Prenatal developmental origins of behavior and mental health: The influence of maternal stress in pregnancy

Highlights

• Maternal psychological distress, life event stress, and objective exposure affect offspring outcome.

• Functional and structural brain changes underlie the problems observed in the offspring.

• Alterations in stress system, immune system, and gut microbiome play a significant role.

• Epigenetic and telomere biology mechanisms are beginning to be explored.

• Interventions focused on offspring also need to be guided by knowledge of changes in biological systems.

Abstract

Accumulating research shows that prenatal exposure to maternal stress increases the risk for behavioral and mental health problems later in life. This review systematically analyzes the available human studies to identify harmful stressors, vulnerable periods during pregnancy, specificities in the outcome and biological correlates of the relation between maternal stress and offspring outcome. Effects of maternal stress on offspring neurodevelopment, cognitive development, negative affectivity, difficult temperament and psychiatric disorders are shown in numerous epidemiological and case-control studies. Offspring of both sexes are susceptible to prenatal stress but effects differ. There is not any specific vulnerable period of gestation; prenatal stress effects vary for different gestational ages possibly depending on the developmental stage of specific brain areas and circuits, stress system and immune system. Biological correlates in the prenatally stressed offspring are: aberrations in neurodevelopment, neurocognitive function, cerebral processing, functional and structural brain connectivity involving amygdalae and (pre)frontal cortex, changes in hypothalamo-pituitary-adrenal (HPA)-axis and autonomous nervous system.

Introduction

Characteristics of the early environment, starting in utero or even before, can represent major risk factors for a lifetime of physical and mental health problems for the individual (Gluckman et al., 2008, Hanson and Gluckman, 2011, Seckl and Holmes, 2007, Van den Bergh, 2011). The ‘fetal programming hypothesis’ (Seckl and Holmes, 2007), the ‘developmental programming hypothesis’ (Barker, 2004, Langley-Evans, 2006, Langley-Evans, 2015), and the ‘Developmental Origins of Health and Disease (DOHaD) hypothesis’ (Barker, 1990, Barker, 2004) specifically state that, during critical or sensitive periods of development, a disturbance in environmental factors, such as exposure to nutrient restriction, exposure to glucocorticoids or synthetic glucocorticoids, has an organizational effect on biological systems with a long development and/or intrinsic plasticity to react and adapt to environmental influences. These systems include the central nervous system (CNS), autonomic nervous system (ANS), neuro-endocrine (hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis), cardiovascular, and immune systems (Bale, 2015; Bale et al., 2010; Griffiths and Hunter, 2014; Harris and Seckl, 2011; Meaney et al., 2007; Räikkönen et al., 2011; Seckl, 2004; Stroud et al., 2016; Stroud et al., 2014). Their plasticity is highest during early development when the organ systems are still immature (Bock et al., 2014, Faulk and Dolinoy, 2011). Following exposure to prenatal challenges, induced changes, such as an altered set-point in HPA-axis, changes in glucocorticoid receptor sensitivity, changes in proteins and neurotransmitters involved in neuronal development and function in the CNS (Matthews, 2000, Matthews, 2002, Schwab et al., 2001, Wyrwoll and Holmes, 2012), will enhance susceptibility to somatic diseases and mental health problems which, in interaction with genetic liabilities and postnatal challenges, will determine ultimate health status. Indeed, over the past 30 years, in addition to extensive experimental animal studies, human studies have gathered robust epidemiological and mechanistic data showing that the most powerful early environmental factors capable of influencing offspring development and health in later life are prenatal stressors, including maternal stress, malnutrition and maternal immune-related factors. Among the first observations were that a lower birth weight − taken as a proxy measure of prenatal exposure to environmental adversity − is a risk factor for the development of cardiovascular and metabolic diseases such as arterial hypertension, coronary heart disease, obesity, and type 2 diabetes (Barker, 1990, Barker, 1995, Barker and Osmond, 1986), as well as mental health problems such as depression (Gale and Martyn, 2004, Thompson et al., 2001) and schizophrenia (Hack et al., 2004, Rifkin et al., 1994). Although much less examined, accumulating evidence mostly gathered during the last decade, is showing how maternal psychological distress, as well as stress from exposure to life events and natural disasters during pregnancy, gives rise to behavior and mental health problems.

The general aim of our review article is to gain a better understanding of the relationships between maternal stress during pregnancy and behavioral and mental health problems in later life in humans. This review, which is restricted to human studies, has the following objectives:

(1) To summarize the results of longitudinal prospective studies on the associations between prenatal stress and the development of behavioral and mental health problems in the offspring (Section 2.1).

