Telemedicine for pediatric surgical outpatient follow-up: A prospective, randomized single-center trial

doi:10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2018.10.014

Journal of Pediatric Surgery

Volume 54, Issue 1, January 2019, Pages 200-207

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2018.10.014 Get rights and content

Abstract

Background and purpose

Telemedicine is gaining popularity for a variety of indications. We performed a randomized controlled trial comparing telemedical versus conventional clinic follow-up in terms of feasibility and quality.

Methods

Patients discharged from pediatric surgery were randomized to telemedical or onsite follow-up. In the telemedical group, video telephony was used to obtain interim history and physical findings. Onsite patients were personally seen in the outpatient clinic. Caregivers completed a postvisit survey on satisfaction and efficiency. Providers scored data transmission quality and clinical interpretability.

Results

From March 2015 until January 2017, 224 patients were randomized equally to the study groups. Telemedicine was highly accepted by caregivers, and data transmission quality was sufficient for comprehensive follow-up. No important clinical findings were missed. Quality of interaction scored higher in the telemedical versus the onsite group (77.8% vs. 48%, p < 0.001) as did caregiver satisfaction (5.4 vs. 5.1, p < 0.03). Travel investment, time required, loss of earnings, and days off from work/school were all significantly lower in the telemedical group (p < 0.001).

Conclusions

Telemedical posthospitalization follow-up in pediatric surgery provides a cost-effective, time-saving alternative for patients and caregivers that is well received and accepted. The quality of clinical data transmission is sufficient to provide safe care and uncompromised clinical judgment.

Type of study

Prospective and randomized controlled study.

Level of evidence

Level 1b.

Section snippets

Study design

We conducted a prospective and randomized noninferiority study with a telemedical experimental (intervention) group and an onsite control group. The trial was registered at www.researchregistry.com, registration number 2883. Ethics board approval was granted by the physician board of the state of Rhineland-Palatinate, number 837.255.16 (10574).

Participants

Children and adolescents and their family/caregivers discharged from inpatient pediatric surgical care in our department.

Study cohort and demographics

Participants were enrolled between March 2015, and January 2017. In total, 269 patients were assessed eligible for study participation. Twenty-six eligible participants were excluded owing to exclusion criteria (primary rejection of study participation n = 12; no adequate internet access or IT-System n = 4; insufficient knowledge of German language for verbal conversation n = 10). A total of 243 were consented and randomized. After randomization, 19 consented participants subsequently refused

Discussion

To our knowledge, this is the first randomized, controlled trial on telemedical follow-up for pediatric surgical patients. Telemedicine was shown to be sufficiently accurate to allow safe and efficient follow-up from a provider point of view with nearly universal acceptance by patients and providers. Also, telemedicine was associated with significant economical savings and environmental benefits. The study contained minor surgical interventions as well as complex disease such as patients with

Funding

This work was supported by Sterntaler e.V. Mainz and the Else Kröner-Fresenius-Foundation, Germany.

Conflicts of interest

None.

References (24)

E. Michiels et al.
Camera phones for the follow-up of soft-tissue injuries in adult and pediatric ED patients: a feasibility study
Am J Emerg Med
(2017)
G.G. Miller et al.
Telehealth provides effective pediatric surgery care to remote locations
J Pediatr Surg
(2002)
A.P. Sclafani et al.
Teleconsultation in otolaryngology: live versus store and forward consultations
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg
(1999)
N.W. Dullet et al.
Impact of a university-based outpatient telemedicine program on time savings, travel costs, and environmental pollutants
Value Health
(2017)
C.M. Lilly et al.
UMass memorial critical care operations group: ICU telemedicine program financial outcomes
Chest
(2017)
P.T. Kim et al.
The use of telemedicine in the care of the pediatric trauma patient
Semin Pediatr Surg
(2017)
M.A. Paul et al.
Initial assessment, treatment, and follow-up of minor pediatric burn wounds in four patients remotely: a preliminary communication
Telemed J E Health
(2017)
S. Canon et al.
A pilot study of telemedicine for post-operative urological care in children
J Telemed Telecare
(2014)
S. Shivji et al.
Pediatric surgery telehealth: patient and clinician satisfaction
Pediatr Surg Int
(2011)
M. Schumacher et al.
Methodik klinischer Studien – Methodische Grundlagen der Planung, Durchführung und Auswertung
(2008)

Y.Y. Chi et al.

