Rapid Response SystemsValidation of the National Early Warning Score in the prehospital setting☆
Introduction
Early intervention and response to deranged physiological parameters improves survival outcomes in both medical and surgical patients.1, 2, 3 To this end a number of early warning systems have been developed in recent years4 and have been shown to be good predictors of mortality and deterioration.5 Recent work by the Royal College of Physicians has led to the development of a National Early Warning Score (NEWS)6 which is currently implemented by the National Health Service (NHS) in acute hospitals across the UK and has been successful in identifying patients at risk of deterioration or death.7 More recently there has been adoption of early warning scores in some emergency departments8, 9, 10 although this has not been without controversy.11 The use of NEWS in the prehospital setting also remains controversial, partly due to lack of evidence.12, 13 As the development of this score involved analysis of clinical observations in hospital inpatients, in whom a course of treatment had already been started, uncertainty exists as to the applicability of the NEWS to other settings, particularly the emergency department and prehospital setting, where scores would be derived prior to the institution of any treatment. In this situation the score may contribute to a decision to transfer a patient to hospital14 or may be used as a triage aid, both of which roles differ slightly from the track and trigger (of a clinical review) role for which NEWS was originally intended.
The NEWS was based on the earlier ViEWS15 (VitalPAC Early Warning Score) developed in Portsmouth and stratifies patients into risk categories based on observed heart rate, respiratory rate, systolic blood pressure, arterial oxygen saturation, temperature, and conscious level; plus an additional weighting if the patient is being given oxygen therapy. Patients are then risk stratified based on the resulting aggregate score into low, medium, and high risk groups. Patients with a low aggregate score but who score in the highest category for any single observation are classified as at least medium risk (see Supp. Figs. 1 and 2).
This study, based in a large district general hospital in Paisley, on the western edge of the Greater Glasgow metropolitan area, Scotland, aimed to evaluate the performance of the NEWS in identifying patients at risk of death or deterioration in the prehospital setting.
Section snippets
Methods
Data protection approval to analyse and cross-reference patient-identifiable information was obtained from the Caldicott Guardians of both organisations involved (NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde and Scottish Ambulance Service) prior to commencement of the study. Details of all emergency ambulance crews dispatched with an intention to transfer to the Royal Alexandra Hospital (RAH) were obtained from the Scottish Ambulance Service data warehouse, along with details of demographics, initial patient
Results
11,052 sets of clinical observations were obtained from 6028 unique patients. After exclusions, 1684 complete patient encounters were identified for study (see Supp. Fig. 3). All patients were transported by emergency ambulances staffed either by two paramedics or one paramedic and one emergency ambulance technician. Table 1 shows a description of the patient population studied.
Discussion
Triage is a crucial part of any unplanned care system, and has been developed significantly since its inception during the Napoleonic Wars. Algorithms such as the Manchester Triage System16 provide objective criteria for the allocation of patients to care areas, and can be sensitive enough to detect the signs of critical illness at the point of entry to the emergency department although they may still miss patients with the possibility of deterioration while still in the Emergency Department.17
Limitations
This study does have some limitations. We have not adjusted for age or sex differences between the low, medium and high risk NEWS groups, and this may account for some of the difference in mortality. However, the absence of age or gender adjustments is a feature of the NEWS that our study aimed to validate. As one of the end-points was survival to discharge and only in-hospital death was considered, the mortality rate, particularly the 30day mortality rate, may be underestimated. Similarly, due
Conclusion
Elevated NEWS among unselected prehospital patients is associated with increased levels of adverse outcomes. Calculation of an early warning score prior to transfer to hospital is straightforward and may be a useful triage tool with potential to facilitate earlier recognition of at-risk or deteriorating patients, possibly allowing earlier involvement of appropriate ED and critical care staff.
Conflict of interest statement
No conflicts of interest to declare.
References (31)
- et al.
Physiological abnormalities in early warning scores are related to mortality in adult inpatients
Br J Anaesth
(2004) - et al.
The ability of the National Early Warning Score (NEWS) to discriminate patients at risk of early cardiac arrest, unanticipated intensive care unit admission, and death
Resuscitation
(2013) - et al.
ViEWS – towards a national early warning score for detecting adult inpatient deterioration
Resuscitation
(2010) - et al.
Do either early warning systems or emergency response teams improve hospital patient survival? A systematic review
Resuscitation
(2013) - et al.
Long-term effect of introducing an early warning score on respiratory rate charting on general wards
Resuscitation
(2005) - et al.
The effect of implementing a modified early warning scoring (MEWS) system on the adequacy of vital sign documentation
Aust Crit Care
(2013) - et al.
Is the Modified Early Warning Score (MEWS) superior to clinician judgement in detecting critical illness in the pre-hospital environment?
Resuscitation
(2012) - et al.
Early goal-directed therapy in the treatment of severe sepsis and septic shock
N Engl J Med
(2001) - et al.
Surviving Sepsis Campaign: international guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock
Intensive Care Med
(2012) - et al.
Accuracy of an expanded early warning score for patients in general and trauma surgery wards
Br J Surg
(2012)
An early warning score for the early detection of patients with impending illness
Clin Intensive Care
Standardising the assessment of acute-illness severity in the NHS. Report of a working party
Use of an admission early warning score to predict patient morbidity and mortality and treatment success
Emerg Med J
Current use of early warning scores in UK emergency departments
Emerg Med J
Use of the patient at risk scores in the emergency department: a preliminary study
Emerg Med J
Cited by (129)
Prehospital National Early Warning Score as a predictor of massive transfusion in adult trauma patients
2023, American Journal of Emergency MedicineNational Early Warning Scores Following Emergency Hospital Transfer: Implications for Care Home Residents
2023, Journal of the American Medical Directors AssociationRemote monitoring system using Light Fidelity and InfraRed technologies
2022, Computers and Electrical EngineeringA systematic review of the discrimination and absolute mortality predicted by the National Early Warning Scores according to different cut-off values and prediction windows
2022, European Journal of Internal Medicine
- ☆
A Spanish translated version of the summary of this article appears as Appendix in the final online version at http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2014.12.029.