Elsevier

NeuroImage

Volume 86, 1 February 2014, Pages 554-572
NeuroImage

Review
Social cognition and the cerebellum: A meta-analysis of over 350 fMRI studies

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.09.033Get rights and content

Highlights

  • This meta-analysis explores the role of the cerebellum in social cognition.

  • There is low cerebellar involvement in conditions that trigger the mirror network.

  • There is also low cerebellar involvement during social mentalizing.

  • Abstraction in mentalizing (traits, stereotypes, one's future…) strongly involves the cerebellum.

Abstract

This meta-analysis explores the role of the cerebellum in social cognition. Recent meta-analyses of neuroimaging studies since 2008 demonstrate that the cerebellum is only marginally involved in social cognition and emotionality, with a few meta-analyses pointing to an involvement of at most 54% of the individual studies. In this study, novel meta-analyses of over 350 fMRI studies, dividing up the domain of social cognition in homogeneous subdomains, confirmed this low involvement of the cerebellum in conditions that trigger the mirror network (e.g., when familiar movements of body parts are observed) and the mentalizing network (when no moving body parts or unfamiliar movements are present). There is, however, one set of mentalizing conditions that strongly involve the cerebellum in 50–100% of the individual studies. In particular, when the level of abstraction is high, such as when behaviors are described in terms of traits or permanent characteristics, in terms of groups rather than individuals, in terms of the past (episodic autobiographic memory) or the future rather than the present, or in terms of hypothetical events that may happen. An activation likelihood estimation (ALE) meta-analysis conducted in this study reveals that the cerebellum is critically implicated in social cognition and that the areas of the cerebellum which are consistently involved in social cognitive processes show extensive overlap with the areas involved in sensorimotor (during mirror and self-judgments tasks) as well as in executive functioning (across all tasks). We discuss the role of the cerebellum in social cognition in general and in higher abstraction mentalizing in particular. We also point out a number of methodological limitations of some available studies on the social brain that hamper the detection of cerebellar activity.

Introduction

A 38-year-old woman who had a tumor removed from the fourth ventricle via a surgical incision of 3 mm in the cerebellum, was vividly described by Mariën et al. (2013b) as having an intriguing disorder exhibiting severe disturbances in social behavior:

On the third day after surgery, the clinical neurological examination revealed an alert and cooperative patient…Mood and affect were not appropriate. She remained unconcerned about her medical condition and acted in a rather euphoric way. She often responded to external stimuli in a frontal-like, disinhibited manner and presented with inappropriate behaviour, over-familiarity or flamboyant and impulsive actions… Thirty-one days after tumor surgery, the patient evolved to a state of complete mutism. … After 12 days of akinetic mutism the clinical condition started to change….At the affective and behavioral level, the patient often responded with drama and outbursts of intense and uncontrollable pseudo-bulbar-like crying and laughter (pp. 285–289).

The dysfunctions described in this adult patient provide evidence of severe social and emotional impairment in patients with cerebellar damage. This is surprising, because after a decade of social neuroscientific research using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) one would have hardly predicted such a dramatic impact of cerebellar pathology on social functions that very much resembles “frontal-like” behavior and affective symptoms, including disinhibited and inappropriate behavior, gradually evolving towards mutism and uncontrollable emotionality. And yet, it is a typical description of a complex of behavioral and affective disorders following cerebellar damage (Mariën et al., 2013a, Mariën et al., 2013b). The severity of the social impairments stands in sharp contrast to the marginal role that social neuroimaging reports have attributed to the cerebellum. Current social neuroscientific research is mainly focused on how we interpret actions of other humans and how we interact with them, with the underlying idea that dysfunctions in human social behavior as described above (or other disorders, e.g., autism, paranoia), might often begin with misunderstanding the behaviors of others and the self.

What is the role of the cerebellum in social neuroscience? Traditionally, the cerebellum is conceived as a modulator of motor functions (including tonus, balance and coordination), and motor speech production. However, during the past three decades neuroanatomical, neuroimaging and clinical studies have provided evidence that the cerebellum is also involved in the modulation of cognitive and affective processing (Andreasen and Pierson, 2008, Baillieux et al., 2008). New evidence recently compiled and summarized by Stoodley, Schmahmann and colleagues (Stoodley and Schmahmann, 2009, Stoodley and Schmahmann, 2010, Stoodley et al., 2012, Stoodley et al., 2013) and Mariën and colleagues (De Smet et al., 2013, Mariën et al., 2013a, Mariën et al., 2013b) provides converging evidence in support of a crucial role of the cerebellum in many higher-order cognitive and affective functions, such as spatial, motor and executive processing, working memory, language, somatosensory and emotional processing. Nevertheless, social cognition and social functioning are only marginally dealt with in these recent reviews.

