The TiltMeter app is a novel and accurate measurement tool for the weight bearing lunge test

doi:10.1016/j.jsams.2013.02.001

Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport

Volume 16, Issue 5, September 2013, Pages 392-395

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsams.2013.02.001 Get rights and content

Abstract

Objectives

The weight bearing lunge test is increasing being used by health care clinicians who treat lower limb and foot pathology. This measure is commonly established accurately and reliably with the use of expensive equipment. This study aims to compare the digital inclinometer with a free app, TiltMeter on an Apple iPhone.

Design

This was an intra-rater and inter-rater reliability study. Two raters (novice and experienced) conducted the measurements in both a bent knee and straight leg position to determine the intra-rater and inter-rater reliability. Concurrent validity was also established.

Methods

Allied health practitioners were recruited as participants from the workplace. A preconditioning stretch was conducted and the ankle range of motion was established with the weight bearing lunge test position with firstly the leg straight and secondly with the knee bent. The measurement device and each participant were randomised during measurement.

Results

The intra-rater reliability and inter-rater reliability for the devices and in both positions were all over ICC 0.8 except for one intra-rater measure (Digital inclinometer, novice, ICC 0.65). The inter-rater reliability between the digital inclinometer and the tilmeter was near perfect, ICC 0.96 (CI: 0.898–0.983); Concurrent validity ICC between the two devices was 0.83 (CI: −0.740 to 0.445).

Conclusions

The use of the Tiltmeter app on the iPhone is a reliable and inexpensive tool to measure the available ankle range of motion. Health practitioners should use caution in applying these findings to other smart phone equipment if surface areas are not comparable.

Introduction

The measurement of ankle joint dorsiflexion is routinely performed by clinicians treating lower limb pathologies to specifically evaluate the cause and effect that reduced ankle motion can have on normal gait¹ and injury.1, 2 The accurate measurement for available ankle range of motion has been demonstrated to be critical due to the decision-making and subsequent therapy implemented by health practitioners who manage lower limb musculoskeletal pathology.³

In order to accomplish accurate quantification of joint motion and stiffness, a variety of measurement techniques have been reported in the literature. These techniques have had variable results due to both equipment, clinician technique and the challenges of soft tissue variability.⁴ Past research has established baseline measurements in a non-weight bearing⁵ or weight bearing position,⁶ with the measured leg bent at the knee⁶ or the leg straight,3, 7 with or without instrumentation.⁸ Recent investigations has found that weight bearing ankle joint range of motion measurements show higher intra and inter reliability than non-weight bearing measures⁹ and a valid measure of gastrocnemius and soleus length.¹⁰

The weight bearing lunge with the leg bent at the knee has demonstrated excellent inter-rater and intra-rater reliability (ICC 0.97–0.98)⁶ and the same test performed together with the leg straight has been used with similar reliability results.7, 11 These measures have been reported in range of motion studies with either a standard angle finder (inclinometer)⁷ which has small gravity fed instrumentation or a digital inclinometer placed either at the anterior of the tibia or at posterior flat surface of the Achilles tendon.3, 6, 11 The introduction of the digital inclinometer was aimed to increase the size of the displayed measurement to allow ease and accuracy in reading the result by the clinician. However this instrumentation is often costly, with a single measurement tool in excess of $150(AU).

With the advent of smart phone technology, apps are being introduced into every day practice in the clinical setting. One recent study found the majority of health care providers own a smartphone, with over half of those surveyed, regularly use an app within clinical practice with patients.¹² Smartphone apps offer a cheap and widely accessible means for measurement in a range of areas. More recently the use of smart phones have been tested for reliability of measure in spinal motion¹³ and knee measures.14, 15 It is important to establish the reliability and validity of these apps at each joint if this measurement approach is to be compared with other criterion standard approaches to ensure the usage is appropriate.

This study aims to compare the intra-rater and inter-rater reliability and, concurrent validity of the Tiltmeter app on a smartphone compared to a digital inclinometer. Thus determining if this technology is appropriate to use when measuring ankle range of motion.

