Elsevier

NeuroImage

Volume 36, Issue 3, 1 July 2007, Pages 1026-1040
NeuroImage

Neural substrates of the interaction of emotional stimulus processing and motor inhibitory control: An emotional linguistic go/no-go fMRI study

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.01.056Get rights and content

Abstract

Neural substrates of behavioral inhibitory control have been probed in a variety of animal model, physiologic, behavioral, and imaging studies, many emphasizing the role of prefrontal circuits. Likewise, the neurocircuitry of emotion has been investigated from a variety of perspectives. Recently, neural mechanisms mediating the interaction of emotion and behavioral regulation have become the focus of intense study. To further define neurocircuitry specifically underlying the interaction between emotional processing and response inhibition, we developed an emotional linguistic go/no-go fMRI paradigm with a factorial block design which joins explicit inhibitory task demand (i.e., go or no-go) with task-unrelated incidental emotional stimulus valence manipulation, to probe the modulation of the former by the latter. In this study of normal subjects focusing on negative emotional processing, we hypothesized activity changes in specific frontal neocortical and limbic regions reflecting modulation of response inhibition by negative stimulus processing. We observed common fronto-limbic activations (including orbitofrontal cortical and amygdalar components) associated with the interaction of emotional stimulus processing and response suppression. Further, we found a distributed cortico-limbic network to be a candidate neural substrate for the interaction of negative valence-specific processing and inhibitory task demand. These findings have implications for elucidating neural mechanisms of emotional modulation of behavioral control, with relevance to a variety of neuropsychiatric disease states marked by behavioral dysregulation within the context of negative emotional processing.

Introduction

Approach and withdrawal represent fundamental behavioral tendencies. Successful adaptation requires that they be selectively invoked by a context-appropriate balance of agency and inhibition. Inhibitory control is a multi-domain executive function critical for flexible responsivity to changing task demands, and thereby an essential component of adaptive behavioral regulation. A phylogenetically and ontogenetically later-appearing function (Booth et al., 2003, Casey et al., 1997, Williams et al., 1999), inhibitory control afforded by evolutionary and maturational development may underlie human capacity for future-related thought (e.g., capacity for response inhibition enables transcendence of the “default mode” of human behavior (Mesulam 2002), permitting representation of alternative outcomes, thereby enabling meaningful behavioral decision-making) (Fuster, 2000, Goldman-Rakic, 1988). Inhibitory control is susceptible to impairment in a variety of developmental (Casey et al., 1997), degenerative (Neary et al., 2005, Royall et al., 2002, Shulman, 1997), and acquired (Damasio, 1999) processes, with potentially serious maladaptive consequences.

Neural substrates of response inhibition have been probed in animal model (Iverson and Mishkin, 1970, Roberts and Wallis, 2000), behavioral (Drewe, 1975), physiologic (e.g., Mathalon et al., 2003), and imaging studies (e.g., Fassbender et al., 2004, Garavan et al., 2002, Horn et al., 2003, Kelly et al., 2004, Konishi et al., 1999, Rubia et al., 2001). Convergent findings indicate that response inhibition is significantly mediated by prefrontal cortex (PFC) circuits (e.g., Mesulam, 2000), both dorsal (Braver et al., 2001, Miller and Cohen, 2001) and ventral. Of the latter, orbital frontal cortex (OFC) dysfunction has been long associated with behavioral disinhibition (e.g., Anderson et al., 1999, Rolls, 1996). An “acquired sociopathic” syndrome (e.g., impulsivity, context-dysproportionate aggression) can follow medial OFC (mOFC) damage (Bigelow, 1850, Paradiso et al., 1999, Price et al., 1990), prompting the hypothesis that mOFC dysfunction underlies behavioral dyscontrol in antisocial personality disorder (Damasio, 2000). Patients with personality disorders marked by behavioral disinhibition (e.g., borderline personality disorder) have been shown to behave similarly to OFC lesion patients on impulse control measures (Berlin et al., 2005). Neural networks combining OFC with key limbic structures (e.g., amygdala) have emerged as fundamental mediators of decision-making requiring cognitive–emotional integration (Bechara et al., 2000a).

