Elsevier

NeuroImage

Volume 31, Issue 4, 15 July 2006, Pages 1453-1474
NeuroImage

Three-dimensional locations and boundaries of motor and premotor cortices as defined by functional brain imaging: A meta-analysis

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.02.004Get rights and content

Abstract

The mesial premotor cortex (pre-supplementary motor area and supplementary motor area proper), lateral premotor cortex (dorsal premotor cortex and ventral premotor cortex), and primary sensorimotor cortex (primary motor cortex and primary somatosensory cortex) have been identified as key cortical areas for sensorimotor function. However, the three-dimensional (3-D) anatomic boundaries between these regions remain unclear. In order to clarify the locations and boundaries for these six sensorimotor regions, we surveyed 126 articles describing pre-supplementary motor area, supplementary motor area proper, dorsal premotor cortex, ventral premotor cortex, primary motor cortex, and primary somatosensory cortex. Using strict inclusion criteria, we recorded the reported normalized stereotaxic coordinates (Talairach and Tournoux or MNI) from each experiment. We then computed the probability distributions describing the likelihood of activation, and characterized the shape, extent, and area of each sensorimotor region in 3-D. Additionally, we evaluated the nature of the overlap between the six sensorimotor regions. Using the findings from this meta-analysis, along with suggestions and guidelines of previous researchers, we developed the Human Motor Area Template (HMAT) that can be used for ROI analysis. HMAT is available through e-mail from the corresponding author.

Introduction

In neuroimaging research, there are two general techniques often used to analyze functional neuroimaging data. One approach combines group data from multiple subjects (Worsley et al., 1996, Lazar et al., 2002), producing a task-related group activation map in stereotaxic space. This method gives us the ability to identify activation foci that are common between subjects during a specific task. Another method used to analyze neuroimaging data is a region of interest (ROI) analysis. This technique provides an important method for quantifying the volume and intensity of activation in specific brain regions (Friston, 1997). In order for both techniques to deliver precise and accurate results, it is critical to be able to clearly and consistently locate and identify the location and boundaries for each functional ROI.

Currently, there is consensus that different functions exist for the cortical premotor and sensorimotor regions underlying motor control. These regions can be sectioned into three main divisions: the mesial premotor cortex (MPMC), the lateral premotor cortex (LPMC), and the sensorimotor cortex (SMC) (Roland and Zilles, 1996, Rizzolatti et al., 1998, Luppino and Rizzolatti, 2000). MPMC and LPMC corresponds to Brodmann's area 6, whereas SMC is divided into the primary motor cortex (M1) (Brodmann's area 4), and the primary somatosensory cortices (S1) (Brodmann's areas 1, 2, and 3). The functional distinction between motor and somatosensory areas has long been recognized, and there is agreement that the subregions of area 6 subserve distinct functions (Woolsey et al., 1952, Barbas and Pandya, 1987, Picard and Strick, 1996, Rizzolatti and Luppino, 2001, Schubotz and von Cramon, 2003). For instance, MPMC can be divided rostrally and caudally using the ventral anterior commissure (VCA) line into the pre-supplementary motor area (pre-SMA) and supplementary motor area proper (SMA proper), respectively (Rizzolatti et al., 1998, Picard and Strick, 2001). Additionally, LPMC can be subdivided along the rostral and caudal plane (PMr and PMc) (Barbas and Pandya, 1987, Matelli et al., 1991), and also along the dorsal and ventral plane (PMd and PMv) (He et al., 1993, Fink et al., 1997).

Studies such as these have advanced our understanding of the location and boundaries of the premotor and sensorimotor ROIs. However, it has been recommended that a probabilistic model be used when characterizing the location of an activated voxel (Fox et al., 1998, Amunts et al., 2000, Rademacher et al., 2001a) due in part to the inherent variability involved in functional neuroimaging data. For instance, variability is introduced during steps such as post-processing, filtering, motion correction, and normalization. Additionally, several studies have shown that the general morphology and cytoarchitecture of the brain is variable between subjects and exhibits a probabilistic nature (Amunts et al., 1999, Chiavaras et al., 2001, Grefkes et al., 2001, Rademacher et al., 2001b). To further complicate matters, it is known that functional boundaries do not necessarily correspond to either macro or microanatomical structures, which can lead to a structure–function mismatch (Rademacher et al., 1993).

