Elsevier

Journal of Computational Physics

Volume 283, 15 February 2015, Pages 37-51
Journal of Computational Physics

An iterative particle filter approach for coupled hydro-geophysical inversion of a controlled infiltration experiment

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2014.11.035Get rights and content

Abstract

The modeling of unsaturated groundwater flow is affected by a high degree of uncertainty related to both measurement and model errors. Geophysical methods such as Electrical Resistivity Tomography (ERT) can provide useful indirect information on the hydrological processes occurring in the vadose zone. In this paper, we propose and test an iterated particle filter method to solve the coupled hydrogeophysical inverse problem. We focus on an infiltration test monitored by time-lapse ERT and modeled using Richards equation. The goal is to identify hydrological model parameters from ERT electrical potential measurements. Traditional uncoupled inversion relies on the solution of two sequential inverse problems, the first one applied to the ERT measurements, the second one to Richards equation. This approach does not ensure an accurate quantitative description of the physical state, typically violating mass balance. To avoid one of these two inversions and incorporate in the process more physical simulation constraints, we cast the problem within the framework of a SIR (Sequential Importance Resampling) data assimilation approach that uses a Richards equation solver to model the hydrological dynamics and a forward ERT simulator combined with Archie's law to serve as measurement model. ERT observations are then used to update the state of the system as well as to estimate the model parameters and their posterior distribution. The limitations of the traditional sequential Bayesian approach are investigated and an innovative iterative approach is proposed to estimate the model parameters with high accuracy. The numerical properties of the developed algorithm are verified on both homogeneous and heterogeneous synthetic test cases based on a real-world field experiment.

Introduction

Electrical Resistivity Tomography (ERT) is a practical, cost-effective, indirect tool for collecting soil and moisture content data in subsurface environments [1], [2], [3], [4], [5]. When applied to the simulation of the dynamics of the vadose zone, ERT relies on the inversion of the Direct Current (DC) flow equation providing an image of the electrical resistivity [4], with the soil moisture pattern reconstructed from petrophysical relations, such as, e.g., Archie's Law [6]. A second inverse problem is finally used to estimate hydrological model parameters. It is well known that inverse modeling of a parabolic diffusion equation is generally an ill-posed problem and regularization techniques are often employed to achieve well-posedness [2], [7], [8], [9]. Traditional geophysical inversion is at the same time an over- and under-constrained problem, in the sense that the problem character can change in space, and benefits from the use of prior information embedded in the regularization procedure [10]. However, imposing smoothness via regularization may introduce inaccuracies or even unphysical constraints into the estimates of the hydrological properties [11]. ERT has been widely used to monitor vadose zone processes (e.g. [1], [12], [13]) but it is well known that the inversion procedure can produce mass balance errors [14] especially when surface ERT is used to monitor water infiltration into soil [15], [5], [16] due a rapid decrease of ERT resolution with depth. To cope with this limitation coupled hydro-geophysical approaches seem highly promising [17]. By these procedures, the spatial distribution and the temporal dynamics of the geophysical properties are enforced by a physically based hydrologic model combined with petrophysical relations, and explicit assumptions for spatial and temporal regularization are no longer needed.

Even though the coupled approach avoids an independent geophysical inversion, estimation of the hydrologic properties (e.g. soil hydraulic parameters) is still a highly non-linear, mixed-determined inversion problem. For these reasons, although parameter estimation can be made theoretically well-posed, the physical interpretation of the estimated parameters is still not well understood [18]. The presence of structural model errors (model approximations, uncertain initial conditions, etc.), as well as measurement uncertainties, suggests that a deterministic search for the best parameters is not likely to converge to a single set of “true” values. A stochastic approach based on ensemble forecasting seems therefore the most appropriate solution procedure [18], [19].

Sequential Data Assimilation (S-DA) methods (typically called filters) have been successfully applied to improve model predictions by incorporating real system observations onto the dynamical model and have been already employed to correct the hydrological states of groundwater infiltration models [20]. Their ability to include structural and parametric error distributions make them particularly attractive for application to the problem of dynamic parameter estimation [18]. Because of the high nonlinearity of porous media infiltration models, the typical filtering method used in hydrological applications is the Ensemble Kalman Filter (EnKF) [21]. Notwithstanding the linear optimality properties of the Kalman Gain [22], the main limitation of EnKF is that it is based on the Gaussian approximation of the filtering probability distribution, possibly leading to inaccurate results or even divergence of the posterior pdfs in presence of a strongly nonlinear relation between observations and state variables [23], [24], [25]. To cope with arbitrary non-Gaussian prior distributions, the family of particle filters is a highly attractive alternative, as it is directly based on the Bayesian filtering rule [26], [27]. Particle filters have been recently introduced into hydrology [28], [29], [30], [31], [25] and used also for estimation of hydrological model parameters [32], [33], [34]. All these latter studies focus on the assimilation of direct hydrological information (e.g. discharge [25] or soil moisture data [35], [36], [37]). A coupled hydro-geophysical parameter estimation procedure by S-DA has been presented by [38], but its ability to provide accurate estimates of unknown model parameters remains to be proven, as shown by the consistent underestimation of saturated hydraulic conductivity in the results of [38]. As a matter of fact, the structural uncertainties of both the hydrologic evolution and geophysical observation models strongly affect the estimated parameters. Sequential filters correct both model parameters and state variables at each assimilation time, yielding identified parameter values that vary in time [18]. Compared to smoothers or other more sophisticated inversion methods (e.g., Markov Chain Monte Carlo methods [39], [40]) the filtering approach is computationally more efficient when dealing with a detailed and spatially resolved simulation model such as the coupled Richards equation-ERT solver here employed.