The go/no-go task (Donders, 1868) has been variably adapted to neuropsychologically probe response inhibition. Go/no-go tasks involve execution or inhibition of a motor response, triggered by a go- or no-go stimulus, respectively. Demand to respond quickly creates a pre-potent response tone which must be inhibited when cued by a “no-go” stimulus. Although seemingly behaviorally simple, task performance involves multiple sub-processes, including stimulus discrimination, response selection, motor preparation, response inhibition, and error monitoring.

Imaging studies of go/no-go type response inhibition tasks have used a variety of methodologies (Rubia et al., 2001). Frontal regions variably identified include OFC, dorsolateral PFC (DLPFC), ventrolateral PFC (VLPFC), and anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) (e.g., Casey et al., 1997, De Zubicaray et al., 2000, Horn et al., 2003, Kawashima et al., 1996, Liddle et al., 2001, Watanabe et al., 2002). Non-frontal regions include parietal, temporal, and striatal (e.g., Garavan et al., 1999, Horn et al., 2003, Watanabe et al., 2002). Go/no-go imaging studies have been used to probe mechanisms of select psychiatric disorders. For example, Vollm et al. (2004) demonstrated aberrant neural activation patterns during go/no-go task performance by individuals with personality disorders marked by behavioral dyscontrol (e.g., antisocial personality disorder).

Inconsistencies of activation patterns across response inhibition studies have prompted some investigators to consider a “multi-domain model” of inhibitory control (Mostofsky et al., 2003) where different functions (e.g., motor versus cognitive) are at least in part regulated by different inhibitory mechanisms, correspondingly mediated by different brain regions. Accordingly, activation patterns associated with inhibitory control in part depend on the specific cognitive/behavioral inhibitory process invoked. In contrast, certain regional activations are conserved across response inhibition studies, implying relatively task-independent neural substrates of response inhibition (Wager et al., 2005). For example, Rubia et al. (2001) identified a middle-infero-mesial frontal and inferior parietal network. Others have demonstrated a supra-modal (i.e., stimulus sensory modality-independent) paralimbic/neocortical network (Laurens et al., 2005).

A successful behavioral repertoire involves not only balancing agency and inhibition, but healthy development of adaptive bi-directional modulation of emotion and cognitive control (Critchley, 2003, Davidson, 2000, Gehring and Willoughby, 2002, Lewis et al., 2006). Many psychiatric disorders involve behavioral dyscontrol which becomes prominent within certain emotional contexts (e.g., Posner et al., 2002). Integrative neurocognitive models are being applied to behavioral disorders characterized by dysfunctional interactions of emotion and behavioral control (Blair, 2005). Although the neurocircuitry of emotion has been long studied (e.g., Britton et al., 2006, Phan et al., 2002), mechanisms of the interaction of emotion and cognitive control are only recently being explored (Dolan, 2002, Zald et al., 2002), revealing complex neural interactions (e.g., Hare et al., 2005, Liberzon et al., 2000, Pessoa and Ungerleider, 2004, Phan et al., 2005, Shafritz et al., 2006), and disease-specific abnormalities (e.g., Elliott et al., 2004). Imaging studies probing neural mediation of emotion-modulated behavioral control use neuropsychological probes which join emotional manipulation with a behavioral control task (Yamasaki et al., 2002). For example, Elliott et al. (2000a) used a linguistic go/no-go task in which emotional valence was used to define stimulus targets, theorizing that observed neural activations reflected modulation of behavioral control by emotional valence. Others have employed similar tasks using emotional facial stimuli. Hare et al. (2005) observed slower response (interpreted as decreased approach) to negative facial targets and reduced inhibitory performance (interpreted as decreased avoidance) in response to positive non-target facial expressions. Shafritz et al. (2006) observed inferior frontal and insular activation associated with response inhibition during emotional facial expression go/no-go task performance, while a comparison non-emotional letter–symbol response inhibition task did not activate these regions. The investigators concluded that inhibition within an emotional context recruited neural substrates beyond those activated by non-emotional response inhibition (Shafritz et al., 2006).

When interpreting results of experimental designs that probe the interaction of emotion and behavioral control by using explicit emotion as motor response (“target”) signifier, it is relevant to note that the presumed emotional component of such a task may represent more a categorization (i.e. deciding if a stimulus is “happy” or “sad”) than an emotional task (Elliott et al., 2000a, Elliott et al., 2000b). Evidence suggests that explicit labeling of affect has distinct neural correlates (Crosson et al., 2002, Hariri et al., 2003, Teasdale et al., 1999, Taylor et al., 2003).

