Elsevier

Social Science & Medicine

Volume 232, July 2019, Pages 168-180
Social Science & Medicine

Review article
Conceptual analysis of health systems resilience: A scoping review

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.04.020Get rights and content

Highlights

  • In this paper, we provide a conceptual analysis of health systems resilience.

  • Based on the results of a scoping review, we argue that health systems resilience lacks conceptual maturity.

  • We call for clarification of the concept to guarantee effective communication and valid empirical study.

Abstract

System resilience has long been an area of study, and the term has become increasingly used across different sectors. Studies on resilience in health systems are more recent, multiplying particularly since the 2014 Ebola epidemic in West Africa. The World Health Organization (WHO) is calling for national governments to increase the resilience of their health systems. Concepts help define research objects and guide the analysis. Yet, to be useful, concepts need to be clear and precise.

We aimed to improve the conceptual understanding of health systems resilience by conducting a scoping review to describe the state of knowledge in this area. We searched for literature in 10 databases, and analyzed data using a list of themes. We evaluated the clarity and the precision of the concept of health systems resilience using Daigneault & Jacob's three dimensions of a concept: term, sense, and referent.

Of the 1091 documents initially identified, 45 met the inclusion criteria. Term: multiple terms are used, switching from one to the other to speak about the same subject. Sense: there is no consensus yet on a unique definition. Referent: the magnitude and nature of events that resilient health systems face differ with context, covering a broad range of situations from sudden crisis to everyday challenges.

The lack of clarity in this conceptualization hinders the expansion of knowledge, the creation of reliable analytical tools, and the effectiveness of communication. The current conceptualization of health systems resilience is too scattered to enable the enhancement of this concept with great potential, opening a large avenue for future research.

Section snippets

Background

The World Health Organization's (WHO) reports on the performance of health systems (World Health Organization, 2000) and on universal health coverage (World Health Organization, 2013) highlight that health systems in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) are still facing multiple challenges, owing to their performance, responsiveness, and resilience. The topic of health systems resilience has gained major traction over the past few years.

In 1973, C.S Holling (1973) worked on the resilience

Method

A scoping review is a review methodology that allows for a preliminary assessment to identify nature and extent of available evidence (including ongoing research).

We conducted our review using Arksey & O'Malley's (Arksey and O'Malley, 2005) methodological framework, based on five main stages: (a) identifying the research question; (b) identifying relevant studies; (c) studies selection; (d) charting the data; and (e) summarizing and analyzing the results. We complemented it with subsequent

Search findings

Our search strategy yielded a total of 1092 citations (903 from scientific databases, 150 from grey literature, and 39 from handsearching). That number was reduced to 752 after excluding 264 duplicate records; 77 of these were selected on the basis of their titles and abstract. A final set of 45 articles met all inclusion criteria, and were included in our review. Fig. 2 presents the Prisma chart of our study selection process and Appendix 2 includes the characteristics of selected papers.

Reflecting on main results

The widespread use of the concept of health systems resilience, and its mention in the 2016–2030 SDGs, reflect the attractiveness of the concept. This prominence has led to the publication of a profusion of papers. While drawing on three existing – and significantly different – frameworks (WHO – Kruk et al., Blanchet et al.) (van de Pas et al., 2017), many authors adapt and improve them when they identify gaps by proposing their own vision and interpretation of this concept. The multiplicity of

Conclusion

In light of these reflections, we conclude that the popular concept of health systems resilience remains highly confusing. First, the concept of health systems resilience is still polysemic (Koffi et al., 2018): it depends on one's perception, one's discipline, one's function, and what one wants to achieve. Second, depending on how the health system is perceived and the relative importance of its components, dimensions of the resilience may also be different according to users. The review shows

Acknowledgements

This work was conducted as part of the UNISSahel (Couverture UNIverselle Santé au Sahel) research program, collaborative project between the Institute for Research on Sustainable Development (IRD) and the Agenge Française de Développemnt (AFD); it has been financed by Inserm, public research institute.. We would like to thank Emmanuelle Floch-Galaud, coordinator and librarian of the college of health at the university of Bordeaux, for her careful review of the search strategy; Heather Hickey

References (72)

  • E.W. Barasa et al.