In this paper we propose an iterative procedure to overcome the problem of the sensitivity to the initial guess and provide accurate identification of unknown model parameters from indirect state information. The method is grounded on a Sequential Importance Resampling (SIR) particle filter, already tested in similar hydrological applications [25], [38], whereby an ERT forward simulation model is embedded into the observation equation and both parameter and state distributions are updated at each assimilation step. Iteration is introduced by sequentially repeating until convergence the same simulation period, using as initial guess the state values and parameter pdfs evaluated from the results of the previous iteration. Compared to more sophisticated statistical updates, the use of iterations allows the inclusion of a less accurate but computationally more efficient inversion scheme able to cope with large dimensional problems.

We validate the methodology on synthetic test cases and apply the methods to a field experiment comparing the results of our procedure with traditional uncoupled inversion of ERT data. We focus on both homogeneous and heterogeneous systems with parameters distributed by zones. The proposed procedure displays convergence of the posterior distribution towards the correct value of the hydraulic conductivity in both the homogeneous and heterogeneous scenarios independently from the initial guess. The numerical results obtained from the synthetic test cases show that the iterative approach yields faster convergence with respect to standard DA methods, using consistently smaller ensemble sizes and a drastic reduction of the number of forward model runs, in particular for the heterogeneous test case. The results obtained in the application to the real world problem are consistent with the desired physical constraints at relatively low computational costs, thus improving significantly on existing coupled flow-ERT procedures.

Section snippets

Parameter estimation by sequential data assimilation

The state space model describing the S-DA problem can be written as:xt=F(xt1,λ,wt),yt=H(xt,λ,vt), where xt is the state vector at assimilation time t, F is the evolution operator, λ is the time-independent parameter vector, wt is the stochastic model error, yt is the observation vector, H is the observation model, and vt is the stochastic error term in the observations. Model uncertainty is connected, e.g., to structural model errors, parameter errors, initial solution errors, etc. Casted in a

Evolution and observation models of water infiltration and ERT

In this study we are interested in applying the S-DA method to a coupled hydro-geophysical model. The evolution model (1) describes the soil moisture dynamics in the vadose zone and ERT observations are used to update system state and parameters by means of a geophysical electrical current flow observation model (2).

Experimental results

The performance of the proposed approach was tested on a controlled infiltration field experiment. First, using the geometry of the real case study, a synthetic problem is designed in order to assess the convergence properties of the developed scheme, then, the real field experiment is simulated.

The controlled infiltration experiment is described in [54] and is similar to a previous experiment discussed by [55]. The experimental site is located in Grugliasco (Turin, Italy), nearby the campus of

Discussion

The results presented in this paper demonstrate the accuracy and robustness of the proposed iterative methodology and highlight the weaknesses of both, uncoupled ERT inversion and traditional particle filter applications with ERT data. As shown in Fig. 3, Fig. 4, Fig. 8 for the synthetic test cases and in Fig. 9 for the field simulations, a single iteration of the particle filter method does not provide a reliable estimate of the soil hydraulic conductivity. To verify this hypothesis, we use as

Conclusions

A sequential Bayesian approach for coupled hydro-geophysical assimilation of ERT measurements in a variably saturated flow model is presented. An innovative iterative approach is proposed to achieve accurate identification of the model parameters. The robustness of the methodology is tested on spatially homogeneous and heterogeneous synthetic test cases and validated on a field infiltration experiment. We show that the new approach has several advantages compared to uncoupled inversion and

Acknowledgements

This study was funded by the University of Padova, Italy, within the Research Programme “GEO-RISKS: Geological, morphological and hydrological processes: monitoring, modeling and impact in the north-eastern Italy”, WP4. The authors would like to acknowledge partial funding from the EU FP7 project CLIMB, grant number 244151 (“Climate Induced Changes on the Hydrology of Mediterranean Basins – Reducing Uncertainty and Quantifying Risk”) and the Italian Ministry of Education, Research and

References (58)

  • T.C.J. Yeh et al.

    Stochastic fusion of information for characterizing and monitoring the vadose zone

    Vadose Zone J.

    (2002)
  • Q.Y. Zhou et al.

