Evidence for a cerebral cortical thickness network anti-correlated with amygdalar volume in healthy youths: Implications for the neural substrates of emotion regulation

Abstract

Recent functional connectivity studies have demonstrated that, in resting humans, activity in a dorsally-situated neocortical network is inversely associated with activity in the amygdalae. Similarly, in human neuroimaging studies, aspects of emotion regulation have been associated with increased activity in dorsolateral, dorsomedial, orbital and ventromedial prefrontal regions, as well as concomitant decreases in amygdalar activity. These findings indicate the presence of two countervailing systems in the human brain that are reciprocally related: a dorsally-situated cognitive control network, and a ventrally-situated limbic network. We investigated the extent to which this functional reciprocity between limbic and dorsal neocortical regions is recapitulated from a purely structural standpoint. Specifically, we hypothesized that amygdalar volume would be related to cerebral cortical thickness in cortical regions implicated in aspects of emotion regulation. In 297 typically developing youths (162 females, 135 males; 572 MRIs), the relationship between cortical thickness and amygdalar volume was characterized. Amygdalar volume was found to be inversely associated with thickness in bilateral dorsolateral and dorsomedial prefrontal, inferior parietal, as well as bilateral orbital and ventromedial prefrontal cortices. Our findings are in line with previous work demonstrating that a predominantly dorsally-centered neocortical network is reciprocally related to core limbic structures such as the amygdalae. Future research may benefit from investigating the extent to which such cortical-limbic morphometric relations are qualified by the presence of mood and anxiety psychopathology.

Introduction

Given dense anatomical connections between the amygdalae and prefrontal areas (particularly orbital and ventromedial regions), prefrontal cortices are posited to play an integral role in the regulation of amygdalar activity (Carmichael and Price, 1995, Ghashghaei and Barbas, 2002, Ghashghaei et al., 2007, Ray and Zald, 2012). In humans, interactions between the amygdalae and cerebral cortex have been traditionally studied using functional neuroimaging paradigms. In particular, functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies of emotion regulation implicate a number of cerebral cortical regions in the top-down modulation of amygdalar activity (Banks et al., 2007, Drabant et al., 2009, Kanske et al., 2011, Mayberg et al., 1999, McRae et al., 2010, Ochsner and Gross, 2005, Ochsner et al., 2004). In such studies, increasing activity in prefrontal areas, including dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) and dorsomedial prefrontal cortex (DMPFC), has been associated with concomitant decreases in amygdalar activity.

Interestingly, several recent resting state functional connectivity MRI studies of the amygdala indicate that, while at rest, amygdalar activity is inversely related to activity in DLPFC, DMPFC, and inferior parietal cortices (Kim et al., 2011, Luking et al., 2011, Roy et al., 2009). Specifically, Roy et al. (2009) reported that activity in superior frontal gyrus, middle frontal gyrus, inferior parietal, as well as posterior cingulate and precuneus cortices, was negatively predicted by amygdalar activity. Conversely, Roy et al. (2009) found that activity in regions of the anterior cingulate, insula, and medial prefrontal cortex was positively predicted by amygdala activity. Of note, these findings by Roy et al. (2009) were replicated in a subsequent study by Kim et al. (2011). Further, these resting state functional connectivity studies seemingly converge with a model of reciprocal limbic–cortical functioning proposed by Mayberg et al. (1999). Despite a growing number of studies investigating functional relations between the amygdalae and cerebral cortex, a dearth of research exists regarding morphological relations between these two brain structures.

Members of our group have previously studied the extent to which morphology in one area of the brain correlates with morphology across other brain regions. When studying across individuals, for example, cortical thickness measures in anterior and posterior language areas (i.e., Broca's and Wernike's areas) are significantly correlated (Lerch et al., 2006). Such cortical thickness correlations are posited to reflect, at least in part, underlying anatomical connectivity via white matter pathways (Lerch et al., 2006). Indeed, cortical thickness correlations across individuals show convergence with diffusion MR-based connectivity (Gong et al., 2012). It has also been suggested that cortical thickness correlations—particularly negative thickness correlations—reflect patterns of functional connectivity between antagonistic brain areas (Gong et al., 2012). What is more, previous work demonstrates that a number of discrete anatomical networks in the human brain can be identified by studying structural covariance in the cerebral cortex (He et al., 2007, Zielinski et al., 2010). Intriguingly, the topographies of such structurally-based networks largely overlap with functionally-defined brain networks (He et al., 2007, Zielinski et al., 2010). Despite these findings, it remains unclear the degree to which morphological variation in subcortical structures such as the amygdala is associated with cerebral cortical thickness. Studying structural covariance between the cerebral cortex and amygdalae may provide further insight with regard to functional relations between these brain regions.

In the present study, we investigate the extent to which the reciprocal functional relation between core limbic areas and prefrontal cortical regions is recapitulated from a purely structural standpoint in a large cohort of healthy, typically developing youths. We predict that amygdalar volume will be related to cortical thickness in regions that have been previously implicated in the modulation of amygdalar functioning. Based on the functional imaging research outlined above, a priori regions include bilateral DLPFC and DMPFC, bilateral inferior parietal cortices, as well as bilateral caudal orbitofrontal cortex (OFC) and ventromedial prefrontal cortex (vmPFC).