Original article/Article original
Terbinafine susceptibility and genotypic heterogeneity in clinical isolates of Trichophyton mentagrophytes by random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD)Étude de la sensibilité à la terbinafine par RAPD d’isolats cliniques de Trichophyton mentagrophytes

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mycmed.2014.09.001Get rights and content

Summary

Objective of the study

The four RAPD systems tested in the present study have aimed at investigating DNA fingerprinting of Trichophyton mentagrophytes strains and the correlation between genotyping and antifungal susceptibility to terbinafine.

Patients

Twenty-nine clinical isolates of T. mentagrophytes were recovered from patients suspected of having active dermatophytosis who were referred to the laboratory of medical mycology department in Tehran university. Then, they were subjected to conventional examination by performing direct microscopic examination, culture on primary media, physiological tests.

Materials and methods

The in vitro antifungal susceptibility of twenty-nine T. mentagrophytes isolates against terbinafine was evaluated by modified agar dilution method to determine the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC). Twenty-one sensitive and eight resistant to terbinafine, were submitted to RAPD using 4 decamer primers (A, B, C, D) with the purpose of encountering a genetic marker to terbinafine sensibility and resistance. The UPGMA-Jaccard's correlation coefficient was used to build up dendogram that could represent clusters of similarity. According to their correlation coefficient, the samples were classified as much related (100%), moderately related (80%) and unrelated (< 70%).

Results

All amplifications revealed distinct polymorphic bands and a total of 34 band positions was scored (0/1) for the 4 primers tested. Genetic distances between each of the isolates were calculated and cluster analysis was used to generate a dendrogram showing relationships between them. The combined dendrogram at an average similarity value of 65% grouped all strains into 2 (A, B) groups corresponding to their susceptibility reactions to terbinafine. All susceptible samples were properly grouped, but a few numbers of resistant isolates were also included. Nevertheless, further biochemical and molecular biological studies will be required to fully elucidate the point that resistance might be the result of a mutation in the gene encoding squalene epoxidase in T. mentagrophytes.

Conclusion

This study proved efficacy of applying RAPD molecular technique to complement traditional mycological culture and drug susceptibility tests for accurate and appropriate management of recurrent dermatophytosis and highlights the need for newer antifungals that can combat the emergence of terbinafine-resistant T. mentagrophytes strains.

Résumé

L’objectif

La présente étude est consacrée à rechercher une relation entre la résistance à la terbinafine et la parenté génétique des isolats cliniques de Trichophyton mentagrophytes en appliquant une RAPD-PCR.

Les malades

Dans cette étude, nous avons utilisé 29 isolats de T. mentagrophytes obtenus à partir des patients atteints de dermatophytose et conservés au laboratoire de mycologie médicale du département des sciences médicales à l’université de Téhéran. Les identifications ont été affirmées par les examens microscopiques, macroscopiques et les tests biochimies et physiologiques.

Matériels et méthodes

La sensibilité aux médicaments des 39 exemples (isolats) cliniques T. mentagrophytes a été vérifiée en appliquant la méthode de dilution en gélose modifiée et on a désigné la concentration minimale inhibitrice (MIC). Ensuite, en appliquant quatre indices (A, B, C, D), nous avons vérifié la relation éventuelle entre le patron de résistance et de la sensibilité terbinafine avec leur parenté génétique dans 21 épreuves sensibles et 8 épreuves résidentes à la terbinafine. Selon le résultat de la matrice de similitude obtenu par la corrélation UPGMA-Jaccard et l’analyse spiciforme et à l’aide de UPGMA, nous avons tracé le dendrogramme des indices.

Résultats

Tous les indices appliqués ont montré les différents échantillons de polymorphiques. Au total, 34 bandes d’ADN ont été faites pour 29 isolats de T. mentagrophytes. Selon le dendrogramme obtenu avec une valeur moyenne de similarité de 65 %, les isolats sont classifiés en deux catégories (A, B) d’après le patron de sensibilité au Trichophyton. Tous les échantillons sensibles ont été classés correctement, à l’exception de quelques souches résistantes.

Conclusion

La comparaison entre le patron de résistance ou de sensibilité à la terbinafine montre l’existence d’une relation génétique possible pour certains isolats en utilisant la technique RAPD. Cependant, prouver cette allégation a besoin de recherches plus complètes en études moléculaires et biochimiques.

