Cognitive, Behavioral, and Systems NeuroscienceResearch PaperGrip force regulates hand impedance to optimize object stability in high impact loads
Graphical Abstract
•••
Highlights
▶ Hand-held objects interact with the environment through impacts. ▶Motor prediction is critical as time available for sensory feedback is too short. ▶In collisions, grip force peaked ∼65 ms after the impact. ▶This maximum is pre-programmed and robust across target stiffness. ▶The CNS optimizes stability by regulating hand impedance through grip force.
Section snippets
Experimental procedures
In the first experiment, participants were instructed to tap a real target situated above or below the hand's neutral position with an instrumented object. In the second experiment, we asked another group of volunteers to produce collisions against a target while gripping a force transducer mounted on a robotic arm. We used a virtual environment to simulate stiff and soft targets and implemented catch trials in which the target was only presented visually.
Results
In the first experiment, participants produced collisions with an object against two identical targets, situated 30 cm above or below the object's neutral position. We measured the grip force profiles en route to the target and at the collision to investigate the strategy to cope with impulse-like load forces.
Fig. 2 illustrates upward (left column, Up) and downward (right column, Down) trials for the same participant. In the upward collision, the vertical position increased until the
Discussion
Several studies have used the modulation of grip force with load force as an index of prediction in the control of voluntary movement. Various authors reported anticipatory adjustment of grip force for different forms of load force including those dependent on position, velocity and acceleration, and with impulsive as well as smoothly varying profile (Turrell et al., 1999, Flanagan et al., 2003, Nowak et al., 2004a). Here, we assessed the predictive mechanisms underlying grip force control in a
Acknowledgments
This research was supported by grants from Prodex, OSTC (Belgian Federal Office for Scientific, Technical and Cultural affairs), FSR and ESA, ESTEC Contract 14725/00/NL/JS to JLT, from the UK Medical Research Council to AMW, and EU IST to AMW and RMB and by a Grant from the Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BB/E009174/1), from the National Science Foundation (BSC 0726685) (both to JD). The authors declare no competing interests.
References (26)
- et al.
Vibration energy absorption (VEA) in human fingers-hand-arm system
Med Eng Phys
(2004) - et al.
Coupling of grip force and load force during arm movements with grasped objects
Neurosci Lett
(1993) - et al.
Prediction precedes control in motor learning
Curr Biol
(2003) Anticipatory control of grip force in rapid arm movement
- et al.
Modulation of reflex EMG and stiffness in response to stretch of human finger muscle
J Neurophysiol
(1983) - et al.
Predictive mechanisms control grip force after impact in self-triggered perturbations
J Mot Behav
(2009) - et al.
The central nervous system stabilizes unstable dynamics by learning optimal impedance
Nature
(2001) - et al.
When the fingers need to act faster than the arm: coordination between grip force and load force during oscillation of a hand-held object
Exp Brain Res
(2009) - et al.
Efficiency of grip force adjustments for impulsive loading during imposed and actively produced collisions
Q J Exp Psychol A
(2003) - et al.
Predictive control of grip force when moving object with an elastic load applied on the arm
Exp Brain Res
(2006)
Modulation of grip force with load force during point-to-point arm movements
Exp Brain Res
The stability of precision grip forces during cyclic arm movements with a hand-held load
Exp Brain Res
The role of internal models in motion planning and control: evidence from grip force adjustments during movements of hand-held loads
J Neurosci
Cited by (26)
A haptic illusion created by gravity
2023, iScienceA review of the neurobiomechanical processes underlying secure gripping in object manipulation
2021, Neuroscience and Biobehavioral ReviewsCitation Excerpt :Evidence indicates that humans typically achieve close to a minimal grip-to-load force ratio during object manipulation – just enough force to exceed that which is required to avoid the object slipping or falling (i.e., a safety margin of grip force; Johansson and Westling, 1987). It is interesting that there is a close temporal relationship between the grip force applied and the load force exerted by the object during its manipulation and this grip-to-load force coupling has been observed under various conditions; for example, in discrete grip and lift tasks (Johansson and Westling, 1984), during grasping of objects with different surface textures and under different friction conditions (Cadoret and Smith, 1996; Burstedt et al., 1999; Flanagan and Wing, 1997), when cyclically moving objects at different frequencies, even when an initial excessive grip force is imposed (Flanagan and Wing, 1993; Flanagan and Tresilian, 1994; White et al., 2005), with tangential torque (Kinoshita et al., 1997), and during gripping while jumping (Flanagan and Tresilian, 1994). Notwithstanding these observations, research also demonstrates that the temporal characteristics of grip-to-load force coupling are not always strictly limited to the goal of maintaining a stable safety margin of grip force, and can instead be a function of task demands and/or the variability of the context (Grover et al., 2018; Hadjiosif and Smith, 2015).
Predictive and Reactive Grip Force Responses to Rapid Load Increases in People With Multiple Sclerosis
2017, Archives of Physical Medicine and RehabilitationCitation Excerpt :Our results therefore suggest that cerebellar contributions to anticipatory aspects of object manipulation are largely preserved in MS. This conclusion has to be considered preliminary, given the small size of our sample. The data may also indicate that the brain networks involved in anticipatory behavior are robust enough to compensate for distributed lesions in the early to middle stages of MS. The dissociation of deficits in the self-release as compared with the experimenter-release condition in PwMS can also be taken as further evidence that the force response during the self-release condition does not include prominent reactive components.28,42 Our results showed that PwMS were significantly slower in the 2 functional tests (JTHFT, 9-HPT).
Motor learning of cue-dependent pull-force changes during an isometric precision grip task
2015, Human Movement ScienceCitation Excerpt :Under their experimental conditions the time of grip-force peak was not with the time of collision but was postponed by approximately 65 ms after peak. The authors argue that the collision released energy as vibrations which were transmitted to the upper limb (White et al., 2011). Local tissues of the fingers absorb the energy and damp high frequencies in the range 10–1000 Hz (Burström & Sörensson, 1999; Dong et al., 2004).
Analysis of the effects of surface stiffness on the contact interaction between a finger and a cylindrical handle using a three-dimensional hybrid model
2014, Medical Engineering and PhysicsCitation Excerpt :For practical applications, however, the stiffness of the covering materials can only be varied within a certain range. A covering material that is too soft could make a power tool difficult to control, especially for a vibrating tool [33,34]. Consequently, the operators may need to apply more force to grasp the tool, resulting in an increase of the musculoskeletal load in the hand.
Unintended hand movements after abrupt cessation of variable and constant opposing forces
2013, NeuroscienceCitation Excerpt :Aimed movements with and against gravity have similar kinematics (Papaxanthis et al., 1998), but grossly different patterns of muscle activity (Virjii-Babul et al., 1994). When a hand-held object is moved in different directions, grip forces are well-adjusted to gravitational forces (Flanagan and Wing, 1995; Hermsdörfer et al., 2000), and collisions of the object with a surface are accompanied by sharp increases of grip force before and briefly after the impact (White et al., 2011). A second major source of variable resistance is the mass of objects.