Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-wq2xx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T17:18:32.075Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Evaluation of an Unplanned School Closure in a Colorado School District: Implications for Pandemic Influenza Preparedness

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 March 2015

Erin E. Epson ,
Yenlik A. Zheteyeva ,
Jeanette J. Rainey ,
Hongjiang Gao ,
Jianrong Shi ,
Amra Uzicanin  and
Lisa Miller
Erin E. Epson
Affiliation:
Epidemic IntelligenceService, Atlanta, Georgia Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia;and Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment, Denver, Colorado
Yenlik A. Zheteyeva*
Affiliation:
Division of Global Migration and Quarantine, Community Interventions for Infection Control Unit, , Atlanta, Georgia
Jeanette J. Rainey
Affiliation:
Division of Global Migration and Quarantine, Community Interventions for Infection Control Unit, , Atlanta, Georgia
Hongjiang Gao
Affiliation:
Division of Global Migration and Quarantine, Community Interventions for Infection Control Unit, , Atlanta, Georgia
Jianrong Shi
Affiliation:
Division of Global Migration and Quarantine, Community Interventions for Infection Control Unit, , Atlanta, Georgia
Amra Uzicanin
Affiliation:
Division of Global Migration and Quarantine, Community Interventions for Infection Control Unit, , Atlanta, Georgia
Lisa Miller
Affiliation:
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia;and Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment, Denver, Colorado
*
Correspondence and reprint requests to Yenlik A. Zheteyeva, MD, MPH, CDC – DGMQ, 1600 Clifton Rd NE, Atlanta, GA 30333 (e-mail: igg0@cdc.gov).
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objective

From January 29 through February 5, 2013, a school district outside metropolitan Denver, Colorado, was closed because of absenteeism related to influenza-like illness (ILI) among students and staff. We evaluated the consequences and acceptability of the closure among affected households.

Methods

We conducted a household survey regarding parent or guardian employment and income interruptions, alternative child care arrangements, interruption of noneducational school services, ILI symptoms, student re-congregation, and communication preferences during the closure.

Results

Of the 35 (31%) of 113 households surveyed, the majority (28 [80%]) reported that the closure was not challenging. Seven (20%) households reported challenges: 5 (14%) reported that 1 or more adults missed work, 3 (9%) reported lost pay, and 1 (3%) reported challenges because of missed subsidized school meals. The majority (22 [63%]) of households reported that a hypothetical 1-month closure would not represent a problem; 6 of 8 households that did anticipate challenges reported that all adults worked outside the home. The majority (58%) of students visited at least 1 outside venue during the closure.

Conclusions

A brief school closure did not pose a major problem for the majority of the affected households surveyed. School and public health officials should consider the needs of families in which all adults work outside the home when creating school closure contingency plans. (Disaster Med Public Health Preparedness. 2015;9:4-8)

Keywords

pandemicsdecision makingorganizationalemergency preparednesspublic healthhealth policy
Type
Brief Report
Information
Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness , Volume 9 , Issue 1 , February 2015 , pp. 4 - 8
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Disaster Medicine and Public Health, Inc. 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Longini, IM Jr, Koopman, JS, Monto, AS, Fox, JP. Estimating household and community transmission parameters for influenza. Am J Epidemiol. 1982;115:736-751.Google Scholar
2.Viboud, C, Boelle, PY, Cauchemez, S, et al. Risk factors of influenza transmission in households. Br J Gen Pract. 2004;54:684-689.Google Scholar
3. Task Force on Community Preventive Services. Emergency preparedness and response: school dismissals to reduce transmission of pandemic influenza. http://www.thecommunityguide.org/emergencypreparedness/schooldismissals.html. Published August 2012. Accessed January 6, 2015.Google Scholar
4.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Impact of seasonal influenza-related school closures on families—Southeastern Kentucky, February 2008. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2009;58:1405-1409.Google Scholar
5.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Parental attitudes and experiences during school dismissals related to 2009 influenza A (H1N1)—United States, 2009. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2010;59:1131-1134.Google Scholar
6.Borse, RH, Behravesh, CB, Dumanovsky, T, et al. Closing schools in response to the 2009 pandemic influenza A H1N1 virus in New York City: economic impact on households. Clin Infect Dis. 2011;52(suppl 1):S168-S172.Google Scholar
7.Johnson, AJ, Moore, ZS, Edelson, PJ, et al. Household responses to school closure resulting from outbreak of influenza B, North Carolina. Emerg Infect Dis. 2008;14:1024-1030.Google Scholar
8.Gift, TL, Palekar, RS, Sodha, SV, et al. Household effects of school closure during pandemic (H1N1) 2009, Pennsylvania, USA. Emerg Infect Dis. 2010;16:1315-1317.Google Scholar
9. Influenza Surveillance Summary, Colorado, 2012-2013. Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment. https://www.colorado.gov/pacific/sites/default/files/DC_ComDis_Influenza-Surveillance-Summary-2012-2013_0.pdf. Published November 19, 2013. Accessed January 6, 2015.Google Scholar
10. US Census Bureau. State & County QuickFacts. Elbert County, Colorado. Washington, DC: US Census Bureau; 2012. http://quickfacts.census.gov/qfd/states/08/08039.html. Last revised December 4, 2014. Accessed January 6, 2015.Google Scholar
11. US Department of Education. National Center for Education Statistics website. http://nces.ed.gov/. Accessed January 6, 2015.Google Scholar