Elsevier

NeuroImage

Volume 86, 1 February 2014, Pages 544-553
NeuroImage

Review
Neuroimaging of the Philadelphia Neurodevelopmental Cohort

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.07.064Get rights and content

Highlights

  • The PNC is a large-scale study of neurodevelopment, with 1445 subjects imaged.

  • Measures span multi-modal MRI, genomics, and testing of cognition and psychopathology.

  • The PNC will be a public resource to study normal and pathological brain development.

Abstract

The Philadelphia Neurodevelopmental Cohort (PNC) is a large-scale, NIMH funded initiative to understand how brain maturation mediates cognitive development and vulnerability to psychiatric illness, and understand how genetics impacts this process. As part of this study, 1445 adolescents ages 8–21 at enrollment underwent multimodal neuroimaging. Here, we highlight the conceptual basis for the effort, the study design, and the measures available in the dataset. We focus on neuroimaging measures obtained, including T1-weighted structural neuroimaging, diffusion tensor imaging, perfusion neuroimaging using arterial spin labeling, functional imaging tasks of working memory and emotion identification, and resting state imaging of functional connectivity. Furthermore, we provide characteristics regarding the final sample acquired. Finally, we describe mechanisms in place for data sharing that will allow the PNC to become a freely available public resource to advance our understanding of normal and pathological brain development.

Introduction

Major mental illnesses are increasingly conceptualized as developmental disorders (Paus et al., 2008); 75% of all psychiatric disorders begin before age 24 (Kessler et al., 2005). Therefore, understanding the neurobiological origin of mental illness is predicated upon knowledge of how the brain develops normally, and how abnormal brain development mediates vulnerability to psychiatric symptoms (Insel, 2009). Accordingly, data regarding how both genetics and the environment “bend the curve” of brain development to confer both risk and resilience are of paramount importance. Such an endeavor requires large-scale samples with data that spans multiple levels of analysis, including genetics, neuroimaging, as well as psychiatric and cognitive assessment.

In response to this challenge, as part of the American Reinvestment and Reconstruction Act of 2009, the National Institutes of Mental Health funded an ambitious two-year collaborative study between the Center for Applied Genomics (CAG) at the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia (CHOP; PI: Hakon Hakonarson) and the Brain Behavior Laboratory at the University of Pennsylvania (Penn, PI: Raquel E. Gur). The study design leveraged existing resources at CAG, including a subject pool of approximately 50,000 children, adolescents, and young adults who had previously been genotyped and had provided consent to be re-contacted for future research. As part of the Philadelphia Neurodevelopmental Cohort (PNC), 9428 children ages 8–21 at enrollment were evaluated with a detailed cognitive and psychiatric assessment. A sub-sample of 1445 participants received multi-modal neuroimaging at Penn.

Here we describe the study design and methods of the neuroimaging component of the PNC. We summarize other study components, which will be fully described elsewhere. We focus in this report on the neuroimaging recruitment process, neuroimaging methods, and informatics systems of the PNC. We conclude by discussing the PNC in relation to other large-scale neuroimaging initiatives, describe the data-sharing policies of the PNC, and introduce ongoing and planned follow-up studies. Taken together, the PNC will form a valuable, publically available resource for the study of both normal and pathological human brain development.

Section snippets

Study overview

The PNC is a large-scale initiative that seeks to describe how genetics impact trajectories of brain development and cognitive functioning in adolescence, and understand how abnormal trajectories of development are associated with psychiatric symptomatology. Accordingly, psychiatric and cognitive phenotyping was performed on a sample of n = 9428 participants ages 8–21; a sub-sample (n = 1445) of these participants received multimodal neuroimaging as described here (Fig. 1). All participants were

Genomics

All genotyping was performed at the Center for Applied Genomics as previously described. Of the 1445 samples recruited for the imaging (Hakonarson et al., 2007) studies 657 were genotyped on the Illumina HumanHap 610 array; 399 on the Illumina HumanHap 550 array; 281 on the Illumina Human Omni Express array and 108 on the Affymetrix Axiom array. Samples were recruited randomly from the pool of genotyped samples, so it is unlikely that there is a genotype/phenotype platform bias. All genetic

PNC assessments

As every participant who underwent neuroimaging was recruited from the super-set of subjects for whom medical, cognitive, and psychiatric data was available, the phenotyping available for all imaged subjects is unusually deep for a study of this scale. While the focus of this paper is on the neuroimaging component of the study, the subject-level measures are briefly summarized here. (For further details on the cognitive and psychiatric assessment, see Gur et al. (2012)).

Neuroimaging recruitment

It is hard to overstate the logistical challenges involved in imaging nearly 1500 adolescent participants in a 30-month period on a single scanner. From the outset, recruitment was among the biggest challenges of this study. The recruitment strategy was adapted based on initial experience, where 30% of subjects scheduled for imaging did not arrive for their appointment.

