Review article
Risk factors and correlates of deliberate self-harm behavior: A systematic review

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychores.2008.10.013Get rights and content

Abstract

Objective

Deliberate self-harm behavior—without suicidal intent—is a serious health problem and may be studied as a clinical phenomenon in its own right. Empirical studies of sociodemographic and psychological correlates and risk factors are systematically reviewed.

Methods

We searched Medline, PsycINFO, PSYNDEX (German psychological literature), and reference lists. We targeted self-induced bodily harm without conscious suicidal intent. Studies on suicidal behavior or self-poisoning were only included if they also assessed nonsuicidal self-harm.

Results

Fifty-nine original studies met the criteria. Deliberate self-harm may occur at all ages, yet adolescents and young adults are at a higher risk. Evidence on gender is complex. Only 5 studies realize a prospective design (6 months to 10 years) and test predictors. The majority use cross-sectional and retrospective methods. No longitudinal study (separately) examines new incidence. Evidence of correlates encompasses distal/proximal, person/environment, and state/trait factors. Many studies report associations between current self-harm behavior and a history of childhood sexual abuse. Adolescent and adult self-harmers experience more frequent and more negative emotions, such as anxiety, depression, and aggressiveness, than persons who do not self-harm. Two studies yield specific interactions between childhood trauma and current traits and states such as low emotional expressivity, low self-esteem, and dissociation with respect to a vulnerability to self-harm.

Conclusion

Evidence of distal, biographical stressors is fairly strong. Proximal stressors have rarely been investigated; protective factors, hardly at all. Despite many findings of correlates, the data do not yet justify terming them risk factors. Longitudinal studies are needed.

Introduction

Deliberate self-harm behavior is a significant health problem that is increasingly being studied as a clinical phenomenon in its own right [1], [2], [3]. It is detrimental to the body and may impede social relations, medical treatment, and psychotherapy [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9]. Some reports characterize aggressive acts against one's own body as indicative of especially severe psychopathological problems [6], [10].

The most accepted term for auto-destructive acts in the literature is self-harm[3] or, more specifically, deliberate self-harm behavior[11]. It is defined as the intentional self-induced harming of one's own body resulting in relevant tissue damage [5], [6], [11], [12]. The term encompasses self-injurious behaviors and more indirect forms of bodily harm [13]. It is largely agreed upon to exclude the following from the definition: (a) phenomena that are explicit symptoms or classificatory criteria of other disorders, such as eating disorders or substance abuse; (b) everyday behaviors, such as unhealthy eating habits or lack of exercise; and (c) psychological self-harm, such as deliberately engaging in an abasing partnership. The latter is occasionally studied in the context of borderline personality disorder [14]. However, there is little consensus as to how to classify different levels of frequency, severity (e.g., delicate self-cutting vs. auto-mutilation), or specific forms of deliberate self-harm, such as self-poisoning. Another complex issue is how to distinguish between deliberate self-harm and suicidal behavior.

Prominent definitions of deliberate self-harm behavior exclude suicidal intention [5], [12], [15]. This understanding prevails in U.S. publications, whereas the term self-harm generally includes behaviors irrespective of a suicidal intention in the UK, thus encompassing self-harm behaviors with and without suicidal intention. This discrepancy limits cross-national study comparability. There is some comorbidity between suicidal and nonsuicidal self-harm, and deliberate self-harm is prognostic for suicide attempts [14], [16], [17], [18], [19], [20], [21]. However, there appear to be some important differences between self-harm with the intent to die and self-harm with no intent to die [22]. Studies have revealed a distinction between the psychological functions of suicidal and nonsuicidal self-harm behavior [13]. This distinction is based on the criterion of intention, which is difficult to operationalize. Suicidal intentions may be ambivalent, dissimulated, or concealed. Thus, intention is more difficult to measure reliably than observable behavior [16]. Skegg [3] proposes assessing self-harm behavior descriptively and many authors have adopted the approach of assessing deliberate self-harm as an act of intentional self-injury or self-poisoning “irrespective of the apparent purpose of the act” [23]. However, if we want to expand our knowledge on differences between suicidal and nonsuicidal self-harm, further efforts to develop reliable assessments of intent are required. Some advances have recently been made in this area [24].

