Stereotypy in autism: The importance of function

Abstract

We argue for the utility of a functional definition of stereotypy based on evidence of both sensory automatic and socially mediated reinforcement contingencies in the occurrence of stereotypy in children with autism. A predetermined sensory function of stereotypy is often invoked in the behavioral literature and the term “self-stimulatory behavior” is commonly misused as interchangeable with “stereotypy.” We discuss evidence for a variety of potential functional properties of stereotypy. Diagnostic definitions are reviewed and support for both sensory and social functions is outlined. We argue that stereotypies should be described and categorized according to their function, rather than form. Furthermore, treatment decisions should be based on a functional interpretation of stereotypy, which acknowledges its operant and heterogeneous quality in autism.

Introduction

Restricted, repetitive and stereotyped patterns of behavior are one of three core diagnostic features of autistic disorder (American Psychiatric Association, 2000) and are a frequent target of behavioral interventions for children with autism. Although the underlying causes of stereotypy are unknown, most scientists in the field believe it comprises a class of operant behaviors maintained by reinforcement contingencies (Koegel & Covert, 1972; Lovaas, Newsom, & Hickman, 1987; Rapp & Vollmer, 2005; Rogers & Ozonoff, 2005). A substantial body of research provides evidence for a sensory function of stereotypy, whereby behavior is maintained by automatic reinforcement (Lovaas et al., 1987; Piazza, Adelinis, Hanley, Goh, & Delia, 2000; Rapp, 2006, Rincover, 1978; Rincover, Cook, Peoples, & Packard, 1979). This literature contends that social consequences are not operative, and this has encouraged a cascade of behavioral interventions presuming a predetermined sensory or self-stimulatory function of stereotypy. However, the term stereotypy is not synonymous with self-stimulatory behavior. A growing body of literature suggests that stereotypy is multiply determined and often enters into contingencies of social positive and negative reinforcement (Ahearn, Clark, Gardener, Chung, & Dube, 2003; Durand & Carr, 1987; Kennedy, Meyer, Knowles, & Shukla, 2000; Repp, Felce, & Barton, 1988). Consistent with the general literature regarding the need for treatment individualization in autism (National Research Council, 2001, Schreibman, 2000, Schreibman, 2005; Sherer & Schreibman, 2005; Yoder & Compton, 2004), it is important to design behavioral interventions that target stereotypy according to the functional response class to which behaviors belong rather than the topographical form alone and the assumption of automatic reinforcement as the maintaining contingency.

This paper begins with a review of the diagnostic definition of stereotypy and its relevance to learning for children with autism. This is followed by an argument for the clinical utility of a functional definition of stereotypy, as well as a discussion of evidence supporting both the role of sensory automatic and socially mediated reinforcement contingencies in the occurrence of stereotypy in children with autism. This paper then outlines several behavioral interventions that address this challenging behavior and argues for a functional approach to designing individualized interventions for reducing stereotypy in autism.