Prior research indicates that this no-show rate, while high, is not atypical. In clinical research, reported rates of no-show

Neuroimaging

In contrast to several other recent large-scale neuroimaging efforts (Biswal et al., 2010, Brown et al., 2012, Jack et al., 2008, Schumann et al., 2010), all imaging data from the PNC were acquired at a single site, on a single scanner, in a short period of time that did not span any software or hardware upgrades. Conversely, unlike other large-scale single-site studies (Nooner et al., 2012, Van Essen et al., 2012), due to the demanding recruitment goals and the short study timeline, there was

Informatics and data management

Given the large quantity of data and the rapid timeline of the study, systematic procedures for data management and automated quality assurance were of critical importance. Here, we highlight several of the innovative solutions deployed as part of the PNC, including systems used for subject recruitment, image transfer, image QA and archiving, and data tracking (Fig. 6).

Recruitment

Given the ambitious recruitment goals, information systems to ensure an organized recruitment effort were necessary. As part of the revised recruitment strategy (see above), each communication with the participant and/or parent/guardian was logged digitally within a custom FileMaker database. This database contained all information necessary to determine eligibility and exclusion criteria, including fields for demographics, MRI compatibility, and medical exclusion criteria. All participant

Discussion

While the PNC is notable in many respects, it is neither the only nor the largest study of neurodevelopment. Below we consider the PNC in relation to other prior or ongoing efforts, describe PNC data-sharing policies, and introduce ongoing and planned follow-up studies.

Acknowledgments

Many thanks to the acquisition team, including Jeff Valdez, Raphael Gerraty, Nicholas DeLeo, and Elliot Yodh. Thanks to Rosetta Chiavacci for study coordination, and to Larry Macy for systems support. Thanks to James Dickson for XNAT development.

Conflict of interest

Authors report no disclosures.

References (61)

  • J. Kaufman et al.

    Schedule for affective disorders and schizophrenia for school-age children-present and lifetime version (K-SADS-PL): initial reliability and validity data

    J. Am. Acad. Child Adolesc. Psychiatry

    (1997)
  • T.N.O. Lehmann et al.

    Missed appointments at a Swiss university outpatient clinic

    Public Health

    (2007)
  • M. Mennes et al.

    Making data sharing work: The FCP/INDI experience

    Neuroimage

    (2013)
  • M.P. Milham

    Open neuroscience solutions for the connectome-wide association era

    Neuron

    (2012)
  • Y. Ou et al.

    DRAMMS: deformable registration via attribute matching and mutual-saliency weighting

    Med. Image Anal.

    (2011)
  • D.S. Pine et al.

    Imaging-genetics applications in child psychiatry

    J. Am. Acad. Child Adolesc. Psychiatry

    (2010)
  • T.D. Satterthwaite et al.

    Being right is its own reward: load and performance related ventral striatum activation to correct responses during a working memory task in youth

    Neuroimage

    (2012)
  • T.D. Satterthwaite et al.

    Impact of in-scanner head motion on multiple measures of functional connectivity: relevance for studies of neurodevelopment in youth

    Neuroimage

    (2012)
  • T.D. Satterthwaite et al.

    An improved framework for confound regression and filtering for control of motion artifact in the preprocessing of resting-state functional connectivity data

    Neuroimage

    (2013)
  • D.C. Van Essen et al.

    The Human Connectome Project: a data acquisition perspective

    Neuroimage

    (2012)
  • J.C. Bis et al.

    Common variants at 12q14 and 12q24 are associated with hippocampal volume

    Nat. Genet.

    (2012)
  • B.B. Biswal et al.

    Toward discovery science of human brain function

    Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.

    (2010)
  • T.T. Brown et al.

    Developmental changes in human cerebral functional organization for word generation

    Cereb. Cortex

    (2005)
  • R.L. Buckner et al.

    The organization of the human cerebellum estimated by intrinsic functional connectivity

    J. Neurophysiol.

    (2011)
  • E.Y. Choi et al.

    The organization of the human striatum estimated by intrinsic functional connectivity

    J. Neurophysiol.

    (2012)
  • J.N. Giedd et al.

    Brain development during childhood and adolescence: a longitudinal MRI study

    Nat. Neurosci.

    (1999)
  • N. Gogtay et al.

    Dynamic mapping of human cortical development during childhood through early adulthood

    Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.

    (2004)
  • L. Goldman et al.

    A multivariate approach to the prediction of no-show behavior in a primary care center

    Arch. Intern. Med.

    (1982)
  • K. Gorgolewski et al.

    Nipype: a flexible, lightweight and extensible neuroimaging data processing framework in python

    Front. Neuroinform.

    (2011)
  • K.J. Gorgolewski et al.

    Making data sharing count: a publication-based solution

    Front. Neurosci.

    (2013)
  • Cited by (389)

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    Financial support: This study was supported by RC2 grants from the National Institute of Mental Health MH089983 and MH089924, as well as T32 MH019112. Dr. Satterthwaite was supported by NIMH K23MH098130 and the Marc Rapport Family Investigator grant through the Brain & Behavior Research Foundation. Dr. Calkins was supported by NIMH K08MH79364. Genotyping was funded in part by an Institutional Development Award to the Center for Applied Genomics from The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia and a donation from Adele and Daniel Kubert.

    1

    Satterthwaite, Elliott, and Ruparel contributed equally to this manuscript.

    View full text