The aim of this article is to review the available data in the fMRI literature, and to look for evidence for a possible role of the cerebellum in social cognition. Social cognition is the process of perceiving and interpreting the behavior and state of mind of people, including the self, given non-verbal or verbal input (Amodio and Frith, 2006, Van Overwalle, 2009, Van Overwalle and Baetens, 2009). Interpreting another person's mind is also often termed mentalizing. Distortions in social cognition are often considered as the underlying dysfunction causing severe anomalies in social and affective functioning, such as in autism, schizophrenia, paranoia and prefrontal syndromes. The critical question addressed in this study is: has neuroscience overlooked the role of the cerebellum in social behavior and social cognition?

To understand which role the cerebellum might play in social perception, it is necessary to briefly discuss the functional networks subserving social cognition (Van Overwalle, 2009, Van Overwalle and Baetens, 2009) and to summarize the functional neuroanatomy of the cerebellum (Stoodley and Schmahmann, 2010). Based on these insights a number of potential parallels might be uncovered to unravel the mechanisms of cerebellar involvement in social cognition.

In social cognition, two major networks are typically distinguished: the mirror network and the mentalizing network (Van Overwalle, 2009, Van Overwalle and Baetens, 2009). The function of each network is well understood, although researchers disagree on specific details and processes. In addition, recent developments in behavioral and imaging research on social cognition have pointed to a specific class of social mentalizing that requires a high level of abstraction. This process of abstraction is often framed in terms of construal level theory (Trope and Liberman, 2010). Hence, three sets of categories of social judgments can be distinguished:

  • The mirror network allows the reading of other persons' body, that is, their non-verbal behaviors and movements. Specifically, this network recognizes the goal of a perceived action by matching it to a representation in our memory of our own actions. When observing an action executed by other persons, we rapidly sense the parallels with own actions represented in our behavioral repertoire, and from this the goals of the other person are intuitively inferred (Gallese et al., 2004, Keysers and Gazzola, 2007, Keysers and Perrett, 2004, Uddin et al., 2007).

  • The mentalizing network, supporting social mentalizing or theory of mind (ToM), enables to read other persons' mind from information that is often based on verbal descriptions (Amodio and Frith, 2006). This sets the mentalizing network apart as a relatively high-level cognitive process. Van Overwalle (2009) proposed a major distinction in the functionality and anatomy of mentalizing processes involving either temporary events and actions or more permanent characteristics of people such as their traits.

  • Abstract judgments such as traits are essential for appropriate social cognition and interaction. High abstraction is observed when a behavior is moved away from the concrete here-and-now and described in terms of increasing psychological distance and generality. For instance, abstraction increases when social behavior is characterized in terms of personality traits away from concrete situations (Baetens et al., in press, Meyer et al., 2012, Spunt and Lieberman, 2012, Spunt et al., 2010), in a past or future context away from the present (Martinelli et al., 2012, Spreng et al., 2008, Svoboda et al., 2006), as hypothetical rather than as a concrete fact (Van Hoeck et al., 2013) or in terms of social groups rather than as individuals (Van der Cruyssen et al., submitted for publication).

Fig. 1, taken from Stoodley and Schmahmann (2010), shows a three-dimensional view of the cerebellum from the anterior and the posterior side. The cerebellum is organized into 10 lobules. The anterior lobules (I–V) are separated from the posterior lobules (VI–X) by the primary fissure (in red). The lateral hemispheres expanded during evolution, and this expansion comprises mainly lobules VI and VII, including Crus I and II (Andreasen and Pierson, 2008, Stoodley and Schmahmann, 2010). Hence, we might expect that, if there exists a strong functional connection between the cerebellum and the more recently evolved social capacities in humans (Dunbar, 1998), these social functions might be mediated by the most recently developed cerebellar lobules VI and VII.

