Psychosocial stress induces working memory impairments in an n-back paradigm
Introduction
Stress leads to activation of the sympathetic nervous system (SNS) and an increased activity of the hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal axis (HPAA; de Kloet et al., 2005). The first rapid response of the SNS is mediated via the catecholamines adrenaline and noradrenaline. The second somewhat slower stress response consists of activation of the HPAA and leads to the release of glucocorticoids from the adrenal cortex (GCs; cortisol in humans; corticosterone in rodents).
Numerous studies have demonstrated that acute stress or elevated SNS and/or GC concentrations affect learning and memory in animals and humans (LaBar and Cabeza, 2006; Wolf, 2006; Roozendaal et al., 2006). Stress can result in enhancing as well as impairing effects on declarative long-term memory (Wolf, 2006; Roozendaal et al., 2006; Joels et al., 2006; Lupien et al., 2007). The direction of the effect appears to depend primarily on the phase of declarative memory affected. While the consolidation of emotional material is enhanced by stress, delayed retrieval of previously learned material is impaired (Wolf, 2006, Wolf, 2008; Roozendaal et al., 2006; Lupien et al., 2007). Those effects appear to be caused by the action of glucocorticoids on GC sensitive receptors in the amygdala and hippocampus (Roozendaal, 2002; Joels et al., 2006; Diamond et al., 2007). However, findings suggested that the modulation of memory functions through GCs require concurrent SNS activity. Animal and human studies observed a dependence of the level of arousal and/or adrenergic activity during testing on the GC effects on declarative memory (Abercrombie et al., 2006; Kuhlmann and Wolf, 2006a, Kuhlmann and Wolf, 2006b; de Quervain et al., 2007).
While the effects of stress on declarative memory have received considerable attention fewer studies tested its influence on working memory (WM). The concept of WM refers to the structures and processes used for temporarily maintaining, updating, and manipulating information (Baddeley, 2003). Multiple studies indicate that these processes mainly rely on the integrity of the prefrontal cortex (PFC) (Fuster, 2000; Petrides, 2000; Muller and Knight, 2006) and parietal structures (Baldo and Dronkers, 2006), although this view is not without controversy (Andres, 2003).
Evidences from histopathological studies in rodents, monkeys, and humans indicate a large number of glucocorticoid receptors within the PFC and thus suggest that the PFC might be a target for GCs in the brain (Meaney and Aitken, 1985; Patel et al., 2000; Webster et al., 2002; Perlman et al., 2007). Moreover, the PFC is influenced by stress-sensitive noradrenergic projections from the locus coeruleus. Animal studies observed an enhancing effect of moderate noradrenaline concentrations on WM and an impairment under high concentrations (Arnsten, 1997, Arnsten, 2000; Arnsten and Li, 2005). It is suggested that within a normal range noradrenaline increases the prefrontal control of behaviour, whereas high levels induced a decreased behavioural PFC control (Chamberlain et al., 2006). For WM, comparable to declarative memory processes, human and animal studies revealed a tight interaction between the HPAA and the SNS. GCs did not unfold their modulating influence on WM in the absence of concurrent (nor)adrenergic activity (Arnsten, 2000; Elzinga and Roelofs, 2005; Roozendaal et al., 2006).
Even though a few previous studies in humans observed negative effects of cortisol- or stress-treatment on WM (Lupien et al., 1999; Wolf et al., 2001a; Elzinga and Roelofs, 2005; Oei et al., 2006) the empirical situation is rather heterogeneous. Several previous studies have used the digit span task to assess WM. Here participants are asked to repeat a series of digits either in the same order (forward condition) or in the reversed order (backwards condition). The length of the digit series typically increases up to a maximum of nine digits (eight for backwards). There are most often two trials for each series length and the task is stopped if a subject fails to correctly repeat both digit series of a particular length (Wechsler, 1987).