Deliberate self-harm behavior may occur in clinical as well as in nonclinical samples [9], [10], [25], [26], [27]. DSM-IV and ICD-10 F list self-harm behavior as a diagnostic criterion of borderline personality disorder. However, individuals who self-harm are diagnostically heterogeneous and may suffer from a spectrum of other psychological disorders [28], [29]. Frequently reported co-occurring diagnoses—other than borderline personality disorder—are alcohol and substance abuse [29], [30]; eating disorders [31], [32], [33], [34]; dissociative, somatoform, or body dysmorphic disorders [35], [36], [37]; depression and anxiety disorders [26], [38], [39]; posttraumatic stress disorder [30], [40]; and several personality disorders and schizophrenia [2], [29]. In DSM-IV, self-harm behavior may also be classified as a disorder of impulse control not otherwise specified and ICD-10 has an additional Z code for a personal history of self-harm. Concealed self-harm carried out with the aim of adopting the sick role is classified as factitious disorder [13]. Within factitious disorders, indirect forms of self-harm prevail [41]. Studies indicate certain overlaps between factitious disorder and open (or admitted) self-harm behaviors, making the diagnostic categories not absolutely distinct empirically [6], [42], [43], [44].

In school and college student samples, lifetime prevalence of nonsuicidal self-harm behavior ranges from 13% to 35% [11], [45], [46], [47], [48]. Several population-based samples from the United States and Canada yield a prevalence of 4% pertaining to the past 6 months and lifetime prevalence figures ranging from 2.2% to 6% [49], [50], [51]. Deliberate self-harm behavior is particularly prevalent in patients in psychosomatic medicine and psychiatric settings, including consultation–liaison patients [29], [52], [53], [54].

Generally, the relation between a factor and an illness is probabilistic, not deterministic. Therefore, the term risk factors is more often preferred over the term causal factors. Kraemer et al. [55] define risk factor as a measurable variable that must precede the outcome and be associated with a higher risk of developing the outcome. They distinguish between risk factors of first onset and those of a relapse and—inversely—factors raising the probability of a remission. Knowledge of these factors is relevant for the aims of primary, secondary, and tertiary prevention and for therapy. According to Kraemer et al. [55], a factor that has a correlation with an outcome, with both variables being assessed at the same time, should merely be termed a correlate. Kraemer argues that although a given factor may indeed be a risk factor, it might also be an accompanying condition or a consequence of the illness. To term a variable risk factor, it must be assessed before the outcome occurs.

Distal and proximal factors are distinguished depending on the proximity between factors and outcome. This is often operationalized along a time axis [56], with distal factors arising earlier in the biography and proximal factors nearer to illness onset. The terms distal and proximal are merely descriptive. Another aspect concerns the paths of effect. In a cause-and-effect chain, distal factors are supposed to have more indirect effects and proximal factors more direct effects on the outcome [57]. More specifically, diathesis-stress models define distal as predisposing factors, which are those that make the individual vulnerable to stress, such as parental problems or childhood traumata. Thus, in predisposed individuals, proximal factors may trigger the onset of mental or behavioral problems. Proximal factors are composed of daily hassles, conflicts, acute stress, life events, or traumata closely prior to illness onset.

Transactional models emphasize that risk factors can transact with each other as well as with the behavior itself [58]. While some risk factors are largely considered static, like a history of childhood trauma or personality traits, others are more often considered dynamic, like changing mood states or the current course of events. More recent approaches underscore the variability of risk factors over time, rather than assume that the risk factors remain valid indefinitely [58].

Risk factors may be inherent in the person or in the environment. Accordingly, protective factors can be personal resources (resilience) or social resources [59].

According to the salutogenic approach, when a person faces stress, protective factors diminish the risk of developing a disease [60]. Identifying protective factors is relevant, provided they can be modified and enhanced by interventions.

Well-known models of the interaction between risk and protective factors are the compensation model, which claims that a protective factor simply has an additive positive effect on health and thereby compensates the negative effect of risk factors [59], and the protective factors model, which claims that a protective factor must moderate the association between risk factor and outcome [61], [62].