Power calculation for overall hypothesis testing with high-dimensional commensurate outcomes

Stat Med

(2014)

DEKRA: CO2-Rechner

Cited by (42)

Patient Experience with Virtual Preoperative Consultations in Pediatric Surgical Specialties
2023, Journal of Pediatric Surgery
A cross-sectional study was conducted to assess the comparative effectiveness of virtual visits for preoperative evaluation and surgical decision-making in three pediatric surgical subspecialties.
Patients who underwent surgical procedures in the departments of Urology, Ophthalmology, and Plastic and Oral Surgery at a tertiary care pediatric hospital over a one-year period during the COVID-19 pandemic were included. Patients were assigned to one of three clinical pathways based on their preoperative visit(s): only in-person visit(s) (IP), a combination of in-person and virtual visit(s) (IP/VV), and only virtual visit(s) (VV). Demographics, procedure information, and patient experience survey results were collected. We then assessed variations in procedure types and patient experience scores in these three patient groups.
There were 431 patients who completed the modified patient experience survey. The most common procedures were circumcision (17%), excision of lesion (16%), and strabismus repair (11%). Survey results were positive, with 90% of participants rating that they would recommend the service to others. No significant differences were found among groups in their demographics, overall care rating, and duration between preoperative clinic visit and procedure. Post-hoc power analysis indicated 87% power to detect a 10% difference in survey ratings between IP and VV cases, confirming non-inferiority in patient satisfaction for virtual preoperative visits.
This study demonstrated the non-inferiority of preoperative virtual visits in three pediatric surgical subspecialties as measured by patient experience scores. Additional studies with more granular scope are necessary to further elucidate telemedicine's safety and efficacy for select diagnoses.
III.
Single-center comparison of outcomes between laparoscopic appendectomy and transumbilical laparoscopic assisted appendectomy
2023, Journal of Pediatric Surgery
Appendectomy is the most common pediatric emergency surgery performed to date. This study compared outcomes between laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) and transumbilical laparoscopic assisted appendectomy (TULAA) for 1154 uncomplicated patients across 5 years at a single institution. Primary outcomes include length of stay (LOS), post-operative complications, pain score, and operating room (OR) time.
Demographic and clinical data was collected for 1154 eligible patients treated for uncomplicated appendicitis between August 2014–October 2019, with 830 patients in the LA group, and 324 in the TULAA group. Mixed effects modeling procedure using logistic and linear regression examined the effect of surgery type on the four primary outcomes after adjustment for potential clustering effect of surgeon and confounding factors.
Of 1154 patients, 62.7% were male, and mean (SD) age was 10.9 (3.6) years. Median [IQR] LOS was 28.0 h [22.0, 36.0], mean (SD) OR time was 29.0 (10.0) minutes, and median [IQR] pain at maximum level was 5.5 (2.7). The complication rate overall was <5.0% and did not differ between TULAA and LA groups (p > 0.05). OR time was reduced by an average of 5.2 min in the TULAA group (p < 0.001), pain did not differ between groups overall (p > 0.05), and patients were more likely to be discharged within 24 h in patients who underwent TULAA (OR = 5.3 [1.6, 17.4], p = 0.007).
Retrospective analysis of 1154 pediatric appendectomies, found no difference in complications between single- and three-incision laparoscopic procedures (TULAA vs. LA). Findings suggest TULAA is a safe procedure for acute appendicitis in pediatrics.
IV.
Patient reported satisfaction levels with the use of telemedicine for general surgery—A systematic review of randomized control trials
2023, Surgery in Practice and Science
As healthcare continues to evolve in the wake of COVID-19 pandemic, surgeons are presented with the opportunity to integrate telemedicine into healthcare in tandem with in-person consultations. We aimed to perform a systematic review of randomized controlled trials to assess patient satisfaction with telemedicine interventions in general surgery.
A systematic review was performed in accordance to the PRISMA guidelines. Randomized control trials (RCTs) were included. The risk of bias 2.0 assessment was used to determine potential bias.
In total, 11 prospective, randomized trials involving 1,598 patients (mean age: 49.1 years) were included. Overall 45.5% (5/11) of the trials compared videoconferencing or telephone follow up to traditional in person follow up. Three studies used smart technologies which include activity tracking devices in combination with a website and mobile application (27.3%). The other 3 interventions involved accelerated discharge on post operative day (POD) 1 with tele videoconferencing on POD 2, Post-operative daily text messages with education videos and video calling capability, and supportive text messages post-operatively. Telemedicine was shown to provide similar levels of patient satisfaction compared to controls in all 11 included RCTs.