While some studies using the digit span test observed an impairing effect of cortisol administration (Wolf et al., 2001a) or psychosocial stress exposure (Elzinga and Roelofs, 2005) other studies failed to find effects using the same task (Hoffman and al’Absi, 2004; Kuhlmann and Wolf, 2005; Kuhlmann et al., 2005; Smeets et al., 2006). However, it is questionable whether the digit span task is a sensitive measure for small changes induced by experimental manipulations in young, healthy subjects (Reynolds, 1997; D’Esposito and Postle, 1999; Unsworth and Engle, 2007).
Besides the digit span task some previous studies used the immediate recall of wordlists to test the effects of stress on memory. These tasks rely at least in part on WM functions but also reflect declarative memory processes (Tops et al., 2004; Lezak et al., 2004). Again inconsistent results are reported. Some studies found an impaired immediate recall for neutral (Jelici et al., 2004) and pleasant words (Tops et al., 2004) after acute cortisol administration or psychosocial stress. Other studies in contrast only observed effects for the delayed, but not the immediate recall (de Quervain et al., 2000; Wolf et al., 2001a; Smeets et al., 2006). One contributing factor for the heterogeneous results might be related to the higher susceptibility of simple WM tasks for influencing experimental variables (e.g. phonological similarity or word length) compared to more complex tasks (Unsworth and Engle, 2007). In addition, immediate recall not only depends on WM but also on declarative memory processes and therefore a theoretical interpretation of the findings mentioned above remains difficult (but see Tops et al., 2004).
For more complex WM tasks results seem to be more consistent and impairments were repeatedly found after stress or GC administration (Lupien et al., 1999; Young et al., 1999; Oei et al., 2006). Two well-employed paradigms in WM research are the Sternberg- and the n-back-paradigm (Sternberg, 1966; Owen et al., 2005). In the Sternberg paradigm (Sternberg, 1966) a memory set containing one to four digits or letters is presented. Subsequently, a series of recognition sets are displayed and subjects have to decide as quickly and as accurately as possible whether or not one of the target stimuli is present. Target as well as recognition set size can vary in the number of letters/digits they contain (see Lupien et al., 1999; Oei et al., 2006). The WM load is manipulated by the number of required comparisons. This task thus focuses especially on the processes of maintenance and controlled search (Unsworth and Engle, 2007).
Using the Sternberg paradigm studies showed that both, the acute administration of high doses of hydrocortisone (Lupien et al., 1999) and the induction of psychosocial stress (Oei et al., 2006) impaired WM. These effects were in both studies restricted to trials with high task difficulty (a high comparison load; Lupien et al., 1999; Oei et al., 2006).
Another WM task is the n-back paradigm. Here subjects are asked to monitor series of briefly presented stimuli and have to decide in each trial if the currently presented stimuli is the same as the one presented two or three trials before (a more detailed description can be found in the method section). The main emphasis of this task is thus on monitoring and constant updating in WM (see Unsworth and Engle, 2007). Imaging studies demonstrated that frontal and parietal regions are continuously involved when subjects attend to various forms of the n-back paradigm (Fletcher and Henson, 2001). For the n-back task only the effect of pharmacological GC manipulation on WM was tested in healthy subjects or patients (Monk and Nelson, 2002; Brunner et al., 2005). In addition, the influence of self-reported daily stress or cognitive interference was investigated using this task (Sliwinski et al., 2006; Stawski et al., 2006). To our knowledge, no study examined the n-back WM performance after acute experimentally induced psychosocial stress. However, this is of interest, because this task assesses specific WM processes which differ from those assessed with the Sternberg paradigm (see above Sternberg, 1966; Fletcher and Henson, 2001; Owen et al., 2005).
