Elsevier

Journal of Electrocardiology

Volume 48, Issue 3, May–June 2015, Pages 329-338
Journal of Electrocardiology

The effectiveness of screening history, physical exam, and ECG to detect potentially lethal cardiac disorders in athletes: A systematic review/meta-analysis

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2015.02.001Get rights and content

Abstract

Background

The optimal cardiovascular preparticipation screen is debated. The purpose of this study was to perform a systematic review/meta-analysis of evidence comparing screening strategies.

Methods

PRIMSA guidelines were followed. Electronic databases were searched from January 1996 to November 2014 for articles examining the efficacy of screening with history and physical exam (PE) based on the American Heart Association (AHA) or similar recommendations and electrocardiogram (ECG). Pooled data was analyzed for sensitivity, specificity, false positive rates and positive and negative likelihood ratios. Secondary outcomes included rate of potentially lethal cardiovascular conditions detected with screening and the etiology of pathology discovered.

Results

Fifteen articles reporting on 47,137 athletes were reviewed. After meta-analysis the sensitivity and specificity of ECG was 94%/93%, history 20%/94%, and PE 9%/97%. The overall false positive rate of ECG (6%) was less than that of history (8%), or physical exam (10%). Positive likelihood ratios were ECG 14.8, history 3.22 and PE 2.93 and negative likelihood ratios were ECG 0.055, history 0.85, and PE 0.93. There were a total of 160 potentially lethal cardiovascular conditions detected for a rate of 0.3% or 1 in 294. The most common pathology was Wolff-Parkinson-White (67, 42%), Long QT Syndrome (18, 11%), hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (18, 11%), dilated cardiomyopathy (11, 7%), coronary artery disease or myocardial ischemia (9, 6%) and arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (4, 3%).

Conclusions

The most effective strategy for screening for cardiovascular disease in athletes is ECG. It is 5 times more sensitive than history, 10 times more sensitive than physical exam, has higher positive likelihood ratio, lower negative likelihood ratio and a lower false positive rate. 12-lead ECG interpreted using modern criteria should be considered best practice in screening for cardiovascular disease in athletes while the use of history and physical alone as a screening tool should be reevaluated.

Introduction

The preparticipation examination (PPE) or periodic health examination (PHE) is the practice of regularly screening athletes prior to participation in sport. PPEs have been common place in the United States for over 50 years, in some countries such as Italy for decades, and in other countries like England PPEs are not required. Although there are many objectives to the PPE, it is widely agreed that the primary purpose of the PPE is to screen for potentially life-threatening disorders [1], [2], [3], [4], [5]. Cardiovascular pathology leading to sudden cardiac death (SCD) is the most common medical cause of death in athletes [6], [7], [8]. Therefore, a large portion of effort during the PPE is directed toward screening for cardiovascular disease. Screening has traditionally consisted of a history and physical examination although the utility of this approach has been questioned [9], [10]. More recently there has been interest in adding a resting 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) to the PPE to improve detection of conditions associated with SCD. ECG screening is supported by Italian data showing a 90% decrease in the rate of SCD with the inclusion of ECG as part of athlete screening [6], although other studies have questioned this result [11]. The debate regarding various screening strategies engenders passionate support on both sides. This paper examines the data related to preparticipation cardiovascular screening in athletes through a systematic review of existing studies. The sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value of history, physical exam and ECG in the individual studies are calculated and a meta-analysis of pooled data performed in an effort to better understand the value and limitations of these tests in order to guide rational evidence-based approaches for cardiovascular screening in athletes.

Section snippets

Methods

The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRIMSA) guidelines were followed conducting and reporting this review.

Results

The literature search initially yielded 787 articles. 756 articles were immediately excluded. There were 31 articles that potentially met the inclusion criteria and these were downloaded for further review. Of those 31, 16 articles were excluded because the study screened only with ECG and did not screen with a cardiovascular history or physical exam [15], [16], [17], [18], [19], [20], [21], [22] the athletes were screened with ECG, history and physical exam but the statistics needed were not

Discussion

The data on cardiovascular screening in a diverse population of over 47,000 athletes around the world is summarized by this systematic review. Cardiovascular screening examinations prior to participation in sport have a long history with various countries, states, and sporting organizations recommending or requiring differing elements. Most notably, the European Society of Cardiology (ESC), International Olympic Committee (IOC), Federation Internationale de Football Association (FIFA), and

Strengths and limitations

The strengths of this review are that it combines data on the screening of 47,137 athletes with a measure of the quality of the studies and meta-analysis of pooled data. The findings reinforce the emerging body of literature supporting the effectiveness of ECG in screening for potentially lethal cardiac disease in athletes while also demonstrating the low relative of history and physical exam.

There were several limitations to this review. The meta-analysis did not have the level of data to

Conclusions

The purpose of this study was to perform a systematic review/meta-analysis of evidence comparing screening strategies. There were fifteen articles identified reporting on 47,137 athletes. The sensitivity of 12-lead ECG was much higher than both history and physical with similar sensitivity. In addition, the false positive rate of ECG (6%) was less than that of history (8%), or physical exam (10%). ECG had the highest positive likelihood ratios and lowest negative likelihood ratios. There were a

References (64)

  • D. Pickham et al.

