Review ArticleSystematic reviews of low back pain prognosis had variable methods and results—guidance for future prognosis reviews
Introduction
Prognosis research can help clinicians educate patients and can be used to target specific interventions to modify prognostic factors. In many topic areas, increasing numbers of primary studies and systematic reviews of prognosis are being published [1]. Systematic reviews are literature reviews that use systematic identification, appraisal, and synthesis according to predefined methods [2]. However, there is limited guidance available to conduct systematic reviews of prognosis. Although basic principles used to reduce bias and random error are similar to those used for intervention reviews, there are several challenges unique to prognosis: lack of clarity in indexing of these studies for bibliographic searches; low quality of primary studies; poor reporting; differences in which prognostic factors were assessed and how they were defined; and difficulties in combining results across different research designs, analyses, and presentations [3].
In the field of low back pain, primary studies have presented inconsistent conclusions regarding important prognostic factors. A number of systematic reviews have been conducted that have attempted to synthesize the evidence on important prognostic factors for low back pain. However, they have often reached inconsistent conclusions, making this literature difficult to interpret. The objectives in our “review of reviews” are to systematically identify published systematic reviews of low back pain prognosis, and comprehensively describe and synthesize their methods, results, and conclusions. We will explore the potential impact of prognosis systematic review methods across sufficiently similar review questions.
Section snippets
Literature search and study selection
We searched the electronic databases MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CINAHL (up to June 2007) using a comprehensive strategy for prognosis studies [3], low back pain [4], and broad search terms for systematic reviews [1]. The complete search strategy is available (Appendix A; available on the journal's website at www.jclinepi.com). We screened references of existing systematic reviews, and the Institute for Work & Health's institutional database. We selected systematic reviews of nonspecific low back pain
Review selection
We identified 357 independent citations in our electronic search. This was supplemented with 29 additional citations (Fig. 1). We excluded two potentially relevant reviews published in German [7], [8], and one report that included systematic reviews [9]. Seventeen systematic reviews of low back pain prognosis, published between 2000 and 2006, were included [10], [11], [12], [13], [14], [15], [16], [17], [18], [19], [20], [21], [22], [23], [24], [25], [26].
Review characteristics
The reviews ranged in quality, with
Discussion
We conducted a systematic review of 17 low back pain prognosis reviews. We observed important differences in the systematic review methods, and in the prognosis studies that each review included. We found only a small number of prognostic factors to be consistently associated with disability in acute/subacute low back pain. Our study highlights areas for further research and guidelines to improve the conduct and reporting of prognosis systematic reviews [31]. We identified issues and make
Acknowledgments
The authors thank Dr. George Tomlinson for comments on earlier versions of this article, Victoria Pennick for helping with editing and comments on earlier drafts, Dr. Mana Rezai for helping with the broad literature review screen and selection, Emma Irvin for helping with literature searches, and Quenby Mahood for helping with literature retrieval.
Funding: Dr. Jill Hayden's salary is partially funded by a research infrastructure grant from the Ontario Workplace Safety and Insurance Board, and
References (37)
- et al.
Validation of an index of the quality of review articles
J Clin Epidemiol
(1991) - et al.
Annales de Readaptation et de Medecine Physique
(2004) - et al.
Prognostic values of physical examination findings in patients with chronic low back pain treated conservatively: a systematic literature review
J Manipulative Physiol Ther
(2001) Prognosis research: why is Dr. Lydgate still waiting?
J Clin Epidemiol
(2006)- et al.
Identifying phases of investigation helps planning, appraising, and applying the results of explanatory prognosis studies
J Clin Epidemiol
(2008) - et al.
Prognosis research: towards evidence-based results and a Cochrane Methods Group
J Clin Epidemiol
(2007) - et al.
Evaluation of the quality of prognosis studies in systematic reviews
Ann Intern Med
(2006) Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions v.4.2.5
Systematic reviews of evaluations of prognostic variables
BMJ
(2001)- et al.
Updated method guidelines for systematic reviews in the Cochrane Collaboration Back Review Group
Spine
(2003)
Psychological mechanisms in the transition from acute to chronic pain: over- or underrated?
Schmerz
Back pain from the epidemiological point of view
Man Med
Occupational health guidelines for the management of low back pain at work: evidence review
Occup Med
Fear avoidance and prognosis in back pain
Arthritis Rheum
Prediction of sickness absence in patients with chronic low back pain: a systematic review
J Occup Rehabil
Prognostic factors for duration of sick leave in patients sick listed with acute low back pain: a systematic review of the literature
Occup Environ Med
A systematic review of sociodemographic, physical, and psychological predictors of multidisciplinary rehabilitation or, back school treatment outcome in patients with chronic low back pain
Spine
Cited by (181)
How to Develop Statistical Predictive Risk Models in Oncology Nursing to Enhance Psychosocial and Supportive Care
2020, Seminars in Oncology NursingAdding Brief Pain Science or Ergonomics Messages to Guideline Advice Did Not Increase Feelings of Reassurance in People With Acute Low Back Pain: A Randomized Experiment
2023, Journal of Orthopaedic and Sports Physical TherapyMuscle synergy patterns as altered coordination strategies in individuals with chronic low back pain: a cross-sectional study
2023, Journal of NeuroEngineering and RehabilitationThe Understanding Persistent Pain Where it ResiDes Study of Low Back Pain Cohort Profile
2023, New Zealand Journal of Physiotherapy