Hospitals as a ‘risk environment’: An ethno-epidemiological study of voluntary and involuntary discharge from hospital against medical advice among people who inject drugs
Introduction
Current estimates suggest that more than 15 million people worldwide regularly inject drugs (Mathers et al., 2008). The health sequelae of injection drug use can be severe, and include infectious disease acquisition and other direct complications of injecting (e.g., overdose). As a consequence, people who inject drugs (PWID) suffer from disproportionately high levels of HIV/AIDS (Mathers et al., 2008) and hepatitis C (HCV) infection (Aceijas & Rhodes, 2007) that, together with high rates of non-fatal overdose (Warner-Smith, Darke, & Day, 2002), injection-related soft tissue infections (Cooper et al., 2007, Lloyd-Smith et al., 2008), and other co-morbidities common among this population, lead to frequent hospitalizations (Gebo et al., 2003, Kerr et al., 2005, Palepu et al., 2001). As a result, PWID are admitted to hospital significantly more often than the general age-adjusted population (Kerr et al., 2005).
There is also clear evidence that PWID are one of the populations most likely to be discharged from hospital against medical advice (Anis et al., 2002, Choi et al., 2011; Jeremiah & Stein, 1995; Yong et al., 2013). For our purposes, discharges against medical advice are understood to be inclusive of discharges occurring among patients who have left hospital prior to completing treatment (whether they have notified hospital staff they are leaving or not), as well as those who have been involuntarily discharged prior to completing treatment (e.g., discharge for breach of hospital policies). Discharges from hospital against medical advice among PWID can exacerbate health complications, and this population is significantly more likely to be readmitted for the same condition and have longer eventual hospital stays than those who have completed treatment (Anis et al., 2002, Choi et al., 2011, Glasgow et al., 2010, Hwang et al., 2003). Furthermore, those discharged against medical advice are at an increased risk of mortality (Choi et al., 2011, Yong et al., 2013), with one Canadian study finding that this population is approximately three times as likely to die in the year following their initial discharge (Choi et al., 2011).
Whereas epidemiological analyses of hospital admissions and discharge data have identified crude demographic risk factors for departures against medical advice among PWID, including female gender, younger age, and Aboriginal ancestry (Anis et al., 2002, Chan et al., 2004), comparatively less attention has been paid to contextual forces underlying this phenomenon. Several studies have noted that these departures are most likely to occur in the days immediately surrounding the disbursement of social assistance payments (Anis et al., 2002, Riddell and Riddell, 2006), and that these may be mitigated to some degree by providing access to inpatient methadone maintenance treatment (Chan et al., 2004). However, the lack of attention to the potential role of intersecting social, structural, and environmental forces operating within hospitals in shaping discharges against medical advice among PWID means that these explanations are incomplete. In addition, these individual-level explanations primarily attribute discharges against medical advice to ‘active drug use’ in a manner that risks locating responsibility for these outcomes solely with PWID. This overlooks social and structural–environmental characteristics of hospitals that potentially lead to discharges against medical advice, and creates a missed opportunity to modify these environmental characteristics to promote better retention of PWID in care.
This research gap is particularly striking given more than a decade of evidence demonstrating the need for increased attention to ‘risk environments’ – that is, social and physical settings in which factors exogenous to the individual (i.e., social situations, structures, and places) interact to produce or reduce drug-related harms (Rhodes, 2009, Rhodes et al., 2005). The emergence of the ‘risk environment framework’ has focused attention on how the interplay between physical, social, economic, and policy factors operating across the micro-, meso-, and macro-environmental levels produce harm among PWID (Rhodes, 2002, Rhodes, 2009). Concepts of structural vulnerability and everyday violence have further proven instructive in framing the suffering experienced by drug-using populations (Fairbairn et al., 2008, Shannon et al., 2008). Structural vulnerability refers to how social arrangements embedded in the organization of society render particular populations disproportionately vulnerable to harm (Quesada, Hart, & Bourgois, 2011). Everyday violence refers to the normalization of suffering within any particular context due to the contextual forces that render it invisible (Scheper-Hughes, 1992). Together, these concepts give focus to how the structural context of drug use (e.g., drug criminalization) produces vulnerability to an array of drug- and health-related harms, and reflect dominant power structures that normalize these harms as the natural consequences of drug use. Sorting out the complex contextual forces operating within the risk environments of people who use drugs is critical to understanding their role in shaping health outcomes – in this case, discharges against medical advice – and informing social–ecological interventions.
