Elsevier

Social Science & Medicine

Volume 67, Issue 8, October 2008, Pages 1258-1268
Social Science & Medicine

Does place explain racial health disparities? Quantifying the contribution of residential context to the Black/white health gap in the United States

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.06.018Get rights and content

Abstract

The persistence of the black health disadvantage has been a puzzling component of health in the United States in spite of general declines in rates of morbidity and mortality over the past century. Studies that have focused on well-established individual-level determinants of health such as socio-economic status and health behaviors have been unable to fully explain these disparities. Recent research has begun to focus on other factors such as racism, discrimination, and segregation. Variation in neighborhood context—socio-demographic composition, social aspects, and built environment—has been postulated as an additional explanation for racial disparities, but few attempts have been made to quantify its overall contribution to the black/white health gap. This analysis is an attempt to generate an estimate of place effects on explaining health disparities by utilizing data from the U.S. National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) (1989–1994), combined with a methodology for identifying residents of the same blocks both within and across NHIS survey cross-sections. Our results indicate that controlling for a single point-in-time measure of residential context results in a roughly 15–76% reduction of the black/white disparities in self-rated health that were previously unaccounted for by individual-level controls. The contribution of residential context toward explaining the black/white self-rated health gap varies by both age and gender such that contextual explanations of disparities decline with age and appear to be smaller among females.

Introduction

The traditional focus of research examining the determinants of health status has been on individual-level differences in socio-economic status (SES) and the health behaviors associated with them. Though SES and health behaviors explain a large portion of the health disparities between non-Hispanic blacks and non-Hispanic whites (henceforth referred to as blacks and white, respectively), in the United States, they do not fully account for the gap (Williams & Collins, 1995). Moreover, health care has been found to contribute little to health status (House & Williams, 2000). The persistence of the unexplained health gap between blacks and whites has led many to direct their attention to differences in residential environments as a contributor to observed health disparities (Kaplan, 1996). This increasing recognition that the social and structural environment where one lives may independently contribute to the formation and development of human conditions, including health outcomes, suggests a research area that has yet to be fully exploited. In this paper, we generate quantitative estimates of the contribution of local residential context toward explaining the black/white health gap in the United States, net of individual-level characteristics.

Section snippets

Black/white differences in health and mortality

Despite a marked increase in life expectancy in the United States over the last century, a gap in life expectancy between blacks and whites remains (NCHS, 2007). Although this gap has narrowed from seven to just over five years between 1990 and 2004, mortality differences between blacks and whites have grown or have remained unchanged for a number of causes such as heart disease, HIV, diabetes mellitus, and several types of cancer (NCHS, 2007). These trends in mortality are indicative of most

Social environment

In addition to individual-level influences on health, a substantial body of literature indicates that where one lives also has important implications for health (Morenoff and Lynch, 2002, Robert, 1999a, Robert, 1999b). Most of the existing literature has focused on the social environment including neighborhood racial segregation (Williams & Collins, 2001), neighborhood demographic or socio-economic characteristics (Robert, 1999b), and social cohesion (e.g., social capital, trust, crime) (

Neighborhood context and health disparities

The level of risk and concentration of resources in the social and physical space are clustered in patterns that mimic the larger patterns of stratification in society (Fitzpatrick & LaGory, 2003). That is, individuals of lower SES and racial minorities are segregated spatially (Jargowksy, 1997, Massey and Fong, 1990, Massey and Shibuya, 1995) into areas that contain higher levels of contextual risk factors that promote the creation of urban sub-cultures that lead to higher rates of risky

Data set

Our analysis is based on data from the 1989–1994 National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) cross-sections. Since 1957, the NHIS has annually conducted nationwide household interviews to collect information concerning the health of the U.S. civilian non-institutionalized population. The 1989–1994 NHIS sample design is a multi-stage probability sample of U.S. households with new households interviewed each year (Massey, Moore, Parsons, & Tadros, 1989). The survey collects information on race,

Analytical strategy

Conventional models that investigate racial health disparities may be subject to bias if they omit neighborhood characteristics that contribute to health outcomes and are correlated to race. While one strategy would be to explicitly include neighborhood characteristics as controls, as a number of studies have done (e.g., Yen & Kaplan, 1999a), the reliance on imprecisely measured units of context, the use of administrative data (and hence a scarcity of potential contextual variables), and the

Results

We present results for male respondents in Table 2 and female respondents in Table 3. In each of these tables, we first present the results of the OLS model and FE models with health controls (models 1 and 2). Next, we present results from the OLS and FE models that excluded health controls (models 3 and 4).

Because all models interact race with age, and age has been centered by the sample mean age, the race coefficients directly estimated from the models reflect the racial health disparities at

Discussion

Our analyses lead to two important conclusions. One, the exclusion of neighborhood context leads to upwardly biased estimates of racial health disparities that were believed to be independent of socio-economic conditions. As a consequence—our second conclusion is that accounting for place provides further explanation for a moderately large portion of observed racial health disparities. The contribution of neighborhood context to the observed racial health gap varies considerably by age and

Acknowledgments

This work was completed with support from grant #NIEHS 1 P50 ESO12383-01. Support for D. Phuong Do was provided by the Kellogg Health Scholars Program grant # P0117943.

