ReviewNeuroimaging of the Philadelphia Neurodevelopmental Cohort☆
Introduction
Major mental illnesses are increasingly conceptualized as developmental disorders (Paus et al., 2008); 75% of all psychiatric disorders begin before age 24 (Kessler et al., 2005). Therefore, understanding the neurobiological origin of mental illness is predicated upon knowledge of how the brain develops normally, and how abnormal brain development mediates vulnerability to psychiatric symptoms (Insel, 2009). Accordingly, data regarding how both genetics and the environment “bend the curve” of brain development to confer both risk and resilience are of paramount importance. Such an endeavor requires large-scale samples with data that spans multiple levels of analysis, including genetics, neuroimaging, as well as psychiatric and cognitive assessment.
In response to this challenge, as part of the American Reinvestment and Reconstruction Act of 2009, the National Institutes of Mental Health funded an ambitious two-year collaborative study between the Center for Applied Genomics (CAG) at the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia (CHOP; PI: Hakon Hakonarson) and the Brain Behavior Laboratory at the University of Pennsylvania (Penn, PI: Raquel E. Gur). The study design leveraged existing resources at CAG, including a subject pool of approximately 50,000 children, adolescents, and young adults who had previously been genotyped and had provided consent to be re-contacted for future research. As part of the Philadelphia Neurodevelopmental Cohort (PNC), 9428 children ages 8–21 at enrollment were evaluated with a detailed cognitive and psychiatric assessment. A sub-sample of 1445 participants received multi-modal neuroimaging at Penn.
Here we describe the study design and methods of the neuroimaging component of the PNC. We summarize other study components, which will be fully described elsewhere. We focus in this report on the neuroimaging recruitment process, neuroimaging methods, and informatics systems of the PNC. We conclude by discussing the PNC in relation to other large-scale neuroimaging initiatives, describe the data-sharing policies of the PNC, and introduce ongoing and planned follow-up studies. Taken together, the PNC will form a valuable, publically available resource for the study of both normal and pathological human brain development.
Section snippets
Study overview
The PNC is a large-scale initiative that seeks to describe how genetics impact trajectories of brain development and cognitive functioning in adolescence, and understand how abnormal trajectories of development are associated with psychiatric symptomatology. Accordingly, psychiatric and cognitive phenotyping was performed on a sample of n = 9428 participants ages 8–21; a sub-sample (n = 1445) of these participants received multimodal neuroimaging as described here (Fig. 1). All participants were
Genomics
All genotyping was performed at the Center for Applied Genomics as previously described. Of the 1445 samples recruited for the imaging (Hakonarson et al., 2007) studies 657 were genotyped on the Illumina HumanHap 610 array; 399 on the Illumina HumanHap 550 array; 281 on the Illumina Human Omni Express array and 108 on the Affymetrix Axiom array. Samples were recruited randomly from the pool of genotyped samples, so it is unlikely that there is a genotype/phenotype platform bias. All genetic
PNC assessments
As every participant who underwent neuroimaging was recruited from the super-set of subjects for whom medical, cognitive, and psychiatric data was available, the phenotyping available for all imaged subjects is unusually deep for a study of this scale. While the focus of this paper is on the neuroimaging component of the study, the subject-level measures are briefly summarized here. (For further details on the cognitive and psychiatric assessment, see Gur et al. (2012)).
Neuroimaging recruitment
It is hard to overstate the logistical challenges involved in imaging nearly 1500 adolescent participants in a 30-month period on a single scanner. From the outset, recruitment was among the biggest challenges of this study. The recruitment strategy was adapted based on initial experience, where 30% of subjects scheduled for imaging did not arrive for their appointment.
Prior research indicates that this no-show rate, while high, is not atypical. In clinical research, reported rates of no-show
Neuroimaging
In contrast to several other recent large-scale neuroimaging efforts (Biswal et al., 2010, Brown et al., 2012, Jack et al., 2008, Schumann et al., 2010), all imaging data from the PNC were acquired at a single site, on a single scanner, in a short period of time that did not span any software or hardware upgrades. Conversely, unlike other large-scale single-site studies (Nooner et al., 2012, Van Essen et al., 2012), due to the demanding recruitment goals and the short study timeline, there was
Informatics and data management
Given the large quantity of data and the rapid timeline of the study, systematic procedures for data management and automated quality assurance were of critical importance. Here, we highlight several of the innovative solutions deployed as part of the PNC, including systems used for subject recruitment, image transfer, image QA and archiving, and data tracking (Fig. 6).
