Ineligible parents, eligible children: Food Stamps receipt, allotments, and food insecurity among children of immigrants

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2004.09.001Get rights and content

Abstract

The Personal Responsibility, Work, and Reconciliation Act (PRWORA) made non-citizens ineligible for federally funded food assistance and reduced Food Stamp allotments (the amount of Food Stamps benefits provided) for households containing a mixture of citizens and non-citizens. Using the Survey of Program Dynamics, we assess the effects of PRWORA on household-level Food Stamps recipiency, Food Stamps allotments, and food security among the children of non-citizens. We find that the children of non-citizens experienced more persistent and higher levels of food insecurity following PRWORA’s enactment than the children of citizens. While declines in Food Stamps allotments substantially explain the disproportionately high levels of food insecurity among the children of non-citizens in the year following welfare reform, high levels of food insecurity continued as late as 2001 among the children of non-citizens on account of both low allotments and Food Stamps receipt among those in need of food assistance.

Introduction

Changes in welfare policy during the 1990s restricted non-citizen’s access to food assistance and may have increased food insecurity among non-citizens and their children. Food insecurity involves the limited or uncertain availability of food in a household—a condition resulting from household resource constraints (Bickel et al., 2000). Food insecurity among the children of immigrants is of policy significance because children of immigrants comprise the fastest growing segment of the US population under age 15 (Hernandez and Charney, 1998). Currently, the children of immigrants comprise one-fifth of all children in the United States (Van Hook and Fix, 2000) and 1 in 10 children live in a household with at least one non-citizen parent (Fix and Zimmermann, 2001). If children of immigrants are experiencing increasingly high levels food insecurity on account of reductions in Food Stamps eligibility, this could have long-term deleterious consequences for the physical and cognitive development of this already-disadvantaged population (Johnston and Markowitz, 1993, Morley and Lucas, 1997).

Enacted in 1996, the Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act (PRWORA) made most non-citizens with less than ten years of US residency ineligible for federally funded food assistance (for more details see Espenshade et al., 1997, Zimmermann and Tumlin, 1999). In addition, the rules under PRWORA specified that Food Stamp allotments (the amount of Food Stamps benefits provided) be reduced in proportion to the number of non-citizens living in the household. In the years following the enactment of PRWORA, Food Stamp caseloads and recipiency levels dropped particularly sharply among non-citizens and their children (Borjas, 2002, Fix, 2001, Fix and Passel, 1999, Fix and Passel, 2002), and it is likely that allotment levels dropped as well. We evaluate here the relationships among declines in Food Stamps recipiency, declines in Food Stamps allotments, and food insecurity levels among children of immigrants for the five years following PRWORA’s enactment, paying particular attention to the children of non-citizens. Although the majority of children of immigrants remained eligible for Food Stamps following welfare reform for reasons explained below, the children of non-citizens experienced the greatest drops in Food Stamps recipiency and thus may have become particularly vulnerable to food insecurity.

Section snippets

Background

Food Stamps recipiency declined more for children of non-citizen parents than other children even though most of these children were not the intended targets of welfare reform. As of 1998, 83% of children living with two non-citizen parents and 88% of children living with a non-citizen single parent were US citizens (Fix and Zimmermann, 2001), and US citizen children, regardless of their parents’ citizenship status, have been and continue to be allowed to receive Food Stamps (USDA, 2004).

Survey of program dynamics

We use the longitudinal files of the Survey of Program Dynamics (SPD) (US Census Bureau, 2001). The SPD allows us to examine Food Stamp recipiency for a cohort of children in nearly all years between 1993 and 2000 (excluding 1995 and 1996), and it includes measures of food insecurity in 1998 and 2001. The SPD was developed by the Census Bureau to evaluate the short- and medium-term effects of Welfare Reform. The SPD sample includes roughly half of the original respondents from the 1992 and 1993

Basic patterns and trends

During the 1990s, the proportion of children covered by Food Stamps declined for all nativity and citizenship groups, but children of non-citizens who never naturalized and children of parents who naturalized in the post-reform period saw the greatest declines (Table 1). Between 1993 and 2000, Food Stamps recipiency declined by 11 percentage points among children of natives and by 5 percentage points among children of citizens who naturalized before 1993. Among children of parents who

Conclusion

Children of non-citizens experienced the highest levels of food insecurity shortly following PRWORA’s enactment. Moreover, children of non-citizens did not recover as much as did other groups between 1998 and 2001, particularly if their parents had not subsequently naturalized. In this paper, we assessed whether the changes in welfare policy inaugurated by PRWORA, in particular changes that may have led to reductions in Food Stamps receipt and Food Stamps allotments, were responsible for the

References (29)

  • G.J. Borjas

    Food insecurity and public assistance

    Journal of Public Economics

    (2004)
  • J.D. Angrist et al.

    Instrumental variables and the search for identification: from supply and demand to natural experiments

    Journal of Economic Perspectives

    (2001)
  • F.D. Bean et al.

    Country of origin, type of public assistance and patterns of welfare recipiency among US immigrants and natives

    Social Science Quarterly

    (1997)
  • S.H. Bell

    Why Are Welfare Caseloads Falling

    (2001)
  • G. Bickel et al.

    Guide to Measuring Household Food Security, Revised 2000

    (2000)
  • G.J. Borjas

    Welfare reform and immigrant participation in welfare programs

    International Migration Review Winter

    (2002)
  • Capps, R., 2001. Hardships among children of immigrants: findings from the 1999 National Survey of America’s Families....
  • Dion, M.R., Pavetti, L., 2000. Access to and participation in medicaid and the Food Stamp Program: a review of the...
  • R. Dunifon et al.

    The influences of participation in the national school lunch program and food insecurity on child well-being

    Social Service Review

    (2003)
  • T. Espenshade et al.

    Implications of the 1996 welfare and immigration reform acts for US immigration

    Population and Development Review

    (1997)
  • M. Fix

    Comment to welfare reform and immigration

  • M. Fix et al.

    Trends in Non-citizens and Citizens Use of Public Benefits Following Welfare Reform: 1994–1997

    (1999)
  • M. Fix et al.

    The Scope and Impact of Welfare Reform’s Immigrant Provisions

    (2002)
  • M. Fix et al.

    All under one roof, mixed status families in an era of reform

    International Migration Review

    (2001)
  • Cited by (94)

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    This research was supported in part by a grant from the Joint Center for Poverty Research and the USDA Food Assistance Program. Infrastructure support was provided by a center grant to the Center for Family and Demographic Research from the National Institutes of Health [R21-HD-42831-01]. Further support was provided by the National Institutes of Health [R01-HD-39075-1]. The authors would like to acknowledge Rebecca Clark, Randy Capps, and Darren Lubotsky for their helpful comments and suggestions.

    View full text