References (81)

  • Y. Benyamini et al.

    Community studies reporting association between self-rated health and mortality: additional studies, 1995 to 1998

    Research on Aging

    (1999)
  • C.E. Bird et al.

    Gender and health: The effects of constrained choice and social policies

    (2008)
  • S.A. Bond-Huie et al.

    Individual and contextual risks of death among race and ethnic groups in the United States

    Journal of Health and Social Behavior

    (2002)
  • K.D. Brownell

    Fast food and obesity in children

    Pediatrics

    (2004)
  • A.C. Cameron et al.

    Microeconometrics: Methods and applications

    (2005)
  • B. Chaix et al.

    Assessment of the magnitude of geographical variations and socioeconomic contextual effects on ischaemic heart disease mortality: a multilevel survival analysis of a large Swedish cohort

    Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health

    (2007)
  • C.A. Collins et al.

    Segregation and mortality: the deadly effects of racism?

    Sociological Forum

    (1999)
  • R.S. Cooper

    A note on the biologic concept of race and its application in epidemiologic research

    American Heart Journal

    (1984)
  • S. Cummins et al.

    Neighbourhood environment and its association with self rated health: evidence from Scotland and England

    Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health

    (2005)
  • R.G. Evans et al.

    If not genetics, then what? Biological pathways and population health

  • R. Ewing et al.

    Urban sprawl as a risk factor in motor vehicle occupant and pedestrian fatalities

    American Journal of Public Health

    (2003)
  • R. Ewing et al.

    Relationship between urban sprawl and physical activity, obesity, and morbidity

    American Journal of Health Promotion

    (2003)
  • K.F. Ferraro et al.

    Utility of health data from social surveys: is there a gold standard for measuring morbidity?

    American Sociological Review

    (1999)
  • K.F. Ferraro et al.

    Health trajectories: long-term dynamics among black and white adults

    Journal of Health and Social Behavior

    (1997)
  • B.K. Finch et al.

    Race/ethnic disparities in infant mortality: the role of behavioral factors

    Social Biology

    (2000)
  • B.K. Finch et al.

    Validity of self-rated health among Latino(a)s

    American Journal of Epidemiology

    (2002)
  • K.M. Fitzpatrick et al.

    Placing' health in an urban sociology: cities as mosaics of risk and protection

    City and Community

    (2003)
  • L.D. Frank et al.

    Health and community design: The impact of the built environment on physical activity

    (2003)
  • V. Fuchs et al.

    Air pollution and medical care use by older Americans: a cross-area analysis

    Health Affairs

    (2002)
  • Fuchs, V., McClellan, M., & Skinner, J. (2001). Area differences in utilization of medical care and mortality among...
  • T.A. Glass et al.

    Neighborhoods, aging and functional limitations

  • A.H. Goodman

    Why genes don't count (for racial differences in health)

    American Journal of Public Health

    (2000)
  • P. Gruenewald et al.

    Changes in outlet densities affect violence rates

    Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research

    (2006)
  • M. Haan et al.

    Poverty and health. Prospective evidence from the Alameda County study

    American Journal of Epidemiology

    (1987)
  • J.S. House et al.

    Understanding and reducing socioeconomic and racial/ethnic disparities

  • M.L. Huffman et al.

    Racial wage inequality: job segregation and devaluation across U.S. labor markets

    American Journal of Sociology

    (2004)
  • S.L. Huston et al.

    Neighborhood environment, access to places for activity, and leisure-time physical activity in a diverse North Carolina population

    American Journal of Health Promotion

    (2003)
  • E.L. Idler et al.

    Self-rated health and mortality in the NHANES-I epidemiologic follow-up study

    American Journal of Public Health

    (1990)
  • E.L. Idler et al.

    Self-rated health and mortality: a review of twenty-seven community studies

    Journal of Health and Social Behavior

    (1997)
  • Cited by (101)

    • The Role of Place in Disparities Affecting Black Men Receiving Hemodialysis

      2021, Kidney International Reports
      Citation Excerpt :

      Our finding of lower rate of cardiovascular disease and lower comorbidity scores among men treated in communities with substantial proportions of Black resdients could represent a difference in disease severity, but could also represent administrative under-coding or a shortfall in diagnostic vigilance for those cared for by healthcare systems serving these communities.42,43 The role of residential segregation, a phenomenon established by historical redlining and housing policies and perpetuated by governmental institutions and corporate practices in driving healthcare inequities as well established and a recognized contributing factor to health disparities like the ones described here.18,44-46 The lingering impact of institutional discrimination is evident in our data and consistent with other studies using census track level community data, indicating that areas with sizable Black populations had higher levels of poverty and family disruption as well as lower overall educational attainment.15,44,47,48

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text