While qualitative research into the experiences of injection drug-using populations in hospital settings is limited, and has yet to systematically explore the experiences of those discharged against medical advice, it has generated preliminary insights into the social forces operating within the hospital ‘risk environment’ (Berg et al., 2009, Merrill et al., 2002, Neale et al., 2008). In an ethnographic study exploring patient–physician interactions in an American urban teaching hospital, Merrill et al. (2002) outlined how ‘mutual mistrust’ frames the hospital care of PWID. Whereas physicians attributed their difficulty in managing pain to the fear of being ‘deceived’ by ‘drug-seeking’ patients and the lack of clinical protocols for pain management among injection drug-using populations, PWID viewed physicians with suspicion and believed that their treatment was primarily shaped by discrimination (Merrill et al., 2002). Whether or not this, together with other contextual factors, plays a role in discharges from hospital against medical advice warrants further attention.
These issues are of considerable relevance in Vancouver, Canada, the site of a longstanding injection drug use epidemic and home to an estimated 15,000 PWID (McInnes et al., 2009). The majority of the city's injection drug-using population will visit an emergency department each year (Kerr et al., 2005), with approximately 17% of these visits resulting in hospitalization (Fairbairn et al., 2011, Palepu et al., 2001). In Vancouver, PWID are covered by universal, publicly-funded health care insurance. However, while comprehensive harm reduction services, including a supervised injection facility, are integrated into the local public health system and local hospitals struggle with the optimal management of hospitalized PWID, hospitals generally operate under abstinence-based drug use policies (Providence Health Care,, Vancouver Coastal Health, 2008). While abstinence-based policies in part reflect anti-drug laws, they are also framed as necessary in promoting patient and staff safety. In addition, prescribing principles promoted by the British Columbia College of Physicians and Surgeons regarding prescription opioids have been primarily developed for non-drug-using populations, and warn against prescribing opioids to ‘high-risk’ populations (British Columbia College of Physicians and Surgeons, 2012). Past research has shown that PWID in this setting are frequently discharged from hospital against medical advice (Anis et al., 2002, Choi et al., 2011, Palepu et al., 2001), and in one urban teaching hospital account for more than half of such discharges (Choi et al., 2011).
We undertook this ethno-epidemiological study to explore how intersecting social, structural, and environmental forces shape the experiences of PWID in hospitals settings and contribute to discharges against medical advice. We were particularly concerned with the role of abstinence-based drug policies in hospital settings in framing the social and structural–environmental contexts of hospital care, pain management practices, and in-hospital drug use. Finally, we aimed to identify ways in which the hospital ‘risk environment’ could be modified to minimize the potential for adverse outcomes, including discharges against medical advice.
Section snippets
Methods
This ethno-epidemiological study was undertaken in connection with two ongoing prospective cohort studies: the Vancouver Injection Drug Users Study (VIDUS) and the AIDS Care Cohort to Evaluate Exposure to Survival Services (ACCESS). These cohort studies include more than 2000 current and former drug users, and their methods have been described in detail elsewhere (Strathdee et al., 1997, Wood, Montaner, et al., 2003, Wood, Zettel, et al., 2003). Ethno-epidemiology seeks to uncover how social
“They felt maybe I was getting high” – ‘Drug-seeking’ and pain management
Our analysis of participant accounts underscored the role of social and structural forces in shaping pain management practices and producing suffering that framed experiences in hospital settings. All participants reported co-morbidities that, together with their presenting illness or injury, resulted in complex pain management needs. The vast majority of our participants (n = 25) had histories of opiate dependency, and those who were injecting heroin or prescription opioids at the time of
Discussion
In summary, our findings highlight how abstinence-only drug policies, together with inadequate pain management fueled by narcotics control and negative stereotypes, frame hospital care, and produce structural vulnerability to harm among PWID. Diverse forms of social control that function to regulate drug use in hospitals (i.e., surveillance and regulation) increase the potential for drug-related harm and discharges against medical advice. Our findings demonstrate that hospitals constitute not
Acknowledgments
The authors thank the study participants for their contribution to the research, as well as current and past researchers and staff with the British Columbia Centre for Excellence in HIV/AIDS. Tricia Collingham, Cameron Dilworth, Ivan Fletcher, Jennifer Matthews and Aaron McKinney provided research support and assistance. This study was supported by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (MOP-81171) and the US National Institutes of Health (R01DA033147). This research was undertaken, in
References (50)
- et al.
