Grip force regulates hand impedance to optimize object stability in high impact loads

doi:10.1016/j.neuroscience.2011.04.055

Neuroscience

Volume 189, 25 August 2011, Pages 269-276

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2011.04.055 Get rights and content

Abstract

Anticipatory grip force adjustments are a prime example of the predictive nature of motor control. An object held in precision grip is stabilized by fine adjustments of the grip force against changes in tangential load force arising from inertia during acceleration and deceleration. When an object is subject to sudden impact loads, prediction becomes critical as the time available for sensory feedback is very short. Here, we investigated the control of grip force when participants performed a targeted tapping task with a hand-held object. During the initial transport phase of the movement, load force varied smoothly with acceleration. In contrast, in the collision, load forces sharply increased to very large values. In the transport phase, grip force and load force were coupled in phase, as expected. However, in the collision, grip force did not parallel load force. Rather, it exhibited a stereotyped profile with maximum ∼65 ms after peak load at contact. By using catch trials and a virtual environment, we demonstrate that this peak of grip force is pre-programmed. This observation is validated across experimental manipulations involving different target stiffness and directions of movement. We suggest that the central nervous system optimizes stability in object manipulation—as in catching—by regulating mechanical parameters including stiffness and damping through grip force. This study provides novel insights about how the brain coordinates grip force in manipulation involving an object interacting with the environment.

Graphical Abstract

•••

Highlights

▶ Hand-held objects interact with the environment through impacts. ▶Motor prediction is critical as time available for sensory feedback is too short. ▶In collisions, grip force peaked ∼65 ms after the impact. ▶This maximum is pre-programmed and robust across target stiffness. ▶The CNS optimizes stability by regulating hand impedance through grip force.

Section snippets

Experimental procedures

In the first experiment, participants were instructed to tap a real target situated above or below the hand's neutral position with an instrumented object. In the second experiment, we asked another group of volunteers to produce collisions against a target while gripping a force transducer mounted on a robotic arm. We used a virtual environment to simulate stiff and soft targets and implemented catch trials in which the target was only presented visually.

Results

In the first experiment, participants produced collisions with an object against two identical targets, situated 30 cm above or below the object's neutral position. We measured the grip force profiles en route to the target and at the collision to investigate the strategy to cope with impulse-like load forces.

Fig. 2 illustrates upward (left column, Up) and downward (right column, Down) trials for the same participant. In the upward collision, the vertical position increased until the

Discussion

Several studies have used the modulation of grip force with load force as an index of prediction in the control of voluntary movement. Various authors reported anticipatory adjustment of grip force for different forms of load force including those dependent on position, velocity and acceleration, and with impulsive as well as smoothly varying profile (Turrell et al., 1999, Flanagan et al., 2003, Nowak et al., 2004a). Here, we assessed the predictive mechanisms underlying grip force control in a

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by grants from Prodex, OSTC (Belgian Federal Office for Scientific, Technical and Cultural affairs), FSR and ESA, ESTEC Contract 14725/00/NL/JS to JLT, from the UK Medical Research Council to AMW, and EU IST to AMW and RMB and by a Grant from the Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BB/E009174/1), from the National Science Foundation (BSC 0726685) (both to JD). The authors declare no competing interests.

References (26)

R.G. Dong et al.
Vibration energy absorption (VEA) in human fingers-hand-arm system
Med Eng Phys
(2004)
J.R. Flanagan et al.
Coupling of grip force and load force during arm movements with grasped objects
Neurosci Lett
(1993)
J.R. Flanagan et al.
Prediction precedes control in motor learning
Curr Biol
(2003)
A.M. Wing
Anticipatory control of grip force in rapid arm movement
K. Akazawa et al.
Modulation of reflex EMG and stiffness in response to stretch of human finger muscle
J Neurophysiol
(1983)
Y. Bleyenheuft et al.
Predictive mechanisms control grip force after impact in self-triggered perturbations
J Mot Behav
(2009)
E. Burdet et al.
The central nervous system stabilizes unstable dynamics by learning optimal impedance
Nature
(2001)
F. Danion et al.
When the fingers need to act faster than the arm: coordination between grip force and load force during oscillation of a hand-held object
Exp Brain Res
(2009)
Y.N. Delevoye-Turrell et al.
Efficiency of grip force adjustments for impulsive loading during imposed and actively produced collisions
Q J Exp Psychol A
(2003)
M. Descoins et al.
Predictive control of grip force when moving object with an elastic load applied on the arm
Exp Brain Res
(2006)

J.R. Flanagan et al.

