Does neighbourhood deprivation affect the genetic influence on body mass?
Introduction
Obesity is an important public health issue due to its links to chronic diseases such as type 2 diabetes and hypertension (Kopelman, 2007), and association with increased mortality generally (Flegal et al., 2013). The worldwide prevalence of obesity has more than doubled since 1980, with the World Health Organisation (2015) describing the problem as an “escalating global epidemic”. In recent years, lack of success with interventions at the individual level in reversing this trend has led to a substantial amount of research aimed at understanding the wider food and built environments in which people live and work, which promote obesity's proximate causes of poor diet and sedentary behaviour (Lake and Townshend, 2006). These environments are often labelled ‘obesogenic’ (Egger and Swinburn, 1997). While there has been a growing body of literature on how these types of environments affect obesity, one area that has so far been unexplored is how these environments may affect the genetic influence on obesity.
Obesity has been shown to have a genetic influence. Studies exploiting the genetic relatedness of twins have estimated the heritability of body mass index (BMI), defined as the proportion of variation in a trait attributable to variation in genetics, as anywhere between 0.47 and 0.9 depending on the population studied and the method used (Elks et al., 2012). It has become increasingly acknowledged, however, that the heritability of many human traits, such as BMI, is not a constant and is dependent on the social environment (Turkheimer et al., 2003, Tuvblad et al., 2006). In other words, social factors and genetics may interact in producing health outcomes, and as such cannot be assumed to be independent. Despite this, there has been little research into how wider social contexts, such as neighbourhoods, may moderate genetic influence on obesity. Previous gene-environment interaction studies have mostly treated the environment as behaviours such as exercise (e.g. Ahmad et al. (2013)) and diet (e.g. Qi et al. (2014)), rather than the wider obesogenic environments which produce these behaviours and which are currently the focus of much social research (Boardman et al., 2013). Notable exceptions include a study by Boardman et al. (2012), which shows that school context moderates heritability of body mass index (BMI), and Rosenquist et al. (2015), who use measured genetic data to show that the relationship between variants of the fat mass and obesity-associated FTO gene and body mass index varies with cohort of birth.
Understanding the relative importance of genetic and social risk factors and how they interact can be important for future health policy. For example, it may be the case that in the most extreme obesogenic environments, the environment ‘outweighs’ the effect of an individual's genetics, having such a large effect that differences between people due to genetics are small in comparison. This may not be a causal interaction in the biological sense as the change in heritability would be due to an increase in environmental variation rather than changes in the effect of specific genes. If this were the case, it would suggest that more resources should be put into focussing on understanding social environments.
Alternatively, it may be that there are aspects of obesogenic environments that moderate genetic vulnerability to obesity and cause changes in the relationship between specific genes and obesity. If this was the case, policies could be designed that not only reduce the effect of the environment as a whole, but can also reduce the genetic influences on weight gain (Boardman et al., 2012). Another possibility could be that social policies are only effective for certain types of individuals due to their genotype. Whatever the underlying relationship between social environments and genetics, these possibilities highlight the need for research which considers both genetics and the social environment together.
In this research, neighbourhood deprivation is used as the proxy for the obesogenic environment as, according to a systematic review from Giskes et al. (2011), it is the only measure of neighbourhood environment consistently associated with obesogenic dietary intakes, even after controlling for possible confounding individual level variables. The theory is that deprived neighbourhoods may be poorer environments for food and physical activity, though the empirical evidence for the pathways through which this happens is mixed, and may differ across countries (Cummins and Macintyre, 2006, Townshend and Lake, 2009). One possibility is that access to unhealthy food is easier in deprived neighbourhoods. For example Cummins et al. (2005) show that in the UK, neighbourhood deprivation is correlated with the number of McDonalds restaurants. Another possibility is that more deprived neighbourhoods have poorer quality recreational facilities and greenspaces which may discourage physical activity (van Lenthe et al., 2005), although other research suggests access to facilities for physical activity can actually be better in deprived neighbourhoods (Pearce et al., 2007).
Additionally, as well as the built and physical environments, it may be that the social environments of neighbourhoods matter too. Neighbourhoods may have an influence on health behaviours through their influence in forming social norms and through social networks (Galster, 2012). Living in deprived neighbourhoods may also contribute to increased stress, which has been suggested to have an influence on increasing unhealthy behaviours (Pampel et al., 2010). Finally, although neighbourhoods are the focus of this study, it is important to remember that neighbourhoods themselves are only one aspect of obesogenic environments. Larger scale political and economic contexts and other small scale contexts such schools may also play an important role (Swinburn et al., 1999).
The aim of this research is to examine whether the genetic influence on BMI varies as a function of neighbourhood deprivation and if so, what the nature of this relationship is. The research is based upon data from the UK and genetic influence is included latently as heritability using data from twin pairs. The paper will proceed by first introducing the data, then outlining the statistical methodology before presenting the results and discussing their implications.
