Elsevier

NeuroImage

Volume 172, 15 May 2018, Pages 786-807
NeuroImage

Neurofeedback with fMRI: A critical systematic review

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.12.071Get rights and content

Highlights

  • We conducted a systematic review of 99 fMRI neurofeedback (fMRI-nf) experiments.

  • fMRI-nf successfully drives BOLD regulation and behavioral change.

  • BOLD regulation guarantees neither neural regulation nor clinical improvement.

  • Psychosocial factors may contribute to regulation of BOLD signal and behavior.

  • Efficacy remains undetermined because few studies test for clinical significance.

Abstract

Neurofeedback relying on functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI-nf) heralds new prospects for self-regulating brain and behavior. Here we provide the first comprehensive review of the fMRI-nf literature and the first systematic database of fMRI-nf findings. We synthesize information from 99 fMRI-nf experiments—the bulk of currently available data. The vast majority of fMRI-nf findings suggest that self-regulation of specific brain signatures seems viable; however, replication of concomitant behavioral outcomes remains sparse. To disentangle placebo influences and establish the specific effects of neurofeedback, we highlight the need for double-blind placebo-controlled studies alongside rigorous and standardized statistical analyses. Before fMRI-nf can join the clinical armamentarium, research must first confirm the sustainability, transferability, and feasibility of fMRI-nf in patients as well as in healthy individuals. Whereas modulating specific brain activity promises to mold cognition, emotion, thought, and action, reducing complex mental health issues to circumscribed brain regions may represent a tenuous goal. We can certainly change brain activity with fMRI-nf. However, it remains unclear whether such changes translate into meaningful behavioral improvements in the clinical domain.

Introduction

In recent years, neurofeedback using fMRI (fMRI-nf) has increasingly captured the interest of scientists, clinical researchers, practitioners, and the general public. This technique provides individuals with near real-time feedback from their ongoing brain activity (Fig. 1). FMRI-nf offers many advantages over traditional, albeit increasingly challenged, forms of neurofeedback aiming to entrain and control electroencephalographic signals (EEG-nf; Birbaumer et al., 2013). Unlike EEG-nf, fMRI-nf provides millimetric spatial resolution and consistently guides participants to successfully regulate their brain activity indexed by the blood-oxygen-level dependent (BOLD) signal (Thibault et al., 2015). In addition, research on fMRI-nf improves on many key methodological shortcomings that plague typical EEG-nf experiments (e.g., Arnold et al., 2013, Thibault and Raz, 2016)—employing more rigorous control conditions (e.g., sham neurofeedback from an unrelated brain signal) and measuring both learned regulation of the BOLD signal as well as behavioral response. Here we offer a critical systematic review of the fast growing literature on fMRI-nf, with an eye to examining the underlying mechanisms, observable outcomes, and potential therapeutic benefits.

The present review gathers findings from nearly all available primary experiments involving fMRI-nf, which aim to train neural regulation or modify behavior (we exclude case studies and other experiments that present only individual level analyses). We opt for a systematic review rather than a meta-analysis due to the wide variety of experimental designs and statistical methods used in fMRI-nf. Whereas meta-analyses generally focus on a specific treatment and outcome measure, the spectrum of fMRI-nf studies hardly renders itself to this meta-analytic approach—the studies train distinct brain regions, employ a variety of controls, use different time points as their baseline, measure diverse behaviors, and vary in the length of training and instructions provided. While we encourage meta-analyses for more specific questions concerning fMRI-nf (e.g., Emmert et al., 2016), a comprehensive meta-analysis would risk misrepresenting the heterogeneity of the field by assigning a single valuation to the technique as a whole (Moher et al., 2009, Thompson, 1994).

After outlining the parameters of our literature search, we present the distribution of control conditions and experimental designs throughout the field. We then examine the effectiveness of fMRI-nf protocols in (1) training self-regulation of the BOLD signal and (2) modifying behavior. Some scholars speciously conflate these two distinct outcome categories, assuming that altered BOLD patterns will inevitably or necessarily drive observable changes in behavior; however, this assumption hardly holds true. After considering the observable outcomes, we evaluate the status of fMRI-nf as it begins to edge towards clinical acceptance. We conclude that fMRI-nf presents a reliable tool for modulating brain activity, but that current experimental protocols vary too widely to reify therapeutic efficacy and endorse practical guidelines at this time.