Patient reported satisfaction with the use of telemedicine is similar to standard of care models in general surgery. With several shortcomings confounding the results in support of telemedicine, further experimentation with telemedicine interventions will likely improve patient reported satisfaction with using telemedicine for peroperative surgical care.
Satisfaction and feasibility of videoconsultation (VC) in orthopaedic and trauma surgery in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic: Prospective study of 783 patients
2023, Orthopaedics and Traumatology: Surgery and Research
The COVID-19 pandemic has required that specialists use videoconsultation (VC) to maintain continuity of care. As in-person consultations (IPCs) and surgical procedures were cancelled, VC became the tool of choice. No recent French study has assessed VC as the main consultation modality. The objective of this prospective study was to evaluate: 1) patient satisfaction, 2) access to and the future of VC, 3) and the reasons for VC refusal in the setting of the pandemic.
Patients responded favourably to VC.
We conducted a prospective, single-centre, observational study of consecutive patients who were invited to switch from IPC to VC during the lockdown of March 16 to May 11, 2020, when IPCs were not available. All patients were included in the study, regardless of whether they accepted the VC. The reasons for refusal were recorded at the time of the invitation. The surgeons sent the patients who accepted an emailed satisfaction questionnaire after the VC.
Of the 783 patients with scheduled IPCs, 291 (37.2%) accepted a VC instead, 408 (52.1%) refused the VC, and 84 (10.7%) could not be contacted by telephone and were therefore excluded. The VC acceptance rate was 37% (291/783). Of the 291 VC patients, 233 (80.1%) returned the satisfaction questionnaire, although 2 questionnaires had too many missing data to be included, leaving 231 patients for the analysis. The VC was the first consultation with the surgeon for 66 (28.6%) patients. Of the 165 (71.4%) other patients, 51.6% (85/165) were receiving post-operative follow-up. On a 0-5 scale, the global VC experience was scored 4.3 ± 0.8. Of the 231 VC patients, 161 (69.7%) felt that the VC was equivalent to an IPC, 18 (7.8%) that it was poorer, and 7 (3%) that it was better than an IPC; 45 (19.5%) had no opinion on this point. If choosing between a VC or an IPC had been possible during this first lockdown, 168/231 (72.7%) patients would have chosen an IPC. In contrast, 198/231 (85.7%) patients said they would choose an IPC after the lockdown. The group that refused the VC had a significantly older mean age (57.8 ± 16.4 years vs. 48.0 ± 14.4 years, p < 0.0001) and lived closer to the institution (p < 0.0001), whereas the sex distribution was comparable, with 42.9% of males (175/408) refusing and 46.8% (108/231) accepting the VC (p = 0.39). The main reason for refusal was a wish for an in-person encounter with the surgeon (268/408, 65.7%). Patients aged ≥65 years were more likely to refuse due to technical considerations (access to electronic equipment and to the Internet), whereas patients ≤35 years were more likely to wait for an IPC.
The rate of satisfaction with the VC was high. Satisfaction was not significantly associated with the reason for the consultation (joint involved, degenerative or post-traumatic condition, first VC, first consultation, or follow-up before or after surgery). Although most patients who accepted the VC felt that this modality was equivalent to an IPC, many remained desirous of an in-person encounter with the surgeon, notably among the youngest individuals. Outside the setting of a pandemic, the IPC remains the consultation modality of choice for most of our patients.
V, prospective study without a control group.
Satisfaction and feasibility of videoconsultation (VC) in orthopaedic and trauma surgery in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic: Prospective study of 783 patients
2023, Revue de Chirurgie Orthopedique et Traumatologique
L’épidémie COVID-19 a contraint les spécialistes à recourir à la vidéo-téléconsultation (VTC) afin d’assurer un lien médical. Les consultations physiques (CP) et les interventions chirurgicales ayant été annulées, la VTC devait être privilégiée. Il n’existe aucune étude française récente portant sur la VTC comme principale solution de consultation. Aussi, nous avons mené une étude prospective afin d’évaluer : 1) la satisfaction des patients ; 2) l’accessibilité et l’avenir de la VTC ; 3) les motifs de refus à la VTC dans ce contexte.
La VTC a été appréciée favorablement par les patients.
Nous avons mené une étude prospective monocentrique observationnelle d’une série continue de patients, contactés pendant la période du confinement du 16 mars au 11 mai 2020, leur proposant de modifier le format de la CP en VTC. L’ensemble des patients étaient considérés dans l’étude, qu’ils aient accepté ou non la VTC. Les motifs de refus étaient recueillis lors de la proposition. En cas d’acceptation, le chirurgien envoyait par mail au patient un questionnaire anonyme de satisfaction après la VTC.
