Elsevier

Journal of Clinical Densitometry

Volume 11, Issue 4, October–December 2008, Pages 503-510
Journal of Clinical Densitometry

Original Article
Muscle Mass Is More Strongly Related to Hip Bone Mineral Density Than Is Quadriceps Strength or Lower Activity Level in Adults Over Age 50 Year

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocd.2008.03.001Get rights and content

Abstract

This cross-sectional study examined whether reduced hip bone mineral density (BMD) is better explained by isokinetic knee extensor strength (KES), lower limb lean body mass (L-LBM), or Physical Activity Scale for the Elderly (PASE). Through population-based recruitment, 1543 adults without knee osteoarthritis were recruited. For men and women respectively, means ± SD were age 60.8 ± 8.0 and 61.1 ± 7.9 yr; body mass index 29.6 ± 4.6 and 29.1 ± 5.4 kg/m2; hip BMD 1.025 ± 0.138 and 0.895 ± 0.128 g/cm2; KES 124.9 ± 41 and 72.7 ± 22.9 N·m; L-LBM 10.3 ± 1.5 and 7.0 ± 1.2 kg; and PASE 206.4 ± 99.7 and 163.8 ± 77.0. The relationship between BMD and KES in men (r2 = 0.21, p  0.002) and women (r = 0.23, p < 0.001) was significant before adjustment. However, this association was no longer significant after controlling for L-LBM. Even after controlling for age, race, and sex, the association between BMD and KES was better explained by L-LBM (partial R2 = 0.14, p < 0.001) than by PASE (partial R2 = 0.00). Allometric scaling of KES to body size attenuated the association of BMD with KES (Std Beta = 0.03). The significant association between BMD and L-LBM (Std Beta = 0.36) remained stronger than that between BMD and weight (Std Beta = 0.21). Therefore, muscle mass accounted for a greater proportion of the variance in hip BMD than KES or activity level and explained a significant proportion of the association between weight and BMD.

Introduction

Studies have demonstrated that spine extensor muscle weakness is associated with low spine bone mineral density (BMD) 1, 2 and spine deformity (3). However, there are differing results regarding whether knee extensor strength (KES) is an independent predictor of BMD (4). The relationship between BMD and KES is of clinical interest because weakness is a possible contributor to increased risk and impact severity of falls (5), and individuals with low BMD are at greatest risk for fractures with falls. Therefore, an association between these would support a need for knee extensor strengthening in a group with dual risk factors.

To date, populations studied have been mainly normal weight (body mass index [BMI] ≥25 kg/m2), and this may significantly influence results, considering that increased obesity can be associated with both increased lean body mass (LBM) and lower activity level 6, 7. However, given the fact that 39% of older adults (age ≥54 yr) in the United States are obese and over 65% meet criteria for being either overweight or obese (8), there is a need to examine the relationship between BMD and KES in a population that includes obese adults.

Study of KES must also consider the potential effects of lower limb lean body mass (L-LBM), weight, and age, as these have been shown to be inter-related and also related to hip BMD 7, 9. Activity level, weight, and age may also be related to hip BMD. Using multiple regression models to consider these relationships has revealed that in nonobese women, KES is strongly related to femoral neck BMD, but not to spinal BMD, suggesting a local effect. Due to the effects of body mass on both strength and BMD, it is appropriate to use allometric scaling to control for the effect of body mass when examining the relation between strength and BMD 4, 10, 11, 12. Additionally, to guide therapy to maintain or increase hip BMD, it would be useful first to examine whether there is a relationship between KES and BMD and then clarify whether this relationship is better explained by muscle bulk (L-LBM) or physical activity.

The aim of this study was to determine whether there is an association between BMD and several factors that could be targets of rehabilitative interventions: strength, LBM, and activity; testing the following hypotheses: (1) KES is significantly associated with total hip BMD (2), LBM in the lower limbs explains the association between KES and BMD (3), and activity level does not account for the relationship between KES and BMD (4), The association between BMD and KES is better explained by L-LBM than by activity level. Finally, these results are not modified by either (5) stratifying by BMI or (6) adjusting strength for body size. The present report used cross-sectional data from the initial examination of the Multicenter Knee Osteoarthritis (MOST) Study.