Modulation of grip force with load force during point-to-point arm movements

Exp Brain Res

(1993)

J.R. Flanagan et al.

The stability of precision grip forces during cyclic arm movements with a hand-held load

Exp Brain Res

(1995)

J.R. Flanagan et al.

The role of internal models in motion planning and control: evidence from grip force adjustments during movements of hand-held loads

J Neurosci

(1997)

Cited by (26)

A haptic illusion created by gravity
2023, iScience
Human dexterity requires very fine and efficient control of fingertip forces, which relies on the integration of cutaneous and proprioceptive feedback. Here, we examined the influence of gravity on isometric force control. We trained participants to reproduce isometric vertical forces on a dynamometer held between the thumb and the index finger in normal gravity and tested them during parabolic flight creating phases of microgravity and hypergravity, thereby strongly influencing the motor commands and the proprioceptive feedback. We found that gravity creates the illusion that upward forces are larger than downward forces of the same magnitude. The illusion increased under hypergravity and was abolished under microgravity. Gravity also affected the control of the grip force employed to secure the grasp. These findings suggest that gravity biases the haptic estimation of forces, which has implications for the design of haptic devices to be used during flight or space activities.
A review of the neurobiomechanical processes underlying secure gripping in object manipulation
2021, Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews
Citation Excerpt :
Evidence indicates that humans typically achieve close to a minimal grip-to-load force ratio during object manipulation – just enough force to exceed that which is required to avoid the object slipping or falling (i.e., a safety margin of grip force; Johansson and Westling, 1987). It is interesting that there is a close temporal relationship between the grip force applied and the load force exerted by the object during its manipulation and this grip-to-load force coupling has been observed under various conditions; for example, in discrete grip and lift tasks (Johansson and Westling, 1984), during grasping of objects with different surface textures and under different friction conditions (Cadoret and Smith, 1996; Burstedt et al., 1999; Flanagan and Wing, 1997), when cyclically moving objects at different frequencies, even when an initial excessive grip force is imposed (Flanagan and Wing, 1993; Flanagan and Tresilian, 1994; White et al., 2005), with tangential torque (Kinoshita et al., 1997), and during gripping while jumping (Flanagan and Tresilian, 1994). Notwithstanding these observations, research also demonstrates that the temporal characteristics of grip-to-load force coupling are not always strictly limited to the goal of maintaining a stable safety margin of grip force, and can instead be a function of task demands and/or the variability of the context (Grover et al., 2018; Hadjiosif and Smith, 2015).
O’SHEA, H. and S. J. Redmond. A review of the neurobiomechanical processes underlying secure gripping in object manipulation. NEUROSCI BIOBEHAV REV 286–300, 2021. Humans display skilful control over the objects they manipulate, so much so that biomimetic systems have yet to emulate this remarkable behaviour. Two key control processes are assumed to facilitate such dexterity: predictive cognitive-motor processes that guide manipulation procedures by anticipating action outcomes; and reactive sensorimotor processes that provide important error-based information for movement adaptation. Notwithstanding increased interdisciplinary research interest in object manipulation behaviour, the complexity of the perceptual-sensorimotor-cognitive processes involved and the theoretical divide regarding the fundamentality of control mean that the essential mechanisms underlying manipulative action remain undetermined. In this paper, following a detailed discussion of the theoretical and empirical bases for understanding human dexterous movement, we emphasise the role of tactile-related sensory events in secure object handling, and consider the contribution of certain biophysical and biomechanical phenomena. We aim to provide an integrated account of the current state-of-art in skilled human-object interaction that bridges the literature in neuroscience, cognitive psychology, and biophysics. We also propose novel directions for future research exploration in this area.
Predictive and Reactive Grip Force Responses to Rapid Load Increases in People With Multiple Sclerosis
2017, Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Citation Excerpt :
Our results therefore suggest that cerebellar contributions to anticipatory aspects of object manipulation are largely preserved in MS. This conclusion has to be considered preliminary, given the small size of our sample. The data may also indicate that the brain networks involved in anticipatory behavior are robust enough to compensate for distributed lesions in the early to middle stages of MS. The dissociation of deficits in the self-release as compared with the experimenter-release condition in PwMS can also be taken as further evidence that the force response during the self-release condition does not include prominent reactive components.28,42 Our results showed that PwMS were significantly slower in the 2 functional tests (JTHFT, 9-HPT).
To determine the effects of multiple sclerosis (MS) on predictive and reactive grip force control in a catching task and on clinical tests of hand function.
Case-control study with matched-pairs control group.
University prevention and rehabilitation center.
Participants (N=30) consisted of people with multiple sclerosis (PwMS) (n=15) and healthy controls (n=15), matched for sex, age, and hand dominance.
Not applicable.
Performance on the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS), Nine-Hole Peg Test (9-HPT), Jebsen-Taylor Hand Function Test (JTHFT), and 2-point discrimination (2PD) was evaluated. To analyze grip force control, blindfolded subjects held a receptacle equipped with grip force and acceleration sensors in their hand. In a catching task, a weight was dropped from (1) the experimenter's hand unexpectedly into the receptacle (reactive force control); and (2) from the subject's opposite hand (predictive force control). Grip forces and time lags were analyzed.