Fig. 2 shows the results of two recent meta-analyses on a number of functional contributions of the cerebellum to higher cognition (E et al., in press, Stoodley and Schmahmann, 2009). It is apparent that several lobules of the cerebellum are not only involved in sensorimotor functions, but also in non-motor functions such as central-executive and linguistic processes. Neuroanatomical studies have identified several reciprocal loops connecting the cerebellum to different parts of the cerebrum, including the prefrontal cortex, the hippocampus, the limbic cortex, the superior temporal cortex and the parietal cortex (Baillieux et al., 2008), areas which all play a crucial role in social cognition, emotion regulation and a variety of other higher cognitive functions (Andreasen and Pierson, 2008, Baillieux et al., 2008, Stoodley and Schmahmann, 2010). Studies on intrinsic connectivity identified distinct networks involved in sensorimotor, executive and default mode (related to mentalizing) processing encompassing both the cerebellum and cortex (Habas et al., 2009). Therefore, the cerebellum might contribute to functions that may form the building blocks of social cognition.

The growing amount of evidence indicating that the cerebellum is recruited in higher cognition has led to the development of diverse theories that attempt to explain this involvement. One theory developed by Schmahmann and co-workers relates to the breakdown of functions after cerebellar lesions and includes, as noted earlier, various components of motor, cognitive and affective processes (Schmahmann and Sherman, 1998, Stoodley et al., 2013). Because of its essential uniform and regular anatomy, Schmahmann and co-workers view the cerebellum as an oscillation dampener, modulating behavior automatically around a homeostatic baseline. Disruption of this “universal cerebellar transform” may result in dysmetria of movement, thought and emotion including domain-specific deficiencies in executive functioning, spatial cognition, language, affect and personality. Another set of theories views the cerebellum as a domain-general modulator of cognitive processes. Its function is to detect errors in patterns of information, and to update the information by error-driven mechanisms and to send adaptive feedback to the cerebral cortex (e.g., Andreasen and Pierson, 2008, Bower, 1997). Bower (1997), for instance, argues that the cerebellum itself is not the seat of any particular function, but rather facilitates the efficiency by which other brain structures perform their own processes. According to this view, the cerebellum is useful but not strictly necessary for many different kinds of brain processes. Interestingly, this theory predicts that cerebellar involvement increases as the number and complexity of motor, cognitive, and emotional tasks increases. In support of this, recent evidence shows that the cerebellum is more strongly activated when task difficulty raises (Salmi et al., 2010, Xiang et al., 2003).

Regardless of whether the cerebellum is considered having several distinct functions or a domain-general regulatory function, neuroscientific evidence points to the involvement of distinct cerebellar lobules in various cognitive and affective processes. The following cerebellar processes described in recent functional meta-analyses (E et al., in press, Stoodley and Schmahmann, 2009) seem to share functional communalities with social cognition:

  • Motor regulation is, as noted earlier, one of the core functions of the cerebellum. In social cognition, comprehension of non-verbal movements and behavior by others often depends on the mirror network (Van Overwalle and Baetens, 2009). This network allows to recognize the goal of a perceived action by matching it to a representation in our memory of similar actions executed by ourselves (Gallese et al., 2004, Keysers and Gazzola, 2007, Keysers and Perrett, 2004, Uddin et al., 2007). The mirror network is sometimes extended to somatosensory and affective processes to facilitate the understanding of another person's state of mind and emotions (Keysers et al., 2010). Perhaps this sensorimotor aspect of reading others' non-verbal behaviors is also shared in the cerebellum.

  • Executive functions consist of a variety of cognitive abilities to plan and direct goal-oriented behavior and decision-making. As social mentalizing involves the interpretation of goal-directed actions by others and extracting from this interpretation permanent characteristics such as others' traits, some executive processes relating to social mentalizing may be shared with the cerebellum.

  • Closely related to executive functionality is working memory, as this cognitive skill may aid to perform some executive tasks that are very complex and demanding. Hence we may expect the involvement of working memory in the most complex and abstract social judgments that require holding in mind several pieces of socially-relevant information.

  • Language and especially semantic understanding of the meaning of words, sentences and narratives are inherently involved in social cognition. To grasp the meaning of a story or sentence, the comprehension of goals, behaviors and mind of agents is often a prerequisite, so that semantics and pragmatics shares a lot of commonalities with social mentalizing (Mar, 2011). It seems plausible that in addition to a range of the known linguistic functions (De Smet et al., 2013, Mariën et al., 2013a, Mariën et al., 2013b), the cerebellum also mediates semantics and pragmatics of language.

  • Emotions are closely related to social cognition, because adequate and subtle social interaction requires the understanding of others' emotions, including reading facial expressions. Emotions show a large overlap with social mentalizing (Van Overwalle, 2009), which may also be mediated by the cerebellum.

