Elsevier

Social Science & Medicine

Volume 185, July 2017, Pages 38-45
Social Science & Medicine

Does neighbourhood deprivation affect the genetic influence on body mass?

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.05.041Get rights and content

Highlights

  • The study looks at interactions between genetics and neighbourhoods.

  • Body mass index (BMI) is used as the dependent variable.

  • A twin design and multilevel modelling procedure are employed.

  • A greater genetic influence on BMI is found in deprived neighbourhoods.

  • The importance of research into gene-environment interactions is highlighted.

Abstract

Most research into the role of gene-environment interactions in the etiology of obesity has taken environment to mean behaviours such as exercise and diet. While interesting, this is somewhat at odds with research into the social determinants of obesity, in which the focus has shifted away from individuals and behaviours to the types of wider obesogenic environments in which individuals live, which influence and produce these behaviours. This study combines these two strands of research by investigating how the genetic influence on body mass index (BMI), used as a proxy for obesity, changes across different neighbourhood environments measured by levels of deprivation. Genetics are incorporated using a classical twin design with data from Twins UK, a longitudinal study of UK twins running since 1992. A multilevel modelling approach is taken to decompose variation between individuals into genetic, shared environmental, and non-shared environmental components. Neighbourhood deprivation is found to be a statistically significant predictor of BMI after conditioning on individual characteristics, and a heritability of 0.75 is estimated for the entire sample. This heritability estimate is shown, however, to be higher in more deprived neighbourhoods and lower in less deprived ones, and this relationship is statistically significant. While this research cannot say anything directly about the mechanisms behind the relationship, it does highlight how the relative importance of genetic factors can vary across different social environments, and therefore the value of considering both genetic and social determinants of health simultaneously.

Introduction

Obesity is an important public health issue due to its links to chronic diseases such as type 2 diabetes and hypertension (Kopelman, 2007), and association with increased mortality generally (Flegal et al., 2013). The worldwide prevalence of obesity has more than doubled since 1980, with the World Health Organisation (2015) describing the problem as an “escalating global epidemic”. In recent years, lack of success with interventions at the individual level in reversing this trend has led to a substantial amount of research aimed at understanding the wider food and built environments in which people live and work, which promote obesity's proximate causes of poor diet and sedentary behaviour (Lake and Townshend, 2006). These environments are often labelled ‘obesogenic’ (Egger and Swinburn, 1997). While there has been a growing body of literature on how these types of environments affect obesity, one area that has so far been unexplored is how these environments may affect the genetic influence on obesity.

Obesity has been shown to have a genetic influence. Studies exploiting the genetic relatedness of twins have estimated the heritability of body mass index (BMI), defined as the proportion of variation in a trait attributable to variation in genetics, as anywhere between 0.47 and 0.9 depending on the population studied and the method used (Elks et al., 2012). It has become increasingly acknowledged, however, that the heritability of many human traits, such as BMI, is not a constant and is dependent on the social environment (Turkheimer et al., 2003, Tuvblad et al., 2006). In other words, social factors and genetics may interact in producing health outcomes, and as such cannot be assumed to be independent. Despite this, there has been little research into how wider social contexts, such as neighbourhoods, may moderate genetic influence on obesity. Previous gene-environment interaction studies have mostly treated the environment as behaviours such as exercise (e.g. Ahmad et al. (2013)) and diet (e.g. Qi et al. (2014)), rather than the wider obesogenic environments which produce these behaviours and which are currently the focus of much social research (Boardman et al., 2013). Notable exceptions include a study by Boardman et al. (2012), which shows that school context moderates heritability of body mass index (BMI), and Rosenquist et al. (2015), who use measured genetic data to show that the relationship between variants of the fat mass and obesity-associated FTO gene and body mass index varies with cohort of birth.

Understanding the relative importance of genetic and social risk factors and how they interact can be important for future health policy. For example, it may be the case that in the most extreme obesogenic environments, the environment ‘outweighs’ the effect of an individual's genetics, having such a large effect that differences between people due to genetics are small in comparison. This may not be a causal interaction in the biological sense as the change in heritability would be due to an increase in environmental variation rather than changes in the effect of specific genes. If this were the case, it would suggest that more resources should be put into focussing on understanding social environments.

Alternatively, it may be that there are aspects of obesogenic environments that moderate genetic vulnerability to obesity and cause changes in the relationship between specific genes and obesity. If this was the case, policies could be designed that not only reduce the effect of the environment as a whole, but can also reduce the genetic influences on weight gain (Boardman et al., 2012). Another possibility could be that social policies are only effective for certain types of individuals due to their genotype. Whatever the underlying relationship between social environments and genetics, these possibilities highlight the need for research which considers both genetics and the social environment together.

In this research, neighbourhood deprivation is used as the proxy for the obesogenic environment as, according to a systematic review from Giskes et al. (2011), it is the only measure of neighbourhood environment consistently associated with obesogenic dietary intakes, even after controlling for possible confounding individual level variables. The theory is that deprived neighbourhoods may be poorer environments for food and physical activity, though the empirical evidence for the pathways through which this happens is mixed, and may differ across countries (Cummins and Macintyre, 2006, Townshend and Lake, 2009). One possibility is that access to unhealthy food is easier in deprived neighbourhoods. For example Cummins et al. (2005) show that in the UK, neighbourhood deprivation is correlated with the number of McDonalds restaurants. Another possibility is that more deprived neighbourhoods have poorer quality recreational facilities and greenspaces which may discourage physical activity (van Lenthe et al., 2005), although other research suggests access to facilities for physical activity can actually be better in deprived neighbourhoods (Pearce et al., 2007).

