How Effective are Cash Transfers at Improving Nutritional Status?
Introduction
One of the most widely implemented development policies over the past years has been the Cash Transfer (CT) program, implemented in as many as 48 countries as of 2008 (see Barrientos, Niño-Zarazúa, & Maitrot, 2010 for a list). Targeted toward the poor, these programs distribute cash payments. A common variant, the Conditional Cash Transfer program (CCT) distributes cash if recipients meet conditions typically including sending children to school and/or getting regular health care.
CT programs have achieved success on many fronts, such as improving consumption levels, school attendance, and access to health care (particularly preventive health care, such as growth monitoring and vaccinations) while decreasing child labor (Fiszbein & Schady, 2009). However, these programs have not consistently improved recipient children’s height for age, a common measure of nutritional status. Sometimes this is a stated objective and sometimes not; still, the question arises of whether the transfers are increasing consumption, and if those consumption gains are translating into improved health for members of the household. Since the health of pregnant women and young children can be seen in young children’s nutritional status, a look at height for age shows whether the transfers are achieving improved health for some of the recipients. This paper analyzes the state of the evidence regarding the relationship between cash transfer programs and the nutritional status of children in recipient households. It addresses the question of which intervention and population characteristics facilitate or limit the effects of transfers on nutritional status.
While previous works have mentioned the issue as part of broader surveys of the relationship between CTs and health, none have focused on the issue per se, none have included unconditional cash transfer programs as a comparison, and none have looked at anthropometrics beyond five programs in Latin America. This paper accomplishes these aims.
In the next section we discuss our two focal points: cash transfer programs and nutritional status. Following that we review the links between the two, including a short summary of the theoretical relationship. After describing the theory we describe our methodology and then our results, and conclude.
Section snippets
Literature review
CCTs’ conditions are designed to incentivize household investment in human capital accumulation. High discount rates or the undervaluing of services such as education or health care are assumed to be keeping the poor from making optimal decisions, and so CCTs set up incentives to get households to properly optimize. Although this paternalistic view may be naïve, positive externalities from education and health care also imply that the socially optimal level of investment may not be chosen by
Search methods
We gathered data by systematically searching for all existing studies which examine the impact of a cash transfer program on child anthropometric outcomes. In particular, included studies had to report authors’ original estimates of the impact of an intervention, at least one component of which was a direct cash transfer. In addition, the relevant studies had to focus on the program effect on height for age or weight for age, another measure of nutritional status.
Our search started with an
Search results
Through this process, we examined over 30,000 articles, not including journals hand-searched. The set of final usable articles is summarized in Table 1. The PRISMA flow diagram (slightly modified from Moher, Liberati, Tetzlaff, & Altman, 2009) in the Appendix also summarizes the search. Database searches identified 16,467 records, and an additional 13,740 were located on the institutional websites. Citations were screened by title and abstract to isolate empirical studies of cash transfer
Data analysis
Statistical consideration provides a more objective means of identifying trends (Mann, 1990) though the small number of subgroups makes clean identification difficult. We first use a forest plot to evaluate the overall trend toward effectiveness. Next, we compare some theory-based covariates with observed anthropometric outcomes.
Discussion
By systematically canvassing the literature on cash transfer programs, we identified many studies assessing impacts on nutritional status. Programs vary greatly in effectiveness, depending on a variety of program, recipient, environmental, and study characteristics. On average we see nominally positive but insignificant effects on nutritional status, verifying previous researchers’ observation that such programs have inconsistent effects on child nutritional status. (It bears repeating that the
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank the Department for International Development (DFID), United Kingdom and 3ie for funding this study and seminar participants at the International Food Policy Research Institute, Midwest International Economic Development Conference, and the American Agricultural Economics Association Meetings. Additionally, we would like to thank Alessandro Romeo, Brad Barham, Hugh Waddington, Jef Leroy, and M. Caridad Araujo for their help. All errors in the paper remain our own and the
References (22)
- et al.
Role of cash in conditional cash transfer programs for child health, growth, and development: An analysis of Mexico’s Oportunidades
The Lancet
(2008) Welfare grants and their impact on child health: The case of Sri Lanka
World Development
(2008)Conditional cash transfers are associated with a small reduction in the rate of weight gain of preschool children in Northeast Brazil
Journal of Nutrition
(2004)- Ahmed, A. U., et al. (2009). Comparing food and cash transfers to the ultra poor in Bangladesh. Research Monograph 163....
- Attanasio, O., Gómez, L., Heredia, P., & Vera-Hernández, M. (2005). The short term impact of a conditional cash subsidy...
- Barrios, F., Galeano, L., & Sánchez, S. (2008). El impacto del programa Tekoporâ de Paraguay en la nutrición, el...
- Baulch, B. (2010). The medium-term impact of the primary education stipend in rural Bangladesh. Discussion Paper 00976....
- Behrman, J., Fernald, L., Gertler, P., Neufeld, L. M., & Parker, S. (2008). Evaluación externa del Programa...
Grandmothers and granddaughters: Old-age pensions and intrahousehold allocation in South Africa
The World Bank Economic Review
(2003)- et al.
10-Year effect of Oportunidades, Mexico’s conditional cash transfer program, on child growth, cognition, language, and behavior: A longitudinal follow-up study
The Lancet
(2009)
Cited by (0)
- 3
Studies may have since been updated or published in peer reviewed journals. We cite the work as was available during our search.