Sono-myography and Sono-myoelastography of the Tender Points of Women with Fibromyalgia

Abstract

Sono-myography and sono-myoelastography have been found useful in the investigation of myofascial trigger points. The objective of this study was to use the same techniques to investigate the morphology, stiffness and blood flow of tender points in women with fibromyalgia and to compare the results with those for samples from healthy patients. Algometry tests indicated significant differences between groups (p < 0.001). Elliptical and hypoechoic areas were observed in the ultrasound images of the upper trapezius in both groups. No differences between groups were found in the number of hypoechoic areas (p = 0.167, t = 1.008); blood flow also did not differ between the groups. Larger hypoechoic areas were found in the fibromyalgia group (p = 0.139, t = 1.317). Sono-myoelastography did not reveal greater stiffness in these areas compared with the rest of the muscle. These results lead us to believe that sono-myoelastography and sono-myography, used in the diagnosis of myofascial trigger points, may not be able to discriminate tender points.

Introduction

Fibromyalgia (FM) is a non-articular form of rheumatism with chronic widespread pain of idiopathic origin. FM was included in the 10th Revision of the International Classification of Diseases in 1991 by the World Health Organization (WHO 2007). FM is characterized by widespread musculoskeletal pain, but it is also associated with such symptoms as sleep disorders, fatigue and decreased cognitive functioning. It also tends to be accompanied by pathologic findings such as depression, chronic fatigue syndrome, Raynaud's syndrome, subjective joint inflammation, arterial hypertension, rheumatoid arthritis, polyarthritis, bronchitis, diabetes, varicose veins, anxiety and migraines (Lera et al. 2009). The high prevalence of FM makes it a major health problem; its prevalence ranges from 0.7% to 20% in different study populations (Wolfe et al. 2010). In Spain, its prevalence ranges from 2.1% to 5.7% of the general population and accounts for 10% to 20% of visits to a rheumatologist and 5% to 8% of physician visits (de Miquel et al. 2010). Although FM affects the general population, its prevalence increases with age and affects women more often than men (Huynh et al. 2008). This makes it one of the most frequent causes of generalized and chronic musculoskeletal pain. Similar to its diagnosis and classification, the treatment of FM is not standardized; all types of treatments, supported and not supported by scientific evidence, have been used (Cuesta-Vargas and Adams, 2011, University of Texas, 2005). Most commonly, FM is diagnosed on the basis of the diagnostic criteria of the American College of Rheumatology (ACR), which was established in 1990 (Wolfe et al. 1990). There are also many different classifications of FM (Giesecke et al., 2003, Hassett et al., 2008, Müller et al., 2007, Thieme et al., 2004). The ACR criteria include a history of widespread pain and pain on digital palpation in at least 11 of 18 tender points (TPs). The ACR recently developed a new evaluation system that does not depend on TPs. It is intended to complement the TPs, and it also adds a symptom severity scale (Wolfe et al. 2010).

Tender points are defined as sensitive points used to diagnose FM. Many studies have cited similarities between TPs and myofascial trigger points (MTrPs), which are even occasionally confused (Borg-Stein and Stein 1996). These concepts are found in two types of non-inflammatory myalgia: TPs in FM and MTrPs in myofascial pain (Kuncewicz and Samborski 2009).

Myofascial trigger points are defined as sensitive and stiff spots with a palpable taut band of skeletal muscle fibers. These areas may be asymptomatic (latent MTrPs) or may cause pain and even referred pain (MTrPs) (Simons et al. 1999). Various elastography techniques have been proposed and developed to image the relative mechanical properties of tissue, for example, speckle tracking, which is used to evaluate myocardial function; transient elastography, which uses low-frequency transient vibration and pulse-echo ultrasound; compression elastography, which uses correlation techniques to calculate the strain map in the tissue; and sono-myoelastography (SME). SME is relatively inexpensive and easy to use; it also has been validated as a method for imaging stiff nodules in soft tissues (Sikdar et al., 2009, Taylor et al., 2000). Some studies have described the possibility of using sonography in the diagnosis of MTrPs (Sikdar et al. 2009). These studies examined ultrasound views of MTrPs; even blood flow in vessels close to MTrPs was analyzed by Doppler imaging. In studies of MTrPs, Sikdar et al., 2008, Sikdar et al., 2009, Sikdar et al., 2010 obtained ultrasound images with an elliptically shaped range of interesting areas of hypoechogenicity and MTrPs with a heterogeneous echotexture, corresponding to areas where MTrPs were located by palpation. These areas were markedly different from the rest of the muscle, images of which were isoechoic and homogeneous (Sikdar et al. 2008). Sikdar et al. (2008) also found that when vibrations were delivered through an external agent, SME revealed greater rigidity in the MTrP than in the rest of the muscle. Subsequent studies found that blood vessels near active MTrPs often produce a biphasic pattern in the waveform of blood flow (Sikdar et al. 2010). SME has recently gained attention in detecting musculoskeletal problems in tendons and muscles, particularly because of its low cost and non-invasive nature (Park and Kwon 2011). We postulate that it is possible to apply recent developments in SME imaging of the musculoskeletal system for painful points (MTrPs) to the TPs to diagnose FM, because image processing enhances diagnosis and biomedical treatment. Therefore, the objective of this study was to use sono-myography and SME to analyze the morphology, stiffness and blood flow of these TPs in patients with FM and to compare them with those of a sample of healthy patients.