Additionally, as well as the built and physical environments, it may be that the social environments of neighbourhoods matter too. Neighbourhoods may have an influence on health behaviours through their influence in forming social norms and through social networks (Galster, 2012). Living in deprived neighbourhoods may also contribute to increased stress, which has been suggested to have an influence on increasing unhealthy behaviours (Pampel et al., 2010). Finally, although neighbourhoods are the focus of this study, it is important to remember that neighbourhoods themselves are only one aspect of obesogenic environments. Larger scale political and economic contexts and other small scale contexts such schools may also play an important role (Swinburn et al., 1999).

The aim of this research is to examine whether the genetic influence on BMI varies as a function of neighbourhood deprivation and if so, what the nature of this relationship is. The research is based upon data from the UK and genetic influence is included latently as heritability using data from twin pairs. The paper will proceed by first introducing the data, then outlining the statistical methodology before presenting the results and discussing their implications.

Section snippets

Data

The study uses data from Twins UK, an ongoing study of twins aged 16 and over from across the UK which began in 1992. Twins chose to become part of the study, meaning that the sample is not representative of the UK population. For historical reasons the sample is 90% female. Additionally, the sample is more highly educated and has proportionally fewer ethnic minorities than the UK population as whole. The dataset consists of measurements of height and weight, from which BMI can be calculated.

Methodology

This study uses the classical twin design which is based around comparing the correlations between monozygotic (MZ) and dizygotic (DZ) twins. The correlation between MZ twins and their co-twins is made up of environmental influences and genetic influences that the twins share. The correlation between DZ twins and their co-twins is similarly made up of shared environmental influences and genetic influences, but in contrast to MZ twins who share 100% of their genes, DZ twins share, on average,

Results

Table 2 shows the results of all models. Using equation (3) to calculate the proportion of the total variation due to genetics, Model 1 estimates a heritability of 75% across the sample. The majority of the rest of the variation is attributed to the non-shared environment, while the variance attributed to shared environmental factors is small and not statistically significant. Model 2 shows that there is a statistically significant association between neighbourhood deprivation and log BMI, even

Discussion

The results of this study show that the genetic influence on obesity is dependent upon the social environment, with a higher proportion of the variation in BMI being attributed to genetics in more deprived neighbourhoods. Additionally, the results suggest that this increase in heritability is, at least in part, due to the actual amount of variation linked to genetics increasing, rather than solely due to changes in the amount of environmental variation. The results show no evidence for

References (36)

  • J.D. Boardman et al.

    Defining the environment in gene–environment research: lessons from social epidemiology

    Am. J. Public Health

    (2013)
  • J.D. Boardman et al.

    Is the gene-environment interaction paradigm relevant to genome-wide studies? The case of education and body mass index

    Demography

    (2014)
  • S. Cummins et al.

    Food environments and obesity—neighbourhood or nation?

    Int. J. Epidemiol.

    (2006)
  • D.M. Dick

    Gene-environment interaction in psychological traits and disorders

    Annu. Rev. Clin. Psychol.

    (2011)
  • G. Egger et al.

    An “ecological” approach to the obesity pandemic

    BMJ Br. Med. J.

    (1997)
  • C.E. Elks et al.

    Variability in the heritability of body mass index: a systematic review and meta-regression

    Front. Endocrinol.

    (2012)
  • K.M. Flegal et al.

    Association of all-cause mortality with overweight and obesity using standard body mass index categories: a systematic review and meta-analysis

    Jama

    (2013)
  • G.C. Galster

    The mechanism (s) of neighbourhood effects: theory, evidence, and policy implications

  • Cited by (7)

    • Theoretical Approaches to Research on the Social Determinants of Obesity

      2022, American Journal of Preventive Medicine
      Citation Excerpt :

      The social determinants of obesity are not the entire story of excessive weight gain but are key variables in the process, sometimes acting independently of biological causes and sometimes acting together to cause people to become obese. Consequently, biomarkers are increasingly being utilized in sociologic studies of weight gain, as is the use of social variables in gene‒environment studies, to provide more thorough assessments of the causes of obesity.4,67,68 Future developments in theories of obesity in the social sciences will likely incorporate both biological and genetic views of the causal factors of obesity into their models where feasible.

    • Parental feeding practices and child eating behavior in different socioeconomic neighborhoods and their association with childhood weight. The STEPS study

      2022, Health and Place
      Citation Excerpt :

      Children growing in disadvantaged neighborhoods are at greater risk for overweight or obesity (Carroll-Scott et al., 2013; McCurdy et al., 2014; Owen et al., 2017; Rautava et al., 2022).

    • Genetic Epidemiology and Obesity

      2023, Handbook of Obesity - Volume 1: Epidemiology, Etiology, and Physiopathology, Fourth Edition
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text