  • Spatial processing involves navigation in space and places. Spatial navigation shares some core areas with social mentalizing in the cortex (Spreng et al., 2008). Hence, it is possible that some of this shared functionality exists also in the cerebellum, perhaps for regulating and fine-tuning spatial recognition in the perception of goal-directed behavior, or for the understanding of the mental state and attitude of other people.

Cerebellar involvement in this range of functions is shown in Fig. 2. The lobules prominently involved in sensorimotor processes are located in the right anterior lobe of the cerebellum, while non-motor processes are located in the posterior lobe of both cerebellar hemispheres. Taken together and given the parallels in processes and tasks between social cognition and the cerebellum, there is good reason to believe that the cerebellum might play an important and direct role in social cognition.

To further investigate the hypothesis of intrinsic involvement of the cerebellum in social cognition, we explored a number of neuroimaging meta-analyses that were published since 2008 and cover the literature till 2011 in the domain of social cognition (on the mirror and mentalizing networks) and related areas of social thinking involved in episodic autobiographic memory and construal level, emotion and emotion regulation. We included only meta-analyses that (a) investigated the whole-brain (or most parts of it), (b) used a methodology that allowed to detect activity in the cerebellum (this excludes the use of a priori regions of interest), and that (c) did not include any motor activity of the participants (e.g., tasks involving imitation and judgment of self-agency) so that only the effect of pure perception or observation could be examined.

As shown in Table 1, the purported role of the cerebellum seems quite limited. The majority of meta-analyses report no direct involvement of the cerebellum at all, while some of them report a substantial role (up to 54% of the studies). Moreover, the incidence of cerebellar activity in emotion perception and regulation is very limited, not surpassing 15% of the studies reported in the meta-analyses. This variety and low incidence of the cerebellum in social tasks is disconcerting. Perhaps, it is due to the fact that none of the meta-analyses (with the exception of E et al., in press, Stoodley and Schmahmann, 2009), focused on the cerebellum so that not the whole cerebellum was scanned and cerebellar activity remains underreported. By contrast, Stoodley and Schmahmann (2009) selected only “a small subset of articles reporting cerebellar activation” (p. 493) just like E et al. (in press), and so ended up with a much favorable view on cerebellar involvement.

However, a more detailed analysis of the individual studies included in these meta-analyses reveals that there is a great heterogeneity in the definition, tasks and themes in the studies. By pooling such a diversity of tasks together, conditions that do trigger the cerebellum may have been overshadowed by other conditions that do not involve the cerebellum. A more fine grained parcellation and careful delineation of the different conditions and tasks might reveal a more reliable contribution of the cerebellum in some subtasks of social cognition.

The aim of the present meta-analysis is to identify, select and analyze these studies. Given the large number of studies, we left the analysis of emotion processing and regulation for future analysis. In brief, our general plan of analysis was as follows:

  • As a first step, we selected a large set of individual studies on social mirroring and mentalizing, including studies from previous meta-analyses (mainly from Van Overwalle, 2009, Van Overwalle and Baetens, 2009) and from a novel literature search. However, as noted earlier, we excluded studies that involved some sort of motor activity by the participants (e.g., tasks using imitation and judgment of self-agency) so that only the effect of pure perception or observation could be examined. For consistency with earlier research on social cognition, we used the same task categories as in the two meta-analyses by Van Overwalle (2009) and Van Overwalle and Baetens (2009) to define social cognitive functions. Because earlier task categories were defined for analysis of the cerebrum, their potential relevance for analysis of the cerebellum is important as well. Additionally, we included novel task categories and contrasts that were inspired by recent research on abstraction in social mentalizing (cf. Trope and Liberman, 2010) including, as noted earlier, judgments about traits, hypothetical events, the episodic past or future of the self or other persons, as opposed to concrete here-and-now events. Each individual study is included in a task category that is relatively small, so that the conditions and tasks are homogeneous and consistent, which increases the possibility to detect a reliable role of the cerebellum (Table 2 and Supplementary Table S1).

  • As a second step, we coded the cerebellar coordinates reported in the individual studies. During this step, we noted a potential underreporting of the cerebellum due to a failure to include the entire cerebellum in the whole brain scan (which goes often undetected because it is not reported). Although this meta-analysis cannot amend this limitation, by selecting a large and homogenous set of studies, robust activity in the cerebellum might survive this noise. We report the incidence of cerebellum activity in each task category.