Section snippets

Methods

The study design was implemented to test the following:

1.
Intra-rater and inter-rater reliability of the weight bearing lunge test with leg straight and knee bent using the digital inclinometer
2.
Intra-rater and inter-rater reliability of the weight bearing lunge test with leg straight and knee bent using the Tiltmeter app on the iPhone
3.
Concurrent validity between the digital inclinometer and the TiltMeter app on the iPhone

Allied health clinicians were recruited within the workplace setting to

Results

A total of 20 people were recruited to the study. There was a majority of females (16 female), with a mean (SD) age of 40 (±12) years with a mean (SD) body mass index (kg/m²) of 25.4 kg/m² ± 5.0 kg/m². All participants gave written consent and disclosed no history of recent foot or ankle injuries or surgery at the right foot. No participants had a history of a neuromuscular condition.

The ICC between the instrumentation on static hard surfaces was 0.9973 and the 95% limits of agreement −4.064 to

Discussion

The aim of this study was to explore if the use of a low cost and easily accessed app on a smartphone, was appropriate to be used within the clinical setting. The results determined all scores excepting one to be above 0.8, well beyond the acceptable level of correlation.¹⁹ Previous studies have determined that the use of the weight bearing lunge, with varied measurement instrumentation and position of instrumentation have high reliability (0.85–0.96).6, 11, 20 This study has also determined

Conclusion

The use of the TiltMeter app on the iPhone is a reliable measure of ankle range of motion in healthy adults. Clinicians should use clinical judgement and caution in when using this technology on different smart phone technology to that mentioned within this study.

Practical implications

1.
Clinicians can confidently utilise smartphone technology within clinical practice for monitoring ankle joint range of movements
2.
Researchers can incorporate the use of a low cost measurement tool/technology into study designs
3.
Further investigations into the reliability of different smartphone technology can be conducted to improve clinical outcomes

Acknowledgements

No financial support was obtained for this study.

References (20)

K.L. Bennell et al.
Intra-rater and inter-rater reliability of a weight-bearing lunge measure of ankle dorsiflexion
Aust J Physiother
(1998)
S.E. Munteanu et al.
A weightbearing technique for the measurement of ankle joint dorsiflexion with the knee extended is reliable
J Sci Med Sport
(2009)
C.W. Digiovanni et al.
Isolated gastrocnemius tightness
J Bone Joint Surg Am
(2002)
D.L. Riddle et al.
Risk factors for plantar fasciitis: a matched case-control study
J Bone Joint Surg Am
(2003)
K.J. Rose et al.
Factors associated with foot and ankle strength in healthy preschool-age children and age-matched cases of Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 1A
J Child Neurol
(2010)
K. Rome
Ankle joint dorsiflexion measurement studies. A review of the literature
J Am Podiatr Med Assoc
(1996)
R.A. Elveru et al.
Goniometric reliability in a clinical setting. Subtalar and ankle joint measurements
Phys Ther
(1988)
K. Bennell et al.
Hip and ankle range of motion and hip muscle strength in young female ballet dancers and controls
Br J Sports Med
(1999)
S.G. Trevino et al.
Use of a torque-range-of-motion device for objective differentiation of diabetic from normal feet in adults
Foot Ankle Int
(2004)
M.M. Konor et al.
Reliability of three measures of ankle dorsiflexion range of motion
Int J Sports Phys Ther
(2012)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (55)

