The epidemics of myopia: Aetiology and prevention

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.preteyeres.2017.09.004Get rights and content

Highlights

  • There is an epidemic of myopia in the developed countries of East and Southeast Asia.

  • A related epidemic of high myopia is due to early onset myopia and rapid myopic progression.

  • There is a new and highly prevalent form of high myopia, which is acquired rather than genetic.

  • Intense education and limited time outdoors play major causal roles in both epidemics.

  • These modifiable risk factors are already being used in schools to contain the epidemics.

Abstract

There is an epidemic of myopia in East and Southeast Asia, with the prevalence of myopia in young adults around 80–90%, and an accompanying high prevalence of high myopia in young adults (10–20%). This may foreshadow an increase in low vision and blindness due to pathological myopia. These two epidemics are linked, since the increasingly early onset of myopia, combined with high progression rates, naturally generates an epidemic of high myopia, with high prevalences of “acquired” high myopia appearing around the age of 11–13. The major risk factors identified are intensive education, and limited time outdoors. The localization of the epidemic appears to be due to the high educational pressures and limited time outdoors in the region, rather than to genetically elevated sensitivity to these factors. Causality has been demonstrated in the case of time outdoors through randomized clinical trials in which increased time outdoors in schools has prevented the onset of myopia. In the case of educational pressures, evidence of causality comes from the high prevalence of myopia and high myopia in Jewish boys attending Orthodox schools in Israel compared to their sisters attending religious schools, and boys and girls attending secular schools. Combining increased time outdoors in schools, to slow the onset of myopia, with clinical methods for slowing myopic progression, should lead to the control of this epidemic, which would otherwise pose a major health challenge. Reforms to the organization of school systems to reduce intense early competition for accelerated learning pathways may also be important.

Introduction

As a recent report in Nature, entitled “The Myopia Boom” demonstrated, it is now widely accepted that there is an epidemic of myopia in the developed countries of East and Southeast Asia, paralleled by an epidemic of high myopia (Dolgin, 2015). Recent meta-analyses have suggested that close to half of the world's population may be myopic by 2050, with as much as 10% highly myopic (Holden et al., 2016a). Because of the links of high myopia to pathological myopia (Spaide et al., 2014), in which changes in the choroid, retina and sclera can lead to uncorrectable vision loss, and because correction of the underlying refractive error does not prevent the appearance of pathology, prevention of myopia and particularly high myopia has become an important international public health priority (Morgan et al., 2012, Holden et al., 2016b).

These epidemics have been extensively reviewed from a variety of perspectives (Foster and Jiang, 2014, French et al., 2013a, Holden et al., 2014, Holden et al., 2016a, Holden et al., 2016b, Hysi et al., 2014, Morgan, 2003, Morgan and Rose, 2005, Morgan and Rose, 2013, Morgan et al., 2012, Ohno-Matsui et al., 2016, Pan et al., 2012, Rose et al., 2016, Sankaridurg and Holden, 2014, Wallman and Winawer, 2004, Wojciechowski, 2011, Wojciechowski and Hysi, 2013), which can be consulted for more details. The specific aim of this review is to bring together the evidence that there is an epidemic of myopia in the developed countries of East and Southeast Asia, to compare it to an epidemic of myopia in Jewish boys attending Orthodox schools in Israel, to analyse the conditions in which the epidemics of myopia have emerged, and to link broad changes in society to specific changes in education and specific environmental exposures such as near work and time outdoors, through to biological pathways. We will not deal extensively with genetic factors, because it is now generally accepted that genetic change is too slow to explain the rapid changes in prevalence that have taken place in East and Southeast Asia (Hysi et al., 2014, Morgan and Rose, 2005, Wojciechowski, 2011, Wojciechowski and Hysi, 2013). For the purpose of this review, we will simply note that genetic factors impose a level of baseline risk of myopia, and concentrate on the associations of myopia with environmental risk factors which have led to the epidemic of myopia in the developed countries of East and Southeast Asia. We conclude that changes in education and the time that children spend outdoors have played a major causal role in the emergence of the myopia epidemics, and that these factors can be modified to achieve prevention.

Section snippets

The evidence for an epidemic

In the developed countries of East and Southeast Asia, the prevalence of myopia is now 80–90% in children completing secondary schooling at the age of 17–18 (Morgan et al., 2012), compared to the prevalences of 20–40% seen in many developed western countries (Cumberland et al., 2015, Morgan et al., 2012, Pan et al., 2012, Vitale et al., 2008, Vitale et al., 2009, Williams et al., 2015a). In contrast, in less developed parts of the world, with less developed education systems, the prevalence of

The evidence for an epidemic of high myopia

In parallel with the epidemic of school myopia, an epidemic of high myopia (more than 5 or 6D of myopia) has appeared. This epidemic was clear in the first studies from Taiwan (Ding et al., 2017, Lin et al., 2004). Fig. 3 shows current data on myopia and high myopia from East and Southeast Asia. The prevalence of high myopia has increased by as much as 10-fold, more than the proportional increase in total myopia, meaning that the percentage of myopes who become highly myopic has increased (

