Judging the quality of qualitative inquiry: Criteriology and relativism in action
Section snippets
Scenario 1: criteriology in action
Like many sport and exercise scientists, Dr X holds to the parallel perspective described by Sparkes (1998) regarding the issue of validity and the problem of criteria. That is, he1 believes that qualitative research represents an alternative paradigm to quantitative or postpositivistic research, and, therefore, a set of criteria unique to
Scenario 2: relativism in action
Dr Y is equally as concerned as Dr X to promote high quality research in sport and exercise sciences. However, rather than adopting the parallel perspective on validity she renounces this concept and seeks alternative criteria for judging qualitative inquiry in ways described by Sparkes (1998). Dr Y, therefore, like Dr X does believe in using criteria to judge research. The difference is that she does not believe that these criteria should be determined in advance of any particular piece of
Conclusions
Of the two scenarios we have presented, we clearly favour the second over the first. As we have indicated, a criteriological approach to judgment, while it might provide a false sense of security, help in the production of ‘quick’ and ‘clean’ research, and make life easier for those doing the judging, it is based on very shaky philosophical ‘foundations.’ This approach is also inherently limiting and one dimensional. At its worst, such an approach simply imposes its own preordained criteria on
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank the two anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments on an earlier draft of this article.
References (42)
- et al.
The physical activity experiences of men with serious mental illness: three short stories
Psychology of Sport and Exercise
(2008) The new constellation: The ethical-political horizons of modernity/postmodernity
(1991)- et al.
Introduction: entering the field of qualitative research
The enlightened eye
(1991)Final negotiations
(1995)- et al.
Autoethnography, personal narrative, reflexivity: researcher as subject
- et al.
Can there be criteria for selecting research criteria? A hermeneutical analysis of an inescapable dilemma
Qualitative Inquiry
(1998) - et al.
Burnout in competitive junior tennis players: II qualitative analysis
The Sport Psychologist
(1996) - et al.
Fourth generation evaluation
(1989) - et al.
Paradigmatic controversies, contradictions and emerging confluences