PwMS (mean EDSS ± SD, 4.2±1.86) had impairments in the 9-HPT and JTHFT (P<.001). The 2PD did not differ significantly between PwMS and controls. During reactive force control (catching task 1), PwMS showed significantly higher grip forces immediately after impact (P<.05), and a significant prolongation of the time from grip force increase until reaching the peak of grip force (P<.001). PwMS and controls did not differ during predictive force control (catching task 2; P>.1).
Exaggerated grip force responses and alterations of timing after an unpredictable perturbation, combined with preserved grip force control during predictable conditions, is a characteristic pattern of fine motor control deficits in MS. Measures of reactive grip force responses may be used to complement neurologic assessments. Further studies exploring the usefulness of these measures should be performed in a broader community of PwMS.
Motor learning of cue-dependent pull-force changes during an isometric precision grip task
2015, Human Movement Science
Citation Excerpt :
Under their experimental conditions the time of grip-force peak was not with the time of collision but was postponed by approximately 65 ms after peak. The authors argue that the collision released energy as vibrations which were transmitted to the upper limb (White et al., 2011). Local tissues of the fingers absorb the energy and damp high frequencies in the range 10–1000 Hz (Burström & Sörensson, 1999; Dong et al., 2004).
The “raspberry task” represents a precision grip task that requires continuous adjustment of grip and pull forces. During this task subjects grip a specialized grip rod and have to increase the pull force linearly while the rod is locked. The aim of this study was to determine whether an associated, initially neutral cue is able to evoke pull-force changes in the raspberry task. A standard delay paradigm was used to study cued pull-force changes during an ongoing movement resulting in unloading. Pull force and EMG activity of hand and arm muscles were recorded from 13 healthy, young subjects. The cue was associated with a complex change in motor behavior.
In this task, cued force changes take place more rapidly than in protective reflex systems (in median after the second presentation of the cueing stimulus). A cued force change was detectable in two-thirds of paired trials. Although the force change is produced by a decrease of the EMG activity in several grip- and pull-force-producing muscles, the most significant effect in the majority of the subjects was an increase of the activity of the flexor carpi ulnaris muscle which antagonises corresponding pull-force-producing muscles. Cued force changes require adequately and precisely controlled activation of the muscle groups involved in the movement.
Analysis of the effects of surface stiffness on the contact interaction between a finger and a cylindrical handle using a three-dimensional hybrid model
2014, Medical Engineering and Physics
Citation Excerpt :
For practical applications, however, the stiffness of the covering materials can only be varied within a certain range. A covering material that is too soft could make a power tool difficult to control, especially for a vibrating tool [33,34]. Consequently, the operators may need to apply more force to grasp the tool, resulting in an increase of the musculoskeletal load in the hand.
Contact interactions between the hand and handle, such as the contact surface softness and contact surface curvature, will affect both physical effort and musculoskeletal fatigue, thereby the comfort and safety of power tool operations. Previous models of hand gripping can be categorized into two groups: multi-body dynamic models and finite element (FE) models. The goal of the current study is to develop a hybrid FE hand gripping model, which combines the features of conventional FE models and multi-body dynamic models. The proposed model is applied to simulate hand-gripping on a cylindrical handle with covering materials of different softness levels. The model included three finger segments (distal, middle, and proximal phalanxes), three finger joints (the distal interphalangeal (DIP), proximal interphalangeal (PIP), and metacarpophalangeal (MCP) joint), and major anatomical substructures. The model was driven by joint moments, which are the net effects of all passive and active muscular forces acting about the joints. The finger model was first calibrated by using experimental data of human subject tests, and then applied to investigate the effects of surface softness on contact interactions between a finger and a cylindrical handle. Our results show that the maximal compressive stress and strain in the soft tissues of the fingers can be effectively reduced by reducing the stiffness of the covering material.
Unintended hand movements after abrupt cessation of variable and constant opposing forces
2013, Neuroscience
Citation Excerpt :
Aimed movements with and against gravity have similar kinematics (Papaxanthis et al., 1998), but grossly different patterns of muscle activity (Virjii-Babul et al., 1994). When a hand-held object is moved in different directions, grip forces are well-adjusted to gravitational forces (Flanagan and Wing, 1995; Hermsdörfer et al., 2000), and collisions of the object with a surface are accompanied by sharp increases of grip force before and briefly after the impact (White et al., 2011). A second major source of variable resistance is the mass of objects.
Humans are highly efficient in moving in a world of variable resistive forces which result, e.g., from different masses of objects or different directions of movements relative to gravity. However, the underlying mechanisms are challenged when an opposing force is suddenly removed. The resulting involuntary movements are known as accident risks in everyday life. We studied their characteristics upon abrupt cessations of opposing forces of 1, 2, and 4 N which were presented in a series of variable or constant forces. The characteristics of the involuntary hand movements are largely determined by the mechanical impedance of the limb. The involuntary movements are oscillatory in nature, and their amplitude increases with stronger opposing force. Limb impedance is modulated both in a reactive and in an anticipatory manner. The reactive modulation occurs during each involuntary movement as a consequence of the neural responses elicited by the rapid limb acceleration consequent upon the cessation of the opposing force. Anticipatory modulation of limb impedance may serve to produce similar involuntary movements in spite of different opposing forces. The modulation is thus stronger with variable forces, where differences between resulting involuntary movements can be experienced more easily, than with constant forces.