Although there are some excellent reviews on deliberate self-harm behavior [1], [2], [3], we believe that we have added to this knowledge in several ways. In contrast to earlier reviews that give a comprehensive overview [3] or focus on the functions of self-harm [1], [2], our review elucidates on the possible factors in the etiology of deliberate self-harm that have been empirically investigated. Since Gratz's 2003 review on risk factors and functions of deliberate self-harm [1], a considerable number of self-harm studies have been published, thus making an updated review expedient. Moreover, other than Gratz's 2003 review, which focused on childhood traumatic experiences and emotion regulation as possible factors [1], our review focuses on a broader range of empirically investigated sociodemographic and psychological factors. Additionally, we evaluate each risk factor or correlate in terms of the methodological strength of the available evidence and infer open research issues that need to be addressed.

Our review focuses on sociodemographic and psychological factors. Although several studies also yield associations between deliberate self-harm and alcohol or other substance abuse, binge eating, or restricted eating, we will not include this information. One reason for this is that substance abuse and disturbed eating may indicate co-occurring disorders. As a result, the question of correlates or risk factors would be strongly linked with the question of diagnostic comorbidity proper. A second reason is that substance abuse and disturbed eating are in themselves behavior with a strong inherent element of self-harm. This makes it a much more complex issue than just treating substance abuse and disturbed eating as correlates or risk factors. In our view, the relation between deliberate self-harm with alcohol or substance abuse and disturbed eating behaviors, in particular, deserves investigating in more detail than this review would allow.

Section snippets

Research strategies

We searched Medline, PsycINFO, and PSYNDEX (German psychological literature) for the keywords [“self-harm” OR “self-injur⁎” OR “self-cut⁎” OR “self-destruct⁎” OR “auto-mutilat⁎” OR “auto-destruct⁎”] combined with [“risk facto⁎” OR “correlate⁎” OR “precurs⁎” OR “predict⁎” OR “causal facto⁎”]. We also searched reference lists. We included studies that adopt the definition of deliberate self-harm as self-induced bodily harm without conscious suicidal intent [1]. Studies on suicidal behavior or

Study design

Only 5 of the 59 original studies test predictors of deliberate self-harm in a longitudinal design [23], [69], [85], [90], [109]. They each include two time points of measurement, with intervals ranging from 6 months to 10 years. Three of the longitudinal studies [23], [69], [90] investigated patients who were medically treated for deliberate self-harm at t1. The predicted criterion at t2 was not new onset but recurrence of deliberate self-harm. In a Finnish epidemiological study [109], a

Discussion

We reviewed empirical studies on correlates and potential risk factors of nonsuicidal, deliberate, self-harm behavior. We included studies that were in accordance with an accepted definition of deliberate self-harm behavior [1]. However, we considered some studies on suicidal behavior if they also included nonsuicidal self-harm behavior.

Sociodemographic and many other distal and proximal correlates of deliberate self-harm could be identified. There were few longitudinal studies, but such

Conclusions for research

Knowledge on correlates and risk factors is important in order to better predict, understand, and treat deliberate self-harm behavior. Future research should include (a) longitudinal studies; (b) a psychometrically sound assessment of deliberate self-harm; (c) proximal stress factors (life events, stress, daily hassles, or situational triggers) that occur prior to the onset of deliberate self-harm; (d) the coping with stress dimension; (e) the potential role of social resources; (f) models that

References (118)

  • MilnesD et al.

    Problems reported by self-harm patients. Perception, hopelessness, and suicidal intent

    J Psychosom Res

    (2002)
  • NewmanSC et al.

    Case-control study of unemployment and parasuicide

    Compr Psychiatry

    (2007)
  • NijmanHLI et al.

    Self-mutilating behaviour of psychiatric inpatients

    Eur Psychiatry

    (1999)
  • GratzKL

    Risk factors for and functions of deliberate self-harm: an empirical and conceptual review

    Clin Psychol

    (2003)
  • ClarkeL et al.

    Self-mutilation: culture, contexts, and nursing responses

    J Clin Nurs

    (1998)
  • FavazzaAR

    The coming of age of self-mutilation

    J Nerv Ment Dis

    (1998)
  • LinehanMM

    Cognitive–behavioral treatment of borderline personality disorder

    (1993)
  • RamonS

    Attitudes of doctors and nurses to self-poisoning patients

    Soc Sci Med

    (1980)
  • TantamD et al.