Introduction

Dermatophytes taxonomically are divided into three genera (Epidermophyton, Microsporum and Trichophyton) that colonies keratinised tissues (skin, hair and nails) of man and animals. The colonization process is facilitated by the release of various proteolytic and other enzymes by dermatophytes, which in turn provoke inflammatory responses in the host, resulting in dermatophytosis.

Trichophyton is particularly important and represents the most frequently isolated of all dermatophytes from human patients. Although infections by Trichophyton are usually restricted to the superficial epidermis, these fungi may be invasive and cause a severe and disseminated infection in immune compromised patients, such as those associated with AIDS, diabetes mellitus, organ transplantation with the development of dermatophytic granulomas [33], [41], [44]. Thus, the identification of genetic features in Trichophyton strains resistant to antifungal agents might help considerably in the treatment and prophylaxis of dermatophytosis.

Terbinafine is a generic antifungal agent used to treat superficial mycoses such as dermatophyte [1], [39]. Terbinafine interferes with ergostrol biosynthesis by inhibiting a membrane-bound squalene epoxidase [35]. Inhibition of squalene epoxidase results in ergostrol deficiency with the accumulation of squalene, which may be responsible for in vitro fungicidal activity [15], [35]. Although terbinane is widely used to treat infections caused by dermatophytes and other fungal pathogens, some of these infections are still difficult to resolve completely and remissions and relapses are often observed [7], [17]. So far, remissions and relapses have been attributed to the inability of the antifungal drug to penetrate the site of infection rather than to the intrinsic or acquired resistance of the fungus. On one hand, the emergence of allylamine-resistant dermatophyte strains as the result of use and occasional overuse of terbinafine had gradually become prominent especially in the case of patients with onychomycosis (receiving prolonged therapy and high concentration of drug) [32]. On the other hand, routine antifungal susceptibility testing is not usually performed in the case of dermatophyte infection in clinical laboratories. So it is likely that resistance occurs but it is not detected. Morphology-based identifications of hyphae directly from the lesion samples have been used to diagnosis of dermatophytes for many years. Although they are economic, these procedures suffer from drawbacks of being non-specific so that, up to 15% of false-negative results can be attributed to this technique [36]. Also, in vitro culture is time-consuming and for some unusual and atypical isolates, identification can be very slow and may take weeks to produce a definite result [26]. Also, many dermatophytes share common genetic structures and show similar cultural characteristics [16], [24].

Despite their close genetic relationship, various dermatophyte fungi have enough differences at the molecular level to be exploited for the rapid identification of several common dermatophyte species [25]. A large number of molecular techniques have been developed for identification of dermatophytes to the species level. This is due to speed, simplicity degree of handling and reproducibility of these techniques as compared to the traditional techniques. Several molecular typing methods, such as restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis of mitochondrial DNA [6], [21], sequencing of the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region of the ribosomal DNA [14], sequencing of protein-encoding genes [20], [19], and arbitrarily primed PCR [AP-PCR] [27], [26], and PCR fingerprinting [13], have led to dramatic progress in distinguishing closely related species and strains of dermatophytes with different profiles of virulence factors, susceptibility to antifungal drugs as well as determining whether the original isolate is responsible for reinfection or a new strain has been acquired. However, most of these techniques (e.g., restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis) are complex, laborious, time-consuming, and not easily employable for routine identification of dermatophytes; RAPD technology is simple, rapid, and, in the absence of specific nucleotide sequence information for the many dermatophyte species, able to generate species-specific or strain-specific DNA polymorphisms on the basis of characteristic band patterns detected by agarose gel electrophoresis.

Randomly amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) methods have frequently been used for phylogenetic analysis and identification of dermatophytes. Gräser et al. [13] used four non-specific primers, (AC) 10, (GTG)5, M13 core sequence, and AP3 for 26 species of dermatophytes, of which 17 species showed characteristic patterns. They suggested that these patterns could be useful for the identification of clinical isolates even if they did not have typical phenotypic characteristics. In case of Trichophyton, Kim et al. succeeded in distinguishing T. rubrum, T. mentagrophytes by RAPD [22]. For identification of T. mentagrophytes and T. tonsurans, Kac et al. [18] proposed a RAPD method, in which T. mentagrophytes was divided into subtypes on the basis of amplification patterns in RAPD using three primers. These results suggest that the RAPD method is useful for identification and subtyping of dermatophytes.

