Elsevier

NeuroImage

Volume 57, Issue 1, 1 July 2011, Pages 19-21
NeuroImage

Comments and Controversies
Avoiding asymmetry-induced bias in longitudinal image processing

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.02.076Get rights and content

Abstract

Longitudinal image processing procedures frequently transfer or pool information across time within subject, with the dual goals of reducing the variability and increasing the accuracy of the derived measures. In this note, we discuss common difficulties in longitudinal image processing, focusing on the introduction of bias, and describe the approaches we have taken to avoid them in the FreeSurfer longitudinal processing stream.

Section snippets

Biased registration (lack of inverse consistency)

In order to study differences across time within the same subject, images are frequently registered using either a rigid or affine registration or higher dimensional non-linear warps. Typically, a first step is to remove pose differences due to varying head positions and orientations in the scanner. For this, a rigid registration is performed, to correct for translational and rotational differences (in some cases 9 or 12 degrees of freedom or more complex combinations are used to allow for

Biased resampling space (interpolation asymmetry)

Longitudinal studies frequently acquire more than two images for each subject. In order to reduce variability and detect true change in structure or function, it is important to be able to transfer and share information across time. A standard way of constructing spatial correspondence is to register all follow-up images to the baseline scan. The images are then either resampled at that location or the inverse maps are used to transport information into native voxel spaces. Either way, even

Biased information transfer

As described above, information is often transferred across time within each subject. For example, a common skull strip or shared Talairach transform can significantly reduce variability. Cortical and subcortical segmentation and parcellation procedures involve solving many complex nonlinear optimization problems, such as deformable surface reconstruction, nonlinear atlas-image registration, and nonlinear spherical surface registration. These optimization problems are typically solved with

Additional comments

Any of these biases can, of course, be removed by independently processing the inputs at the cost of increased variability. As soon as longitudinal information is incorporated as “prior knowledge,” bias is introduced, for example due to temporal smoothing, and accuracy may suffer particularly when measuring large longitudinal change. Therefore, it is theoretically possible that changes of greater magnitude are underestimated by initializing each time point with common information from the

Cited by (369)

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text