Accordingly, while there are anatomical and physiological data in humans supporting functional distinctions for each of the six motor and premotor brain ROIs, their three-dimensional boundaries and locations in a standardized coordinate space remain unclear. Therefore, the purpose of this meta-analysis was three-fold: (1) to determine the locations and extent of six sensorimotor ROIs based on the data available in the neuroimaging literature, (2) to estimate boundaries between selected ROIs in stereotaxic space, and (3) to create an ROI template in stereotaxic space. First, in order to determine the location and extent of each motor ROI, we reviewed 126 articles that had used a motor task and reported activation foci from any combination of the six cortical motor ROIs. The ROIs included MPMC (pre-SMA and SMA), LPMC (PMd and PMv) and SMC (M1 and S1). Because it has been recommended that a probabilistic model be used when characterizing the location of an activated voxel (Fox et al., 1998, Amunts et al., 2000, Rademacher et al., 2001a), we then used the activation likelihood estimation (ALE) method developed by Turkeltaub et al. (2002) to localize the distributions of the activation foci in stereotaxic space. This technique is based on the assumption that a single coordinate represents a probability distribution, which allows us to determine the likelihood that at least one activation focus lies within any given voxel. Second, to estimate boundaries we characterized the limit of one region in relation to an adjacent region. Third, based on previously established anatomical criteria in conjunction with the data generated from our probability distributions, we drew the ROIs in Talairach space to create the Human Motor Area Template (HMAT). Our findings for these three-dimensional ROIs are presented in the results section and in the discussion, we compare our estimated boundaries with previous suggestions from the literature.

Section snippets

Methods

The outline of the methods section is as follows. First, we discuss the specific inclusion criteria for the articles and coordinates, the ROI categorization, and the exclusion of outliers. Next, we discuss the data processing steps that include the generation of the activation likelihood estimates, significance testing, and boundary estimates. Lastly, we discuss how we created the ROI template.

Results

The summary statistics for the three composite regions and the 6 individual regions are listed in Table 1. There were 94 articles reporting MPMC, 92 articles reporting LPMC, and 101 articles reporting SMC. Another observation from Table 1 is that researchers do not always specify individual regions, but in many cases will only specify a composite region. The composite regions include both the coordinates segregated into individual regions and the coordinates specified as a composite region. We

Discussion

The purpose of this study was to develop rigorous guidelines for the three-dimensional location and boundaries of six principle cortical ROIs associated with premotor and sensorimotor control in the human: pre-SMA, SMA proper, PMd, PMv, M1, and S1. The study implemented a probability based meta-analysis of individual activation foci from 126 fMRI and PET articles examining motor tasks. The discussion is organized according to the 3 different composite regions: MPMC, LPMC and SMC. For each

Acknowledgments

This research was supported in part by grants from the National Institutes of Health (R01-NS-52318, R01-NS-28127, R01-NS-40902). We thank Drs. John Sweeney and Colum MacKinnon for their thoughts and invaluable comments on this manuscript.

References (207)

  • F. Debaere et al.

    Internal vs. external generation of movements: differential neural pathways involved in bimanual coordination performed in the presence or absence of augmented visual feedback

    NeuroImage

    (2003)
  • M.P. Deiber et al.

    Cerebral processes related to visuomotor imagery and generation of simple finger movements studied with positron emission tomography

    NeuroImage

    (1998)
  • M. Dhamala et al.

    Neural correlates of the complexity of rhythmic finger tapping

    NeuroImage

    (2003)
  • J.M. Ellermann et al.

    Activation of visuomotor systems during visually guided movements: a functional MRI study

    J. Magn. Reson.

    (1998)
  • A.M. Ferrandez et al.

    Basal ganglia and supplementary motor area subtend duration perception: an fMRI study

    NeuroImage

    (2003)
  • G. Fesl et al.

    Inferior central sulcus: variations of anatomy and function on the example of the motor tongue area

    NeuroImage

    (2003)
  • H. Foltys et al.

    Power grip disinhibits the ipsilateral sensorimotor cortex: a TMS and fMRI study

    NeuroImage

    (2003)
  • P.T. Fox et al.

    Beyond the single study: function/location metanalysis in cognitive neuroimaging

    Curr. Opin. Neurobiol.

    (1998)
  • P.T. Fox et al.

    Location-probability profiles for the mouth region of human primary motor-sensory cortex: model and validation

    NeuroImage

    (2001)
  • S.A. Frutiger et al.

    Multivariate predictive relationship between kinematic and functional activation patterns in a PET study of visuomotor learning

    NeuroImage

    (2000)
  • S. Geyer et al.

    The somatosensory cortex of human: cytoarchitecture and regional distributions of receptor-binding sites

    NeuroImage

    (1997)
  • S. Geyer et al.

