Impact of Obesity on Surgeon Ergonomics in Robotic and Straight-Stick Laparoscopic Surgery

doi:10.1016/j.jmig.2019.07.009

Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology

Volume 27, Issue 5, July–August 2020, Pages 1063-1069

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2019.07.009 Get rights and content

Abstract

Study Objective

Work-related musculoskeletal symptoms (WMSs) are reported to be increasing in surgeons performing minimally invasive procedures. Therefore, we investigated the use of inertial measurement units (IMUs) and electromyography (EMG) sensor recorders to record real-time information on the muscle movement/activity required to perform training exercises in simulated in normal and high body mass index (BMI) models.

Design

Prospective study.

Setting

University hospital.

Participants

Four consultant gynecologic oncology surgeons experienced in complex straight-stick (SS) laparoscopic and robotically assisted (RA) surgery.

Interventions

Three exercises (hoops onto pegs and wire chase) using SS and RA surgery on 2 abdominal models: normal BMI and high BMI.

Measurements and Main Results

We measured time to complete exercise and surgeon muscle movement/activity. The time to complete all exercises was significantly lower for RA surgery as compared with SS laparoscopy (p <.05 or better). The movement of the surgeons’ core was significantly greater in high BMI SS laparoscopy compared with normal BMI SS laparoscopy for exercises 1 and 2 (p <.001). Muscle usage, as determined by EMG peak, was significantly higher in normal BMI SS laparoscopy and even higher in high BMI SS laparoscopy but was generally flat for all normal and high BMI RA surgery exercises (p <.05 or better).

Conclusion

Detailed real-time information can be collected through IMUs/EMG sensors. Our results indicate that RA surgery requires less surgeon movements and muscle activity to complete tasks compared with SS laparoscopy, particularly in a high BMI model. The implications of these results are that RA surgery in high BMI patients may therefore have less physical impact on the surgeon compared with SS laparoscopy and may result in lower WMS rates.

Section snippets

Methods

Four consultant gynecologic oncologists who routinely perform complex SS and RA surgery participated in the study. Ethical approval was not required for this study. Two abdominal models were used: the basic model, A, representing a patient with a BMI within normal range, and a modified model, B, wrapped in foam to a depth of 6 cm to simulate an obesity (equating to a BMI of 30). The ports were placed contralaterally in the same position for all exercises, 8 cm from the camera port (Fig. 1A).

The

Time

The time to complete all exercises was significantly lower for RA MIS as compared with SS laparoscopy, and this was seen for all surgeons (p <.001) (Fig. 2, Table 1). Specifically, exercise 1 was significantly quicker in model SS-A compared with SS-B, and both were significantly slower (p <.05) compared with RA-A and RA-B. The time was significantly lower (p <.005) in all 3 exercises for SS-B compared with RA-A and RA-B. In all 3 exercises, no significant difference in completion time was

Discussion

This study has shown that it is possible to obtain detailed information on surgeons’ muscle activity and positioning using IMUs and EMG sensors. Through this we have shown that SS laparoscopy is physically more demanding for the surgeon, with regard to muscle movement and activity, in the case of simulated obesity.

Although the use of wearable IMUs have been reported previously [19], we have shown that the addition of EMG data gives a better insight on how the movement is created. This

Acknowledgment

We thank Dr. Daniele Magistro, Mr. Weisheng Kong, and Mr. Jianjia Ma for their help in setting up the experiments and analysis of the results.

References (29)

J Franasiak et al.
Physical strain and urgent need for ergonomic training among gynecologic oncologists who perform minimally invasive surgery
Gynecol Oncol
(2012)
CH Stucky et al.
Surgeon symptoms, strain, and selections: systematic review and meta-analysis of surgical ergonomics
Ann Med Surg (Lond)
(2018)
PL Rosenblatt et al.
Ergonomics in the operating room: protecting the surgeon
J Minim Invasive Gynecol
(2013)
DJ Xiao et al.
Ergonomic factors on task performance in laparoscopic surgery training
Appl Ergon
(2012)
R Craven et al.
Ergonomic deficits in robotic gynecologic oncology surgery: a need for intervention
J Minim Invasive Gynecol
(2013)
ME Tarr et al.
Comparison of postural ergonomics between laparoscopic and robotic sacrocolpopexy: a pilot study
J Minim Invasive Gynecol
(2015)
ME McDonald et al.
Physician pain and discomfort during minimally invasive gynecologic cancer surgery
Gynecol Oncol
(2014)
S Kondalsamy-Chennakesavan et al.
Clinical audit in gynecological cancer surgery: development of a risk scoring system to predict adverse events
Gynecol Oncol
(2009)
S Hignett et al.
Human factors evaluation of surgeons' working positions for gynaecological minimal access surgery
J Minim Invasive Gynecol
(2017)
K Galaal et al.
Laparoscopy versus laparotomy for the management of early stage endometrial cancer
Cochrane Database Syst Rev
(2012)

E Sutton et al.