Section snippets

Review protocol

We searched the Topic: (neurofeedback) AND (fMRI OR “functional magnetic resonance imag*” OR “functional MRI”) across All Databases and all years in Web of Science on August 25th, 2017 (see Fig. 2 for a flow chart of study inclusion). Of the 434 published articles written in English that were returned, we omitted 114 not directly related to fMRI-nf (e.g., performed neurofeedback with a different imaging modality or used fMRI as a means of analysis only), 72 conference proceedings or abstracts,

Experimental design in fMRI-nf

How does the fMRI-nf literature stack up to the gold standard of experimental science across most clinical research domains: placebo-controlled and double-blind? Ideally, control groups receive a highly comparable treatment that omits the active ingredient or mechanism of action purported to drive improvement, and neither participants nor experimenters can identify who receives veritable versus placebo treatment. Increasingly, fMRI-nf experiments are rising to this standard and employing a

BOLD self-regulation

The question at the heart of fMRI-nf research is whether individuals can learn to volitionally modulate neural activity in circumscribed brain regions. The cumulative evidence suggests that participants can indeed successfully modulate the BOLD signal from a wide variety of brain regions (Fig. 5A). While this overarching finding may spark enthusiasm, we would do well to remember that participants in thousands of imaging studies before the advent of neurofeedback had already regulated their own

Behavioral self-regulation

The promise of fMRI-nf stems from the potential to regulate brain processes and, in turn, to improve well-being. Nonetheless, we remain far from establishing causal links between circumscribed patterns of brain activity and complex human behaviors. Whereas neuroscientists have successfully mapped discrete stimuli onto the sensory cortices (e.g., primary motor, sensory, or visual areas), the neural correlates of psychiatric conditions and multifaceted mental processes appear to rely on the

Sustainability, transferability, and practicality of fMRI-nf

While positive findings abound in fMRI-nf research, the clinical feasibility and value of this technique remains unconfirmed. A few years ago, several prominent neurofeedback researchers stated in an authoritative review that the “real usefulness [of fMRI-nf] in clinical routine is far from being demonstrated” (Sulzer et al., 2013a). The present review suggests that their statement remains valid: to date, few studies have tested clinical significance, examined patient populations, or

Steps forward in neurofeedback protocols

Since the inception of fMRI-nf in 2003, research on neurofeedback has progressed significantly. For one, fMRI-nf makes several important advances over more traditional, EEG-based, approaches to neurofeedback. EEG-nf experiments generally involve dozens of training sessions and often neglect to directly measure whether participants learn to modulate neural activity. In contrast, fMRI-nf requires only a few runs to impart BOLD modulation, and relevant experiments almost always measure neural

Conclusion

The present comprehensive review suggests that fMRI-nf may develop into a powerful biobehavioral intervention. Experiments repeatedly demonstrate that real-time feedback allows individuals to modulate the BOLD signal from a plethora of cortical regions. And yet, BOLD self-regulation falls short of implying behavioral self-regulation. Our in-depth review reveals three important lacunae in the domain of fMRI-nf:

First, replications remain sparse. Of the 99 experiments we identified, few show

Funding

This work was supported by the Canada Research Chair program and Canadian Institutes of Health Research (MOP-106454), Discovery grants from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) (38656-210) and the Bial Foundation (118/14). Robert T. Thibault, also a Bial recipient, acknowledges an Alexander Graham Bell Canada Graduate Scholarship and Michael Smith Foreign Study Supplement from NSERC. Michael Lifshitz acknowledges a Canada Vanier Scholarship from NSERC and a

Contributors

RTT, the guarantor of this article, led the systematic review, defined the search criteria, extracted data from the publications, and prepared the initial draft of the manuscript. AM and RRR helped review the publications and edit the manuscript. AR and ML provided comments throughout manuscript preparation and worked with RTT to produce the final draft.

References (200)

  • P. Easterbrook et al.

    Publication bias in clinical research

    Lancet

    (1991)
  • K. Emmert et al.

    Continuous vs. intermittent neurofeedback to regulate auditory cortex activity of tinnitus patients using real-time fMRI - a pilot study

    NeuroImage Clin.

    (2017)
  • K. Emmert et al.

    Meta-analysis of real-time fMRI neurofeedback studies using individual participant data: how is brain regulation mediated?

    NeuroImage

    (2016)
  • K.A. Garrison et al.

    Real-time fMRI links subjective experience with brain activity during focused attention

    NeuroImage

    (2013)
  • S.M. Greer et al.

    Control of nucleus accumbens activity with neurofeedback

    NeuroImage

    (2014)
  • I. Habes et al.

    fMRI neurofeedback of higher visual areas and perceptual biases

    Neuropsychologia

    (2016)
  • S. Haller et al.

    Dynamic reconfiguration of human brain functional networks through neurofeedback

    NeuroImage

    (2013)
  • J.P. Hamilton et al.

    Effects of salience-network-node neurofeedback training on affective biases in major depressive disorder

    Psychiatry Res. Neuroimaging

    (2016)
  • C.A. Hanlon et al.

    Reduction of cue-induced craving through realtime neurofeedback in nicotine users: the role of region of interest selection and multiple visits

    Psychiatry Res. - Neuroimaging

    (2013)
  • M. Hui et al.