    From bouncing back, to nurturing emergence: reframing the concept of resilience in health systems strengthening

    Health Policy Plan.

    (2017)
  • E. Barasa et al.

    What is resilience and how can it Be nurtured? A systematic review of empirical literature on organizational resilience

    Int. J. Health Policy Manag.

    (2018)
  • C. Bayntun et al.

    Developing a health system approach to disaster management: a qualitative analysis of the core literature to complement the WHO Toolkit for assessing health-system capacity for crisis management

    PLoS Curr.

    (2012)
  • C. Béné et al.

    Making the Most of Resilience

    (2013)
  • K. Blanchet

    Governance of health systems

    Int. J. Health Policy Manag.

    (2013)
  • K. Blanchet

    Thinking shift on health systems: from blueprint health programmes towards resilience of health systems

    Int. J. Health Policy Manag.

    (2015)
  • K. Blanchet et al.

    Governance and capacity to manage resilience of health systems: towards a new conceptual framework

    Int. J. Health Policy Manag.

    (2017)
  • A. Boin et al.

    The rise of resilience

  • G.A. Bonanno

    Loss, trauma, and human resilience: have we underestimated the human capacity to thrive after extremely aversive events?

    Am. Psychol.

    (2004)
  • Castleden

    Resilience thinking in health protection

    J. Public Health (Oxford, England)

    (September 2011)
  • Commission on a Global Health Risk Framework for the Future, National Academy of Medicine, Secretariat. The Neglected Dimension of Global Security: A Framework to Counter Infectious Disease Crises [Internet]

    (2016)
  • P.-M. Daigneault

    La participation à l’évaluation : du concept à la mesure

    (2012)
  • P.-M. Daigneault et al.

    Les concepts souffrent-ils de négligence bénigne en sciences sociales? Eléments d’analyse conceptuelle et examen exploratoire de la littérature francophone à caractère méthodologique

    Soc. Sci. Inf.

    (2012)
  • A. Dauphiné et al.

    La résilience : un concept pour la gestion des risques, Resilience : a concept for risk management

    Ann. Geograph.

    (2007)
  • S. Degroote et al.

    Approach to identifying research gaps on vector-borne and other infectious diseases of poverty in urban settings: scoping review protocol from the VERDAS consortium and reflections on the project's implementation

    Infect. Dis. Poverty

    (2018)
  • K.L. Ebi et al.

    Some lessons learned from public health on the process of adaptation

    Mitig. Adapt. Strategies Glob. Change

    (2006)
  • J.M. Farley et al.

    Evaluation of flood preparedness in government healthcare facilities in Eastern Province, Sri Lanka

    Glob. Health Action

    (2017)
  • A.K. Fridell et al.

    Resilient Health Systems in the European Union

    (2017)
  • S. Fukuma et al.

    Fukushima after the Great East Japan Earthquake: lessons for developing responsive and resilient health systems

    J. Glob. Health

    (2017)
  • L. Gilson et al.

    Everyday resilience in district health systems: emerging insights from the front lines in Kenya and South Africa

    BMJ Glob. Health

    (2017)
  • J. Hanefeld et al.

    Towards an understanding of resilience: responding to health systems shocks

    Health Policy Plan.

    (2018)
  • J.J. Hess et al.

    Integrating climate change adaptation into public health practice: using adaptive management to increase adaptive capacity and build resilience

    Environ. Health Perspect.

    (2012)
  • C.S. Holling

    Resilience and stability of ecological systems

    Annu. Rev. Ecol. Systemat.

    (1973)
  • M.-P. Kieny et al.

    Health-system resilience: reflections on the Ebola crisis in western Africa

    Bull WHO

    (2014)
  • H. Kluge et al.

    Strengthening global health security by embedding the International Health Regulations requirements into national health systems

    BMJ Glob. Health

    (2018)
  • J.M. Koffi et al.

    Formes de résilience et stratégies de politique publique

  • Cited by (89)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text