Elsevier

Neuroscience

Volume 272, 11 July 2014, Pages 21-28
Neuroscience

The brain structure correlates of individual differences in trait mindfulness: A voxel-based morphometry study

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2014.04.051Get rights and content

Highlights

  • The neuroanatomical basis of trait mindfulness was investigated in a large sample.

  • Trait mindfulness positively correlated with the GM volume in the hippocampus/amygdala and ACC.

  • Trait mindfulness negatively correlated with the GM volume in the PCC and OFC.

Abstract

Mindfulness is the state of being attentive to and aware of what is taking place in the present, which is beneficial for reducing stress-related symptoms and improving mental and physical health. Previous studies have demonstrated that meditation practice can improve individuals’ mindfulness through modifying functions and structures of multiple brain regions, including the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC), insula, fronto-limbic network, posterior cingulate cortex (PCC), and temporal-parietal junction. However, little is known about the neuroanatomical correlates of trait mindfulness. In the current study, we used voxel-based morphometry to investigate the neural correlates of individual differences in trait mindfulness by correlating the gray matter (GM) volume of each voxel across the whole brain with trait mindfulness measured by the Mindful Attention Awareness Scale in a large sample of young adults (N = 247). We found that individuals who were more mindful of the present had greater GM volume in the right hippocampus/amygdala and bilateral ACC, but less GM volume in bilateral PCC and the left orbitofrontal cortex. These results suggest that trait mindfulness is associated with brain regions involved in executive attention, emotion regulation, and self-referential processing, through which mindfulness may exert its beneficial effects on psychological and physical well-being.

Introduction

Have you ever started eating a snack bar, taken a couple of bites, then noticed all you had left was an empty packet in your hand? Or, have you ever been driving somewhere and arrived at your destination only to realize you remembered nothing about your journey? Often during our daily lives, we are “not present.” The nonjudgmental awareness of what is taking place in the present is called mindfulness (Brown and Ryan, 2003). A large body of evidence has shown that mindfulness produces a wide range of beneficial effects, including improvements in cognitive functioning, psychological well-being, and physical health, for healthy participants as well as for those with clinical disorders such as anxiety, depression, and attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (Tang et al., 2007, Carmody and Baer, 2008, Shapiro et al., 2008, Schmertz et al., 2009, Smalley et al., 2009, Howell et al., 2010, Killingsworth and Gilbert, 2010, Barnhofer et al., 2011, Conn, 2011).

It has been proposed that the wide range of benefits related to mindfulness are produced by an array of distinct but interacting cognitive mechanisms, namely, attention regulation, body awareness, emotion regulation, and change in perspective on the self (Hölzel et al., 2011). Neuroimaging studies provided supporting evidence for these mechanisms by demonstrating that meditation practice improves mindfulness through modifying functions and structures of multiple regions involved in these mechanisms (Hölzel et al., 2011, Ott et al., 2011). For example, experienced meditators, compared with non-meditators, showed increased activation and greater cortical thickness in the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) (Holzel et al., 2007, Grant et al., 2010, Gard et al., 2012) and insula (Lazar et al., 2005, Farb et al., 2007, Farb et al., 2010), which are typically involved in executive attention (Bush et al., 2000), and body awareness (Craig, 2003) respectively. In addition, meditation training is associated with modified gray matter (GM) density in the fronto-limbic network (including multiple sites of the prefrontal cortex, amygdala, and hippocampus), which is particularly important for emotion regulation (Holzel et al., 2008, Holzel et al., 2010, Luders et al., 2009a, Luders et al., 2012, Chiesa, 2010, Froeliger et al., 2012, Leung et al., 2013). Finally, the posterior cingulate cortex (PCC) and temporal-parietal junction (TPJ), which are engaged in the self-referential processing (Northoff and Bermpohl, 2004), showed modified GM density following meditation practice (Holzel et al., 2011).

Although previous literature mostly focused on mindfulness fostered by meditation training, a growing number of studies have defined mindfulness as a dispositional trait and investigated the individual differences in trait mindfulness. Yet, there is only limited research assessing the neural basis of trait mindfulness, indicating involvement of the regions corresponding to those obtained in meditation training. For example, several functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies have shown that higher trait mindfulness is associated with reduced activation in the amygdala and increased activation in the medial prefrontal cortex (MPFC), orbitofrontal cortex (OFC), ACC, and TPJ (Creswell et al., 2007, Modinos et al., 2010, Ives-Deliperi et al., 2011, Brown et al., 2013, Dickenson et al., 2013), and trait mindfulness is negatively correlated with resting-state activity in the PCC (Way et al., 2010). To date, only two recent studies have examined the relationship between brain structure and trait mindfulness (Murakami et al., 2012, Taren et al., 2013). One study measured the trait mindfulness by the Five-Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire (FFMQ) in a small sample of participants (N = 19), and observed a positive correlation between one of the five facets on the FFMQ (the describing facet measuring a tendency to label observed experiences with words) and GM volume in the amygdala and insula (Murakami et al., 2012). The other study examined neuroanatomical correlates of trait mindfulness, measured by the Mindful Attention Awareness Scale (MAAS, Brown and Ryan, 2003), by focusing on pre-selected ROIs in the limbic system, and found that trait mindfulness was associated with volumes in the amygdala and hippocampus (Taren et al., 2013). Therefore, the relationship between trait mindfulness and brain structure has never been examined across the whole brain in a large sample of participants.

