38: 15–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Renkl, A., Atkinson, R.K. & Maier, U.H. (2000) From studying examples to solving problems: Fading worked-out solution steps helps learning. In: L. Gleitman & A.K. Joshi (eds), Proceeding of the 22nd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, pp. 393–398. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Renkl, A., Atkinson, R., Maier, U. & Staley, R. (2002) From example study to problem solving: Smooth transitions help learning, Journal of Experimental Education 70: 293–315.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sweller, J. (1988) Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning, Cognitive Science 12: 257–285.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sweller, J. (1994) Cognitive load theory, learning difficulty and instructional design, Learning and Instruction 4: 295–312.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sweller, J. (1999) Instructional Design in Technical Areas. Melbourne: ACER Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sweller, J. (2003) Evolution of human cognitive architecture. In: B. Ross (ed), The Psychology of Learning and Motivation, Vol. 43, pp. 215–266. San Diego: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sweller, J. & Chandler, P. (1994) Why some material is difficult to learn, Cognition and Instruction 12: 185–233.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sweller, J., Chandler, P., Tierney, P. & Cooper, M. (1990) Cognitive load and selective attention as factors in the structuring of technical material, Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 119: 176–192.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sweller, J. & Cooper, G.A. (1985) The use of worked examples as a substitute for problem solving in learning algebra, Cognition and Instruction 2: 59–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sweller, J. & Levine, M. (1982) Effects of goal specificity on means-ends analysis and learning, Journal of Experimental Psychology; Learning, Memory, and Cognition 8: 463–474.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sweller, J., Mawer, R. & Ward, M. (1983) Development of expertise in mathematical problem solving, Journal of Experimental Psychology; General 112: 634–656.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sweller, J., Van Merriënboer, J. & Paas, F. (1998) Cognitive architecture and instructional design, Educational Psychology Review 10: 251–296.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tarmizi, R. & Sweller, J. (1988) Guidance during mathematical problem solving, Journal of Educational Psychology 80: 424–436.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tindall-Ford, S., Chandler, P. & Sweller, J. (1997) When two sensory modes are better than one, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied 3: 257–287.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trafton, J.G. & Reiser, B.J. (1993) The contribution of studying examples and solving problems to skill acquisition, Proceedings of the 15th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, pp. 1017–1022. Hillsdale: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tuovinen, J. & Sweller, J. (1999) A comparison of cognitive load associated with discovery learning and worked examples, Journal of Educational Psychology 91: 334–341.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Merriënboer, J. (1990) Strategies for programming instruction in high school: Program completion vs. program generation, Journal of Educational Computing Research 6: 265–287.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Merriënboer, J. & de Croock, M. (1992) Strategies for computer-based programming instruction: Program completion vs. program generation, Journal of Educational Computing Research 8: 365–394.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Merriënboer, J., Kirschner, P. & Kester, L. (2003) Taking the load off a learner's mind: Instructional design for complex learning, Educational Psychologist 38: 5–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Merriënboer, J. & Krammer, H. (1987) Instructional strategies and tactics for the design of introductory computer programming courses in high school, Instructional Science 16: 251–285.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Merriënboer, J., Schuurman, J., de Croock, M. & Paas, F. (2002) Redirecting learner's attention during training: Effects on cognitive load, transfer test performance and training efficiency, Learning and Instruction 12: 11–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vollmeyer, R., Burns, B. & Holyoak, K. (1996) The impact of goal specificity on strategy use and the acquisition of problem structure, Cognitive Science 20: 75–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ward, M. & Sweller, J. (1990) Structuring effective worked examples, Cognition and Instruction 7: 1–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yeung, A., Jin, P. & Sweller, J. (1998) Cognitive load and learner expertise: Split-attention and redundancy effects in reading with explanatory notes, Contemporary Educational Psychology 23: 1–21.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sweller, J. Instructional Design Consequences of an Analogy between Evolution by Natural Selection and Human Cognitive Architecture. Instructional Science 32, 9–31 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:TRUC.0000021808.72598.4d

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:TRUC.0000021808.72598.4d

Keywords

Navigation