We developed an emotional linguistic go/no-go fMRI paradigm with a factorial block design to specifically investigate neural substrates of the interaction of emotional stimulus processing and inhibitory control in both normal subjects and patient populations. This paradigm introduces stimulus emotional valence incidentally relative to the explicit behavioral task demand (i.e., go or no-go). It is thought that such interaction better approximates that operating in many real-world socio-behavioral contexts. Sufficiency of incidental emotional stimuli to modulate neural activity is supported by diverse data (e.g., Isenberg et al., 1999, Perlstein et al., 2002, Whalen et al., 1998). Rather than requiring subjects explicitly use emotional stimulus content to guide performance on a behavioral task, this paradigm joins task demand (i.e., go or no-go) with concomitant task-unrelated emotional stimulus valence manipulation, to probe the modulation of the former by the latter.

Building on coalescing knowledge of the functional neuroanatomy of cognitive control, and accumulating evidence of the interaction of emotion and response inhibition, we hypothesized functional changes in prefrontal (e.g., mOFC) and anterior limbic (e.g., amygdala) sites reflecting the modulation of behavioral inhibitory control by emotional stimulus processing. Further, we hypothesized valence-distinct activity variations enabling identification of negative valence-specific neural substrates of the interaction of emotional stimulus processing and response inhibition.

Section snippets

Subjects

Fourteen healthy subjects (10 females; mean age 23.9 years, range 18–31; 12 right-handed (Edinburgh Handedness Inventory; Oldfield, 1971)) participated in the study. All were screened using the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV (First et al., 1996); exclusion criteria included any psychiatric, neurological, or medical condition, either current or past. No subjects were taking psychotropic medications; two subjects were using oral contraceptives. All subjects met acceptable limits of head

Behavioral

Valence ratings (Fig. 2) revealed significant differences among negative, neutral, and positive word ratings (p < 0.001, respectively). Response times (Fig. 3) were significantly slower in no-go versus go blocks within negative and positive valence conditions (p < 0.01), with a trend toward such difference within neutral valence (p = 0.066). There were no significant valence-dependent differences in total mean response times (i.e., mean RT of all responses within all Go- and No-Go blocks of a

Discussion

Results overall indicate support for hypotheses regarding fronto-limbic activity changes associated with, and valence-distinct variation in the neural network engaged by, the interaction of emotional stimulus processing and behavioral inhibitory task demand. Because of its relevance to pathologic disturbances of the human behavioral repertoire, we contextualize results with special attention to findings revealed by those contrasts highlighting negative valence-specific behavioral inhibition,

Conclusion

Building on emerging functional neuroanatomic understanding of response inhibition, and complementing recent studies of emotional–cognitive interaction using explicit emotion, this study aimed to elucidate neural mechanisms by which incidental emotional stimulus processing modulates response inhibition. It is thought that such interaction better approximates that operating in many real-world socio-behavioral contexts. The conjunction of emotional stimulus processing with behavioral inhibitory

References (134)

  • M. Esslen et al.

    Brain areas and time course of emotional processing

    NeuroImage

    (2004)
  • J. Fan et al.

    The activation of attentional networks

    NeuroImage

    (2005)
  • C. Fassbender et al.

    A topography of executive functions and their interactions revealed by fMRI

    Cogn. Brain Res.

    (2004)
  • D. Fernandez-Duque et al.

    Executive attention and metacognitive regulation

    Conscious. Cogn.

    (2000)
  • H. Garavan et al.

    Dissociable executive functions in the dynamic control of behavior: inhibition, error detection, and correction

    NeuroImage

    (2002)
  • A.S. Garrett et al.

    Time course of the subjective emotional response to aversive pictures: relevance to fMRI studies

    Psychiatr. Res.

    (2001)
  • S.A. Gruber et al.

    Stroop performance in normal control subjects: an fMRI study

    NeuroImage

    (2002)
  • H. Gu et al.

    Single-shot interleaved z-shim EPI with optimized compensation for signal losses due to susceptibility-induced field inhomogeneity at 3T

    NeuroImage

    (2002)
  • T.A. Hare et al.

    Contributions of amygdala and striatal activity in emotion regulation

    Biol. Psychiatry

    (2005)
  • A.R. Hariri et al.

