Original researchHigh chronic training loads and exposure to bouts of maximal velocity running reduce injury risk in elite Gaelic football
Introduction
Training load has been reported as a modifiable risk factor for subsequent injury.1 Several studies have investigated the influence of training workload and injury risk in team sports. In professional rugby union, players1 higher 1-week (>1245 AU) and 4-week cumulative loads (>8651 AU) were associated with a greater risk of injury. Furthermore, Rogalski et al.2 observed that larger 1-weekly (>1750 arbitrary units, OR = 2.44–3.38), 2-weekly (>4000 arbitrary units, OR = 4.74) and previous to current week changes in load (>1250 arbitrary units, OR = 2.58) were significantly related to greater injury risk throughout the in-season phase in elite Australian rules football players.
The ability to produce high speeds is considered an important quality for performance, with athletes shown to achieve 85–94% of maximal velocity during team sport match-play.3 Well-developed high-speed running ability and maximal velocity are required of players during competition in order to beat opposition players to possession and gain an advantage in attacking and defensive situations.4, 5 In order to optimally prepare players for these maximal velocity and high speed elements of match play, players require regular exposure to periods of high-speed running during training environments6. Recent evidence suggests that lower limb injuries are associated with excessive high-speed running exposure.7, 8 Within elite rugby league and Australian football cohorts, players who performed greater amounts of very high-speed running within training sessions were 2.7 and 3.7 times more likely to sustain a non-contact, soft tissue injury than players who performed less very-high speed running.8, 9 However, these studies failed to assess the potential impact that chronic training load could have on reducing the injury risk in these players. Currently there is a lack of understanding of the potential benefits of maximal velocity exposures and also the minimum dose required to provide protection against injuries.
Recent evidence suggests that high chronic training loads can offer a protective stimulus for team sport athletes.10, 11 Australian rules football players with higher 1 week training loads (>3519 AU) were at reduced risk of injury (OR = 0.199) compared to players exposed to lower training loads (<3518 AU).12 Additionally Cross et al.1 have reported a U-shaped curve for training load and injury risk in elite rugby union players with low and high training loads increasing injury risk, and intermediate loads reducing injury risk. High aerobic fitness has been reported to offer a protective effect against subsequent lower limb injury for team sport players.6 Higher training loads may be needed to provide the appropriate stimulus for aerobic fitness improvements6 with lower training loads potentially placing players at increased risk due to a lack of exposure to the physical stimulus required for competitive play.6
Although greater amounts of high-speed running have been associated with injury risk, there is evidence that players are often required to perform maximal efforts over short to moderate distances during competition and training.13, 14, 15 Training for team sport ultimately requires a balance between appropriately prescribed training loads to develop the required physical qualities to compete while also allowing the appropriate recovery between sessions and match-play to minimise injury risk for players. Given the need for players to perform maximal efforts during match-play, exposure of players to these maximal efforts during training may offer a “vaccine” against soft-tissue injury.6 However, the inter-relationship among these training variables and potential injury risk is poorly understood. Therefore the aim of the current investigation was to examine exposure to maximal velocity events as a potential modifiable risk factor for injury within Gaelic football. Additionally with higher chronic training loads offering a protective effect from injury in other sports, there is a need to investigate the interaction of chronic training loads, maximal velocity exposure, and injury risk within Gaelic football. Accordingly, we explored the relationship between training load, the number of maximal velocity exposures during training and match-play, the distance covered at maximal velocity and injury risk in elite Gaelic football players.
Section snippets
Methods
The current investigation was a prospective cohort study of elite Gaelic football players competing at the highest level of competition in Gaelic football (National League Division 1 and All-Ireland Championship). Data were collected for 37 players (Mean ± SD, age: 24 ± 3 years; height: 179 ± 5 cm; mass: 79 ± 7 kg) over one season. The study was approved by the local institute’s research ethics committee and written informed consent was obtained from each participant.
The intensity of all competitive
Results
In total, 91 time-loss injuries were reported across the season (36 training injuries and 55 match injuries). A rate of 2.4 injuries per player was observed. Overall, match injury incidence was 45.3/1000 h (95% CI: 41.9–53.8) with a training injury incidence of 6.9/1000 h (95% CI: 5.8–7.8). The total match and training volumes reported during the season were 1210 h and 5975 h respectively.
Players who produced over 95% maximal velocity within training and match-play environments in the preceding
Discussion
The current investigation is the first to explore the relationship between training load, maximal velocity exposures and injury risk in elite Gaelic football players. Our data showed that when players’ produced over 95% of their maximal velocity they were at reduced risk of subsequent injury (OR: 0.12) (Table 1). When maximal velocity exposures were considered independently of training load history a U-shaped curve was shown for number of exposures and subsequent injury risk (Supplementary Fig.
Conclusion
In conclusion when maximal velocity exposures were considered independently of training load history a U-shaped curve was shown for number of exposures and subsequent injury risk. Our data suggests that players who produce ≥95% of their maximal velocity were at reduced injury risk compared to players who produced lower relative maximal velocities. Coaches should expose players to high percentages of maximal velocity within training situations as this offers a potential “vaccine” against
Practical applications
- •
Exposure of players to maximal velocity running should be mainstream practice in elite sport in order to adequately prepare players for maximal velocity situations during match-play.
- •
Coaches should allow for situations within training where players can achieve high percentages of maximal velocity as these situations offer a potential protective effect against injury.
- •
Players who produce ≥95% of their maximal velocity are at reduced injury risk compared to players who produced lower relative
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to acknowledge with considerable gratitude the players, coaches and medical staff for their help throughout the study period.
References (28)
- et al.
Training and game loads and injury risk in elite Australian footballers
J Sci Med Sport
(2013) - et al.
Different methods of training load quantification and their relationship to injury and illness in elite Australian football
J Sci Med Sport
(2016) - et al.
The influence of in-season training loads on injury risk in professional rugby union
Int J Sports Physiol Perform
(2016) - et al.
Peak match speed and maximal sprinting speed in young soccer players: effect of age and playing position
Int J Sports Physiol Perform
(2015) Australian football player work rate: evidence of fatigue and pacing?
Int J Sports Physiol Perform
(2010)- et al.
Standardisation of acceleration zones in professional field sport athletes
Int J Sports Sci Coaching
(2014) The training-injury prevention paradox: should athletes be training smarter and harder?
Br J Sports Med
(2016)- et al.
Hamstring muscle strains in professional football players a 10-year review
Am J Sports Med
(2011) - et al.
Relationship between running loads and soft-tissue injury in elite team sport athletes
J Strength Cond Res
(2012) - et al.
Accelerometer and GPS-derived running loads and injury risk in elite Australian footballers
J Strength Cond Res
(2014)