The ergonomics of women in surgery

Surg Endosc

(2014)

MJ van Det et al.

Ergonomic assessment of neck posture in the minimally invasive surgery suite during laparoscopic cholecystectomy

Surg Endosc

(2008)

A Albayrak et al.

A newly designed ergonomic body support for surgeons

Surg Endosc

(2007)

D Zhang et al.

Development of subliminal persuasion system to improve the upper limb posture in laparoscopic training: a preliminary study

Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg

(2015)

Cited by (30)

Application of wearable technology for the ergonomic risk assessment of healthcare professionals: A systematic literature review
2024, International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics
Healthcare professionals are exposed to multiple physical risk factors related to the development of work-related musculoskeletal disorders (WRMSD), which significantly affect their quality of life. Several ergonomic methods have been developed for identifying risk factors in the workplace. Among these, wearable devices that perform direct measurements have demonstrated outstanding potential in recent years to provide reliable, non-invasive, and continuous exposure assessment. Therefore, this systematic review aims to describe the use of wearable technology for the ergonomic risk assessment of healthcare professionals. Twenty-nine publications were selected following PRISMA guidelines based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria set. Most of the articles were published in the last three years, confirming a growing trend in the research on this topic. Most wearable devices, which were used isolated or combined, consist of inertial sensors used to measure and assess the exposure to awkward postures and sEMG sensors, which provide the measurement of muscle activity parameters related to the force applied while performing work activities. The main results and respective analyses provided insights into the strengths and limitations of using wearable technology to acquire data on several work activities performed by healthcare professionals. Future research is needed to widen and validate the applicability of wearable technology in support of ergonomic interventions aimed at preventing the development of WRMSD among healthcare professionals.
Inpatient opioid use and pain control after robotic versus laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy
2024, Surgery (United States)
During the past decade, the proportion of bariatric surgery performed robotically has been rising. However, the clinical benefits of the robotic approach over laparoscopy are uncertain. One area in need of further investigation is pain control after robotic versus laparoscopic bariatric surgery.
A retrospective cohort study was conducted of bariatric surgery patients undergoing laparoscopic or robotic sleeve gastrectomy at a single institution from October 2019 to August 2022. Inpatient opioid use was measured in morphine milliequivalents. Pain scores were collected by the nursing staff.
A total of 368 patients were included: 286 laparoscopic and 82 robotic surgery patients. The groups shared similar demographics. For the entire cohort, the mean age was 42 years, the body mass index was 50 kg/m², and 79% were female. Mean operative time was significantly lower for laparoscopic surgeries (87.5 ± 47.3 minutes vs 109.3 ± 30.3 minutes; P < .01). The median total inpatient morphine milligram equivalents used was similar for both groups: 52.3 (31.5–77.0) for the laparoscopic group versus 40 (24–74.5) for robotic (P = .13). Mean postoperative pain scores (scale out of 10) were not significantly different between groups: 5.2 ± 1.7 (postoperative day 0) and 4.5 ± 1.7 (day 1) for laparoscopic patients versus 5.1 ± 2.0 (day 0) and 4.4 ± 1.8 (day 1) for robotic. The proportion of patients prescribed opioids at discharge was significantly higher for the laparoscopic group (75.2% vs 62.2%; P = .02). Other clinical outcomes, including duration of stay, 30-day readmissions, and visits to the emergency department, were not significantly different.
There is no difference in inpatient opioid use or pain scores between patients undergoing laparoscopic and robotic sleeve gastrectomy.
Bariatric Surgeon Ergonomics: A Comparison of Laparoscopy and Robotics
2024, Journal of Surgical Research
Bariatric surgery is routinely performed using laparoscopic and robotic approaches. Musculoskeletal injuries are prevalent among both robotic and laparoscopic bariatric surgeons. Studies evaluating ergonomic differences between laparoscopic and robotic bariatric surgery are limited. This study aims to analyze the ergonomic, physical, and mental workload differences among surgeons performing robotic and laparoscopic bariatric surgery.
All primary laparoscopic and robotic bariatric surgeries, Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, and sleeve gastrectomy between May and August 2022 were included in this study. Objective ergonomic analysis was performed by an observer evaluating each surgeon intraoperatively according to the validated Rapid Entire Body Assessment tool, with a higher score indicating more ergonomic strain. After each operation, surgeons subjectively evaluated their physical workload using the body part discomfort scale, and their mental workload using the surgery task load index.
Five bariatric surgeons participated in this study. In total, 50 operative cases were observed, 37 laparoscopic and 13 robotic. The median total Rapid Entire Body Assessmentscore as a primary surgeon was significantly higher in laparoscopic (6.0) compared to robotic (3.0) cases (P < 0.01). The laparoscopic and robotic approaches had no significant differences in the surgeons’ physical (body part discomfort scale) or mental workload (surgery task load index).
This study identified low-risk ergonomic stress in surgeons performing bariatric surgery robotically compared to medium-risk stress laparoscopically. Since ergonomic stress can exist even without the perception of physical or mental stress, this highlights the importance of external observations to optimize ergonomics for surgeons in the operating room.
Robotic-assisted surgery in high-risk surgical patients with endometrial cancer
2024, Best Practice and Research: Clinical Obstetrics and Gynaecology
Many patients diagnosed with an endometrial cancer are at high-risk for surgery due to factors such as advanced age, raised body mass index or frailty. Minimally-invasive surgery, in particular robotic-assisted, is increasingly used in the surgical management of endometrial cancer however, there are a lack of clinical trials investigating outcomes in high-risk patient populations. This article will review the current evidence and identify areas of uncertainty where future research is needed.
The ergonomic impact of patient body mass index on surgeon posture during simulated laparoscopy
2021, Applied Ergonomics
Citation Excerpt :
The upper body posture of surgeons was assessed by classifying motion capture data using the LUBA ergonomic framework. This study contributes to the growing literature concerning the impact of patient BMI on surgeons performing laparoscopy (Franasiak et al., 2012; Hignett et al., 2017; Liang et al., 2019; Moss et al., 2019; Sers et al., 2021). As hypothesized, BMI 50 kg/m2 caused significant deterioration in postural neutrality (i.e. increased total LUBA score) as compared to 20 kg/m2 (baseline) and 30 kg/m2 in the participant cohort (Table 2).
Laparoscopy is a cornerstone of modern surgical care, with clear advantages for the patients. However, it has also been associated with inducing upper body musculoskeletal disorders amongst surgeons due to their propensity to assume non-neutral postures. Further, there is a perception that patients with high body mass indexes (BMI) exacerbate these factors. Therefore, surgeon upper body postures were objectively quantified using inertial measurement units and the LUBA ergonomic framework was used to assess posture during laparoscopic training on patient models that simulated BMIs of 20, 30, 40 and 50 kg/m². In all surgeons the posture of the upper body significantly worsened during simulated laparoscopic surgery on the BMI 50 kg/m² model as compared to the baseline BMI model of 20 kg/m². These findings suggest that performing laparoscopic surgery on patients with high BMIs increases the prevalence of non-neutral posture and may further increase the risk of musculoskeletal disorders in surgeons.
Can robotic surgery help reduce medical discrimination for obese patients?
2020, Gynecologie Obstetrique Fertilite et Senologie

