Short CommunicationDigital health interventions: widening access or widening inequalities?
Introduction
The development and application of digital technology to deliver health interventions has proliferated in recent years. Advocates cite improvements in technology and access which facilitates digital delivery alongside limitations in accessibility, availability and capacity of traditional models.1 However, a key issue associated with digital interventions which has yet to be fully acknowledged is how they may impact on health inequalities.
The objectives of this study were to summarize the so-called ‘digital divide’, consider how it may negatively impact on health and health inequalities, and suggest ways in which such impacts can be mitigated against. This study incorporates a mixed methods approach; descriptive analyses of multiple data sources on digital participation, and a review of the evidence on how digital technology may impact on health inequalities. The follow-ing is a discussion of preliminary observations from this work.
Section snippets
Health inequalities
Health inequalities are, ‘the systematic differences in the health of people occupying unequal positions in society’.2 They occur across a range of social dimensions including income, social class, deprivation, caste, ethnicity and geography. The overwhelming balance of evidence is that interventions which tackle individual behaviours are least likely to be effective in reducing health inequalities; whilst those interventions which utilize taxation, legislation, regulation and changes in the
Digital participation and the digital divide
Recent advances in hardware and software have increased access to ‘digital participation’, effectively people's ability to access the Internet and use it creatively.4 As a result, prevention and treatment are now being delivered to large parts of the population using a range of new media. This digital revolution has seen desktop computers now complimented by laptops, tablets, smartphones, games consoles and digital televisions, all with the ability to access the Internet and potentially provide
Digital technology and health
From a plausible theory perspective,16 there are a number of potential advantages to using digital technology to deliver health interventions,1 providing they are effective. Intervention content can be delivered consistently across users, without a therapist, and so has the potential to be more cost-effective over time. They are flexible in that they can be accessed in users' own time and at their own pace, with no waiting times for an appointment and no geographical constraints. They are
Conclusion
Digital health interventions offer a potentially important new development for prevention and treatment provided they are proven to be effective and cost effective. The use of digital technology can be seen both as an indicator of socio-economic status and a facilitator for better health outcomes. However, issues of equity require more appropriate recognition as digital health interventions may potentially widen health inequalities rather than narrow them.
Author statements
With thanks to Dr. Gerry McCartney for comments on earlier drafts of this paper.
References (16)
- et al.
Web-based interventions for substance use disorders: a qualitative review
J Subst Abuse Treat
(2004) - et al.
Why are health care interventions delivered over the internet? a systematic review of the published literature
J Med Internet Res
(2006) The challenge of health inequalities
- et al.
Health inequalities policy review for the Scottish Ministerial Task Force on health inequalities
(2014) Digital participation in Scotland: a review of the evidence
(2011)- et al.
Internet-based interventions for smoking cessation
Cochrane Libr
(2013) - et al.
Online alcohol interventions: a systematic review
J Med Internet Res
(2010) - et al.
Internet-based physical activity interventions
Am J Lifestyle Med
(2014)