Outcomes in the behavioral domain identified are the following: neurodevelopment (including state-regulation, sleep problems, neurobehavioral maturity and motor development), cognitive development, and temperament; together, these could be seen as a cluster of cognitive, behavioral and affective self-regulation factors. The ‘mental health’ domain includes outcomes identified as: anxiety, depression (often combined into ‘internalizing problems’), bipolar disorder, posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD); aggressive behavior, conduct disorder (often combined into ‘externalizing problems’); impaired social behavior; eating disorders; autism and autism spectrum disorders (ASD); attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD); borderline personality; suicides and suicide attempts; schizophrenia and psychosis.

Within each of the Sections 2.1.1–2.1.4, we organize the results according to the kinds of maternal stress to which the offspring in the studies were exposed: (i) ‘maternal psychological distress’, which includes general or pregnancy-specific anxiety, and depressive symptoms; (ii) major life events experienced by the mother (such as illnesses or deaths in the close family, financial and relationship problems, house moves, car accident, etc.); and (iii) exposure to a disaster (maternal hardship due to a natural disaster) and the subjective distress and cognitive appraisal related to it. The vast research literature on ‘proximal risk or adversity’, e.g., focusing on or including effects of drug and alcohol abuse in pregnancy is not reviewed in our paper.

(2) To identify the biological correlates of maternal stress in the offspring that were studied in humans, we describe the findings of the studies by biological system (Sections 2.2–2.4). The identified biological correlates are: (i) functional brain correlates (neurocognitive function; cerebral processing; functional brain connectivity) (Section 2.2), (ii) HPA-axis function (cortisol reactivity and basal cortisol) (Section 2.3), (iii) ANS-function (fetal autonomic function including heart rate (HR), heart rate variability (HRV), and postnatal autonomic function, e.g., indexed by vagal tone as measured by respiratory sinus arrhythmia (RSA) (Section 2.4).

(3) To identify the biological systems that undergo changes in their developmental trajectory which may underlie the behavioral and mental health problems observed, and to describe the available evidence that these biological systems reveal underlying mechanisms (Section 3). The identified biological systems are: (i) the stress system (3.1), (ii) immune system (3.2), (iii) gut microbiome (3.3), and (iv) telomere biology (3.4).

(4) To reach a general conclusion (Section 4).

For this review, we chose to include studies in Section 2.1 that met the following criteria: (1) prospective and longitudinal; (2) published between 2010 and early 2017; (3) quasi-experimental, epidemiological or clinical (but not an intervention) design. A search was performed of electronic databases (MEDLINE, Web of Sciences, PsychINFO and Google Scholar) through 2016. The electronic search was based on the following concepts: (1) terms related to maternal stress during pregnancy (e.g., stress, anxiety, pregnancy anxiety, depression, life events, bereavement, exposure, natural disaster; and (2) terms related to offspring behavior and mental health outcomes (e.g., neurodevelopment, state-regulation, motor development, cognitive development, neurocognition, temperament, negative affectivity, extraversion, orienting/regulation, effortful control, difficult temperament, mental health, mental disorders, psychopathology, psychiatric problems). We did not take into account studies that had only birth outcome (e.g., weight, length or head circumference at birth, or premature birth) as outcome variable.

Because there are few prospective studies of biological correlates and biological systems that reveal clues as to the underlying mechanisms effecting offspring prenatally exposed to maternal stress, we also included retrospective studies and studies published before 2010 in Sections 2.2 and 3. The terms related to biological correlates include: neurocognitive function, cerebral processing; functional brain connectivity; HPA-axis, cortisol reactivity, basal cortisol; ANS-function, heart rate, heart rate variability, alpha-amylase and dyspnea. The terms related to biological systems include: stress system, immune system, gut microbiome and telomere biology. The search was complemented by hand-searches of the references from relevant reviews and from direct communications with research groups.

Fig. 1 gives a schematic representation of the variables and study designs of the studies reviewed in Section 2, i.e., as the relationship between three blocks (blocks (1)–(3)) of variables. Most of the studies reviewed examine the relation between (1) maternal stress and (3) offspring behavior or mental health (see Section 2.1); some studies examine the link between (1) maternal stress and (2) offspring biological correlates (see Sections 2.2–2.4); and a few studies examine the links between (1) maternal stress, (2) biological correlates and (3) offspring behavior or mental health problems in one design (results of the latter studies are integrated in Sections 2.1–2.4).

In Section 3 it is explained how changes in biological systems − such as the stress system, immune system, gut microbiome and telomere biology − may explain the links described in Section 2 and represented in Fig. 1, and the available evidence is summarized.