    Neocortical modulation of the amygdala response to fearful stimuli

    Biol. Psychiatry

    (2003)
  • N.R. Horn et al.

    Response inhibition and impulsivity: an fMRI study

    Neuropsychologia

    (2003)
  • R. Kawashima et al.

    Functional anatomy of go/no-go discrimination and response selection in man — a PET study in man

    Brain Res.

    (1996)
  • I. Liberzon et al.

    Limbic activation and psychophysiologic responses to aversive visual stimuli. Interaction with cognitive task

    Neuropsychopharmacology

    (2000)
  • D.H. Mathalon et al.

    Anatomy of an error

    Biol. Psychol.

    (2003)
  • D.J. McGonigle et al.

    Variability in fMRI: an examination of intersection differences

    NeuroImage

    (2000)
  • D.G. Mitchell et al.

    Risky decisions and response reversal: is there evidence of OFC dysfunction in psychopathic individuals?

    Neuropsychologia

    (2002)
  • S.H. Mostofsky et al.

    fMRI evidence that the neural basis of response inhibition is task-dependent

    Cogn. Brain Res.

    (2003)
  • D.A. Nathaniel-James et al.

    The role of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex: evidence from the effects of contextual constraint in a sentence completion task

    NeuroImage

    (2002)
  • D. Neary et al.

    Frontotemporal dementia

    Lancet Neurol.

    (2005)
  • K.N. Ochsner et al.

    For better or for worse: neural systems supporting the cognitive down- and up-regulation of emotion

    NeuroImage

    (2004)
  • R.C. Oldfield

    The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory

    Neuropsychologia

    (1971)
  • L. Pessoa et al.

    Neuroimaging studies of attention and the processing of emotion-laden stimuli

    Prog. Brain Res.

    (2004)
  • B.S. Peterson et al.

    An fMRI study of Stroop word color interference: evidence for cingulate subregions subserving multiple distributed attentional systems

    Biol. Psychiatry

    (1999)
  • K.L. Phan et al.

    Functional neuroanatomy of emotion: a meta-analysis of emotion activation studies in PET and fMRI

    NeuroImage

    (2002)
  • J.M. Allman et al.

    The anterior cingulate cortex. The evolution of an interface between emotion and cognition

    Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci.

    (2001)
  • S.W. Anderson et al.

    Impairment of social and moral behavior related to early damage in human prefrontal cortex

    Nat. Neurosci.

    (1999)
  • A. Bechara et al.

    Emotion, decision-making, and the orbitofrontal cortex

    Cereb. Cortex

    (2000)
  • A. Bechara et al.

    Characterization of the decision-making deficit of patients with ventromedial prefrontal cortex lesions

    Brain

    (2000)
  • H.A. Berlin et al.

    Borderline personality disorder, impulsivity, and the orbitofrontal cortex

    Am. J. Psychiatry

    (2005)
  • H.J. Bigelow

    Dr. Harlow’s case of recovery from the passage of an iron bar through the head

    Am. J. Med. Sci.

    (1850)
  • R.J.R. Blair

    Applying a cognitive neuroscience perspective to the disorder of psychopathy

    Dev. Psychopathol.

    (2005)
  • M. Botvinick et al.

    Conflict monitoring and cognitive control

    Psychol. Rev.

    (2001)
  • J.C. Britton et al.

    Neural correlates of social and nonsocial emotions: an fMRI study

    NeuroImage

    (2006)
  • S.A. Bunge et al.

    Prefrontal regions involved in keeping information in and out of mind

    Brain

    (2001)
  • A. Burke et al.

    Remembering emotional events

    Mem. Cogn.

    (1992)
  • C.S. Carter et al.

    Parsing executive processes: strategic vs. evaluative functions of the anterior cingulate cortex

    Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.

    (2000)
  • B.J. Casey et al.

    A developmental functional MRI study of prefrontal activation during performance of a go/no-go task

    J. Cogn. Neurosci.

    (1997)
  • H. Critchley

    Emotion and its disorders

    Br. Med. Bull.

    (2003)
  • B. Crosson et al.

    Semantic monitoring of words with emotional connotation during fMRI: contribution of anterior left frontal cortex

    J. Int. Neuropsychol. Soc.

    (2002)
  • A.R. Damasio

    The Feeling of What Happens

    (1999)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text