The underlying anatomical correlates of long-term meditation: Larger hippocampal and frontal volumes of gray matter

Abstract

Although the systematic study of meditation is still in its infancy, research has provided evidence for meditation-induced improvements in psychological and physiological well-being. Moreover, meditation practice has been shown not only to benefit higher-order cognitive functions but also to alter brain activity. Nevertheless, little is known about possible links to brain structure. Using high-resolution MRI data of 44 subjects, we set out to examine the underlying anatomical correlates of long-term meditation with different regional specificity (i.e., global, regional, and local). For this purpose, we applied voxel-based morphometry in association with a recently validated automated parcellation approach. We detected significantly larger gray matter volumes in meditators in the right orbito-frontal cortex (as well as in the right thalamus and left inferior temporal gyrus when co-varying for age and/or lowering applied statistical thresholds). In addition, meditators showed significantly larger volumes of the right hippocampus. Both orbito-frontal and hippocampal regions have been implicated in emotional regulation and response control. Thus, larger volumes in these regions might account for meditators' singular abilities and habits to cultivate positive emotions, retain emotional stability, and engage in mindful behavior. We further suggest that these regional alterations in brain structures constitute part of the underlying neurological correlate of long-term meditation independent of a specific style and practice. Future longitudinal analyses are necessary to establish the presence and direction of a causal link between meditation practice and brain anatomy.

Introduction

Although the systematic study of meditation is still in its infancy, research has shown that an active meditation/mindfulness practice fosters attentional and emotional self-regulation, as well as behavioral flexibility, altogether promoting well-being (Brown and Ryan, 2003). Moreover, findings in clinical populations suggest that meditation is effective in reducing a number of psychological and physical symptoms, and even biological markers of disease progression (Baer, 2003, Grossman et al., 2004, Creswell et al., in press). These outcomes are complemented by reports of alterations in physiological parameters and biochemical measures as a consequence of meditation (Solberg et al., 2004, Doraiswami and Xiong, 2007). Finally, meditation practice has been demonstrated to affect higher functions of the central nervous system, reflected in increased performances and altered brain activity (So and Orme-Johnson, 2001, Jha et al., 2007, Srinivasan and Baijal, 2007, Doraiswami and Xiong, 2007).

Less is known about the link between meditation and brain structure. Outcomes from cross-sectional studies in normative samples (i.e., non-meditators) have suggested changes in cerebral macro-structure, such as increased gray matter (GM), in response to intensive training in a number of cognitive, sensory, and motor domains (Maguire et al., 2000, Gaser and Schlaug, 2003, Mechelli et al., 2004). Evidences for experience-, stimulus-, and practice-induced alterations in brain anatomy have been further substantiated through longitudinal studies (Draganski et al., 2004, Draganski et al., 2006, May et al., 2007, Driemeyer et al., 2008, Boyke et al., 2008). Therefore, similar effects on cerebral macro-structure are likely as a consequence of meditation which “traditionally requires a long-term commitment to daily practice” (Pagnoni and Cekic, 2007). One recent morphometric study revealed altered age effects on GM volume in practitioners of Zen meditation, but did not provide direct evidence for structural GM differences between meditators and non-meditators (Pagnoni and Cekic, 2007). To our knowledge, there are only two studies¹ that specifically compared aspects of brain anatomy between the two groups (Lazar et al., 2005, Holzel et al., 2008). More specifically, when examining differences in GM concentration (Holzel et al., 2008) and cortical thickness (Lazar et al., 2005) associated with Insight meditation (Vipassana), these analyses revealed significantly increased measurements in meditators in the left inferior temporal gyrus, right anterior insula, right hippocampus, and right middle/superior frontal cortex.

To further explore the associations between meditation and brain anatomy and expand the currently rather sparse literature on this field of research, we examined high-resolution MRI data in a well-matched sample of 22 meditators and 22 controls. We used voxel-based morphometry (VBM; Ashburner and Friston, 2000), in combination with a recently developed automated parcellation approach (Tu et al., 2008), to reveal possible links between meditation and brain structure on a global, regional, and very local level. That is, we complemented (i) overall volume measurements (total brain and GM) with (ii) volume measurements of pre-defined (sub)cortical regions of interest (ROIs), and with (iii) voxel-wise analyses of GM across the whole brain. Our study differs from previous analyses with respect to the mean duration of meditation practice, which is considerably longer in the current sample. Finally, we have included meditators who practice different styles of meditation to capture common elements among the immense variety of meditation practices (Doraiswami and Xiong, 2007), and thus reveal the underlying neural correlates of long-term meditation independent of a specific practice.