  • As a last step, we conducted an Activation Likelihood Estimation (ALE) analysis to identify the clusters of consistent activation across studies in the cerebellum. We then compared these clusters to activations reported in earlier meta-analyses on the cerebellum (E et al., in press, Stoodley and Schmahmann, 2009) to verify whether these activations are unique to social cognition, or overlap with other functions such as sensorimotor or cognitive processes.

Section snippets

Selection of studies and coordinates

The fMRI studies reviewed in the current study were taken from two earlier meta-analyses on social cognition by Van Overwalle (2009) and Van Overwalle and Baetens (2009), and updated by including more recent studies published between 2009 and the end of 2012. Studies were identified by a search in PubMed using the term “fMRI” along with at least one of the following terms in the title or abstract: “person”, “social” or “self”. In addition, we searched for the terms “fMRI” and

Results and discussion

Table 2 lists a summary overview of the categories included in this meta-analysis, the number of studies included in each category and the percentage of studies that show activation of the cerebellum. A Supplementary Table lists all the details of all the individual studies and contrasts. We included all the studies with tasks that belonged to a category, regardless of a (lack of) activation of the cerebellum, so that the proportion of studies involving the cerebellum could be estimated. To

What is the role of the cerebellum in social cognition?

This review covers more than 350 fMRI studies to provide further insight to the role of the cerebellum in social cognition. In discussing the results and implications of this study, we follow the dichotomy between the evolutionary younger “cognitive” and older “sensorimotor” cerebellar topography. First, the ALE analysis found robust social-cognitive clusters that overlap with executive and semantic (language) functions identified in prior meta-analyses (E et al., in press, Stoodley and

Conclusion

We return to the initial question of our study: has neuroscience overlooked the role of the cerebellum in social cognition? Our answer is twofold. No, the cerebellum seems seldom crucially involved in social thought that involves little abstraction. Yes, we did underestimate the role of the cerebellum during social inferences that require high-level abstraction away from the current event. For instance, when making inferences about traits and stereotypes of other persons and groups, when

References (51)

  • P. Mariën et al.

    Posterior fossa syndrome in adults: a new case and comprehensive survey of the literature

    Cortex

    (2013)
  • D.L. Schacter et al.

    The future of memory: remembering, imagining, and the brain

    Neuron

    (2012)
  • C.J. Stoodley et al.

    Functional topography in the human cerebellum: a meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies

    NeuroImage

    (2009)
  • C.J. Stoodley et al.

    Evidence for topographic organization in the cerebellum of motor control versus cognitive and affective processing

    Cortex

    (2010)
  • C.J. Stoodley et al.

    Functional topography of the cerebellum for motor and cognitive tasks: an fMRI study

    NeuroImage

    (2012)
  • E. Svoboda et al.

    The functional neuroanatomy of autobiographical memory: a meta-analysis

    Neuropsychologia

    (2006)
  • L.Q. Uddin et al.

    The self and social cognition: the role of cortical midline structures and mirror neurons

    Trends Cogn. Sci.

    (2007)
  • F. Van Overwalle et al.

    Understanding others' actions and goals by mirror and mentalizing systems: a meta-analysis

    NeuroImage

    (2009)
  • D.M. Amodio et al.

    Meeting of minds: the medial frontal cortex and social cognition

    Nat. Rev. Neurosci.

    (2006)
  • K. Baetens et al.

    Involvement of the mentalizing network in social and non-social high construal

    Soc. Cogn. Affect. Neurosci

    (2013)
  • K. Baetens et al.

    The role of the dmPFC in high construal: constraint or meaning?

    Soc. Cogn. Affect. Neurosci.

    (2013)
  • J.R. Binder et al.

    Where is the semantic system? A critical review and meta-analysis of 120 functional neuroimaging studies

    Cereb. Cortex

    (2009)
  • D.L. Collins et al.

    Automatic 3D intersubject registration of MR volumetric data in standardized Talairach space

    J. Comput. Assist. Tomogr.

    (1994)
  • H.J. De Smet et al.

    The cerebellum: its role in language and related cognitive and affective functions

    Brain Lang

    (2013)
  • R.I.M. Dunbar

    The social brain hypothesis

    Evol. Anthropol. Issues News Rev.

    (1998)
  • Cited by (0)

    This research was funded by a Strategic Research Program (SPR15) awarded by the Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Belgium.

    View full text