Test–retest and inter-rater reliability of Clinometer for measuring range of motion in patients with hip osteoarthritis
2023, Fisioterapia
Evaluar la fiabilidad intraexaminador e interexaminador de la aplicación Clinometer para medir el rango de movimiento (RDM) de la cadera en pacientes con artrosis de cadera y su correlación con el goniómetro universal.
Se diseñó un estudio de medidas repetidas en el que se incluyeron 35 pacientes con artrosis de cadera. Se registró el RDM de rotación interna, externa, flexión y extensión de cadera mediante la aplicación Clinometer por 2 examinadores independientes. Se calculó la fiabilidad intraexaminador e interexaminador utilizando el coeficiente de correlación intraclase, y se calculó el error estándar de medición y el cambio mínimo detectable. Se utilizó el coeficiente de correlación de Pearson para correlacionar la aplicación Clinometer con el goniómetro universal.
La aplicación Clinometer mostró una fiabilidad excelente tanto intraexaminador (coeficiente de correlación intraclase: 0,82-0,96) como interexaminador (coeficiente de correlación intraclase: 0,81-0,95) para todos los RDM de la cadera valorados. La correlación entre este instrumento y el goniómetro universal mostró ser fuerte para todos los RDM de la cadera (r > 0,70).
La aplicación Clinometer ha mostrado unos niveles de fiabilidad excelentes para la medición del RDM de rotación interna, externa, flexión y extensión de la cadera en pacientes con artrosis y presenta una fuerte correlación con el goniómetro universal.
To evaluate the test–retest and inter-rater reliability of the application Clinometer for measuring the hip range of motion (ROM) in patients with hip osteoarthritis and its correlation with the universal goniometer.
A blinded repeated measured was carried out with 35 patients with hip osteoarthritis. Hip internal rotation, external rotation, flexion and extension ROM were measured using Clinometer app by 2 independents raters. The intraclass correlation coefficient was used to calculate the test–retest reliability and inter-rater reliability. The standard error measurement and minimal detectable change were also calculated. The Pearson's correlation coefficient was used to correlate the app with the universal goniometer.
Clinometer application achieved excellent test–retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient: 0.82-0.96) and inter-rater reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient: 0.81-0.95) in all the ROMs assessed. The correlation analysis with the universal goniometer showed strong correlation values (r > 0.70) in all the ROMs assessed.
Clinometer application presented excellent test–retest reliability and inter-rater reliability for the measurement of hip ROM in patients with hip osteoarthritis. The smartphone application showed a strong correlation compared to universal goniometer.
Assessing the Validity and Reliability of a New Video Goniometer App for Measuring Joint Angles in Adults and Children
2020, Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
To assess the convergent validity and reliability of joint angle measurements from a new video goniometer iPhone/iPad application separately in adults, older and young children.
Cross-sectional.
Child care and university environments.
Fifty-four adults (mean ± SD=22.5±4.5y), 20 older children (mean ± SD=10.9±2.2y), 20 younger children (mean ± SD=1.6±0.8y) (N=94).
Adults and older children performed both standardized static positions and functional activities. Younger children performed only a functional activity protocol.
Joint angle measurements using the app were validated against a commercially validated two-dimensional goniometric software program. In addition, validity of the app was compared to a standard mechanical goniometer for the measurement of angles drawn on a white board. Intra- and interrater reliability were assessed through independent rescoring of videos.
Correlations between joint angle estimates obtained from the app and goniometer software or a mechanical goniometer were positive and very strong (r>.900; P<.0001). The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for repeated scoring from the app indicated excellent intra- and interrater reliability (ICC>.900).
High correlations for repeated measures and comparison to gold standard angle measurement instruments suggest that the new app is a valid and reliable tool for assessing joint angles during functional activity. This tool may provide clinicians an inexpensive yet accurate method for quantification of movements and immediate feedback on range of motion during tasks in a natural environment.
The growing significance of smartphone apps in data-driven clinical decision-making: Challenges and pitfalls
2020, Artificial Intelligence in Medicine: Technical Basis and Clinical Applications