Sept cent quatre-vingt-trois CP étaient programmées, 291 VTC ont été réalisées (37,2 %), 408 patients (52,1 %) ont refusé la VTC, 84 (10,7 %) n’ont pu être contactés par téléphone et ont donc été exclus. Le taux d’acceptation à la VTC était de 37 % (291/783). Le taux de participation au questionnaire était de 80,1 % (233/291), dont 2 réponses très partielles non prises en compte dans le reste des analyses, laissant 231 patients en analyse. Il s’agissait d’une première consultation avec le chirurgien pour 28,6 % (66/231) des patients, alors que 71,4 % (165/231) avaient déjà rencontré le chirurgien et, parmi ces derniers, 51,6 % (85/165) consultaient pour un suivi après chirurgie. L’expérience globale de la VTC était cotée en moyenne à 4,3 ± 0,8 sur une échelle de 0 à 5. Au total, 69,7 % (161/231) évaluaient la VTC identique à une CP, mais pour 7,8 % (18/231), l’expérience était plus mauvaise, et pour 3 % (7/231), elle était meilleure ; 19,5 % (45/231) restaient sans avis. Si le choix entre CP et VTC avait été possible pendant ce premier confinement, 72,7 % (168/231) des patients auraient choisi une CP. En revanche, 85,7 % (198/231) choisiront une CP après le confinement. Le groupe ayant refusé la VTC était en moyenne significativement plus âgé (57,8 ± 16,4 ans vs 48 ± 14,4 ans (p < 0,0001)) et habitait à une distance moins importante de l’institution (p < 0,0001), mais il n’y avait pas différence selon le sexe avec 42,9 % d’hommes (175/408) en cas de refus de VTC vs 46,8 % d’hommes (108/231) (p = 0,39)). Le principal motif de refus était la volonté de rencontrer physiquement le praticien dans 65,7 % des cas (268/408). Les patients les plus âgés (≥ 65 ans) ont le plus largement évoqué des problèmes matériels (accès équipement et internet), les patients les plus jeunes (≤ 35 ans) préféraient attendre une CP.
Un taux élevé de satisfaction a été constaté. Les motifs (articulation, pathologie dégénérative ou traumatique, première VTC, première consultation ou suivi avant ou après chirurgie) n’avaient pas d’influence significative sur la satisfaction. Bien qu’une majorité évaluait la VTC identique à la CP, la population est encore attachée au lien physique lors de la consultation, d’autant plus parmi les plus jeunes. En dehors du contexte épidémique, la CP reste encore le mode de consultation souhaité par une large majorité de nos patients.
IV ; étude prospective sans groupe contrôle.
Utilization and Adequacy of Telemedicine for Outpatient Pediatric Surgical Care
2022, Journal of Surgical Research
Citation Excerpt :
Future work is necessary to investigate whether the identified disparities in TM use among children is due to provider bias, cultural preferences and expectations, or availability of and knowledge regarding the necessary technology and internet connectivity. TM in pediatric surgical outpatient care has not been widely researched, but this study's findings are consistent with other studies that suggest TM is a viable option for provision of care in the pediatric surgical population, with considerable potential for time and cost savings for families.3-9,11,12 New consultations and established visits are especially amenable to TM when the visit's focus is on education and management options.6
Telemedicine (TM) use accelerated out of necessity during the COVID-19 pandemic, but the utility of TM within the pediatric surgery population is unclear. This study measured utilization, adequacy, and disparities in uptake of TM in pediatric surgery during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Scheduled outpatient pediatric surgery clinic encounters at a large academic children's hospital from January 2020 through March 2021 were reviewed. Sub-group analysis examined post-operative (PO) visits after appendectomy and umbilical, epigastric, and inguinal hernia repairs.
Of 9149 scheduled visits, 87.9% were in-person and 12.1% were TM. TM visits were scheduled for PO care (76.9%), new consultations (7.1%), and established patients (16.0%). Although TM visits were more frequently canceled or no shows (P < 0.001), most canceled TM visits were PO visits, of which 41.7% were canceled via electronic communication reporting the absence of any PO concerns. TM visits were adequate for accomplishing visit goals in 98.2%, 95.5%, and 96.2% of PO, new, and established patient visits, respectively. Patients utilizing TM visits were more frequently of white race, privately-insured, from less disadvantaged neighborhoods, and living a greater distance from clinic (P < 0.001 for all comparisons).
TM was adequate for the majority of visits in which it was utilized, including the basic PO visits that occurred via TM. TM was used more by patients with greater travel and less by those of minority race, with public insurance, and from more disadvantaged neighborhoods. Future work is necessary to ensure broad access to this useful tool for all children requiring surgical care.