Global estimates of prevalence of HCV infection among injecting drug users
International Journal of Drug Policy
(2007) - et al.
Seeking refuge from violence in street-based drug scenes: women's experiences in North America's first supervised injection facility
Social Science & Medicine
(2008) - et al.
A micro-environmental intervention to reduce the harms associated with drug-related overdose: evidence from the evaluation of Vancouver's safer injection facility
International Journal of Drug Policy
(2007) - et al.
Interdisciplinary mixed methods research with structurally vulnerable populations: case studies of injection drug users in San Francisco
International Journal of Drug Policy
(2013) - et al.
Global epidemiology of injecting drug use and HIV among people who inject drugs: a systematic review
The Lancet
(2008) - et al.
Heightened pain perception in illicit substance-using patients in the ED: implications for management
The American Journal of Emergency Medicine
(2011) Shifting moral values to enhance access to health care: harm reduction as a context for ethical nursing practice
International Journal of Drug Policy
(2008)The ‘risk environment’: a framework for understanding and reducing drug-related harm
International Journal of Drug Policy
(2002)Risk environments and drug harms: a social science for harm reduction approach
International Journal of Drug Policy
(2009)- et al.
The social structural production of HIV risk among injecting drug users
Social Science & Medicine
(2005)
Risk, shame and the public injector: a qualitative study of drug injecting in South Wales
Social Science & Medicine
Social and structural violence and power relations in mitigating HIV risk of drug-using women in survival sex work
Social Science & Medicine
Public injection settings in Vancouver: physical environment, social context and risk
International Journal of Drug Policy
Accessing care for injection-related infections through a medically supervised injecting facility: a qualitative study
Drug and Alcohol Dependence
Reconciling incongruous qualitative and quantitative findings in mixed methods research: exemplars from research with drug using populations
International Journal of Drug Policy
Leaving hospital against medical advice among HIV-positive patients
Canadian Medical Association Journal
The law (and politics) of safe injection facilities in the United States
American Journal of Public Health
Providers' experiences treating chronic pain among opioid-dependent drug users
Journal of General Internal Medicine
Prescription review committee prescribing principles
HIV-positive injection drug users who leave the hospital against medical advice: the mitigating role of methadone and social support
Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes
Readmission rates of patients discharged against medical advice: a matched cohort study
PLoS ONE
Nationwide increase in the number of hospitalizations for illicit injection drug use-related infective endocarditis
Clinical Infectious Diseases
Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory
Emergency department utilization among a cohort of HIV-positive injecting drug users in a Canadian setting
The Journal of Emergency Medicine
Hospitalization rates differ by hepatitis C status in an urban HIV cohort
Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes
Cited by (195)
“The machine doesn't judge”: Counternarratives on surveillance among people accessing a safer opioid supply via biometric machines
2024, Social Science and MedicineHow I manage severe bacterial infections in people who inject drugs
2024, Clinical Microbiology and InfectionLongitudinal polysubstance use patterns and non-fatal overdose: A repeated measures latent class analysis
2024, International Journal of Drug PolicyThe multiple makings of a supervised consumption service in a hospital setting
2024, International Journal of Drug PolicyBenzodiazepine Withdrawal in the Context of Benzodiazepine-Contaminated Opioids: Practice Implications
2024, Journal for Nurse Practitioners