Smartphone applications have a growing role within the medical field, as they provide both doctors and patients with instant access to information and decision-support tools. This chapter focuses on data-driven clinical decision-making apps and explaining different categories of apps used in health care such as predictive model apps, camera-based apps, and artificial intelligence–based apps. Recent studies show the potential of using clinical decision-support applications in the medical field, by empowering the role of patients and the clinicians in decision-making, and emphasizing the importance and contribution of technology and artificial intelligence in the quality of life and health care. However, it also becomes clear that there is a need for standardized clinical evaluation guidelines for these applications. In conclusion, there is a need for clinical trials to increase the quality of applications.
The role of medical smartphone apps in clinical decision-support: A literature review
2019, Artificial Intelligence in Medicine
The now ubiquitous smartphone has huge potential to assist clinical decision-making across the globe. However, the rapid pace of digitalisation contrasts starkly with the slower rate of medical research and publication. This review explores the evidence base that exists to validate and evaluate the use of medical decision-support apps. The resultant findings will inform appropriate and pragmatic evaluation strategies for future clinical app developers and provide a scientific and cultural context for research priorities in this field.
Medline, Embase and Cochrane databases were searched for clinical trials concerning decision support and smart phones from 2007 (introduction of first smartphone iPhone) until January 2019.
Following exclusions, 48 trials and one Cochrane review were included for final analysis. Whilst diagnostic accuracy studies are plentiful, clinical trials are scarce. App research methodology was further interrogated according to setting and decision-support modality: e.g. camera-based, guideline-based, predictive models. Description of app development pathways and regulation were highly varied. Global health emerged as an early adopter of decision-support apps and this field is leading implementation and evaluation.
Clinical decision-support apps have considerable potential to enhance access to care and quality of care, but the medical community must rise to the challenge of modernising its approach if it is truly committed to capitalising on the opportunities of digitalisation.
Full length foot orthoses have an immediate treatment effect and modify gait of children with idiopathic toe walking
2019, Gait and Posture
There remains a substantial lack of evidence to support the use of foot orthoses as a conservative treatment option for idiopathic toe walking (ITW). Encouraging heel contact during gait is one of the primary goals of most interventions in paediatric ITW.
Does the combined treatment of high-top boots and orthoses increase the number of heel contacts during gait and change spatio-temporal gait parameters?
This within subject designed randomised controlled trial recruited fifteen children diagnosed with ITW (n = 10 males). They were fitted with bilateral custom made rigid contoured carbon fibre foot orthoses placed inside high-top boots. To analyze the effect of this treatment, heel contacts and spatio-temporal parameters measured by an 8.3 m Gaitrite® mat were compared to barefoot walking and shod walking.
An immediate increase in heel contact (p = 0.021) was observed in the combined treatment only. Gait changes included a large increase in stride time in the combined treatment condition compared to barefoot walking (p = 0.006). This was associated with a decrease in the percentage of swing phase in the gait cycle (p < 0.010), an increase in stance phase (p < 0.010) and an increase in double support time (p < 0.001).
These results suggest the hardness and thickness of the shoe and stiffness of the orthosis midsole may lead to improved local dynamic stability and foot position awareness with increased sensory feedback provided through the entire length of the foot. Further research is indicated to validate this treatment option on long term outcomes in this population group.
Ankle dorsiflexion range of motion and landing postures during a soccer-specific task
2023, PLoS ONE

View all citing articles on Scopus

View full text

Original researchThe TiltMeter app is a novel and accurate measurement tool for the weight bearing lunge test

Abstract

Objectives

Design

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Introduction

Section snippets

Methods

Results

Discussion

Conclusion

Practical implications

Acknowledgements

Aust J Physiother

J Sci Med Sport

Isolated gastrocnemius tightness

J Bone Joint Surg Am

Risk factors for plantar fasciitis: a matched case-control study

J Bone Joint Surg Am

Factors associated with foot and ankle strength in healthy preschool-age children and age-matched cases of Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 1A

J Child Neurol

Ankle joint dorsiflexion measurement studies. A review of the literature

J Am Podiatr Med Assoc

Goniometric reliability in a clinical setting. Subtalar and ankle joint measurements

Phys Ther

Hip and ankle range of motion and hip muscle strength in young female ballet dancers and controls

Br J Sports Med

Use of a torque-range-of-motion device for objective differentiation of diabetic from normal feet in adults

Foot Ankle Int

Reliability of three measures of ankle dorsiflexion range of motion

Int J Sports Phys Ther

Original research
The TiltMeter app is a novel and accurate measurement tool for the weight bearing lunge test