View all citing articles on Scopus

: No funding was obtained for this study. Intuitive Surgical provided the robotic instruments and the abdominal model on which the exercises were performed. All 4 surgeons who participated in this study have undergone training in the use of the da Vinci robot provided by Intuitive Surgical. Mr. Ind received a consultancy from Medtronic in 2017.

View full text

Original articleImpact of Obesity on Surgeon Ergonomics in Robotic and Straight-Stick Laparoscopic Surgery

Abstract

Study Objective

Design

Setting

Participants

Interventions

Measurements and Main Results

Conclusion

Section snippets

Methods

Time

Discussion

Acknowledgment

Gynecol Oncol

Ann Med Surg (Lond)

J Minim Invasive Gynecol

Appl Ergon

J Minim Invasive Gynecol

J Minim Invasive Gynecol

Gynecol Oncol

Gynecol Oncol

J Minim Invasive Gynecol

Laparoscopy versus laparotomy for the management of early stage endometrial cancer

Cochrane Database Syst Rev

The ergonomics of women in surgery

Surg Endosc

Ergonomic assessment of neck posture in the minimally invasive surgery suite during laparoscopic cholecystectomy

Surg Endosc

A newly designed ergonomic body support for surgeons

Surg Endosc

Development of subliminal persuasion system to improve the upper limb posture in laparoscopic training: a preliminary study

Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg

Original article
Impact of Obesity on Surgeon Ergonomics in Robotic and Straight-Stick Laparoscopic Surgery