    Areas 3a, 3b, and 1 of human primary somatosensory cortex. Part 2. Spatial normalization to standard anatomical space

    NeuroImage

    (2000)
  • M. Ghilardi et al.

    Patterns of regional brain activation associated with different forms of motor learning

    Brain Res.

    (2000)
  • C. Grefkes et al.

    Human somatosensory area 2 observer-independent cytoarchitectonic mapping, interindividual variability, and population map

    NeuroImage

    (2001)
  • J. Grezes et al.

    Activations related to “mirror” and “canonical” neurones in the human brain: an fMRI study

    NeuroImage

    (2003)
  • O. Gruber et al.

    The functional neuroanatomy of human working memory revisited. Evidence from 3-T fMRI studies using classical domain-specific interference tasks

    NeuroImage

    (2003)
  • F. Hamzei et al.

    Reduction of excitability (“inhibition”) in the ipsilateral primary motor cortex is mirrored by fMRI signal decreases

    NeuroImage

    (2002)
  • B. Haslinger et al.

    The role of lateral premotor–cerebellar–parietal circuits in motor sequence control: a parametric fMRI study

    Cogn. Brain Res.

    (2002)
  • A.E. Hernandez et al.

    Language switching and language representation in Spanish–English bilinguals: an fMRI study

    NeuroImage

    (2001)
  • B. Horwitz et al.

    Correlations between reaction time and cerebral blood flow during motor preparation

    NeuroImage

    (2000)
  • I. Indovina et al.

    On somatotopic representation centers for finger movements in human primary motor cortex and supplementary motor area

    NeuroImage

    (2001)
  • T. Ino et al.

    Parieto-frontal networks for clock drawing revealed with fMRI

    Neurosci. Res.

    (2003)
  • K. Inoue et al.

    A PET study of visuomotor learning under optical rotation

    NeuroImage

    (2000)
  • L. Jancke et al.

    The effect of switching between sequential and repetitive movements on cortical activation

    NeuroImage

    (2000)
  • L. Jancke et al.

    Cortical activations during paced finger-tapping applying visual and auditory pacing stimuli

    Cogn. Brain Res.

    (2000)
  • K.J. Jantzen et al.

    Practice-dependent modulation of neural activity during human sensorimotor coordination: a functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging study

    Neurosci. Lett.

    (2002)
  • I.H. Jenkins et al.

    The effect of movement frequency on cerebral activation: a positron emission tomography study

    J. Neurol. Sci.

    (1997)
  • S.H. Johnson et al.

    Selective activation of a parietofrontal circuit during implicitly imagined prehension

    NeuroImage

    (2002)
  • M. Joliot et al.

    FMRI and PET of self-paced finger movement: comparison of intersubject stereotaxic averaged data

    NeuroImage

    (1999)
  • A.M. Kang et al.

    An event-related fMRI study of implicit phrase-level syntactic and semantic processing

    NeuroImage

    (1999)
  • R. Kawashima et al.

    The effect of verbal feedback on motor learning—A PET study. Positron emission tomography

    NeuroImage

    (2000)
  • H. Kinoshita et al.

    Functional brain areas used for the lifting of objects using a precision grip: a PET study

    Brain Res.

    (2000)
  • M. Kobayashi et al.

    Ipsilateral motor cortex activation on functional magnetic resonance imaging during unilateral hand movements is related to interhemispheric interactions

    NeuroImage

    (2003)
  • F. Lacquaniti et al.

    Visuomotor transformations for reaching to memorized targets: a PET study

    NeuroImage

    (1997)
  • M.F. Lafleur et al.

    Motor learning produces parallel dynamic functional changes during the execution and imagination of sequential foot movements

    NeuroImage

    (2002)
  • C. Lamm et al.

    Evidence for premotor cortex activity during dynamic visuospatial imagery from single-trial functional magnetic resonance imaging and event-related slow cortical potentials

    NeuroImage

    (2001)
  • N.A. Lazar et al.

    Combining brains: a survey of methods for statistical pooling of information

    NeuroImage

    (2002)
  • H. Alkadhi et al.

    Reproducibility of primary motor cortex somatotopy under controlled conditions

    Am. J. Neuroradiol.

    (2002)
  • H. Alkadhi et al.

    Somatotopy in the ipsilateral primary motor cortex

    NeuroReport

    (2002)
  • K. Amunts et al.

    Broca's region revisited: cytoarchitecture and intersubject variability

    J. Comp. Neurol.

    (1999)
  • Cited by (557)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text