The objective of this study thus was to examine the influence of acute psychosocial stress and associated endocrine responses of the SNS and HPA axis on WM of male participants. Salivary alpha-amylase (sAA; as a marker of SNS activity; Rohleder et al., 2004; van Stegeren et al., 2006; Ehlert et al., 2006) and salivary cortisol (as a marker of HPA activity; Dickerson and Kemeny, 2004; Kudielka and Kirschbaum, 2005) were assessed before and several times after a stressful or a non-stressful situation. After the treatment WM was assessed in two conditions varying in their demand. In addition, a series of several blocks of both conditions was presented thus allowing a characterization of the temporal course of the stress effects.
Section snippets
Participants
Forty young, healthy male university students were recruited and randomly assigned to a stress (n=20) or a control (n=20) condition. Four of these 40 subjects (one of the stress and three of the control group) were excluded from data analysis because in at least one block in the WM task they solely pressed one button (only “no” or “yes” answers), probably due to a lack of motivation. All 36 subjects (mean age±S.D.: 24.53±3.48) were normally weighted (BMI 23.52±2.19) and none of them suffered
Cortisol and autonomic responses to stress
A 2 (group)×4 (time) repeated measurement ANOVA was performed for cortisol and alpha-amylase, respectively. The analyses of the endocrine responses revealed higher cortisol concentration in the stressed group compared to the control group (see Figure 1a). The ANOVA indicated a significant time×group interaction (F(3,102)=15.51; p<0.01). Follow up analysis with Bonferroni–Holm corrected independent t-tests revealed significant differences between the stressed and non-stressed group on the +10
Discussion
The main objective of this study was to investigate the effect of acute psychosocial stress and the associated endocrine responses of the HPAA and SNS on WM performance in two levels of task difficulty of a numerical n-back task. We observed that stress led to impaired WM. The effects were not modulated by difficulty (2- or 3-back), but vanished over time. Changes in the reaction time of the WM performance were moderately but significantly correlated with the cortisol response, but were not
Role of the funding sources
The funding source had no further role in the design of the study, and in the collection, analysis, and interpretation of the data. In addition, it had no role in the decision to submit the paper for publication.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Acknowledgements
The work of the authors was supported by a grant from the German Research Foundation (DFG WO 733/6-2). We wish to thank Boris Suchan (Ruhr-University Bochum) and Gernot Horstmann (University of Bielefeld) for their help in programming and implementing the working memory task.
References (90)
- et al.
Endogenous cortisol elevations are related to memory facilitation only in individuals who are emotionally aroused
Psychoneuroendocrinology
(2006) Frontal cortex as the central executive of working memory: time to revise our view
Cortex
(2003)Stress impairs prefrontal cortical function in rats and monkeys: role of dopamine D1 and norepinephrine alpha-1 receptor mechanisms
Prog. Brain Res.
(2000)- et al.
Neurobiology of executive functions: catecholamine influences on prefrontal cortical functions
Biol. Psychiatry
(2005) - et al.
Effects of experimentally-induced emotional states on frontal lobe cognitive task performance
Neuropsychologia
(1999) - et al.
The dependence of span and delayed-response performance on prefrontal cortex
Neuropsychologia
(1999) - et al.
Maintenance versus manipulation of information held in working memory: an event-related fMRI study
Brain Cogn.
(1999) - et al.
The effect of acute stress on subsequent neuropsychological test performance (2003)
Arch. Clin. Neuropsychol.
(2004) - et al.
Learning under stress: how does it work?
Trends Cogn. Sci.
(2006) - et al.
Stress- and treatment-induced elevations of cortisol levels associated with impaired declarative memory in healthy adults
Life Sci.
(1996)
Temporal changes in neural activation during practice of information retrieval from short-term memory: an fMRI study
Brain Res.
Sex differences in HPA axis responses to stress: a review
Biol. Psychol.
Acute HPA axis responses, heart rate, and mood changes to psychosocial stress (TSST) in humans at different times of day
Psychoneuroendocrinology
A non-arousing test situation abolishes the impairing effects of cortisol on delayed memory retrieval in healthy women
Neurosci. Lett.
