Evaluation of ammonia and odour emissions from animal slurry and digestate storage in the Po Valley (Italy)

Highlights

• The storage facilities for animal manure determine ammonia and odour emissions.

• These emissions cause environmental problems and annoyance to inhabitants.

• The determination of emission rates is useful to quantify these problems.

• Ammonia and odours have been detected studying four storage facilities during two years.

• Both ammonia and odour emitted depended upon slurries’ characteristics and environmental parameters.

Abstract

Ammonia and odour emissions from one lagoon (Lagoon 1: pig slurry) and three tanks (Tank 2: cow slurry; Tank 3: digestate from pig slurry and energy crops; Tank 4: digestate from pig and cow slurries plus energy crop) used for slurry storage were sampled for two years (2015–2017) in livestock farms that differed for animal breeding and manure management (anaerobic digestion).

On average, the ammonia emission rate (AER) was higher for Tank 3 (AER of 30.68 ± 28.1 g N-NH₃ m⁻² d⁻¹) than for Lagoon 1 and Tank 2 and 4, i.e. 9.29 ± 14.89 gN-NH₃ m⁻² d⁻¹, 9.38 ± 13.75 g N-NH₃ m⁻² d⁻¹, 15.74 ± 21.91 g N-NH₃ m⁻² d⁻¹, respectively. PLS regression analysis (R² = 0.544; R²_Adj. = 0.484) indicated that temperature was the main predictor of ammonia emitted, followed by concentration in the slurry of total ammonia and the relative percentage of volatile solids (VS).

On the other hand, PLS analysis (R² = 0.529, R²adj. = 0.417) indicated that odour emissions from animal slurry storages depended similarly upon total solids and VS (both referred to fresh weight) slurry contents, TAN/TKN ratio and degrees of biological stability (measured by anaerobic biogas potential – ABP), resulting in the Specific Odours Emission Rates (SOER) of 12,124 ± 7,914 and 35,207 ± 41,706 OUE m⁻² h⁻¹, 65,430 ± 45,360 and 43,971 ± 53,350 OUE m⁻² h⁻¹, for Lagoon 1 and Tanks 2, 3 and 4. These results suggest covering the tanks to limit both ammonia and odour emissions.

Introduction

Livestock production in North America, Europe, Australia and East Asia is rising because of the increase in demand for livestock commodities. Much of this increment was concentrated in East Asia and developing countries, where the total meat production tripled between 1980 and 2002, and a further doubling of the demand is expected by 2050 (McGilloway, 2005, Thornton, 2010, World Bank, 2009). Intensive farming has been proven to be economically effective but many adverse effects, with particular reference to the handling of livestock wastes, have become evident. In particular, the increase in the quantity of manure produced by the animals has triggered concerns for environmental sustainability in relation to air, surface, ground water and land pollution (Cambra-López et al., 2010, Edeogu et al., 2001, McCrory and Hobbs, 2001).

Livestock manure is the most important source of atmospheric ammonia (NH₃) in Europe. It is estimated that agricultural activities contribute to 80–95% of ammonia emissions across Europe (Hayes et al., 2004, Leip et al., 2015). Atmospheric NH₃ readily reacts with atmospheric acids to form ammonium (NH₄⁺) which is an important constituent of aerosols causing respiratory diseases and with atmospheric precipitation, acidification and eutrophication of soil and surface waters (Ndegwa et al., 2008, Wang et al., 2015). Ammonia is the main precursor for the formation of secondary inorganic particles such as particulate matter (PM_2.5 and PM₁₀) in the atmosphere, which are considered among the most important atmospheric pollutants as regards their potential impact on human health (Carnevale et al., 2010, Erisman and Schaap, 2004, Paulot and Jacob, 2014).

Environmental regulations are becoming more rigorous concerning ammonia emissions into the atmosphere. In particular, the European Union has recently adopted the new EU directive 2016/2284 concerning the reduction of national emissions of certain atmospheric pollutants, including ammonia, i.e. member states must reduce their annual ammonia emissions progressively from 2020 to 2030.

Italy in particular, should bring its annual ammonia emissions below the permitted threshold of 354.5 GgNH₃ y⁻¹, which is equivalent to a reduction of 10% of the current value (393 GgNH₃ for the year 2015). The North of Italy (Po valley) has to make the major effort in ammonia reduction since it contributes greatly to total Italian emissions because this area represents the industrial and agricultural “locomotive” of Italy. In addition, the particular geographical conformation of the Po Valley, closed between high mountain ranges on three sides out of four, causes the accumulation of pollutants in the air, especially nitrogen oxides (NO_x), ozone (O₃), PM₁₀ and PM_2.5, which in the last decades have always exceeded the limits indicated in the Directive 2008/50/EC.

To counteract this negative phenomenon, the Lombardy Region (North Italy) is implementing a series of measures (Lombardia, 2017, Lombardia, 2018) aiming for the improvement of the air quality in the area, including ammonia emission reduction in agriculture. National statistics reveal that the agricultural sector in northern Italy contributes to 94% of the total ammonia emitted annually in Italy (year 2017) (ISPRA, 2019). In particular ammonia losses seem to be due, above all, to animal breeding, manure/slurry storage facilities and manure/slurry application to soils (Behera et al., 2013, Sommer, 1997). All these are not only responsible for ammonia emissions but they are responsible, also, for annoyance to the inhabitants due to odour production.

Odour is one of the major environmental concerns for the livestock industry. The main sources of odours include building ventilation, manure storage and land spreading. Manure storage represents the major source of complaints and lawsuits. Three major mechanisms control the odour emission from a manure storage facility: i. the chemical-physical characteristics of the state of the manure (e.g. total solid and volatile solids contents, pH, ammonia content, biological stability etc.), ii. the bio-process which the manure has undergone (e.g. aerobic vs. anaerobic digestion) and iii. the state of the air above the manure surface, which controls the process of gases transport (Q. Liu et al., 1995, Sommer and Feilberg, 2013). Often the odours produced are a direct consequence of animal manure decomposed anaerobically to form unstable intermediate by-products, resulting in a complex mixture of over 168 volatile compounds of which 30 are odorous (Hayes et al., 2004). These compounds created from natural biological reactions include organic acids, aldehydes, alcohols, fixed gases, carbonyls, esters, amines, sulphides, mercaptans, aromatics and nitrogen heterocycles (Hayes et al., 2004). Complaints about the nuisance caused by odours from livestock farms have led to the need for alternative manure management and odour control strategies (Edeogu et al., 2001, Estrada et al., 2013).

Manure/storage ammonia and odour emissions represent an important issue above all in those countries in which storage tank coverage is not obligatory. Unfortunately, there are not many available data with reference to these two types of emissions with particular reference to manure storage. Lab scale data are available but there are very few data from full scale plant studies, although these data are useful to understand the real contribution of manure storage to the total emissions and to propose appropriate counter-measures to reduce emissions.

In this work ammonia and odours emission from one lagoon and three open tanks, used for slurry/digestate storage, were sampled for two years (2015–2017) in livestock farms, providing full scale data useful to understand the contribution of slurry/digestate storage to air pollution. In addition, results obtained were critically discussed considering both chemical and biological parameters characterizing slurry/digestate.

This work has been financed by the Lombardy Region in search of data to better address practical measures and correct politics for emission reduction.