Elsevier

Vaccine

Volume 33, Supplement 4, 27 November 2015, Pages D66-D71
Vaccine

Vaccine hesitancy: Causes, consequences, and a call to action

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2015.09.035Get rights and content

Vaccine hesitancy reflects concerns about the decision to vaccinate oneself or one’s children. There is a broad range of factors contributing to vaccine hesitancy, including the compulsory nature of vaccines, their coincidental temporal relationships to adverse health outcomes, unfamiliarity with vaccine-preventable diseases, and lack of trust in corporations and public health agencies. Although vaccination is a norm in the U.S. and the majority of parents vaccinate their children, many do so amid concerns. The proportion of parents claiming non-medical exemptions to school immunization requirements has been increasing over the past decade. Vaccine refusal has been associated with outbreaks of invasive Haemophilus influenzae type b disease, varicella, pneumococcal disease, measles, and pertussis, resulting in the unnecessary suffering of young children and waste of limited public health resources. Vaccine hesitancy is an extremely important issue that needs to be addressed because effective control of vaccine-preventable diseases generally requires indefinite maintenance of extremely high rates of timely vaccination. The multifactorial and complex causes of vaccine hesitancy require a broad range of approaches on the individual, provider, health system, and national levels. These include standardized measurement tools to quantify and locate clustering of vaccine hesitancy and better understand issues of trust; rapid, independent, and transparent review of an enhanced and appropriately funded vaccine safety system; adequate reimbursement for vaccine risk communication in doctors’ offices; and individually tailored messages for parents who have vaccine concerns, especially first-time pregnant women. The potential of vaccines to prevent illness and save lives has never been greater. Yet, that potential is directly dependent on parental acceptance of vaccines, which requires confidence in vaccines, healthcare providers who recommend and administer vaccines, and the systems to make sure vaccines are safe.

Introduction

Vaccine hesitancy reflects concerns about the decision to vaccinate oneself or one’s children. Concerns that contribute to hesitancy may be based upon the perceived need for vaccination as well as the perceived risks and benefits of vaccination. A recent report from the Strategic Advisory Group of Experts (SAGE) on Immunization of the WHO defines vaccine hesitancy as “delay in acceptance or refusal of vaccines despite availability of vaccinations services. Vaccine hesitancy is complex and context specific, varying across time, place, and vaccines. It is influenced by factors such as complacency, convenience, and confidence” [1]. Although this definition only includes people who delay or refuse vaccines, some individuals may have concerns about the decision to vaccinate while still fully vaccinating themselves and/or their children on time according to the recommended schedule or standard of care. For example, a parent may be concerned about adverse events associated with the vaccine yet recognize the value of vaccinating to protect their children from infectious diseases. This parent may vaccinate their child on time yet still have concerns, so this decision was made with hesitance.

Hesitant individuals include those who refuse some or all vaccines, delay some vaccines perhaps according to an “alternative schedule,” or accept all vaccines but remain concerned. Hesitancy is on a continuum and can be measured by assessing attitudes and beliefs toward infectious diseases and the vaccines used to prevent them. Although attitudes and beliefs that measure concerns are associated with vaccine acceptance, delay, and refusal, they do not perfectly predict vaccination decisions, as other factors such as ease of access, competing priorities, social norms, and compliance with provider recommendations and vaccination requirements for school or work can also be influential. The immediate epidemiologic risks of hesitancy are a result of vaccine delay and refusal; however, parents who are vaccinating on time despite concerns may be particularly vulnerable to misinformation, with the potential of being swayed to delay or refuse future vaccines.

In this article, we review the causes, prevalence, reasons for, impact, and relevance of vaccine hesitancy. We also include a call to action to address vaccine hesitancy and improve vaccine confidence. Although our focus is on pediatric vaccines in the U.S., many of the issues discussed below also have important implications internationally.

Section snippets

Causes of vaccine hesitancy

There is a broad range of factors contributing to vaccine concerns among parents. Vaccines have been victims of their own success. Because vaccines have effectively controlled many once-common childhood infectious diseases, parents of young children are no longer familiar with these diseases. Instead, fear has shifted to alleged vaccine reactions that typically include childhood health problems that occur around the time that many vaccines are given. Thus, a coincidental temporal relationship

The prevalence of vaccine concerns

There is no standardized tool to measure vaccine hesitancy that has been widely used; however, Opel et al. [8] recently developed and tested the validity and reliability of such a tool, and WHO’s SAGE working group recently recommended a series of survey questions in order to improve the measurement of hesitancy [1]. Although these survey questions could prove useful in developing a uniform measure for vaccine hesitancy, they need to be field tested and validated. Further limiting our ability

Reasons for delay and refusal of vaccines

Parental vaccine refusal has been associated with perceptions of susceptibility and severity of disease, safety and effectiveness of vaccines, and trust in healthcare providers and the government [12], [13], [14]. The NIS, a random-digit-dial survey of households with children aged 19–35 months followed by a mailed provider survey to obtain sampled children’s provider-confirmed vaccination histories, has included an attitudinal module in select years, allowing immunization histories to be

The impact on vaccine coverage

Fortunately, vaccination is a norm in the U.S. The majority of parents vaccinate their children. Vaccine coverage at preschool is measured through the NIS, and coverage at kindergarten entrance is reported from schools to states. Ad hoc studies can also contribute to understanding vaccine coverage.