    Comparison of three ECG criteria for athlete pre-participation screening

    J Electrocardiol

    (2014)
  • W.G. Guntheroth

    Innocent murmurs: A suspect diagnosis in non-pregnant adults

    Am J Cardiol

    (2009)
  • A.G. Holst et al.

    Incidence and etiology of sports-related sudden cardiac death in Denmark — Implications for preparticipation screening

    Heart Rhythm

    (2010)
  • R. Puranik et al.

    Sudden death in the young

    Heart Rhythm

    (2005)
  • R.E. Eckart et al.

    Sudden death in young adults: An autopsy-based series of a population undergoing active surveillance

    J Am Coll Cardiol

    (2011)
  • M.P. Ryan et al.

    The standard electrocardiogram as a screening test for hypertrophic cardiomyopathy

    Am J Cardiol

    (1995)
  • D. Corrado et al.

    Does sports activity enhance the risk of sudden death in adolescents and young adults?

    J Am Coll Cardiol

    (2003)
  • M.P. Suarez-Mier et al.

    Pathology of sudden death during recreational sports in Spain

    Forensic Sci Int

    (2013)
  • C. Basso et al.

    Clinical profile of congenital coronary artery anomalies with origin from the wrong aortic sinus leading to sudden death in young competitive athletes

    J Am Coll Cardiol

    (2000)
  • Preparticipation physical evaluation

    (2010)
  • D. Corrado et al.

    Cardiovascular pre-participation screening of young competitive athletes for prevention of sudden death: Proposal for a common European protocol. Consensus Statement of the Study Group of Sport Cardiology of the Working Group of Cardiac Rehabilitation and Exercise Physiology and the Working Group of Myocardial and Pericardial Diseases of the European Society of Cardiology

    Eur Heart J

    (2005)
  • A. Ljungqvist et al.

    The International Olympic Committee (IOC) Consensus Statement on periodic health evaluation of elite athletes March 2009

    Br J Sports Med

    (2009)
  • B.J. Maron et al.

    Recommendations and considerations related to preparticipation screening for cardiovascular abnormalities in competitive athletes: 2007 update: A scientific statement from the American Heart Association Council on Nutrition, Physical Activity, and Metabolism: Endorsed by the American College of Cardiology Foundation

    Circulation

    (2007)
  • D. Corrado et al.

    Trends in sudden cardiovascular death in young competitive athletes after implementation of a preparticipation screening program

    JAMA

    (2006)
  • K.G. Harmon et al.

    Incidence of sudden cardiac death in National Collegiate Athletic Association athletes

    Circulation

    (2011)
  • B.J. Maron et al.

    Sudden deaths in young competitive athletes. Analysis of 1866 deaths in the United States, 1980–2006

    Circulation

    (2009)
  • J.A. Drezner

    Contemporary approaches to the identification of athletes at risk for sudden cardiac death

    Curr Opin Cardiol

    (2008)
  • B.J. Maron et al.

    Cardiovascular preparticipation screening of competitive athletes. A statement for health professionals from the Sudden Death Committee (clinical cardiology) and Congenital Cardiac Defects Committee (cardiovascular disease in the young), American Heart Association

    Circulation

    (1996)
  • R.M. Harbord et al.

    A unification of models for meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy studies

    Biostatistics

    (2007)
  • C.T. Ng et al.

    Prevalence of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy on an electrocardiogram-based pre-participation screening programme in a young male South-East Asian population: Results from the Singapore Armed Forces Electrocardiogram and Echocardiogram screening protocol

    Europace

    (2011)
  • S. Koch et al.

    ECG and echocardiographic findings in 10–15-year-old elite athletes

    Eur J Prev Cardiol

    (2012)
  • N. Heron et al.

    The health profile of football/soccer players in Northern Ireland — A review of the UEFA pre-participation medical screening procedure

    BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil

    (2014)
  • Cited by (187)

    • Preparticipation Cardiac Evaluation from the Pediatric Perspective

      2023, Cardiology Clinics
      Citation Excerpt :

      There have been recent articles examining the utility of adding the ECG to the typical PPE.31,32 Advocates of ECG screening argue that the ECG is an inexpensive test, and with the use of new guidelines33 and experienced interpreting physicians, the sensitivity and specificity are appropriate.34 Those who argue against ECG programs contend that resources should be focused elsewhere because ECGs have not been shown to save lives or prevent SCD, they add significant cost, and they lead to unnecessary, sometimes invasive, testing and procedures.

    • What is athlete’s heart?

      2023, Athlete's Heart: A Multimodal Approach - From Physiological to Pathological Cardiac Adaptations
    • Cardiac

      2023, The Youth Athlete: A Practitioner's Guide to Providing Comprehensive Sports Medicine Care
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text