In our study, we used voxel-based morphometry (VBM) to investigate the neuroanatomical correlates of mindfulness by examining the association between GM volume and individual differences in trait mindfulness across the whole brain in a large sample of participants (N = 247). We used the MAAS to assess mindfulness as a dispositional trait, which is defined as the general tendency to be attentive to and aware of present-moment experiences in everyday life (Brown and Ryan, 2003). The MAAS has been widely used to assess individual differences in trait mindfulness in previous studies (e.g., Barnes et al., 2007, Creswell et al., 2007, Carmody et al., 2008, Niemiec et al., 2010). We hypothesized that individual differences in trait mindfulness would be associated with GM volume within multiple brain regions reported in previous studies to be implicated in meditation practice and correlate with trait mindfulness, namely the ACC, insula, MPFC, OFC, amygdala, hippocampus, PCC, and TPJ (Hölzel et al., 2011, Ott et al., 2011).

Section snippets

Participants

Two hundred and forty-seven college students (131 females; 19–25 years of age, Mean = 21.7, SD = 1.0) voluntarily participated in this study. Participants with self-reported history of neurological or psychiatric disorders were excluded. The Institutional Review Board (IRB) of the Beijing Normal University approved the behavioral and MRI protocols. All participants gave informed written consent prior to the experiment.

Assessment of mindfulness

Mindfulness was assessed with the MAAS (Brown and Ryan, 2003), which is a

Results

Participants’ MAAS scores were used as an index of their trait mindfulness, with higher scores indicating a tendency to be more mindful. The kurtosis (−0.132) and skewness (0.079) of the scores indicated normality of the data, with a range between −1 and +1 (Muthen and Kaplan, 1985, Marcoulides and Hershberger, 1997). The scale showed satisfying internal reliability (Cronbach’s α = 0.83), and the mindfulness scores ranged from 2.07 to 5.40 (mean = 3.79; SD = 0.57), suggesting a significant amount of

Discussion

In the present study, we investigated the neuroanatomical correlates of individual differences in trait mindfulness. Specifically, we used VBM to correlate the GM volume of each voxel across the whole brain with mindfulness scores measured by MAAS in a large sample of young adults. We found that individuals more mindful of the present possessed less GM volume in bilateral PCC. In addition, individual’s trait mindfulness was associated with greater GM volume in the right hippocampus/amygdala and

Conclusion

Our study investigated the neuroanatomical correlates of trait mindfulness in a large sample of participants. We showed that individual differences in trait mindfulness were associated with GM volume in multiple brain regions involved in executive attention, self-referential processing, and emotion regulation. These findings not only help our understanding of the neural mechanisms related to mindfulness, but also invite future studies on how mindfulness produces beneficial effects on

Author contributions

J. Liu conceived the experiment; H. Lu, M. Xu, X. Wang & X. Li, collected the data; H. Lu analyzed the data; H. Lu, Y. Song & J. Liu wrote the paper.

Competing financial interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31230031, 91132703, and 31100808) and the National Basic Research Program of China (2010CB833903).

References (81)

  • A.J. Howell et al.

    Mindfulness predicts sleep-related self-regulation and well-being

    Pers Individ Dif

    (2010)
  • E. Luders et al.

    The underlying anatomical correlates of long-term meditation: larger hippocampal and frontal volumes of gray matter

    Neuroimage

    (2009)
  • G. Northoff et al.

    Cortical midline structures and the self

    Trends Cogn Sci

    (2004)
  • G. Northoff et al.

    Self-referential processing in our brain? A meta-analysis of imaging studies on the self

    Neuroimage

    (2006)
  • K.N. Ochsner et al.

    The cognitive control of emotion

    Trends Cogn Sci

    (2005)
  • F.L. Schmidt et al.

    Theory testing and measurement error

    Intelligence

    (1999)
  • T.W. Schmitz et al.

    Relevance to self: a brief review and framework of neural systems underlying appraisal

    Neurosci Biobehav Rev

    (2007)
  • E.K. Silberman et al.

    Hemispheric lateralization of functions related to emotion

    Brain and Cogn

    (1986)
  • H. Takeuchi et al.