In 2013, vaccination coverage measured by the NIS showed that 83.1% of children aged 19–35 months received four or more diphtheria, tetanus, acellular pertussis vaccine (DTaP) doses; 92.7% received

Does vaccine hesitancy matter given that most parents vaccinate their children?

Effective control of vaccine-preventable diseases requires extremely high rates of timely vaccination. For example, about 95% of the population must be vaccinated with two doses of measles-containing vaccine in order to fully benefit from community protection and interrupt disease transmission. The level of vaccine coverage needed to optimize community protection and effectively control childhood infectious diseases varies based on the infectivity of the disease, the likelihood of disease

Call to action: what can be done to address vaccine hesitancy and improve confidence?

The multifactorial and complex causes of vaccine hesitancy require a broad range of approaches, interventions, and system changes on the individual, provider, health system, and national levels. An improved understanding of issues of trust in healthcare providers, the healthcare system, and public health authorities and how these factors vary among different subpopulations would help inform these efforts. Standardized measurement tools such as those recommended by SAGE [1] would facilitate the

Conclusions

The potential of vaccines to reduce suffering, save lives, and curb healthcare spending has never been greater. Yet, that potential is directly dependent on parental acceptance of vaccines, which requires confidence in vaccines, healthcare providers who recommend and administer vaccines, and the systems to make sure vaccines are safe. This complex problem requires a multilevel approach, including interventions at the individual and health system levels. We must act now, before a measles

Acknowledgments

This article is being published concurrently in the American Journal of Preventive Medicine and Vaccine. The articles are identical except for stylistic changes in keeping with each journal’s style. Either of these versions may be used in citing this article. Publication of this article was supported by Merck and Novartis.

No financial disclosures were reported by the authors of this paper.

References (48)

  • P.J. Smith et al.

    Association between health care providers’ influence on parents who have concerns about vaccine safety and vaccination coverage

    Pediatrics

    (2006)
  • B. Bardenheier et al.

    Are parental vaccine safety concerns associated with receipt of measles-mumps-rubella, diphtheria and tetanus toxoids with acellular pertussis, or hepatitis B vaccines by children?

    Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med

    (2004)
  • D.A. Gust et al.

    Underimmunization among children: effects of vaccine safety concerns on immunization status

    Pediatrics

    (2004)
  • B.G. Gellin et al.

    Do parents understand immunizations? A national telephone survey

    Pediatrics

    (2000)
  • A. Kennedy et al.

    Confidence about vaccines in the United States: understanding parents’ perceptions

    Health Aff (Millwood)

    (2011)
  • D. Gust et al.

    Immunization attitudes and beliefs among parents: beyond a dichotomous perspective

    Am J Health Behav

    (2005)
  • Washington State Department of Health. School Immunization Status Data Reports....
  • D.A. Salmon et al.

    Parental vaccine refusal in Wisconsin: a case-control study

    WMJ

    (2009)
  • D.A. Salmon et al.

    Factors associated with refusal of childhood vaccines among parents of school-aged children: a case-control study

    Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med

    (2005)
  • P.J. Smith et al.

    The association between intentional delay of vaccine administration and timely childhood vaccination coverage

    Public Health Rep

    (2010)
  • P.J. Smith et al.

    Parental delay or refusal of vaccine doses, childhood vaccination coverage at 24 months of age, and the Health Belief Model

    Public Health Rep

    (2011)
  • L.D. Elam-Evans et al.

    CDC. National, state, and selected local area vaccination coverage among children aged 19-35 months—United States, 2013

    MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep

    (2014)
  • E.T. Luman et al.

    Timeliness of childhood vaccinations in the United States: days undervaccinated and number of vaccines delayed

    JAMA

    (2005)
  • J.M. Glanz et al.

    Association between undervaccination with diphtheria, tetanus toxoids, and acellular pertussis (DTaP) vaccine and risk of pertussis infection in children 3 to 36 months of age

    JAMA Pediatr

    (2013)
  • Cited by (332)

    • Opinions and vaccination during an epidemic

      2024, Journal of Mathematical Economics
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text