Renal transplantation
Outcome
Influence of Number of Retransplants on Renal Graft Outcome

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.transproceed.2008.03.144Get rights and content

Abstract

Background

To assess the influence of number of transplants on the renal graft outcome.

Methods

Retrospective analysis of various factors that could influence the outcome of kidney retransplantation in patients receiving more than one allograft between 1993 and 2005 at our center.

Results

During the 12-year period (1993–2005), 196 patients received more than one renal transplant. Of these, 163 had two (group 1) and 33 had more than two transplants (group II). In group II, 24 patients had three, eight had four, and one had five consecutive allografts. The control group comprised of 100 randomly selected patients receiving a first graft during the same period. In group I, 53 (32.5%) grafts failed. Eighteen (11.0%) patients died with functioning grafts. In group II, 14 (41.2%) grafts failed while four patients (11.8%) died with functioning grafts. In group I, actuarial graft survival rates at 1, 2, 3, and 4 years were 82.3%, 67.3%, 55.97%, and 42.14%, respectively. In group II, the respective figures were 84.85%, 66.67%, 60.61%, and 51.52%. The difference was not statistically significant (P = .96). In the control group, 1-, 2-, 3-, and 4-year survival rates were 92%, 84, 74%, and 60%, respectively. The difference between the control and study groups was statistically significant (P = .0002).

Conclusion

Graft survival after retransplantation is relatively inferior when compared to the primary graft but still remains fairly high. Therefore, previous graft failure should not be considered as a relative contraindication for retransplantation.

Section snippets

Subjects and Methods

Data were collected from the hospital records of all patients who underwent more than one kidney transplantation in our unit from January 1993 to May 2005. Patients were divided into two groups according to whether they received two (group I) or more than two (group II) consecutive renal grafts. These two groups were compared with a control group (n = 100) of randomly selected patients receiving a first graft during the same period. The parameters studied included patient and donor

Results

During the 12-year period (1993–2005), 196 patients received more than one renal transplant. Of these, 163 had two (group I) and 33 had more than two transplants (group II). In group II, 24 patients had three, eight had four, and one had five allografts. Baseline characteristics of the patients in the two groups are shown in Table 1. The control group consisted of 100 patients with primary transplants.

Immunosuppression protocol was similar for all patients: prednisone, a calcineurin inhibitor,

Discussion

Renal allograft retransplantation constitutes only a small fraction of overall transplant activity in most transplant units. In our center, the mean number of retransplants per year is 16.4 (±4.5 SD). Over the study period of 12 years, the proportion of retransplants has remained fairly stable. Although the population of patients with failed grafts should be expected to increase with time, the above figures are in line with the finding that the proportion of patients with failed grafts

References (12)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (30)

  • Early prediction of renal graft function: Analysis of a multi-center, multi-level data set

    2022, Current Research in Translational Medicine
    Citation Excerpt :

    Currently, a large effort is being undertaken to determine new risk factors for the outcome of renal transplantation, with the goal of improving therapy and organ allocation [3–6]. While a number of risk factors have been identified (including HLA mismatch, age of donor or cold ischemia time), they are still not sufficient for a precise prediction of transplant outcome [3,4,6–8]. Therefore, machine learning-based risk assessment models are envisaged to assist medical decision-making in patient therapy and eventually improve patient care [9].

  • Clinical Prognosis of Renal Retransplant Patients: A Single-Center Experience

    2019, Transplantation Proceedings
    Citation Excerpt :

    In our study, no delayed graft function and no early acute rejection was detected during the follow-up period. Previous studies reported inferior graft survivals after retransplantation compared with primary cases [9,13,14]. However, many studies have shown that when using new immunosuppressive regimens, the survival of repeat grafts is not significantly different from the first grafts [15,16].

  • Indications, risks and impact of failed allograft nephrectomy

    2019, Transplantation Reviews
    Citation Excerpt :

    Nowadays, renal retransplantation is an accepted alternative for return to dialysis after graft failure [4]. Graft survival after retransplantation is inferior to primary graft survival, but remains fairly high [5–7]. Of alltransplantations performed in the United States, 13% are repeat transplantations [3].

  • Long-term outcome of kidney retransplantation in comparison with first kidney transplantation: A report from the thai transplantation registry

    2013, Transplantation Proceedings
    Citation Excerpt :

    Kidney retransplantation has been considered high risk because of the highly sensitized subjects and technical difficulties.9 Previous studies reported inferior graft survivals after retransplantation compared with primary cases.3–5 However, many studies have shown that when using new immunosuppressive regimens the survival of repeat grafts is not significant different from first grafts.6,7

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text