The rapid diagnosis of COVID-19 patients is essential to reduce the disease spread.
•
The detection limits between rapid antigen detection (RAD) test, viral culture and RT-PCR varied hugely.
•
The RAD test was 103 fold less sensitive than viral culture while RAD was 105 fold less sensitive than RT-PCR.
•
The RAD test detected between 11.1 % and 45.7 % of RT-PCR-positive samples from COVID-19 patients.
•
The RAD test serves only as adjunct to RT-PCR test because of potential for false-negative results.
Abstract
Background
The rapid diagnosis of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients is essential to reduce the disease spread. Rapid antigen detection (RAD) tests are available, however, there is scanty data on the performance of RAD tests.
Objective
To evaluate the performance of the commercially available BIOCREDIT COVID-19 Ag test and compare it with RT-PCR for detecting Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) virus. Analytical sensitivity for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 virus was determined for the RAD test using viral culture and RT-PCR as reference methods. The RAD test was further evaluated using respiratory samples collected from confirmed COVID-19 patients. The results were compared with RT-PCR test.
Results
The detection limits between RAD test, viral culture and RT-PCR varied hugely. RAD was 103 fold less sensitive than viral culture while RAD was 105 fold less sensitive than RT-PCR. The RAD test detected between 11.1 % and 45.7 % of RT-PCR-positive samples from COVID-19 patients.
Conclusions
This study demonstrated that the RAD test serves only as adjunct to RT-PCR test because of potential for false-negative results.