    Personality disorder and self-wounding

    Br J Psychiatry

    (1992)
  • HerpertzS

    Self injurious behaviour

    Acta Psychiatr Scand

    (1995)
  • GratzKL

    Measurement of deliberate self-harm: preliminary data on the deliberate self-harm inventory

    J Psychopathol Behav

    (2001)
  • WinchelRM et al.

    Self-injurious behavior: a review of the behavior and biology of self-mutilation

    Am J Psychiatry

    (1991)
  • SansoneRA et al.

    The Self-harm Inventory (SHI): development of a scale for identifying self-destructive behaviors and borderline personality disorder

    J Clin Psychol

    (1998)
  • PattisonEM et al.

    The deliberate self-harm syndrome

    Am J Psychiatry

    (1983)
  • CooperJ et al.

    Suicide after deliberate self-harm: a 4-year cohort study

    Am J Psychiatry

    (2005)
  • SuominenK et al.

    Completed suicide after a suicide attempt: a 37-year follow-up study

    Am J Psychiatry

    (2004)
  • FosterT et al.

    Mental disorders and suicide in Northern Ireland

    Br J Psychiatry

    (1997)
  • CanettoS

    Meanings of gender and suicidal behavior during adolescence

    Suicide Life-Threat

    (1997)
  • ZahlD et al.

    Repetition of deliberate self-harm and subsequent suicide risk: long-term follow-up study of 11583 patients

    Br J Psychiatry

    (2004)
  • BrownMZ et al.

    Reasons for suicide attempts and nonsuicidal self-injury in women with borderline personality disorder

    J Abnorm Psychol

    (2002)
  • KapurN et al.

    The repetition of suicidal behavior: a multicenter cohort study

    J Clin Psychiatry

    (2006)
  • LinehanMM et al.

    Suicide Attempt Self-Injury Interview (SASII): development, reliability, and validity of a scale to assess suicide attempts and intentional self-injury

    Psychol Assess

    (2006)
  • CroyleKL et al.

    Subclinical self-harm: range of behaviors, extent, and associated characteristics

    Am J Orthopsychiatry

    (2007)
  • KlonskyM et al.

    Deliberate self-harm in a nonclinical population: prevalence and psychological correlates

    Am J Psychiatry

    (2003)
  • MarchettoM

    Repetitive skin-cutting: parental bonding, personality and gender

    Psychol Psychother

    (2006)
  • KlonskyED et al.

    Self-injury: a research review for the practitioner

    J Clin Psychol

    (2007)
  • LangbehnDR et al.

    Clinical correlates of self-mutilation among psychiatric inpatients

    Ann Clin Psychiatry

    (1993)
  • HarnedMS et al.

    Self-harm and suicidal behavior in women with comorbid PTSD and substance dependence

    Am J Addict

    (2006)
  • FavazzaAR et al.

    Self-mutilation and eating disorders

    Suicide Life-Threat

    (1989)
  • TrugliaE et al.

    Aggressiveness, anger and eating disorders: a review

    Psychopathology

    (2006)
  • WhitlockJ et al.

    Self-injurious behaviors in a college population

    Pediatrics

    (2006)
  • PaulT et al.

    Self-injurious behavior in women with eating disorders

    Am J Psychiatry

    (2002)
  • LowG et al.

    Childhood trauma, dissociation, and self-harming behaviour: a pilot study

    Br J Med Psychol

    (2000)
  • PhillipsKA et al.

    Skin picking as a symptom of body dysmorphic disorder

    Psychopharmacol Bull

    (1995)
  • SimeonD et al.

    Depersonalization disorder and self-injurious behavior

    J Clin Psychiatry

    (1995)
  • AndoverMS et al.

    Self-mutilation and symptoms of depression, anxiety, and borderline personality disorder

    Suicide Life-Threat

    (2005)
  • RossS et al.

    A study of the frequency of self-mutilation in a community sample of adolescents

    J Youth Adolesc

    (2002)
  • GershunyBS et al.

    Current posttraumatic stress disorder and history of trauma in trichotillomania

    J Clin Psychol

    (2006)
  • KocaleventR-D et al.

    Autodestructive syndromes: a literature review

    Psychother Psychosom

    (2005)
  • FeldmanMD et al.

    The spectrum of factitious disorders

    Clinical practice No. 40

    (1996)
  • Cited by (323)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text