CT based radiomic signature
CT-based radiomic signature predicts distant metastasis in lung adenocarcinoma

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2015.02.015Get rights and content

Abstract

Background and purpose

Radiomics provides opportunities to quantify the tumor phenotype non-invasively by applying a large number of quantitative imaging features. This study evaluates computed-tomography (CT) radiomic features for their capability to predict distant metastasis (DM) for lung adenocarcinoma patients.

Material and methods

We included two datasets: 98 patients for discovery and 84 for validation. The phenotype of the primary tumor was quantified on pre-treatment CT-scans using 635 radiomic features. Univariate and multivariate analysis was performed to evaluate radiomics performance using the concordance index (CI).

Results

Thirty-five radiomic features were found to be prognostic (CI > 0.60, FDR < 5%) for DM and twelve for survival. It is noteworthy that tumor volume was only moderately prognostic for DM (CI = 0.55, p-value = 2.77 × 10−5) in the discovery cohort. A radiomic-signature had strong power for predicting DM in the independent validation dataset (CI = 0.61, p-value = 1.79 × 10−17). Adding this radiomic-signature to a clinical model resulted in a significant improvement of predicting DM in the validation dataset (p-value = 1.56 × 10−11).

Conclusions

Although only basic metrics are routinely quantified, this study shows that radiomic features capturing detailed information of the tumor phenotype can be used as a prognostic biomarker for clinically-relevant factors such as DM. Moreover, the radiomic-signature provided additional information to clinical data.

Section snippets

Patient characteristics

This study is an Institutional Review Board-approved analysis of CT for treatment simulation from North-American NSCLC patients receiving chemoRT at our institution from 2001 to 2013. We limited the patient population to pathologically-confirmed lung adenocarcinoma with locally advanced disease (overall stage II–III) [30]. Patients with surgery or chemotherapy before the scheduled radiation therapy planning CT date were excluded from the study. Patients treated before July 2009 were included in

Results

The majority of all patients were female (62.6%) and the median age at start of treatment was 64 years (range: 35–93 years). The median follow-up time was 23.7 months (range: 1.8–119.2 months) and the median survival time was 24.7 months (range: 1.8–119.2 months). The median time to distant metastasis (DM) was 13.4 months (range: 0.3–117.5 months). Patient characteristics, clinical outcomes are shown in Table 1.

Time to DM was similar between Dataset1 and Dataset2 (p-value < 0.36), as for the numbers of

Discussion

Medical imaging gives valuable information for diagnostic, treatment planning or surveillance of cancer patients. Routinely, basic metrics are extracted from these images to utilize as a prognostic factor [27], [28], [29], [30], or to assess treatment response. However, there is much more tumor phenotypic information captured in these images. Radiomics are able to quantify tumor phenotypical differences from medical images by using a large set of imaging features that can be linked to clinical

Disclaimer

None.

Source of support

Authors acknowledge financial support from the National Institute of Health (NIH-USA U01CA190234). Authors acknowledge financial support from the QuIC-ConCePT project, which is partly funded by EFPI A companies and the Innovative Medicine Initiative Joint Undertaking (IMI JU) under Grant Agreement No. 115151. This research is also supported by the Dutch technology Foundation STW (Grant No. 10696 DuCAT), which is the applied science division of NWO, and the Technology Programme of the Ministry

Conflict of interest

None declared.

References (39)

  • B.M. Alexander et al.

    Tumor volume is a prognostic factor in non-small-cell lung cancer treated with chemoradiotherapy

    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys

    (2011)
  • R. Siegel et al.

    Cancer statistics, 2014: cancer Statistics, 2014

    CA Cancer J Clin

    (2014)
  • W.J. Curran et al.

    Sequential vs. concurrent chemoradiation for stage III non-small cell lung cancer: randomized phase III trial RTOG 9410

    J Natl Cancer Inst

    (2011)
  • J.D. Bradley et al.

    Radiation Therapy Oncology Group: A randomized phase III comparison of standard-dose (60 Gy) versus high-dose (74 Gy) conformal chemoradiotherapy with or without cetuximab for stage III non-small cell lung cancer: Results on radiation dose in RTOG 0617

    ASCO Meet Abstr

    (2013)
  • N. Hanna et al.

    Phase III Study of cisplatin, etoposide, and concurrent chest radiation with or without consolidation docetaxel in patients with inoperable stage III non–small-cell lung cancer: the Hoosier Oncology Group and U.S. Oncology

    J Clin Oncol

    (2008)
  • K. Kelly et al.

    Phase III trial of maintenance gefitinib or placebo after concurrent chemoradiotherapy and docetaxel consolidation in inoperable stage III non-small-cell lung cancer: SWOG S0023

    J Clin Oncol Off J Am Soc Clin Oncol

    (2008)
  • P. Lambin et al.

    Predicting outcomes in radiation oncology–multifactorial decision support systems

    Nat Rev Clin Oncol

    (2013)
  • C. Parmar et al.

    Robust radiomics feature quantification using semiautomatic volumetric segmentation

    PLoS One

    (2014)
  • R.T.H. Leijenaar et al.

    Stability of FDG-PET Radiomics features: An integrated analysis of test-retest and inter-observer variability

    Acta Oncol

    (2013)
  • Cited by (570)

    • Trends and Hotspots in Global Radiomics Research: A Bibliometric Analysis

      2024, Technology in Cancer Research and Treatment
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    1

    Equal contribution.

    View full text