The importance of cognition to quality of life after stroke

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychores.2014.08.009Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Cognitive impairment is associated with poorer quality of life after stroke.

  • Attention and visuospatial ability are the closest correlates of quality of life.

  • Choice reaction time in the acute stage is linked to 12-month quality of life.

Abstract

Objective

Suffering a stroke typically has a negative impact on a person's quality of life. There is some evidence that post-stroke cognitive impairment is associated with poor quality of life, but the relative importance of deficits in different cognitive domains has not been established.

Methods

Patients with confirmed stroke were recruited in the acute hospital. A subgroup of patients completed 2 computerized cognitive tasks (simple and choice reaction time) within 2 weeks of stroke. The full cohort was followed up at 3 months with a comprehensive neuropsychological battery and then at 12 months with the Assessment of Quality of Life ('AQoL).

Results

Sixty patients participated in the study (mean age 72.1 years, SD 13.9), with a subgroup of 33 patients tested acutely (mean age 75.5 years, SD 11.9). Presence of cognitive impairment at 3 months was independently associated with lower quality of life at 12 months (p = 0.021). Attention and visuospatial ability were the cognitive domains most closely associated with quality of life. Faster choice reaction time in the acute stage (mean 5.4 days post-stroke) was significantly associated with better quality of life at 12 months (p = 0.003).

Conclusion

Cognition, particularly attention and visuospatial ability, is strongly associated with quality of life after stroke. It is possible that straightforward reaction time tasks are sensitive to the extent of brain damage, and might therefore be surrogate markers for quality of life.

Introduction

Stroke can impact many aspects of a person's life, resulting in major adjustments and long-term challenges for the individual and their family. Groups of stroke survivors have been shown to have a lower average quality of life (QoL) than groups of age-matched people who have not experienced a stroke [1], [2]. Defining QoL is complex, as it is determined by an individual's perception nested in the context of their values, expectations and cultural beliefs [3]. There is general consensus, however, that QoL is a multidimensional concept that incorporates physical, psychological and social domains of health and well-being [4], [5]. As health care has moved from the traditional medical model (humans as biological organisms) to a more humane model (people as integrated, feeling beings), QoL has become viewed as the endpoint most relevant to the individual [6]. This move has been accelerated by treatment advances, particularly in cancer (i.e., ongoing chemotherapy will keep you alive, but is it a life worth living?).

Historically, the focus of rehabilitation after stroke has been on improving physical function. Such improvements clearly have a positive effect on QoL, but there are other important considerations. Results from the Australian stroke incidence study NEMESIS showed that handicap, physical impairment and disability were all independent predictors of health-related QoL, but so were dementia and mood disorder [7]. Hochstenbach et al. [8] found that several cognitive tasks—mostly in the attention domain—administered at 2 months post-stroke were predictive of QoL at 10 months. In multivariate analysis, the Trail-making part B task (requiring executive function, and also incorporating visuospatial scanning) emerged as an independent predictor of QoL. Similarly, Nys et al. [9] reported that cognitive impairment in the first month post-stroke was as an independent predictor of low QoL at 6–10 months. In this case, visuospatial ability was the cognitive domain with the strongest link to QoL. Given that the QoL life scales used in these two studies [8], [9] included specific items on cognition, however, it might be argued that these associations are somewhat circular.

Although the evidence base is limited, these studies give some indication that attention and visuospatial ability are particularly closely related to QoL after stroke. This is interesting because, unlike tasks used to assess the cognitive domains of memory and language, the tasks used to assess attention and visuospatial ability are typically speed-dependent. This raises the prospect that the association with QoL is not with these cognitive domains per se, but is mediated by a more generalized speed of processing capability. Recent findings from two large (n > 300), longitudinal (> 3 years follow-up) studies have demonstrated that long-term functional outcome after stroke can be independently predicted by processing speed [10] and visuomotor speed [11]. Whether long-term QoL can also be predicted by processing speed remains an open question. One of the advantages of using processing speed as a cognitive marker is that reaction time tasks are more straightforward than standard, time-consuming paper-and-pencil neuropsychological tasks. Computerized reaction time tasks have been used in stroke samples to test attention, processing speed and working memory [12], [13], and our group has established their feasibility in acute stroke patients [14].

In light of this previous research, we formulated 3 hypotheses. First, that cognitive impairment at 3 months post-stroke would be independently associated with QoL at 12 months (evaluated on a QoL scale without specific cognitive items). Second, that the cognitive domains of attention and visuospatial ability would be the strongest correlates of long-term QoL. Third, that speed of processing (simple and choice reaction time) in the acute stage would be independently related to QoL at 12 months. This is not because we believe that reaction time per se is important for life satisfaction, but that speed of processing might be an important foundation for other cognitive processes and a useful marker for the extent of brain damage after stroke.

Section snippets

Participants

Patients who were admitted to the acute stroke unit at the Austin Hospital with confirmed stroke (ischemic or intracerebral hemorrhage) were eligible. Patients were excluded if they: (a) were younger than 18 years old, (b) were unconscious on admission to hospital, (c) required an interpreter, or (d) had major visual, hearing or language impairments which would be likely to prevent completion of the cognitive assessments. Patients were recruited from 2009 to early 2011. In February 2010

Results

The total number of patients approached in the acute stage was 104; of these, 60 patients were recruited to the study (see Fig. 1). A subgroup of 33 patients were tested on the computerized cognitive tasks in the acute stage (mean days post-stroke = 5.4, SD = 2.9). Demographics and stroke characteristics of the sample are outlined in Table 2.

Hypothesis 1

At 3 months, 21 patients had no cognitive impairment (35%), 14 were mildly cognitively impaired (23%) and 25 had moderate–severe cognitive impairment (42%).

Discussion

Our results indicate that cognitive impairment at 3 months post-stroke was associated with lower QoL at 12 months post-stroke, even when important covariates (age, stroke severity, depression) were taken into account. Of the 5 cognitive domains assessed, poorer attention and visuospatial ability were significantly and independently related to lower long-term QoL. Data from a subgroup of participants tested acutely showed that slower choice reaction times at this early stage were significantly

Conflict of interest

Dr Darby is a shareholder and consultant for CogState Ltd.

The authors have no other competing interests to report.

Acknowledgments

We thank all participants for their time and effort. We also thank Debbie Hansen and Karen Moss for helping collect the data. This work was supported by research grants from the National Stroke Foundation and from the Equity Trustees Preston & Loui Geduld Trust Fund. Dr Cumming was funded by a National Heart Foundation Postdoctoral Research Fellowship. The Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health acknowledges the strong support of the Victorian Government and in particular the funding

References (27)

  • AL Lau et al.

    Defining quality of life for Chinese elderly stroke survivors

    Disabil Rehabil

    (2003)
  • JW Sturm et al.

    Quality of life after stroke: the North East Melbourne Stroke Incidence Study (NEMESIS)

    Stroke

    (2004)
  • S Barker-Collo et al.

    Auckland Stroke Outcomes Study. Part 2: cognition and functional outcomes 5 years poststroke

    Neurology

    (2010)
  • Cited by (102)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text