Comparison with societies with little formal education

There are few studies with good methodology in societies with little formal education, but the prevalence of myopia, determined with cycloplegia, was only 0.4% in a large sample of illiterate African adults in Gabon (Holm, 1937), and the prevalence of myopia under cycloplegia in uneducated adult Inuit was only 1.2% (Skeller, 1954). Only 20 years later, several papers using cycloplegia reported low prevalences of myopia in older Inuit, with much higher prevalences in the younger adults (Alsbirk,

Environmental risk factors

While the systematic association of myopia prevalence with educational experiences is striking, as with all associations, it could be confounded by parallel changes. As societies have developed, there have been systematic increases in education, but there have been parallel changes in a number of other parameters such as family income, living environments, including changes in population density, style of housing, pollution, diet, and lifestyle, and some associations with factors of this kind

Time outdoors as a protective factor

There is now consistent evidence that children who spend more time outdoors are less likely to be or become myopic (Dirani et al., 2009, French et al., 2013a, French et al., 2013b, Guggenheim et al., 2012, Guo et al., 2013a, Guo et al., 2013b, He et al., 2015, Ip et al., 2008, Jones et al., 2007, Jones-Jordan et al., 2011, Jones-Jordan et al., 2012, Khader et al., 2006, Lin et al., 2014, Mutti et al., 2002, Onal et al., 2007, Parssinen and Lyyra, 1993, Rose et al., 2008a, Rose et al., 2008b,

Time outdoors

Studies on animal models have shown that, at least in the form-deprivation model, bright light exposures can completely abolish the development of experimental myopia (Ashby et al., 2009, Ashby and Schaeffel, 2010, Karouta and Ashby, 2015, Lan et al., 2013, Lan et al., 2014, Lan et al., 2016, Norton, 2016, Smith et al., 2012, Smith et al., 2013). It now also generally accepted that the mechanism initially proposed (Rose et al., 2008a), involving light-induced release of dopamine (Boelen et al.,

Time outdoors does not appear to regulate progression

While the biological pathways that lead to delay in the onset of myopia seem to be reasonably clear, there is general agreement that there is little evidence for regulation of progression, defined as myopic shifts in refraction in those who are already myopic (French et al., 2013a, French et al., 2013b, He et al., 2015, Jones et al., 2007, Jones-Jordan et al., 2012, Rose et al., 2008a, Wu et al., 2013a, Wu et al., 2013b, Xiong et al., 2017). However, Parssinen et al. (2014) have reported that

Are genetic differences important?

The tight geographical localization of the myopia epidemic has led to the plausible hypothesis that the populations of these regions might be genetically more susceptible to environmental risk factors than other populations. However, when dealing with ethnic differences, it is vital to consider cultural factors as explanations, because human ethic/racial groups are rather similar in overall genetic terms, while differentiation in terms of cultural factors, while difficult to quantify, is often

A framework for myopia prevention

Seet et al. (2001) developed a framework for understanding the emergence of an epidemic of myopia in Singapore, and for prevention of myopia. They distinguished between distal factors which covered broad social factors such as urbanization and meritocracy, intermediate factors such as indoor environment and near work activity and proximal factors such as genetics and biology. With the advantage of over 15 additional years of research, we propose a more developed hierarchy of causal factors,

Future directions

At one level, future directions in this area are dominated by the need to take action. At the public health level, school-based interventions to increase the amount of time that children spend outdoors provide an immediate approach to reducing the onset of myopia, which should flow through to reductions in the prevalence of high myopia. There is a further need to explore changes to curriculum and school systems to reduce educational pressures, so that more time outdoors is available. Further

Conclusions

Overall, we conclude that the increasing prevalences of myopia and high myopia can be largely explained by two causal factors, increased educational pressures and reductions in the amount of time that children spend outdoors, both of which promote the development of myopia. Increases in the prevalence of myopia can be traced back to the emergence of modern western education systems over 100 years ago. A perfect storm of high educational pressures and limited time outdoors has converged to

Acknowledgements

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors. The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

References (186)

  • Y. Guo et al.

    Outdoor activity and myopia among primary students in rural and urban regions of Beijing

    Ophthalmology

    (2013)
  • B.A. Holden et al.

    Global prevalence of myopia and high myopia and temporal trends from 2000 through 2050

    Ophthalmology

    (2016)
  • J. Huang et al.

    Efficacy comparison of 16 interventions for myopia control in children: a network meta-analysis

    Ophthalmology

    (2016)
  • R. Iribarren

    Crystalline lens and refractive development

    Prog. Retin. Eye Res.

    (2015)
  • W. Lan et al.

    Changes in dopamine and ZENK during suppression of myopia in chicks by intense illuminance

    Exp. Eye Res.

    (2016)
  • Y.B. Liang et al.

    Refractive errors in a rural Chinese adult population the Handan eye study

    Ophthalmology

    (2009)
  • H.H. Liu et al.