Recruitment
Given the ambitious recruitment goals, information systems to ensure an organized recruitment effort were necessary. As part of the revised recruitment strategy (see above), each communication with the participant and/or parent/guardian was logged digitally within a custom FileMaker database. This database contained all information necessary to determine eligibility and exclusion criteria, including fields for demographics, MRI compatibility, and medical exclusion criteria. All participant
Discussion
While the PNC is notable in many respects, it is neither the only nor the largest study of neurodevelopment. Below we consider the PNC in relation to other prior or ongoing efforts, describe PNC data-sharing policies, and introduce ongoing and planned follow-up studies.
Acknowledgments
Many thanks to the acquisition team, including Jeff Valdez, Raphael Gerraty, Nicholas DeLeo, and Elliot Yodh. Thanks to Rosetta Chiavacci for study coordination, and to Larry Macy for systems support. Thanks to James Dickson for XNAT development.
Conflict of interest
Authors report no disclosures.
References (61)
- et al.
Imaging genetics—days of future past
Neuroimage
(2010) - et al.
A parametric study of prefrontal cortex involvement in human working memory
Neuroimage
(1997) - et al.
Neuroanatomical assessment of biological maturity
Curr. Biol.
(2012) - et al.
Activation of prefrontal cortex in children during a nonspatial working memory task with functional MRI
Neuroimage
(1995) AFNI: software for analysis and visualization of functional magnetic resonance neuroimages
Comput. Biomed. Res.
(1996)- et al.
The NIH MRI study of normal brain development
Neuroimage
(2006) - et al.
Brain activation during facial emotion processing
Neuroimage
(2002) - et al.
A cognitive neuroscience-based computerized battery for efficient measurement of individual differences: standardization and initial construct validation
J. Neurosci. Methods
(2010) - et al.
Improved optimization for the robust and accurate linear registration and motion correction of brain images
Neuroimage
(2002) - et al.
FSL
Neuroimage
(2012)
Schedule for affective disorders and schizophrenia for school-age children-present and lifetime version (K-SADS-PL): initial reliability and validity data
J. Am. Acad. Child Adolesc. Psychiatry
Missed appointments at a Swiss university outpatient clinic
Public Health
Making data sharing work: The FCP/INDI experience
Neuroimage
Open neuroscience solutions for the connectome-wide association era
Neuron
DRAMMS: deformable registration via attribute matching and mutual-saliency weighting
Med. Image Anal.
Imaging-genetics applications in child psychiatry
J. Am. Acad. Child Adolesc. Psychiatry
Being right is its own reward: load and performance related ventral striatum activation to correct responses during a working memory task in youth
Neuroimage
Impact of in-scanner head motion on multiple measures of functional connectivity: relevance for studies of neurodevelopment in youth
Neuroimage
An improved framework for confound regression and filtering for control of motion artifact in the preprocessing of resting-state functional connectivity data
Neuroimage
The Human Connectome Project: a data acquisition perspective
Neuroimage
Common variants at 12q14 and 12q24 are associated with hippocampal volume
Nat. Genet.
Toward discovery science of human brain function
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
Developmental changes in human cerebral functional organization for word generation
Cereb. Cortex
The organization of the human cerebellum estimated by intrinsic functional connectivity
J. Neurophysiol.
The organization of the human striatum estimated by intrinsic functional connectivity
J. Neurophysiol.
Brain development during childhood and adolescence: a longitudinal MRI study
Nat. Neurosci.
Dynamic mapping of human cortical development during childhood through early adulthood
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
A multivariate approach to the prediction of no-show behavior in a primary care center
Arch. Intern. Med.
Nipype: a flexible, lightweight and extensible neuroimaging data processing framework in python
Front. Neuroinform.
Making data sharing count: a publication-based solution
Front. Neurosci.
Cited by (389)
A systematic review and meta-analysis of resting-state fMRI in anxiety disorders: Need for data sharing to move the field forward
2023, Journal of Anxiety DisordersIndividual differences in delay discounting are associated with dorsal prefrontal cortex connectivity in children, adolescents, and adults
2023, Developmental Cognitive NeuroscienceDevelopment of Iron Status Measures during Youth: Associations with Sex, Neighborhood Socioeconomic Status, Cognitive Performance, and Brain Structure
2023, American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
- ☆
Financial support: This study was supported by RC2 grants from the National Institute of Mental Health MH089983 and MH089924, as well as T32 MH019112. Dr. Satterthwaite was supported by NIMH K23MH098130 and the Marc Rapport Family Investigator grant through the Brain & Behavior Research Foundation. Dr. Calkins was supported by NIMH K08MH79364. Genotyping was funded in part by an Institutional Development Award to the Center for Applied Genomics from The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia and a donation from Adele and Daniel Kubert.
- 1
Satterthwaite, Elliott, and Ruparel contributed equally to this manuscript.