Original article/Article originalTerbinafine susceptibility and genotypic heterogeneity in clinical isolates of Trichophyton mentagrophytes by random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD)Étude de la sensibilité à la terbinafine par RAPD d’isolats cliniques de Trichophyton mentagrophytes
Introduction
Dermatophytes taxonomically are divided into three genera (Epidermophyton, Microsporum and Trichophyton) that colonies keratinised tissues (skin, hair and nails) of man and animals. The colonization process is facilitated by the release of various proteolytic and other enzymes by dermatophytes, which in turn provoke inflammatory responses in the host, resulting in dermatophytosis.
Trichophyton is particularly important and represents the most frequently isolated of all dermatophytes from human patients. Although infections by Trichophyton are usually restricted to the superficial epidermis, these fungi may be invasive and cause a severe and disseminated infection in immune compromised patients, such as those associated with AIDS, diabetes mellitus, organ transplantation with the development of dermatophytic granulomas [33], [41], [44]. Thus, the identification of genetic features in Trichophyton strains resistant to antifungal agents might help considerably in the treatment and prophylaxis of dermatophytosis.
Terbinafine is a generic antifungal agent used to treat superficial mycoses such as dermatophyte [1], [39]. Terbinafine interferes with ergostrol biosynthesis by inhibiting a membrane-bound squalene epoxidase [35]. Inhibition of squalene epoxidase results in ergostrol deficiency with the accumulation of squalene, which may be responsible for in vitro fungicidal activity [15], [35]. Although terbinane is widely used to treat infections caused by dermatophytes and other fungal pathogens, some of these infections are still difficult to resolve completely and remissions and relapses are often observed [7], [17]. So far, remissions and relapses have been attributed to the inability of the antifungal drug to penetrate the site of infection rather than to the intrinsic or acquired resistance of the fungus. On one hand, the emergence of allylamine-resistant dermatophyte strains as the result of use and occasional overuse of terbinafine had gradually become prominent especially in the case of patients with onychomycosis (receiving prolonged therapy and high concentration of drug) [32]. On the other hand, routine antifungal susceptibility testing is not usually performed in the case of dermatophyte infection in clinical laboratories. So it is likely that resistance occurs but it is not detected. Morphology-based identifications of hyphae directly from the lesion samples have been used to diagnosis of dermatophytes for many years. Although they are economic, these procedures suffer from drawbacks of being non-specific so that, up to 15% of false-negative results can be attributed to this technique [36]. Also, in vitro culture is time-consuming and for some unusual and atypical isolates, identification can be very slow and may take weeks to produce a definite result [26]. Also, many dermatophytes share common genetic structures and show similar cultural characteristics [16], [24].
Despite their close genetic relationship, various dermatophyte fungi have enough differences at the molecular level to be exploited for the rapid identification of several common dermatophyte species [25]. A large number of molecular techniques have been developed for identification of dermatophytes to the species level. This is due to speed, simplicity degree of handling and reproducibility of these techniques as compared to the traditional techniques. Several molecular typing methods, such as restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis of mitochondrial DNA [6], [21], sequencing of the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region of the ribosomal DNA [14], sequencing of protein-encoding genes [20], [19], and arbitrarily primed PCR [AP-PCR] [27], [26], and PCR fingerprinting [13], have led to dramatic progress in distinguishing closely related species and strains of dermatophytes with different profiles of virulence factors, susceptibility to antifungal drugs as well as determining whether the original isolate is responsible for reinfection or a new strain has been acquired. However, most of these techniques (e.g., restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis) are complex, laborious, time-consuming, and not easily employable for routine identification of dermatophytes; RAPD technology is simple, rapid, and, in the absence of specific nucleotide sequence information for the many dermatophyte species, able to generate species-specific or strain-specific DNA polymorphisms on the basis of characteristic band patterns detected by agarose gel electrophoresis.
Randomly amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) methods have frequently been used for phylogenetic analysis and identification of dermatophytes. Gräser et al. [13] used four non-specific primers, (AC) 10, (GTG)5, M13 core sequence, and AP3 for 26 species of dermatophytes, of which 17 species showed characteristic patterns. They suggested that these patterns could be useful for the identification of clinical isolates even if they did not have typical phenotypic characteristics. In case of Trichophyton, Kim et al. succeeded in distinguishing T. rubrum, T. mentagrophytes by RAPD [22]. For identification of T. mentagrophytes and T. tonsurans, Kac et al. [18] proposed a RAPD method, in which T. mentagrophytes was divided into subtypes on the basis of amplification patterns in RAPD using three primers. These results suggest that the RAPD method is useful for identification and subtyping of dermatophytes.
In this work, at first, the in vitro antifungal susceptibilities of twenty-nine T. mentagrophytes isolates against terbinafine was determined by agar dilution method as described by Mota et al. [38] with slight modifications. This important methodology used for in vitro testing of dermatophytes is simple, inexpensive, and does not require specialized equipment. Though, no agar-based susceptibility testing method has been standardized for the testing of dermatophytes. Afterward, 21 sensitive and 8 resistant to terbinafine was subjected to random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) analyses, applying four single short primers, with the purpose of determining their genetic relatedness and terbinafine susceptibility and resistant of T. mentagrophytes isolates. As Trichophyton species have innate pathogenicity as well as an almost universal sensitivity to terbinafine in the past, identification to the species level associated to the evaluation of terbinafine sensitivity or resistance might be relevant for clinical management.