    Prevalence and progression of myopic retinopathy in Chinese adults: the Beijing Eye Study

    Ophthalmology

    (2010)
  • H. Matsumura et al.

    Prevalence of myopia and refractive changes in students from 3 to 17 years of age

    Surv. Ophthalmol.

    (1999)
  • E. Maul et al.

    Refractive error study in children: results from La Florida, Chile

    Am. J. Ophthalmol.

    (2000)
  • C.S. McCarthy et al.

    Dopaminergic agents affect the ability of brief periods of normal vision to prevent form-deprivation myopia

    Exp. Eye Res.

    (2007)
  • P.L. Megaw et al.

    Diurnal patterns of dopamine release in chicken retina

    Neurochem. Int.

    (2006)
  • A. Mirshahi et al.

    Myopia and level of education: results from the Gutenberg health study

    Ophthalmology

    (2014)
  • P.H. Alsbirk

    Refraction in adult West Greenland Eskimos. A population study of spherical refractive errors, including oculometric and familial correlations

    Acta Ophthalmol.

    (1979)
  • A.A. Alvarez et al.

    Quantifying light exposure patterns in young adults

    J. Mod. Opt.

    (2013)
  • R.G. Anera et al.

    Prevalence of refractive errors in school-age children in Morocco

    Clin. Exp. Ophthalmol.

    (2009)
  • R. Ashby et al.

    The effect of ambient illuminance on the development of deprivation myopia in chicks

    Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci.

    (2009)
  • R.S. Ashby et al.

    The effect of bright light on lens compensation in chicks

    Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci.

    (2010)
  • K.G. Au Eong et al.

    Education and myopia in 110,236 young Singaporean males

    Singap. Med. J.

    (1993)
  • K.G. Au Eong et al.

    Race, culture and Myopia in 110,236 young Singaporean males

    Singap. Med. J.

    (1993)
  • M.K. Boelen et al.

    Light-stimulated release of dopamine from the primate retina is blocked by 1-2-amino-4-phosphonobutyric acid (APB)

    Vis. Neurosci.

    (1998)
  • D.J. Brotman et al.

    In search of fewer independent risk factors

    Arch. Intern. Med.

    (2005)
  • D. Cheng et al.

    Myopia prevalence in Chinese-Canadian children in an optometric practice

    Optom. Vis. Sci.

    (2007)
  • S.J. Chew et al.

    The pattern of myopia in young Singaporean men

    Singap. Med. J.

    (1988)
  • S.Y. Chua et al.

    Age of onset f myopia predicts risk of high myopia in later childhood in myopic Singapore children

    Ophthalmic Physiol. Opt.

    (2016)
  • P.M. Cumberland et al.

    Frequency and distribution of refractive error in adult life: methodology and findings of the UK Biobank Study

    PLoS One

    (2015)
  • D. Czepita et al.

    Prevalence of myopia and hyperopia in a population of Polish schoolchildren

    Ophthalmic Physiol. Opt.

    (2007)
  • R. Dandona et al.

    Refractive errors in an urban population in southern India: the Andhra Pradesh eye disease study

    Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci.

    (1999)
  • R. Dandona et al.

    Population-based assessment of refractive error in India: the Andhra Pradesh eye disease study

    Clin. Exp. Ophthalmol.

    (2002)
  • R. Dandona et al.

    Refractive error in children in a rural population in India

    Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci.

    (2002)
  • L. Deng et al.

    Children's refractions and visual activities in the school year and summer

    Optom. Vis. Sci.

    (2010)
  • B. Dharani et al.

    Comparison of measurements of time outdoors and light levels as risk factors for myopia in young Singapore children

    Eye

    (2012)
  • M. Dirani et al.

    Outdoor activity and myopia in Singapore teenage children

    Br. J. Ophthalmol.

    (2009)
  • E. Dolgin

    The myopia boom

    Nature

    (2015)
  • L. Donovan et al.

    Myopia progression in Chinese children is slower in summer than in winter

    Optom. Vis. Sci.

    (2012)
  • L. Donovan et al.

    Myopia progression rates in urban children wearing single-vision spectacles

    Optom. Vis. Sci.

    (2012)
  • P.J. Foster et al.

    Epidemiology of myopia

    Eye

    (2014)
  • A.N. French et al.

    Patterns of myopigenic activities with age, gender and ethnicity in Sydney schoolchildren

    Ophthalmic Physiol. Opt.

    (2013)
  • Z. Gao et al.

    Refractive error in school children in an urban and rural setting in Cambodia

    Ophthalmic Epidemiol.

    (2012)
  • W.S. Goh et al.

    Changes in refractive trends and optical components of Hong Kong Chinese aged 19-39 years

    Ophthalmic Physiol. Opt.

    (1994)
  • J.A. Guggenheim et al.

    Time outdoors and physical activity as predictors of incident myopia in childhood: a prospective cohort study

    Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci.

    (2012)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text