    Regional gray matter volume of dopaminergic system associate with creativity: evidence from voxel-based morphometry

    NeuroImage

    (2010)
  • H. Takeuchi et al.

    Failing to deactivate: the association between brain activity during a working memory task and creativity

    NeuroImage

    (2011)
  • V.A. Taylor et al.

    Impact of mindfulness on the neural responses to emotional pictures in experienced and beginner meditators

    NeuroImage

    (2011)
  • V. Van Veen et al.

    The anterior cingulate as a conflict monitor: fMRI and ERP studies

    Physiol Behav

    (2002)
  • T.D. Wager et al.

    Prefrontal-subcortical pathways mediating successful emotion regulation

    Neuron

    (2008)
  • R.A. Baer et al.

    Assessment of mindfulness by self-report the Kentucky inventory of mindfulness skills

    Assessment

    (2004)
  • S.J. Banks et al.

    Amygdala–frontal connectivity during emotion regulation

    Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci.

    (2007)
  • S. Barnes et al.

    The role of mindfulness in romantic relationship satisfaction and responses to relationship stress

    J Marital Fam Ther

    (2007)
  • O. Blanke et al.

    Linking out-of-body experience and self processing to mental own-body imagery at the temporoparietal junction

    J Neurosci

    (2005)
  • K.W. Brown et al.

    The benefits of being present: mindfulness and its role in psychological well-being

    J Pers Soc Psychol

    (2003)
  • K.W. Brown et al.

    Dispositional mindfulness and the attenuation of neural responses to emotional stimuli

    Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci

    (2013)
  • J. Carmody et al.

    Relationships between mindfulness practice and levels of mindfulness, medical and psychological symptoms and well-being in a mindfulness-based stress reduction program

    J Behav Med

    (2008)
  • A. Chiesa

    Vipassana meditation: systematic review of current evidence

    J Altern Complement Med

    (2010)
  • E. Congdon et al.

    Differences in neural activation as a function of risk-taking task parameters

    Front Neurosci

    (2013)
  • V.S. Conn

    The power of being present: the value of mindfulness interventions in improving health and well-being

    West J Nurs Res

    (2011)
  • A.D. Craig

    Interoception: the sense of the physiological condition of the body

    Curr Opin Neurobiol

    (2003)
  • J.D. Creswell et al.

    Neural correlates of dispositional mindfulness during affect labeling

    Psychosom Med

    (2007)
  • J. Dickenson et al.

    Neural correlates of focused attention during a brief mindfulness induction

    Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci

    (2013)
  • T. Emavardhana et al.

    Changes in self-concept, ego defense mechanisms, and religiosity following seven-day Vipassana meditation retreats

    J Sci Study Relig

    (1997)
  • N.A. Farb et al.

    Attending to the present: mindfulness meditation reveals distinct neural modes of self-reference

    Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci

    (2007)
  • N.A. Farb et al.

    Minding one’s emotions: mindfulness training alters the neural expression of sadness

    Emotion

    (2010)
  • N.A. Farb et al.

    The mindful brain and emotion regulation in mood disorders

    Can J Psychiatry

    (2012)
  • Cited by (41)

    • RELN rs7341475 Associates with Brain Structure in Japanese Healthy Females

      2022, Neuroscience
      Citation Excerpt :

      As our sample consisted of healthy females without a diagnosis of mental illness, the enlargement of rGMV in ACC in subjects with the SZ risk genotype may indicate the action of this protective mechanism. Conversely, previous studies have reported that an increase in the rGMV in the ACC is associated with various personality traits such as empathy (Banissy et al., 2012), mindfulness (Lu et al., 2014), narcissistic personality (Nenadić et al., 2021), type A behavior pattern (Wang et al., 2014), internal locus of control (Hashimoto et al., 2015), extraversion (Kapogiannis et al., 2013), self-handicapping tendency (Takeuchi et al., 2013), a need for uniqueness (Takeuchi et al., 2012), internet addiction tendency (Li et al., 2015), and effortful control (Zhang et al., 2015). Therefore, enlargement of the ACC rGMV as protection against SZ development in G/G homozygotes could be a secondary mechanism that contributes to these personalities.

    • Neurostructural correlates of dispositional self-compassion

      2021, Neuropsychologia
      Citation Excerpt :

      The difference between the mindfulness component of self-compassion and mindfulness more generally is that the former refers to mindfulness only in face of one's personal suffering. It has been found that trait mindfulness was linked to greater GMV in ACC and hippocampus/amygdala, and less GMV in PCC and orbito-frontal cortex (Lu et al., 2014). Another construct similar to certain component of self-compassion whose neurostructural correlates have been examined is brooding.

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    Equal contribution.

    View full text