Suicide and the Great Recession of 2007–2009: The role of economic factors in the 50 U.S. states

Highlights

• After controlling for confounding factors, a positive temporal association between unemployment and suicide remains within states.

• The association is stronger in states with higher female labor force participation, for both males and females.

• Unemployment is associated with middle-aged suicide but not young or elderly suicide.

• Other economic factors, such as percent manufacturing jobs, are associated with suicide levels across states.

Abstract

After several decades of decline, U.S. suicide rates have risen since 2005, a trend driven largely by increases among those aged 45–64 that began in 1999. A prominent explanation for this pattern relates to deteriorating economic conditions, especially the sharp rise in unemployment associated with the Great Recession of 2007–2009. We pool data from 1997 to 2010 on the 50 U.S. states to examine the role of economic factors in producing the recent rise in suicide rates. Unlike prior studies, we examine trends in the total suicide rate and in the rate disaggregated by sex, age group and time period and include a number of important confounding factors in a multivariate analysis. We find a strong positive association between unemployment rates and total suicide rates over time within states. The association appears stronger in states that had higher female labor force participation rates over the period, suggesting that the Great Recession may generate greater levels of anomie in this context. Once we consider contextual factors such as female labor force participation, we find that rising unemployment had a similar adverse effect on male and female suicide rates. A positive effect of unemployment on temporal variation in middle-aged suicide exists but not for other age groups. Other economic characteristics, such as percent of manufacturing jobs and per capita income, are not associated with temporal variation in suicide rates within states but are associated with variation between states in suicide rates. The findings suggest that the following may be important components of effective prevention strategies: 1) specifically targeting employers and workplaces as important stakeholders in the prevention of suicide, 2) disseminating information about health risks tied to un/employment, and 3) linking the unemployed to mental health resources.

Introduction

Between 2005 and 2010, the total suicide rate in the United States rose from 11 per 100,000 to 12.4 per 100,000, reversing the declining trend apparent since the late 1980s (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2009). However, these overall figures conceal important differences in trends by age group. Suicide rates for individuals between the ages of 35 and 64 rose sharply during the first decade of the 21st century, an unusual pattern since suicide rates for this age group have either been stable or declining for decades. The young (ages 15–24) and the elderly (65 and older) exhibited no such concomitant increase during this period. The increase has been most pronounced for those aged 45–54, rising from 14.2 per 100,000 in 1999 to 19.6 per 100,000 in 2010; rates also rose substantially for those aged 35–44 and 55–64 (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2013). As a result of these patterns, the middle-aged replaced the elderly in 2004 and beyond as the age group with the highest risk of suicide, suggesting a changing epidemiology of suicide (Phillips et al., 2010; Hu et al., 2008).

A key explanation for the rising rates, one that has received significant attention by the national media, relates to the detrimental effects that deteriorating economic conditions may have had on those in midlife. Beyond rising bankruptcy rates over the period (Thorne et al., 2009) and increasingly unstable employment (less than one year of tenure) for males as they enter their thirties and beyond (Farber, 2007), the economic crisis of 2007–2009 may have hit the middle-aged particularly hard. Those between the ages of 35–64 are likely to be family breadwinners, sometimes financially supporting elderly parents in addition to dependent children or adult children, and thus face greater hardship during periods of economic recession and job loss. In contrast, the young and elderly are less likely to be in the labor force and often have the support of family and in the case of the elderly, social security. During the Great Recession, those between the ages of 45 and 64 experienced longer periods of unemployment than younger workers, and many were forced to delay retirement to recoup their losses (AARP, 2009, Dugas, 2009). Using data from the 2008 Health and Retirement study, McInerney et al. (2013) concluded that the wealth losses associated with the 2008 stock market crash significantly increased depressive symptoms and the use of antidepressants. Workplace interventions that promote coping and problem-solving skills during times of hardship, as well as increasing awareness of mental health services, have been suggested as effective suicide prevention strategies that may be useful for this highly vulnerable group (Stamm and Kirkwood, 2012, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Office of the Surgeon General and National Action Alliance for Suicide Prevention, 2012).

The present study pools data from 1997 to 2010 on the 50 U.S. states to shed light on reasons for the recent rise in suicide rates, with a particular focus on the role of economic conditions. Several recent studies (e.g., Chang et al., 2013, Reeves et al., 2012) use both cross-national and U.S. data and a variety of approaches to provide evidence that the rising unemployment rates linked with the Great Recession are associated with increasing suicide rates. However, these studies typically examine the total suicide rate for a limited time frame, and those that study the recent period that captures the Great Recession investigate only the bivariate relationship between unemployment and suicide rates. We build on this prior work in the following ways. First, we examine not only the total suicide rate but also the suicide rate disaggregated by major age group and sex since time trends are not uniform across these different demographic groups. Second, we incorporate a number of possible confounding variables in our analysis, including demographic and social/cultural characteristics of time and place, to better isolate the effect of unemployment on suicide. Finally, we consider multiple measures of economic conditions and the interplay among them in their association with suicide rates.