    Modulation of functional network with real-time fMRI feedback training of right premotor cortex activity

    Neuropsychologia

    (2014)
  • Y. Koush et al.

    Connectivity-based neurofeedback: dynamic causal modeling for real-time fMRI

    NeuroImage

    (2013)
  • E.J. Lawrence et al.

    Self-regulation of the anterior insula: reinforcement learning using real-time fMRI neurofeedback

    NeuroImage

    (2014)
  • J.-H. Lee et al.

    Real-time fMRI-based neurofeedback reinforces causality of attention networks

    Neurosci. Res.

    (2012)
  • J.-H. Lee et al.

    Brain-machine interface via real-time fMRI: preliminary study on thought-controlled robotic arm

    Neurosci. Lett.

    (2009)
  • S. Leucht et al.

    What does the HAMD mean?

    J. Affect. Disord.

    (2013)
  • X. Li et al.

    Volitional reduction of anterior cingulate cortex activity produces decreased cue craving in smoking cessation: a preliminary real-time fMRI study

    Addict. Biol.

    (2012)
  • D.F. Abbott et al.

    Brief breath holding may confound functional magnetic resonance imaging studies

    Hum. Brain Mapp.

    (2005)
  • H. Akil et al.

    The future of psychiatric research: genomes and neural circuits

    Science

    (2010)
  • A.A. Alegria et al.

    Real-time fMRI neurofeedback in adolescents with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder

    Hum. Brain Mapp.

    (2017)
  • S. Ali et al.

    Empirical neuroenchantment: from reading minds to thinking critically

    Front. Hum. Neurosci.

    (2014)
  • D.G. Altman et al.

    Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence

    BMJ  Br. Med. J.

    (1995)
  • K. Amano et al.

    Learning to associate orientation with color in early visual areas by associative decoded fMRI report

    Curr. Biol.

    (2016)
  • L.E. Arnold et al.

    EEG neurofeedback for ADHD: double-blind sham-controlled randomized pilot feasibility trial

    J. Atten. Disord.

    (2013)
  • T. Auer et al.

    Training efficiency and transfer success in an extended real-time functional MRI neurofeedback training of the somatomotor cortex of healthy subjects

    Front. Hum. Neurosci.

    (2015)
  • P. Banca et al.

    Visual motion imagery neurofeedback based on the hMT+/V5 complex: evidence for a feedback-specific neural circuit involving neocortical and cerebellar regions

    J. Neural. Eng.

    (2015)
  • B.D. Berman et al.

    Self-modulation of primary motor cortex activity with motor and motor imagery tasks using real-time fMRI-based neurofeedback

    NeuroImage

    (2011)
  • B.D. Berman et al.

    Modulation of functionally localized right insular cortex activity using real-time fMRI-based neurofeedback

    Front. Hum. Neurosci.

    (2013)
  • M.L. Blefari et al.

    Improvement in precision grip force control with self-modulation of primary motor cortex during motor imagery

    Front. Behav. Neurosci.

    (2015)
  • S. Bray et al.

    Direct instrumental conditioning of neural activity using functional magnetic resonance imaging-derived reward feedback

    J. Neurosci. Off. J. Soc. Neurosci.

    (2007)
  • A.B. Bruehl et al.

    Real-time neurofeedback using functional MRI could improve down-regulation of amygdala activity during emotional stimulation: A proof-of-concept study

    Brain Topogr.

    (2014)
  • K.S. Button

    Statistical rigor and the perils of chance

    eNeuro

    (2016)
  • K.S. Button et al.

    Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience

    Nat. Rev. Neurosci.

    (2013)
  • K. Buyukturkoglu et al.

    Volitional regulation of the supplementary motor area with fMRI-BCI neurofeedback in Parkinson's disease: a pilot study

  • K. Buyukturkoglu et al.

    Self-regulation of anterior insula with real-time fMRI and its behavioral effects in obsessive-compulsive disorder: a feasibility study

    PLoS One

    (2015)
  • M. Canterberry et al.

    Sustained reduction of nicotine craving with real-time neurofeedback: exploring the role of severity of dependence

    Nicotine Tob. Res.

    (2013)
  • Center for Medicade and Medicare Services

    Outpatient Charge Data CY 2014

    (2014)
  • J.Y. Chiao et al.

    The weirdest brains in the world

    Behav. Brain Sci.

    (2010)
  • O. Cohen et al.

    fMRI-based robotic embodiment: controlling a humanoid robot by thought using real-time fMRI

    Presence Teleoperators Virtual Environ.

    (2014)
  • J.S. Cordes et al.

    Cognitive and neural strategies during control of the anterior cingulate cortex by fMRI neurofeedback in patients with schizophrenia

    Front. Behav. Neurosci.

    (2015)
  • A. Cortese et al.

    Multivoxel neurofeedback selectively modulates confidence without changing perceptual performance

    Nat. Commun.

    (2016)
  • Cited by (153)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text