Inequalities in childhood vaccination timing and completion in London

Highlights

• Most children received their primary series according to schedule.

• Timeliness differences persisted for some ethnicities after adjusting for deprivation and area.

• Children unvaccinated at one year were unlikely to complete their course by five years of age.

• Starting but not completing the vaccine course (drop-out) is an issue for some ethnic groups.

Abstract

The UK primary vaccination course includes vaccination against diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis, polio and Haemophilus influenzae type b (DTaP/IPV/Hib) and is scheduled at ages four, 8 and 12 weeks, followed by a ‘preschool booster’ at age three years four months. Vaccine coverage is generally measured at age one, two and five years. In addition to high coverage, vaccination should be timely to maximise population protection.

Vaccination histories for 315,381 children born March 2001 to April 2010 were extracted from Child Health Information Systems in nine London health service areas and grouped into first and fifth birthday cohorts. We assessed timeliness of receipt of DTaP/IPV/Hib and drop-out rates by ethnicity, deprivation and area.

Most children received their first, second and third doses on time at two, three, and four months. Among children completing by one year and after adjusting for deprivation and health area, compared with White-British children, Somali and Bangladeshi children were less likely to have received three doses of DTaP/IPV/Hib by six months of age (−11% and −5% respectively). Differences in timeliness by deprivation and health area existed, but were smaller. Compared with White-British children, children of Polish, Somali and Caribbean ethnicities were less likely to return for preschool booster, with a drop-out rate at least 7% higher in these groups. Within the fifth birthday cohort, only 2.3% of children who were completely unvaccinated (575/25,095) at age one year were fully vaccinated by age five. Higher proportions of partially vaccinated (one or two doses) children at age one year went on to be fully vaccinated by age five ((836/3213) 26.0% and (3565/6076) 58.7% respectively).

These inequalities suggest that tailored approaches may be required to target specific groups with regards to improving vaccine uptake.

Introduction

In order to maximise population protection, vaccines should be administered on time to a high proportion of the population. The UK has an extensive childhood immunisation schedule [1]. Children attend their local general practice (GP) where the vaccines are typically administered by practice nurses. Appointments are generally scheduled by local Child Health Information Systems (CHISs) and invitations and reminders may be delivered by text message, telephone or letter depending on the local system. In London, CHISs do not operate a call and recall system, instead the parent/carer is (usually) invited by their general practice to contact them directly to arrange appointments.

The timing of each vaccine in the routine immunisation schedule is based on recommendations from the Joint Committee for Vaccinations and Immunisation (JCVI), the independent advisory body to the Department of Health [2] and is decided according to a number of factors. These factors include the ability of the immune system to respond, the age-related incidence of infection, vaccine acceptability and operational simplicity. Children not receiving vaccines, or receiving doses later than scheduled may be at increased risk of infection from the disease(s) the vaccine would have protected against.

Here we focus on the primary course, scheduled at four, eight and 12 weeks of age that protects children against diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis, polio and Haemophilus influenzae type b (since autumn 2017 the vaccine has also included hepatitis B), and preschool booster protecting against diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis and polio scheduled at three years four months of age [1]. These vaccines have been routine for decades and timeliness of receipt should be generalizable to other vaccines within the schedule offered at the same ages. Vaccine coverage of the completed primary series at one, two and five years of age has been assessed quarterly and annually as part of the Cover Of Vaccination Evaluated Rapidly (COVER) programme since the late 1980s, and the preschool booster at five years of age since the late 1990s [3]. However, little is known about the actual timings of vaccinations, how closely these follow the vaccination schedule and whether there is any variation in timing of receipt by ethnicity, deprivation, or health area of residence. Furthermore, whilst healthcare professionals are encouraged to catch-up any missed doses we have limited information on the extent to which children who miss out on scheduled vaccines receive them at a later date.

This study aimed to answer the following timing-related questions:

• Of children fully vaccinated by one year of age, what proportion are vaccinated on time (i.e. complete their primary series by six months of age)?

• Does this vary by ethnicity/deprivation/health area of residence?

• What proportion of children who are not fully vaccinated at one and five years of age have started their vaccination course (i.e. are partially vaccinated as opposed to completely unvaccinated)?

• What proportion of children start but do not complete (drop-out) vaccinations at one and five years of age?

• When do children receive their preschool booster?

• Are children caught up with primary vaccinations after one year of age?