Section snippets

Subjects

Subjects were excluded if they had radiographic knee osteoarthritis (Kellgren-Lawrence grade ≥2) or knee arthroplasty, possible confounders for the relationship between BMD and both KES and L-LBM. Subjects were selected from a population-based cohort of adults, aged 50–79 yr, enrolled in the MOST Study, in which eligible participants were targeted to have a BMI over 25 kg/m2 or prior knee injury or surgery. The MOST Study excluded adults with rheumatoid arthritis or cancer.

Radiograph protocol for

Results

A cohort of 3026 (1820F; 1206M) adults was recruited to the MOST Study and 1543 met inclusion criteria for this study (Fig. 1). Complete data were available for 570 men and 809 women due to either exclusions for safe participation in the isokinetic strength or DXA scan protocols. Sex-specific characteristics for variables of interest are summarized in Table 1.

Discussion

The results of this study support a positive association between KES and BMD, in nonobese individuals. However, the association between KES and total hip BMD was explained best by L-LBM, and L-LBM accounted for a higher amount of the variance in BMD than did KES. Therefore, the varying results regarding the relationship between hip BMD and KES in prior studies may have been due to not considering the role of L-LBM.

Our results may have differed from prior studies that examined the relationship

Conclusion

Lower hip BMD, a risk factor for fall-related fractures, appears to be associated with low L-LBM, and this lower muscle mass accounts for a greater proportion of the variance in hip BMD than KES or activity level. Increasing muscle bulk should be examined longitudinally to assess whether BMD can be maintained or increased, with the goal of reducing falls and fracture-related morbidity.

References (33)

  • H. Blain et al.

    Influence of muscle strength and body weight and composition on regional bone mineral density in healthy women aged 60 years and over

    Gerontology

    (2001)
  • National Center for Health Statistics. 2005 Health, United States, 2005 with Chartbook on trends in the health of...
  • L.E. Miller et al.

    Relationships among bone mineral density, body composition, and isokinetic strength in young women

    Calcif Tissue Int

    (2004)
  • M. Hulens et al.

    Study of differences in peripheral muscle strength of lean versus obese women: an allometric approach

    Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord

    (2001)
  • S. Jaric

    Muscle strength testing: use of normalisation for body size

    Sports Med

    (2002)
  • M.J. Davies et al.

    Normalizing strength for body size differences in older adults

    Med Sci Sports Exerc

    (1997)
  • Cited by (47)

    • Association between body weight and proximal tibial bone mineral density after bilateral total knee arthroplasty

      2017, Knee
      Citation Excerpt :

      Palmer et al. [24] concluded that leg LBM and total LBM were significant predictors of BMD in men. Segal et al. [27] reported that leg LBM had a greater effect on hip BMD than did QS or level of activity, and concluded that muscle mass explained a significant proportion of the association between BW and BMD. Because BW, comprised of fat mass and LBM, contributes to gravitational forces on the skeleton, we recognized that LBM might be approximately proportional to BW.

    • Osteoporosis and sarcopenia in older age

      2015, Bone
      Citation Excerpt :

      Studies have shown associations between bone and muscle health by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and more recently using cross-sectional imaging techniques [8,9]. DXA studies have focussed on relationships between facets of muscle health and either bone mass or density and have tended to show positive relationships [10–12]. The use of peripheral quantitative computed tomography (pQCT) has additionally shown bone size and strength to be associated with muscle size, and to a lesser extent, muscle strength.

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    This work was funded by NIA grants to the following organizations: Boston University (David Felson, MD, 1 U01 AG18820); University of Iowa (James Torner, PhD, 1 U01 AG18832); University of Alabama (Cora E. Lewis, MD, MSPH, 1 U01 AG18947); University of California San Francisco (Michael Nevitt, PhD, 1 U01 AG19069); and NICHD through the Association of Academic Physiatrists (Neil Segal, MD, 5K12HD001097-08).

    View full text