The modulatory effects of corticosteroids on cognition: studies in young human populations
Psychoneuroendocrinology
The effects of stress and stress hormones on human cognition: implications for the field of brain and cognition
Brain Cogn.
The perfect time to be stressed: a differential modulation of human memory by stress applied in the morning or in the afternoon
Prog. Neuropsychopharmacol. Biol. Psychiatry
[3H]Dexamethasone binding in rat frontal cortex
Brain Res.
Practice-related effects demonstrate complementary roles of anterior cingulate and prefrontal cortices in attentional control
Neuroimage
The effects of hydrocortisone on cognitive and neural function: a behavioral and event-related potential investigation
Neuropsychopharmacology
The functional neuroanatomy of working memory: contributions of human brain lesion studies
Neuroscience
Stress-induced changes in human salivary alpha-amylase activity—associations with adrenergic activity
Psychoneuroendocrinology
Glucocorticoid and mineralocorticoid receptor mRNA expression in squirrel monkey brain
J. Psychiatr. Res.
Age-related differences in glucocorticoid receptor mRNA levels in the human brain
Neurobiol. Aging
Forward and backward memory span should not be combined for clinical analysis
Arch. Clin. Neuropsychol.
Stress and memory: opposing effects of glucocorticoids on memory consolidation and memory retrieval
Neurobiol. Learn. Mem.
Glucocorticoids interact with emotion-induced noradrenergic activation in influencing different memory functions
Neuroscience
Coping with competitive situations in humans
Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev.
Controlled and automatic processing: behavior, theory, and biological mechanisms
Cogn. Sci.
Interaction of negative olfactory stimulation and working memory in schizophrenia patients: development and evaluation of a behavioral neuroimaging task
Psychiatry Res.
The effect of acute stress on memory depends on word valence
Int. J. Psychophysiol.
Free recall of pleasant words from recency positions is especially sensitive to acute administration of cortisol
Psychoneuroendocrinology
Salivary alpha amylase as marker for adrenergic activity during stress: effect of betablockade
Psychoneuroendocrinology
Maintenance versus manipulation in verbal working memory revisited: an fMRI study
Neuroimage
The influence of stress hormones on emotional memory: relevance for psychopathology
Acta Psychol.
The relationship between stress induced cortisol levels and memory differs between men and women
Psychoneuroendocrinology
Catecholamine regulation of the prefrontal cortex
J. Psychopharmacol.
Working memory: looking back and looking forward
Nat. Rev. Neurosci.
The role of inferior parietal and inferior frontal cortex in working memory
Neuropsychology
Effect of corticosteroids on short-term and long-term memory
Neurology
Noradrenergic modulation of working memory and emotional memory in humans
Psychopharmacology
Psychobiological mechanisms of resilience and vulnerability: implications for successful adaptation to extreme stress
Am. J. Psychiatry
Stress and the brain: from adaptation to disease
Nat. Rev. Neurosci.
Acute cortisone administration impairs retrieval of long-term declarative memory in humans
Nat. Neurosci.
Preventive effect of beta-adrenoceptor blockade on glucocorticoid-induced memory retrieval deficits
Am. J. Psychiatry
Cited by (361)
Cerebral, systemic physiological and behavioral responses to colored light exposure during a cognitive task: A SPA-fNIRS study
2024, Behavioural Brain ResearchFinancial scarcity and cognitive performance: A meta-analysis
2024, Journal of Economic PsychologyHow a pilot's brain copes with stress and mental load? Insights from the executive control network
2024, Behavioural Brain ResearchRelationship between stress and resident non-technical skills during interdisciplinary trauma simulations
2023, Surgery (United States)Adversity effects on nonword repetition skills: A proxy measure of language and reading ability
2023, Child Abuse and NeglectTime-dependent effects of acute stress on working memory performance: A systematic review and hypothesis
2023, Psychoneuroendocrinology