View all citing articles on Scopus

^☆: Author Contributions: Conception and design (JG, DZ, SR, OM); acquisition of data (JG, AE); analysis and interpretation of data (JG, AE, DZ, SR, OM); drafting of manuscript (JG, OM); critical revision of manuscript (JG, DZ, SR, OM).

^☆☆: How this paper will improve care: This randomized study shows that telemedicine is at least equivalent to onsite follow up in pediatric surgery in terms of safety, quality, and effectiveness. Telemedicine saves time and resources of families, is environmentally beneficial, and well accepted among practitioners.

View full text

Other ConditionTelemedicine for pediatric surgical outpatient follow-up: A prospective, randomized single-center trial☆,☆☆

Abstract

Background and purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Type of study

Level of evidence

Section snippets

Study design

Participants

Study cohort and demographics

Discussion

Funding

Conflicts of interest

Am J Emerg Med

J Pediatr Surg

Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg

Value Health

Chest

Semin Pediatr Surg

Initial assessment, treatment, and follow-up of minor pediatric burn wounds in four patients remotely: a preliminary communication

Telemed J E Health

A pilot study of telemedicine for post-operative urological care in children

J Telemed Telecare

Pediatric surgery telehealth: patient and clinician satisfaction

Pediatr Surg Int

Methodik klinischer Studien – Methodische Grundlagen der Planung, Durchführung und Auswertung

Power calculation for overall hypothesis testing with high-dimensional commensurate outcomes

Stat Med

DEKRA: CO2-Rechner

Other Condition
Telemedicine for pediatric surgical outpatient follow-up: A prospective, randomized single-center trial☆,☆☆