Section snippets
Clinical materials
Twenty-nine clinical T. mentagrophytes isolates were obtained from lesions of patients having active dermatophytosis, who were referred to the medical mycology laboratory department in Tehran University of medical sciences, Iran.
Preparation of fungal colonies
The samples were grown on Sabouraud's dextrose agar (Merck, Germany) supplemented with chloramphenicol and cyclohexamide 0.05% (w/v), and incubated at 28 °C for 10 days. These clinical isolates were identified to the species level by using routine phenotypic methods,
Culture results
The in vitro susceptibility of 29 T. mentagrophytes isolates to terbinafine is summarized in Table 1. The MIC50 and MIC90 are also shown. The data are presented as MIC ranges and, where appropriate, as the drug concentrations required to inhibit 50 and 90% of the isolate of each species (MIC50 and MIC90 respectively). The results of experimental indicate that the concentration of terbinafine required for complete growth inhibition of T. mentagrophytes isolates was observed in the range of 0.1 to
Discussion
Dermatophytoses are the most frequent fungal infections worldwide, affecting individuals in various age groups and leading to these patients’ low quality of life and economic burden due to treatment expenditures. Research about different aspects of dermatophytes, such as physiology, genetics, and biochemistry, as well as the pathogenesis of dermatophytoses and the immune response triggered by these infections, are essential to the development of new therapeutic and prophylactic measures.
In this
Disclosure of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest concerning this article.
References (45)
- et al.
Polymorphism in mitochondrial DNA of several Trichophyton rubrum isolates from clinical specimens
Ann Inst Pasteur Microbiol
(1987) - et al.
Terbinafine
J Am Acad Dermatol
(1997) - et al.
Itraconazole in the management of chronic dermatophytoses
J Am Acad Dermatol
(1990) - et al.
Mechanisms of resistance to fenpropimorph and terbinafine, two sterol biosynthesis inhibitors, in Nectria hematococca, a phytopathogenic fungus
Pestic Biochem Physiol
(1999) - et al.
Use of arbitrarily primed polymerase chain reaction to differentiate trichophyton dermatophytes
FEMS Microbiol Lett
(1996) - et al.
Variability of the random amplified polymorphic DNA assay among thermal cyclers, and effects of primer and DNA concentration
Mol Cel Probes
(1993) - et al.
Treatment for common superficial fungal infections
Dermatology
(2001) - et al.
Single-step PCR using (GACA)4Primer: utility for rapid identification of dermatophyte species and strains
J Clin Microbiol
(2008) - et al.
Genetic variation among a worldwide collection of isolates of Fusarium oxysporum, F. spcubense analyzed by RAPD-PCR finger printing
Mycol Res
(1995) - et al.
Molecular cloning and characterization of a novel ABC transporter gene in the human pathogen Trichophytonrubrum
Med Mycol
(2006)
Evaluation of susceptibility of Trichophyton mentagrophytes and Trichophyton rubrum clinical isolates to antifungal drugs using a modified CLSI microdilution method (M38-A)
J Med Microbiol
Trends in the treatment of dermatophytosis
The CTAB-DNA precipitation method: a common mini-scale preparation of template DNA from phagemids, phages or plasmids suitable for sequencing
Biotechniques
Artifactual variation in randomly amplified polymorphic DNA banding patterns
Biotechniques
Comparative and collaborative evaluation of standardization of antifungal susceptibility testing for filamentous fungi
Antimicrob Agents Chemother
Multicenter evaluation of proposed standardized procedure for antifungal susceptibility testing for filamentous fungi
J Clin Microbiol
Role of the ABC transporter TruMDR2 in terbinafine, 4-nitroquinoline N-oxide and ethidium bromide susceptibility in Trichophyton rubrum
J Med Microbiol
Identification of common dermatophytes (Trichophyton, Microsporum Epidermophyton) using polymerase chain reactions
Br J Dermatol
Phylogeny and taxonomy of the family Arthrodermataceae (dermatophytes) using sequence analysis of the ribosomal ITS region
Med Mycol
Phylogeny and dating of some pathogenic keratinophilic fungi using small subunit ribosomal RNA
J Med Vet Mycol
Genetic diversity among Trichophyton mentagrophytes isolates using random amplified polymorphic DNA method
Br J Dermatol
Phylogeneticanalysis of 8 dermatophyte species using chitin synthase1 gene sequences
Mycoses
Cited by (7)
Trends in the epidemiology of dermatophytosis in the Middle East and North Africa region
2022, International Journal of DermatologyThe in vitro effect of nanoliposomal amphotericin B against two clinically important dermatophytes
2022, International Journal of DermatologyIn vitro and In vivo Antifungal Activity of Alkanna tinctoria against Trichophyton rubrun and Trichophyton Mentagrophytes
2021, Iranian Journal of Pharmaceutical SciencesMultidrug-resistant Trichophyton mentagrophytes genotype VIII in an Iranian family with generalized dermatophytosis: report of four cases and review of literature
2021, International Journal of Dermatology