In this work, at first, the in vitro antifungal susceptibilities of twenty-nine T. mentagrophytes isolates against terbinafine was determined by agar dilution method as described by Mota et al. [38] with slight modifications. This important methodology used for in vitro testing of dermatophytes is simple, inexpensive, and does not require specialized equipment. Though, no agar-based susceptibility testing method has been standardized for the testing of dermatophytes. Afterward, 21 sensitive and 8 resistant to terbinafine was subjected to random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) analyses, applying four single short primers, with the purpose of determining their genetic relatedness and terbinafine susceptibility and resistant of T. mentagrophytes isolates. As Trichophyton species have innate pathogenicity as well as an almost universal sensitivity to terbinafine in the past, identification to the species level associated to the evaluation of terbinafine sensitivity or resistance might be relevant for clinical management.

Section snippets

Clinical materials

Twenty-nine clinical T. mentagrophytes isolates were obtained from lesions of patients having active dermatophytosis, who were referred to the medical mycology laboratory department in Tehran University of medical sciences, Iran.

Preparation of fungal colonies

The samples were grown on Sabouraud's dextrose agar (Merck, Germany) supplemented with chloramphenicol and cyclohexamide 0.05% (w/v), and incubated at 28 °C for 10 days. These clinical isolates were identified to the species level by using routine phenotypic methods,

Culture results

The in vitro susceptibility of 29 T. mentagrophytes isolates to terbinafine is summarized in Table 1. The MIC50 and MIC90 are also shown. The data are presented as MIC ranges and, where appropriate, as the drug concentrations required to inhibit 50 and 90% of the isolate of each species (MIC50 and MIC90 respectively). The results of experimental indicate that the concentration of terbinafine required for complete growth inhibition of T. mentagrophytes isolates was observed in the range of 0.1 to

Discussion

Dermatophytoses are the most frequent fungal infections worldwide, affecting individuals in various age groups and leading to these patients’ low quality of life and economic burden due to treatment expenditures. Research about different aspects of dermatophytes, such as physiology, genetics, and biochemistry, as well as the pathogenesis of dermatophytoses and the immune response triggered by these infections, are essential to the development of new therapeutic and prophylactic measures.

In this

Disclosure of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest concerning this article.

References (45)

  • M.E. da Silva Barros et al.

    Evaluation of susceptibility of Trichophyton mentagrophytes and Trichophyton rubrum clinical isolates to antifungal drugs using a modified CLSI microdilution method (M38-A)

    J Med Microbiol

    (2007)
  • A. Del Palacio et al.

    Trends in the treatment of dermatophytosis

    (2000)
  • G. Del Sal et al.

    The CTAB-DNA precipitation method: a common mini-scale preparation of template DNA from phagemids, phages or plasmids suitable for sequencing

    Biotechniques

    (1989)
  • D.L. Ellsworth et al.

    Artifactual variation in randomly amplified polymorphic DNA banding patterns

    Biotechniques

    (1993)
  • A. Espinel-Ingroff et al.

    Comparative and collaborative evaluation of standardization of antifungal susceptibility testing for filamentous fungi

    Antimicrob Agents Chemother

    (1995)
  • A. Espinel-Ingroff et al.

    Multicenter evaluation of proposed standardized procedure for antifungal susceptibility testing for filamentous fungi

    J Clin Microbiol

    (1997)
  • A.L. Fachin et al.

    Role of the ABC transporter TruMDR2 in terbinafine, 4-nitroquinoline N-oxide and ethidium bromide susceptibility in Trichophyton rubrum

    J Med Microbiol

    (2006)
  • Y. Gräser et al.

    Identification of common dermatophytes (Trichophyton, Microsporum Epidermophyton) using polymerase chain reactions

    Br J Dermatol

    (1998)
  • Y. Gräser et al.

    Phylogeny and taxonomy of the family Arthrodermataceae (dermatophytes) using sequence analysis of the ribosomal ITS region

    Med Mycol

    (1999)
  • D. Harmsen et al.

    Phylogeny and dating of some pathogenic keratinophilic fungi using small subunit ribosomal RNA

    J Med Vet Mycol

    (1995)
  • G. Kac et al.

    Genetic diversity among Trichophyton mentagrophytes isolates using random amplified polymorphic DNA method

    Br J Dermatol

    (1999)
  • R. Kano et al.

    Phylogeneticanalysis of 8 dermatophyte species using chitin synthase1 gene sequences

    Mycoses

    (1997)
  • View full text