    Temporal variations of the three-dimensional rainfall infiltration process in heterogeneous soil

    Water Resour. Res.

    (2002)
  • A. Binley et al.

    Dc resistivity and induced polarization methods

  • G. Cassiani et al.

    Non-invasive monitoring of soil static characteristics and dynamic states: a case study highlighting vegetation effects

    Vadose Zone J.

    (2012)
  • G.E. Archie

    The electrical resistivity log as an aid in determining some reservoir characteristics

    Trans. Am. Inst. Min. Metall. Pet. Eng. Inc.

    (1942)
  • W. Menke

    Geophysical Data Analysis: Discrete Inverse Theory

    (1984)
  • D.J. La Brecque et al.

    Autonomous monitoring of fluid movement using 3-d electrical resistivity tomography

    J. Environ. Eng. Geophys.

    (2004)
  • A.M. Tartakovsky et al.

    Hydrogeophysical approach for identification of layered structures of the vadose zone from electrical resistivity data

    Vadose Zone J.

    (2008)
  • K. Singha et al.

    Saline tracer visualized with three-dimensional electrical resistivity tomography: field-scale spatial moment analysis

    Water Resour. Res.

    (2005)
  • D. Michot et al.

    Spatial and temporal monitoring of soil water content with an irrigated corn crop cover using surface electrical resistivity tomography

    Water Resour. Res.

    (2003)
  • J. Travelletti et al.

    Hydrological response of weathered clay-shale slopes: water infiltration monitoring with time-lapse electrical resistivity tomography

    Hydrol. Process.

    (2012)
  • A.C. Hinnell et al.

    Improved extraction of hydrologic information from geophysical data through coupled hydrogeophysical inversion

    Water Resour. Res.

    (2010)
  • G.A. Hansen et al.

    On stochastic parameter estimation using data assimilation

    Physica D

    (2007)
  • P.J. Smith et al.

    Variational data assimilation for parameter estimation: application to a simple morphodynamic model

    Ocean Dyn.

    (2009)
  • M. Camporese et al.

    Ensemble Kalman filter data assimilation for a process-based catchment scale model of surface and subsurface flow

    Water Resour. Res.

    (2009)
  • G. Evensen

    The ensemble Kalman filter: theoretical formulation and practical implementation

    Ocean Dyn.

    (2003)
  • A.H. Jazwinski

    Stochastic Processes and Filtering Theory

    (1970)
  • P. Gauthier et al.

    Assimilation of simulated wind lidar data with a Kalman filter

    Mon. Weather Rev.

    (1993)
  • M.S. Arulampalam et al.

    Comparison of the particle filter with range-parametrized and modified polar EKFs for angle-only tracking

    Proc. SPIE

    (2000)
  • Cited by (34)

    • Sequential and coupled inversion of horizontal borehole ground penetrating radar data to estimate soil hydraulic properties at the field scale

      2021, Journal of Hydrology
      Citation Excerpt :

      A major disadvantage of using point sensor information to estimate soil hydraulic properties is the relatively small sensing volume and the resulting limited representativeness for the field-scale soil states. In the last decades, many studies reported the potential of using geophysical techniques, such as electromagnetic induction (EMI) (e.g., Brosten et al., 2011; Moghadas et al., 2017), electrical resistivity tomography (ERT) (e.g., Brunet et al., 2010; Huisman et al., 2010; Manoli et al., 2015; Mboh et al., 2012; Pollock and Cirpka, 2010) and ground penetrating radar (GPR) (e.g., Hubbard and Rubin, 2000; Looms et al., 2008a; Rossi et al., 2015), to obtain accurate field-scale estimates of SWC and soil hydraulic properties. GPR uses the travel time and attenuation of high-frequency electromagnetic waves travelling through the ground to obtain the dielectric permittivity (ε) and electric conductivity (σ) of the subsurface (e.g., Holliger et al., 2001; Slob et al., 2010).

    • Hydraulic properties characterization of undisturbed soil cores from upward infiltration measurements

      2021, Catena
      Citation Excerpt :

      Taking into account this last constrain, the method could be improved if, for instance, the samples could be stored under air dry conditions. Other method to estimate the soil hydraulic parameters is, for instance, the ERT field measurements combined with a Richards equation solver (Manoli et al., 2015). Such geophysical methods can be used in different kind of sites (Raffelli et al., 2017).

    • Integrated hydrogeophysical modelling and data assimilation for geoelectrical leak detection

      2020, Journal of Contaminant Hydrology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Different hydrological model proposals are evaluated and compared to observed geophysical data. For example, Manoli et al. (2015) used an iterative particle filter approach and a coupled hydrogeophysical forward model to estimate hydraulic conductivity, K, of up to four zones from ERT data obtained during a controlled infiltration experiment. This approach is then extended to a field study which considers both ERT and ground penetrating radar (GPR) data in K estimation (Rossi et al., 2015).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text