Section snippets
Data
The study uses data from Twins UK, an ongoing study of twins aged 16 and over from across the UK which began in 1992. Twins chose to become part of the study, meaning that the sample is not representative of the UK population. For historical reasons the sample is 90% female. Additionally, the sample is more highly educated and has proportionally fewer ethnic minorities than the UK population as whole. The dataset consists of measurements of height and weight, from which BMI can be calculated.
Methodology
This study uses the classical twin design which is based around comparing the correlations between monozygotic (MZ) and dizygotic (DZ) twins. The correlation between MZ twins and their co-twins is made up of environmental influences and genetic influences that the twins share. The correlation between DZ twins and their co-twins is similarly made up of shared environmental influences and genetic influences, but in contrast to MZ twins who share 100% of their genes, DZ twins share, on average,
Results
Table 2 shows the results of all models. Using equation (3) to calculate the proportion of the total variation due to genetics, Model 1 estimates a heritability of 75% across the sample. The majority of the rest of the variation is attributed to the non-shared environment, while the variance attributed to shared environmental factors is small and not statistically significant. Model 2 shows that there is a statistically significant association between neighbourhood deprivation and log BMI, even
Discussion
The results of this study show that the genetic influence on obesity is dependent upon the social environment, with a higher proportion of the variation in BMI being attributed to genetics in more deprived neighbourhoods. Additionally, the results suggest that this increase in heritability is, at least in part, due to the actual amount of variation linked to genetics increasing, rather than solely due to changes in the amount of environmental variation. The results show no evidence for
References (36)
- et al.
McDonald's restaurants and neighborhood deprivation in Scotland and England
Am. J. Prev. Med.
(2005) Gene× environment interaction studies have not properly controlled for potential confounders: the problem and the (simple) solution
Biol. Psychiatry
(2014)- et al.
Deprivation and the development of obesity: a multilevel, longitudinal study in England
Am. J. Prev. Med.
(2010) - et al.
Dissecting obesogenic environments: the development and application of a framework for identifying and prioritizing environmental interventions for obesity
Prev. Med.
(1999) - et al.
Obesogenic urban form: theory, policy and practice
Health & place
(2009) - et al.
Neighbourhood inequalities in physical inactivity: the role of neighbourhood attractiveness, proximity to local facilities and safety in The Netherlands
Soc. Sci. Med.
(2005) - et al.
GCTA: a tool for genome-wide complex trait analysis
Am. J. Hum. Genet.
(2011) - et al.
Gene x physical activity interactions in obesity: combined analysis of 111,421 individuals of European ancestry
Plos Genet.
(2013) - et al.
Twin studies of political behavior: untenable assumptions?
Perspect. Polit.
(2008) - et al.
Gene–environment interactions related to body mass: school policies and social context as environmental moderators
J. Theor. Polit.
(2012)
Defining the environment in gene–environment research: lessons from social epidemiology
Am. J. Public Health
Is the gene-environment interaction paradigm relevant to genome-wide studies? The case of education and body mass index
Demography
Food environments and obesity—neighbourhood or nation?
Int. J. Epidemiol.
Gene-environment interaction in psychological traits and disorders
Annu. Rev. Clin. Psychol.
An “ecological” approach to the obesity pandemic
BMJ Br. Med. J.
Variability in the heritability of body mass index: a systematic review and meta-regression
Front. Endocrinol.
Association of all-cause mortality with overweight and obesity using standard body mass index categories: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Jama
The mechanism (s) of neighbourhood effects: theory, evidence, and policy implications
Cited by (7)
Theoretical Approaches to Research on the Social Determinants of Obesity
2022, American Journal of Preventive MedicineCitation Excerpt :The social determinants of obesity are not the entire story of excessive weight gain but are key variables in the process, sometimes acting independently of biological causes and sometimes acting together to cause people to become obese. Consequently, biomarkers are increasingly being utilized in sociologic studies of weight gain, as is the use of social variables in gene‒environment studies, to provide more thorough assessments of the causes of obesity.4,67,68 Future developments in theories of obesity in the social sciences will likely incorporate both biological and genetic views of the causal factors of obesity into their models where feasible.
Parental feeding practices and child eating behavior in different socioeconomic neighborhoods and their association with childhood weight. The STEPS study
2022, Health and PlaceCitation Excerpt :Children growing in disadvantaged neighborhoods are at greater risk for overweight or obesity (Carroll-Scott et al., 2013; McCurdy et al., 2014; Owen et al., 2017; Rautava et al., 2022).
Genetic and Environmental Influences of Dietary Indices in a UK Female Twin Cohort
2020, Twin Research and Human GeneticsGenetic Epidemiology and Obesity
2023, Handbook of Obesity - Volume 1: Epidemiology, Etiology, and Physiopathology, Fourth EditionDoes urbanicity modify the relationship between a polygenic risk score for depression and mental health symptoms? Cross-sectional evidence from the observational HUNT Study in Norway
2021, Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health