View all citing articles on Scopus

View full text

Cognitive, Behavioral, and Systems NeuroscienceResearch PaperGrip force regulates hand impedance to optimize object stability in high impact loads

Abstract

Graphical Abstract

Highlights

Section snippets

Experimental procedures

Results

Discussion

Acknowledgments

Med Eng Phys

Neurosci Lett

Curr Biol

Modulation of reflex EMG and stiffness in response to stretch of human finger muscle

J Neurophysiol

Predictive mechanisms control grip force after impact in self-triggered perturbations

J Mot Behav

The central nervous system stabilizes unstable dynamics by learning optimal impedance

Nature

When the fingers need to act faster than the arm: coordination between grip force and load force during oscillation of a hand-held object

Exp Brain Res

Efficiency of grip force adjustments for impulsive loading during imposed and actively produced collisions

Q J Exp Psychol A

Predictive control of grip force when moving object with an elastic load applied on the arm

Exp Brain Res

Modulation of grip force with load force during point-to-point arm movements

Exp Brain Res

The stability of precision grip forces during cyclic arm movements with a hand-held load

Exp Brain Res

The role of internal models in motion planning and control: evidence from grip force adjustments during movements of hand-held loads

J Neurosci

Cognitive, Behavioral, and Systems Neuroscience
Research Paper
Grip force regulates hand impedance to optimize object stability in high impact loads